Histone Deacetylase Proteins Research Articles

Mouse preimplantation embryos developed from oocytes injected with round spermatids or spermatozoa have similar but distinct patterns of early messenger RNA expression.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was used to compare the temporal transcriptional activation and mRNA removal for a number of genes in mouse embryos derived by round spermatid injection (ROSI) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A number of marker genes with widely different cellular functions were analyzed. Similar patterns of activation were found for the transcription factor Oct 4, the translation initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 1A, the L1 ribosomal protein, the chromatin modifying protein histone deacetylase 1, the enzyme hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase, the murine endogenous retrovirus-like element, and the repetitive DNA LINE retrotransposons. Expression of the retrovirus-like mobile element intracisternal A particle, however, was markedly elevated from the two-cell to the blastocyst stages in ROSI embryos. Analyses performed for various paternal mRNAs introduced into the oocyte by the round spermatid, including protamines 1 and 2, transition protein 2, ropporin, and glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, revealed all were removed from the preimplantation embryos, albeit with distinct temporal patterns.

Alteration of GCN5 levels in maize reveals dynamic responses to manipulating histone acetylation.

The role played by histone acetyltransferase (HAT), GCN5, in transcriptional co-activation has been analysed in detail in yeast and mammals. Here, we present the cloning and expression pattern of Zmgcn5, the maize homologue. The enzymatic activity of the recombinant ZmGCN5 was analysed with histone and nucleosome substrates. In situ hybridisation of developing maize kernels using Zmgcn5 as probe shows that the transcript is concentrated in rapidly dividing cells. To investigate the role of ZmGCN5 in the transcription of specific plant genes, direct protein-protein interactions were tested. A cDNA clone encoding a putative interacting partner in GCN5-adapter complexes, ZmADA2, was isolated and the interaction between ZmGCN5 and ZmADA2 was confirmed by a GST-spin down experiment. Co-immunoprecipitation of the plant transcriptional activator Opaque-2 and ZmADA2 in nuclear extracts suggests ADA2/GCN5-containing complexes to mediate transcriptional activation by binding of this bZIP factor. For a more general analysis of the effects of histone acetylation on plant gene expression, 2500 ESTs spotted on filters were hybridised with cDNA probes derived either from maize cell lines treated with Trichostatin A (TSA), or from a transgenic line expressing the ZmGCN5 antisense transcript. Several sequences showing marked changes in abundance were confirmed by RNA blot analysis. Inhibition of histone deacetylation with TSA is accompanied by a decrease in the abundance of ZmGCN5 acetylase protein, but by increases in mRNAs for histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. The elevated histone mRNA levels were not reflected in increasing histone protein concentrations, suggesting hyperacetylated histones arising from TSA treatment may be preferentially degraded and substituted by de novo synthesised histones. The ZmGCN5 antisense material showed suppression of the endogenous ZmGCN5 transcript and the profiling analysis revealed increased mRNA levels for H2A, H2B and H4. Furthermore, in the antisense line, a reduction in the amount of the RPD3-type HD1B-I histone deacetylase protein was observed. A model for linked regulation of histone acetylation and histone mRNA transcription is discussed.

A maize histone deacetylase and retinoblastoma-related protein physically interact and cooperate in repressing gene transcription.

In mammalian cells the product of the human retinoblastoma tumour suppressor gene (pRb) can recruit Rpd3-like histone deacetylases to repress transcription. In this study, we investigated whether this mechanism might also be relevant in plants and found both conserved and distinct features. The expression profiles of the Zea mays Rpd3-type histone deacetylase (ZmRpd3I) and the retinoblastoma-related (ZmRBR1) homologues were analysed during endosperm development. GST pull-down and immunoprecipitation experiments showed a physical interaction between ZmRBRI and ZmRpd3I. Because ZmRpd3I lacks a LXCXE motif, conserved in several pRb-interacting proteins, we have mapped the amino acid domains involved in the ZmRBR1/ZmRpd3I interaction. Furthermore, we observed that ZmRbAp1, a maize member of the MSI/RbAp family, facilitated this protein interaction. Co-transformations of tobacco protoplasts with plasmids expressing ZmRBRI and ZmRpd3I showed that the two proteins cooperate in repressing gene transcription. Our findings represent the first indication that in plants a regulator of important biological processes, ZmRBRI, can recruit a histone deacetylase, ZmRpd3I, to control gene transcription.

Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes.

