The paper explains how money as a master dispositif had guided history through institutions of servitude, slavery, its abolition and free labour through networks of human relations. The first section of the paper deals with the idea of money as dispositif. Second section explains how the motive of accumulation of wealth had driven the early modern Europeans into slave traders. Third section explains the abolition of slavery is in continuity with the motive of accumulation. It is explained, the free market for labour is a further extension of the logic of wealth accumulation through control and domination. The fourth section opens the discussion towards imagining counter-dispositif.Dispositif is naturalised power, the second nature that works from within as our mentality organising our thought patterns, attitudes, behavior and actions. It is an internal singularity, habitus, functioning as strange attractor in enabling us to abstract sense from the chaos of experiences. The internal singularity is an affect of historical and biographical engagement with the network of the socius that empowers us to be culturally conditioned sense making beings. Master dispositif is the deep singularity that draws other cleavages of mentalities towards it ‘naturally’ figuratively comparable to a deep valley drawing streams towards it. In this paper, I argue, money beyond its multiple appearances and usages such as, means of exchange, currency, cash apparatus, or financial statement is a master dispositive, primarily an internal psychic apparatus, drawn from our collective historical ontology, that rules our subjective perceptions.The central argument here is that, qua the master dispositif, money has an agential role in guiding history. For instance, though the institutions of servitude, slavery, slavery-abolition, and free-labour appear to us a progress from servitude to freedom I argue, they are just various manifestations in historical junctures since money as a master dispositif has possessed our internal cartography of pathways and ‘progress’. Said in Heideggerian terminology thrown into money’s dispositif is the state of das-man. Human subject moments, as truth moments and authentic freedom, if have to have liberative expressions, that should be through overcoming the eclipse of the Self and not in that being subjected to the dispositif that overwhelms.