aDepartment of Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. *Corresponding author: Jenneke E. Wiersma, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, A. J. Ernststraat 1187, Amsterdam, Netherlands 1081 HL, the Netherlands (j.wiersma@ggzingeest.nl). J Clin Psychiatry 2015;76(7):e906–e907 dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14com09454 © Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. experienced emotional neglect on a regular basis. In a group of chronically depressed individuals (n = 395), this number goes up to 53%.5 Hovens et al10 state that the serious and lifelong consequences of emotional neglect on adult psychopathology have not been recognized for a long time. Most studies have focused on childhood adversities such as sexual abuse, physical abuse, and (physical) neglect. Emotional neglect is often not specifically asked for, and thus is underreported, while the studies that focus on emotional neglect show its importance, especially when it comes to chronic depression.5 Since childhood adversities, and especially those related to maladaptive family functioning, have been linked to more unfavorable clinical characteristics of depression, it is not surprising that these childhood adversities are also associated with poor treatment response for depression.3 However, it may also be the case that this group of patients needs another treatment approach.11 Research has suggested that individuals with and without a history of childhood adversity may react differently to treatment. In a large group of chronically depressed patients (N = 681), a differential response to psychotherapy (Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy) versus pharmacotherapy was found as a function of the presence of childhood adversity (sexual abuse, physical abuse, neglect, and parental loss).11 Psychotherapy was superior over pharmacotherapy for chronically depressed patients who reported childhood adversity. This suggests that there may be important differences in the etiology and pathogenesis of depression in individuals with and without a history of childhood adversity.11 Indeed, biological studies have indicated such differences.12–15 Although research on neurobiological changes in response to childhood adversity is still nascent and, as of yet, based on very mixed samples of children or adults with diverse experiences of childhood adversity, there is a growing body of evidence that childhood adversity contributes to stress-induced changes in a child’s neurobiological systems. These changes may be adaptive at first, but may become maladaptive in the long run by increasing the risk for psychopathology, such as depression.12–15 Importantly, these neurobiological changes in response to childhood adversity may not be permanent; children in foster care experienced a normalization of stress-induced cortisol responses after their foster parents underwent an attachment-based intervention.16 Studies on the interaction of genes and environment underline these findings; positive environmental influences, such as social support, can buffer genetic and environmental risk for depression and promote resilience.13,15,17 In support of this, Kaufman et al18 found that children with genetic Childhood Adversity and Depression