Sequence similarity and profile searching tools were used to analyze the genome sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster for genes encoding three families of histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins and three families of histone acetyltransferase (HAT) proteins. Plants, animals and fungi were found to have a single member of each of three subfamilies of the GNAT family of HATs, suggesting conservation of these functions. However, major differences were found with respect to sizes of gene families and multi-domain protein structures within other families of HATs and HDACs, indicating substantial evolutionary diversification. Phylogenetic analysis identified a new class of HDACs within the RPD3/HDA1 family that is represented only in plants and animals. A similar analysis of the plant-specific HD2 family of HDACs suggests a duplication event early in dicot evolution, followed by further diversification in the lineage leading to Arabidopsis. Of three major classes of SIR2-type HDACs that are found in animals, fungi have representatives only in one class, whereas plants have representatives only in the other two. Plants possess five CREB-binding protein (CBP)-type HATs compared with one to two in animals and none in fungi. Domain and phylogenetic analyses of the CBP family proteins showed that this family has evolved three distinct types of CBPs in plants. The domain architecture of CBP and TAF(II)250 families of HATs show significant differences between plants and animals, most notably with respect to bromodomain occurrence and their number. Bromodomain-containing proteins in Arabidopsis differ strikingly from animal bromodomain proteins with respect to the numbers of bromodomains and the other types of domains that are present. The substantial diversification of HATs and HDACs that has occurred since the divergence of plants, animals and fungi suggests a surprising degree of evolutionary plasticity and functional diversification in these core chromatin components.

SUMO-1 Modification of Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) Modulates Its Biological Activities

Histone deacetylation plays a central role in the regulation of genes linked to virtually all biological processes. This modification reaction is dependent on a family of related histone deacetylases (HDACs), which function as key components of large multiprotein complexes involved in the development of normal and neoplastic cells. The mechanisms regulating HDACs and their roles in such processes are not understood, and these form the major focus for the current study. Here, in the course of assessing possible post-translational modifications of HDAC1, we demonstrated that HDAC1 is a substrate for SUMO-1 (small ubiquitin-related modifier) modification in vitro and in vivo. The HDAC1 lysines targeted for modification were identified as C-terminal Lys-444 and Lys-476, which are also present in mammalian HDAC2 and lower vertebrate HDAC1/2 orthologs yet absent from other HDAC family members, pointing to a means of differential regulation among HDAC proteins. Mutation of these target residues (lysine to arginine substitution) profoundly reduced HDAC1-mediated transcriptional repression in reporter assays without affecting HDAC1 ability to associate with mSin3A and eliminated HDAC1-induced cell cycle and apoptotic responses upon overexpression. Together, the results demonstrate that HDAC1 is modified by SUMO-1, and this modification can dramatically affect HDAC1 activity in a number of surrogate biological assays.

Biological roles and mechanistic actions of co-repressor complexes.

Transcriptional repression, which plays a crucial role in diverse biological processes, is mediated in part by non-DNA-binding co-repressors. The closely related co-repressor proteins N-CoR and SMRT, although originally identified on the basis of their ability to associate with and confer transcriptional repression through nuclear receptors, have been shown to be recruited to many classes of transcription factor and are in fact components of multiple protein complexes containing histone deacetylase proteins. This association with histone deacetylase activity provides an important component of the mechanism that allows DNA-binding proteins interacting with N-CoR or SMRT to repress transcription of specific target genes. Both N-CoR and SMRT are important targets for cell signaling pathways, which influence their expression levels, subcellular localization and association with other proteins. Recently, the biological importance of these proteins has been revealed by studies of genetically engineered mice and human diseases such as acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH).

Histone Deacetylase 1 Phosphorylation Promotes Enzymatic Activity and Complex Formation

Accessibility of the genome to DNA-binding transcription factors is regulated by proteins that control the acetylation of amino-terminal lysine residues on nucleosomal histones. Specifically, histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins repress transcription by deacetylating histones. To date, the only known regulatory mechanism of HDAC1 function is via interaction with associated proteins. Although the control of HDAC1 function by protein interaction and recruitment is well precedented, we were interested in exploring HDAC1 regulation by post-translational modification. Human HDAC1 protein was analyzed by ion trap mass spectrometry, and two phosphorylated serine residues, Ser(421) and Ser(423), were unambiguously identified. Loss of phosphorylation at Ser(421) and Ser(423) due to mutation to alanine or disruption of the casein kinase 2 consensus sequence directing phosphorylation reduced the enzymatic activity and complex formation of HDAC1. Deletion of the highly charged carboxyl-terminal region of HDAC1 also decreased its deacetylase activity and protein associations, revealing its requirement in maintaining HDAC1 function. Our results reinforce the importance of protein associations in modulating HDAC1 function and provide the first step toward characterizing the role of post-translational modifications in regulating HDAC activity in vivo.

