Abstract Background Although intravenous antibiotics have historically been the standard of care for bone and joint infections, clinical trial data has highlighted the safety and efficacy of oral antibiotics. Despite this, intravenous antibiotics are still commonly used and evaluations of institutional guidelines advancing oral antibiotic use are limited. Methods In April 2023, we implemented a new institutional guideline to preferentially treat patients with bone and joint infections with oral antibiotics. The post-guideline cohort was compared with a historical pre-guideline cohort via retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged exclusively on oral antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included 90-day treatment failure, length of stay, and adverse effects. Results One hundred and eighty-six patients (53 pre-guideline and 133 post-guideline) were included in the analysis. Patients in the post-guideline cohort were more likely to be discharged exclusively on oral antibiotics (25% vs. 70%, p<0.01), with no difference in 90-day treatment failure (8% vs. 9%, p=0.75). Patients in the post-guideline cohort had a shorter length of stay than pre-guideline (median days: 8 vs. 7, p=0.04) and trended towards fewer PICC-related adverse events (6% vs. 1% p=0.07). Conclusion An institutional guideline was effective in increasing the proportion of patients with bone and joint infections discharged on oral antibiotics. We observed similar clinical outcomes after implementing the guidelines while reducing length of hospital stay.
Read full abstract