The Sp1-like Protein BTEB3 Inhibits Transcription via the Basic Transcription Element Box by Interacting with mSin3A and HDAC-1 Co-repressors and Competing with Sp1

Sp1-like proteins are characterized by three conserved C-terminal zinc finger motifs that bind GC-rich sequences found in promoters of numerous genes essential for mammalian cell homeostasis. These proteins behave as transcriptional activators or repressors. Although significant information has been reported on the molecular mechanisms by which Sp1-like activators function, relatively little is known about mechanisms for repressor proteins. Here we report the functional characterization of BTEB3, a ubiquitously expressed Sp1-like transcriptional repressor. GAL4 assays show that the N terminus of BTEB3 contains regions that can act as direct repressor domains. Immunoprecipitation assays reveal that BTEB3 interacts with the co-repressor mSin3A and the histone deacetylase protein HDAC-1. Gel shift assays demonstrate that BTEB3 specifically binds the BTE site, a well characterized GC-rich DNA element, with an affinity similar to that of Sp1. Reporter and gel shift assays in Chinese hamster ovary cells show that BTEB3 can also mediate repression by competing with Sp1 for BTE binding. Thus, the characterization of this protein expands the repertoire of BTEB-like members of the Sp1 family involved in transcriptional repression. Furthermore, our results suggest a mechanism of repression for BTEB3 involving direct repression by the N terminus via interaction with mSin3A and HDAC-1 and competition with Sp1 via the DNA-binding domain.

The Orphan Nuclear Receptor TR2 Interacts Directly with Both Class I and Class II Histone Deacetylases

A combination of in vivo and in vitro assays was employed to describe the ligand-independent interaction of the orphan nuclear receptor TR2 and histone deacetylase proteins. The repressive effect of TR2 on transcription of a luciferase reporter driven by a promoter containing a direct repeat-5 (DR5) derived from the human RARβ gene was suppressed by the addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Immunoprecipitation with FLAG-epitope (MDYKDDDDK)-tagged histone deacetylase proteins was used to demonstrate that TR2 and histone deacetylases 3 or 4 are present in the same immunoprecipitated complex. Deacetylase activity was demonstrated for these coimmunoprecipitates, further confirming the in vivo interaction of TR2 and histone deacetylases. Immunoprecipitation with anti-TR2 antibody was used to demonstrate interaction of TR2 with endogenously expressed histone deacetylases 3 and 4 in COS-1 cells. Dissection of TR2 domains showed that the DNA binding domain of the receptor was responsible for interaction with both histone deacetylases 3 and 4 in glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays, while the ligand binding domain did not interact. The pull-down data were confirmed with far Western blots that also showed a direct interaction between labeled histone deacetylase proteins and TR2. It is suggested that repression mediated by unliganded TR2 is mediated, in part, by a direct interaction of this receptor with histone deacetylase proteins.

The orphan nuclear receptor TR2 interacts directly with both class I and class II histone deacetylases.

A combination of in vivo and in vitro assays was employed to describe the ligand-independent interaction of the orphan nuclear receptor TR2 and histone deacetylase proteins. The repressive effect of TR2 on transcription of a luciferase reporter driven by a promoter containing a direct repeat-5 (DR5) derived from the human RARbeta gene was suppressed by the addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Immunoprecipitation with FLAG-epitope (MDYKDDDDK)-tagged histone deacetylase proteins was used to demonstrate that TR2 and histone deacetylases 3 or 4 are present in the same immunoprecipitated complex. Deacetylase activity was demonstrated for these coimmunoprecipitates, further confirming the in vivo interaction of TR2 and histone deacetylases. Immunoprecipitation with anti-TR2 antibody was used to demonstrate interaction of TR2 with endogenously expressed histone deacetylases 3 and 4 in COS-1 cells. Dissection of TR2 domains showed that the DNA binding domain of the receptor was responsible for interaction with both histone deacetylases 3 and 4 in glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays, while the ligand binding domain did not interact. The pull-down data were confirmed with far Western blots that also showed a direct interaction between labeled histone deacetylase proteins and TR2. It is suggested that repression mediated by unliganded TR2 is mediated, in part, by a direct interaction of this receptor with histone deacetylase proteins.

Homo-oligomerisation and nuclear localisation of mouse histone deacetylase 1

Reversible histone acetylation changes the chromatin structure and can modulate gene transcription. Mammalian histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) is a nuclear protein that belongs to a growing family of evolutionarily conserved enzymes catalysing the removal of acetyl residues from core histones and other proteins. Previously, we have identified murine HDAC1 as a growth factor-inducible protein in murine T-cells. Here, we characterise the molecular function of mouse HDAC1 in more detail. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments with epitope-tagged HDAC1 protein reveal the association with endogenous HDAC1 enzyme. We show that HDAC1 can homo-oligomerise and that this interaction is dependent on the N-terminal HDAC association domain of the protein. Furthermore, the same HDAC1 domain is also necessary for in vitro binding of HDAC2 and HDAC3, association with RbAp48 and for catalytic activity of the enzyme.A lysine-rich sequence within the carboxy terminus of HDAC1 is crucial for nuclear localisation of the enzyme. We identify a C-terminal nuclear localisation domain, which is sufficient for the transport of HDAC1 and of reporter fusion proteins into the nucleus. Alternatively, HDAC1 can be shuttled into the nucleus by association with another HDAC1 molecule via its N-terminal HDAC association domain. Our results define two domains, which are essential for the oligomerisation and nuclear localisation of mouse HDAC1.

Glucocorticoid receptor recruitment of histone deacetylase 2 inhibits interleukin-1beta-induced histone H4 acetylation on lysines 8 and 12.

We have investigated the ability of dexamethasone to regulate interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta)-induced gene expression, histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Low concentrations of dexamethasone (10(-10) M) repress IL-1beta-stimulated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) expression and fail to stimulate secretory leukocyte proteinase inhibitor expression. Dexamethasone (10(-7) M) and IL-1beta (1 ng/ml) both stimulated HAT activity but showed a different pattern of histone H4 acetylation. Dexamethasone targeted lysines K5 and K16, whereas IL-1beta targeted K8 and K12. Low concentrations of dexamethasone (10(-10) M), which do not transactivate, repressed IL-1beta-stimulated K8 and K12 acetylation. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we show that dexamethasone inhibits IL-1beta-enhanced acetylated K8-associated GM-CSF promoter enrichment in a concentration-dependent manner. Neither IL-1beta nor dexamethasone elicited any GM-CSF promoter association at acetylated K5 residues. Furthermore, we show that GR acts both as a direct inhibitor of CREB binding protein (CBP)-associated HAT activity and also by recruiting HDAC2 to the p65-CBP HAT complex. This action does not involve de novo synthesis of HDAC protein or altered expression of CBP or p300/CBP-associated factor. This mechanism for glucocorticoid repression is novel and establishes that inhibition of histone acetylation is an additional level of control of inflammatory gene expression. This further suggests that pharmacological manipulation of of specific histone acetylation status is a potentially useful approach for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

14-3-3 Proteins Corral HDAC Proteins

Acetylated histones yield a favorable environment for the transcription of genes; acetylation allows for greater accessibility to gene promoters by transcription factors. On the other hand, histone deacetylases (HDACs) inhibit transcription by limiting accessibility to chromatin. HDACs bind to several transcription factors including the MEF2 family of transcription factors, which are involved in muscle cell differentiation. Grozinger and Scheiber investigate the regulation of HDAC4 and HDAC5, and observe that 14-3-3 proteins, which bind to phosphoserine residues, mediate the localization of HDACs within the cell. Immunocomplexes of overexpressed HDAC4 and HDAC5 contained 14-3-3 proteins, whereas overexpression of HDAC1, representing a different class of HDAC, did not. Fluorescence assays revealed that overexpressed HDAC4 localized to the nucleus, but in the presence of overexpressed 14-3-3β, HDAC4 remained in the cytoplasm. The association of 14-3-3 and HDAC4 was phosphoserine-dependent, and prevented the ability of importin α, a nuclear translocator protein, to bind HDAC4. Finally, increased nuclear localization of HDAC4 correlated with decreased MEF2-dependent transcription. Thus, these results suggest that 14-3-3 proteins can function to regulate transcription by associating with HDAC proteins. Grozinger, C.M., and Schreiber, S.L. (2000) Regulation of histone deacetylase 4 and 5 and transcriptional activity by 14-3-3-dependent cellular localization. Proc . Natl . Acad . Sci . U.S.A. 97 : 7835-7840. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Regulation of histone deacetylase 4 and 5 and transcriptional activity by 14-3-3-dependent cellular localization.

Transcription is controlled in part by the dynamic acetylation and deacetylation of histone proteins. The latter process is mediated by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Previous analysis of the regulation of HDAC activity in transcription has focused primarily on the recruitment of HDAC proteins to specific promoters or chromosomal domains by association with DNA-binding proteins. To characterize the cellular function of the recently identified HDAC4 and HDAC5 proteins, complexes were isolated by immunoprecipitation. Both HDACs were found to interact with14-3-3 proteins at three phosphorylation sites. The association of 14-3-3 with HDAC4 and HDAC5 results in the sequestration of these proteins in the cytoplasm. Loss of this interaction allows HDAC4 and HDAC5 to translocate to the nucleus, interact with HDAC3, and repress gene expression. Regulation of the cellular localization of HDAC4 and HDAC5 by 14-3-3 represents a mechanism for controlling the transcriptional activity of these class II HDAC proteins.

Transcriptional repression mediated by the human polycomb-group protein EED involves histone deacetylation.

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins form multimeric protein complexes, which are involved in maintaining the transcriptional repressive state of genes over successive cell generations. Components of PcG complexes and their mutual interactions have been identified and analysed through extensive genetic and biochemical analyses. Molecular mechanisms underlying PcG-mediated repression of gene activity, however, have remained largely unknown. Previously we reported the existence of two distinct human PcG protein complexes. The EED/EZH protein complex contains the embryonic ectoderm development (EED) and enhancer of zeste 2 (EZH2; refs 9,10) PcG proteins. The HPC/HPH PcG complex contains the human polycomb 2 (HPC2; ref. 11), human polyhomeotic (HPH), BMI1 (ref. 13 ) and RING1 (refs 14, 15) proteins. Here we show that EED (refs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) interacts, both in vitro and in vivo, with histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins. This interaction is highly specific because the HDAC proteins do not interact with other vertebrate PcG proteins. We further find that histone deacetylation activity co-immunoprecipitates with the EED protein. Finally, the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (ref. 17) relieves transcriptional repression mediated by EED, but not by HPC2, a human homologue of polycomb. Our data indicate that PcG-mediated repression of gene activity involves histone deacetylation. This mechanistic link between two distinct, global gene repression systems is accomplished through the interaction of HDAC proteins with a particular PcG protein, EED.

Three proteins define a class of human histone deacetylases related to yeast Hda1p.

Gene expression is in part controlled by chromatin remodeling factors and the acetylation state of nucleosomal histones. The latter process is regulated by histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Previously, three human and five yeast HDAC enzymes had been identified. These can be categorized into two classes: the first class represented by yeast Rpd3-like proteins and the second by yeast Hda1-like proteins. Human HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3 proteins are members of the first class, whereas no class II human HDAC proteins had been identified. The amino acid sequence of Hda1p was used to search the GenBank/expressed sequence tag databases to identify partial sequences from three putative class II human HDAC proteins. The corresponding full-length cDNAs were cloned and defined as HDAC4, HDAC5, and HDAC6. These proteins possess certain features present in the conserved catalytic domains of class I human HDACs, but also contain additional sequence domains. Interestingly, HDAC6 contains an internal duplication of two catalytic domains, which appear to function independently of each other. These class II HDAC proteins have differential mRNA expression in human tissues and possess in vitro HDAC activity that is inhibited by trichostatin A. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicate that these HDAC proteins are not components of the previously identified HDAC1 and HDAC2 NRD and mSin3A complexes. However, HDAC4 and HDAC5 associate with HDAC3 in vivo. This finding suggests that the human class II HDAC enzymes may function in cellular processes distinct from those of HDAC1 and HDAC2.

The carboxy-terminal region of adenovirus E1A activates transcription through targeting of a C-terminal binding protein-histone deacetylase complex

Binding of the C-terminal binding protein, CtBP, to the adenovirus E1A moiety of a Gal4-E1A fusion protein abolishes conserved region (CR) 1-dependent transcription activation. In contrast, a non-promoter targeted E1A peptide, capable of binding CtBP, can induce transcription from the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) promoter. CtBP is shown here to bind the histone deacetylase HDAC1, suggesting that a promoter targeted CtBP-HDAC1 complex can silence transcription from the PCNA promoter through a deacetylation mechanism. Expression of the CtBP binding domain of E1A is sufficient to alleviate repression, possibly due to the displacement of the CtBP-HDAC1 complex from the promoter.

Isolation and Characterization of cDNAs Corresponding to an Additional Member of the Human Histone Deacetylase Gene Family

Several human cDNAs encoding a histone deacetylase protein, HDAC3, have been isolated. Analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence of HDAC3 revealed an open reading frame of 428 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 49 kDa. The HDAC3 protein is 50% identical in DNA sequence and 53% identical in protein sequence compared with the previously cloned human HDAC1. Comparison of the HDAC3 sequence with human HDAC2 also yielded similar results, with 51% identity in DNA sequence and 52% identity in protein sequence. The expressed HDAC3 protein is functionally active because it possesses histone deacetylase activity, represses transcription when tethered to a promoter, and binds transcription factor YY1. Similar to HDAC1 and HDAC2, HDAC3 is ubiquitously expressed in many different cell types.