Histologic HSIL Research Articles

Anal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer in women living with HIV and HIV-negative women with other risk factors.

To determine the prevalence and the risk factors for anal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and anal cancer (HSIL+) in women living with HIV (WLWHIV), and to compare them to HIV-negative women with other risk factors. Prospective cohort study. WLWHIV and HIV-negative women with other risk factors were included. Screening for anal HSIL+ using anal cytology and HPV testing was performed. A high-resolution anoscopy with directed biopsy was also performed in patients with an abnormal cytology result or a positive HPV testing for high-risk (HR) genotypes, and in those with anal symptoms. The period prevalence of anal HR-HPV infection and histological HSIL was 57.9% and 10.9% among WLWHIV, and 60.8% and 9.2% among HIV-negative women. The prevalence of anal HPV 18 infection was higher in WLWHIV. The risk factors for anal HSIL+ in WLWHIV included anal HPV 16, other HR genotypes and low-risk genotypes infection, as well as a history of vulvar HSIL+. In HIV-negative women, the risk factors included anal HPV 16 infection, history of anogenital warts and of vulvar HSIL+, and immunosuppressive treatment. A high prevalence of anal HPV infection and HSIL was observed in WLWHIV and women with other risk factors. Both groups share anal HPV 16 infection and history of vulvar HSIL+ as risk factors for the development of anal HSIL+. Genotyping for anal HPV 16 may help identify women at higher risk of anal cancer.

Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study

Objective To examine the prevalence of infections with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical dysplasia, and the clearance rate of HPV infections, in users of different kinds of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and other contraceptive methods. Methods A cross-sectional register-based study including 16,181 women aged 30–49 years participating in the screening programme for cervical cancer in a Swedish County in 2017–2018. Data on contraception from screening records was paired with the HPV test results, cytological and histological follow-up tests and subsequent HPV test. Results There was no difference in the risk of being HPV positive, or histological HSIL+, between users of copper-containing IUDs and women with no reported use of contraception. Use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hormonal contraception were associated with higher odds for HPV infection in age-adjusted models (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.41, and aOR 1.41; 95% CI 1.22–1.63, respectively) and for HSIL+ (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.02–2.06, and aOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.13–2.16, respectively). No significant differences were found in HPV clearance rates. Conclusions Reported use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hormonal contraception, but not use of copper IUD, was associated with a higher prevalence of HPV infections and histological HSIL + compared to no reported use of contraception.

Human papillomavirus vaccination and anal high-grade precancerous lesions and cancer-a real-world effectiveness study.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has shown high efficacy against anal HPV infection and lesions in clinical trials, and the HPV prevalence and type distribution in anal precancers and cancer predict a high preventable potential for HPV vaccination. However, the real-world effectiveness of HPV vaccination against anal high-grade lesions and cancer is yet to be shown. We investigated HPV vaccine effectiveness against anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse in a nationwide cohort including all Danish women aged 17-32 years during October 2006 to December 2021 (n = 968 881). HPV vaccinations and first occurrence of anal HSIL or worse were retrieved from nationwide registries. Women were considered vaccinated after first dose and classified by age at vaccination. Using Cox regression, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for anal HSIL or worse according to vaccination status. During follow-up, the number of incident histological anal HSIL or worse cases was 37 in unvaccinated women, and less than 5 and 26 in women vaccinated at ages younger than 17 years and 17-32 years, respectively. The overall number of cancers was less than 5. Compared with unvaccinated women, the risk of histological anal HSIL or worse was reduced for women vaccinated at age younger than 17 years (HR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.87). For women vaccinated at age 17-32 years, the hazard rate of anal HSIL or worse was 1.21 (95% CI = 0.73 to 2.03). This is the first study to demonstrate that HPV vaccination at a younger age is associated with substantially reduced risk of anal HSIL or worse in the general population.

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cervicovaginal paps with negative high-risk HPV testing, a prospective study with histological follow-up.

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing has become integral in the screening and treatment protocols for cervical neoplasia. Stand-alone HPV testing is advocated as a screening tool for cervical neoplasia. However, negative hrHPV tests with diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (≥HSIL) have been reported. We report our experience with paps diagnosed as HSIL, negative hrHPV testing, and subsequent follow-up. Of 303 women with HSIL diagnosed on ThinPrep pap between 2019 and 2023, 84 (28%) were tested for hrHPV by Roche Cobas. Repeat testing was performed at a referral center. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p16 was performed on follow-up biopsies and hrHPV in-situ hybridization. Of 84 HSIL cases, 8 were hrHPV negative. Follow-up biopsies available in 7 cases were ≥HSIL (1 with invasive squamous cell carcinoma, 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ). Follow-up HSIL was found on additional cases of HPV negative atypical glandular cells favor neoplastic and atypical squamous cells favor HSIL. IHC for p16 was positive on all biopsies. hrHPV FISH was negative. Our experience with hrHPV testing by Roche Cobas demonstrates that some morphologically diagnostic HSIL paps are hrHPV negative: 8.3% of HSIL paps with subsequent histological HSIL were HPV negative. The index case caused concern among our clinical colleagues. Positive staining for p16 is highly suggestive of HPV induced disease. Possible reasons for negative hrHPV testing could include non-hrHPV types, low HPV DNA levels, or HPV types not included in the Cobas testing panel.

HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: Should reflex cytology be performed after a positive test for HPV 16 and 18?

At Portuguese-organized cervical cancer (CC) screening programs, all women testing positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and/or 18 are referred for immediate colposcopy. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of reflex cytology in women who test positive for HPV 16 and/or 18 to improve the efficiency of CC screening.A cross-sectional and retrospective study was performed based on data from the routine CC screening protocol in force at Cova da Beira University Hospital Center, Portugal between August 2012 and June 2021. The screening method was the Cobas 4800 HPV test using the liquid medium Surepath. In all the selected cases, the patient's HPV test results and the cytology and histology findings of the biopsies obtained using colposcopy were analyzed.This study included 339 women who first tested positive for HPV 16 and/or 18 and were referred for immediate colposcopy, in whom 40 (11.8%) cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL+) were diagnosed. Of these, 12 (30%) had reflex cytology negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) and 14 (35%) had HSIL+ cytology. After 3 years, 14 (9.3%) of the 150 women who were still undergoing follow-up were diagnosed with histologic HSIL+ lesions, of which 5 (35.7%) had baseline NILM cytology.Despite the small sample, the results of this study allow us to conclude that reflex cytology is not useful for discrimination to immediate referral for colposcopy in women who test positive for HPV 16 and/or 18, as most women with a histologic diagnosis of an HSIL+ lesion had <HSIL reflex cytology.

Diagnostic Performance of the Newly Developed WellPrep® Liquid-Based Cytology System and Its Comparison with SurePathTM in Cervical Squamous Lesions

Introduction: WellPrep® (WP), a fully automated, one-step liquid-based cytology (LBC) platform using an all-in-one closed chamber, has recently been developed as a next-generation LBC technology. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cytomorphologic features of WP regarding cervical cytology and also to compare WP with the SurePathTM (SP), one of the most widely used LBC systems used worldwide. Methods: Cervicovaginal samples were taken from 212 females who enrolled in the study, and each sample was split and subsequently used for WP and SP LBC. Following the exclusion of seven cases with insufficient quality, a total of 205 cases were used for subsequent analysis. Among them, 75 (36.6%) received histologic follow-up. All cases were interpreted according to the Bethesda System, while three experienced pathologists evaluated their cytomorphologic features. Results: The diagnostic concordance rate between the two LBC technologies was 84.4% (kappa = 0.776). Furthermore, the diagnostic concordance rates between SP and histology and between WP and histology were 73.3% (kappa = 0.516) and 70.7% (kappa = 0.497), respectively. The two LBC methods showed comparable sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for histologic HSIL+ (SP: sensitivity 82.8%, specificity 84.8%, and AUC 0.838; WP: sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 87.0%, and AUC 0.831). No significant difference was found regarding the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC between SP and WP (p = 0.586, p = 0.670, and p = 0.924, respectively). In terms of cytomorphologic features, WP revealed more often than SP the presence of coarse chromatin (p = 0.031) and mitoses (p = 0.008) but less commonly perinuclear clearing (p = 0.001). Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating that WP has a comparable performance to SP. In conclusion, WP may be an alternative LBC technology for cervical cancer screening.

Cytohistological findings in HPV‐negative cases from HPV primary screening programme: quality assurance study

To evaluate the risk of false HPV-negative results and possible related morphological abnormalities in HPV primary cervical cancer screening. Out of 53,661 HPV-negative cases, 5469 (10.2%) randomly selected cytology slides were evaluated as a part of the quality assurance protocol. The Bethesda category negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) in the HPV-negative cases given was present in 95.4%. Due to cytology other than NILM, 0.4% of cases were referred to colposcopy and 4.2% to the follow-up in one year. In the follow-up HPV negativity and NILM cytology was present in 88.3% of attended women. Cases other than HPV negative and NILM were referred to colposcopy. One biopsy-proven histological HSIL was found in the first round and one in follow-up screening. More comprehensive genotyping of HSIL cases revealed genotypes 69 and 11. Only two HPV test negative cases with histological HSIL were revealed forming 0.04% of quality control group. In both cases, HPV genotype not included in screening tests was found. According to the results, the primary HPV test with cytology triage is an efficient and specific method for cervical cancer screening despite of the fact that some non-high-risk genotypes are missed.

Performance of DNA methylation-based biomarkers in the cervical cancer screening program of northern Portugal: A feasibility study.

Cervical cancer remains a health concern. Effective screening programs are critical to reduce the incidence and mortality. High-risk HPV (hr-HPV) testing as primary screening tool discloses high sensitivity but suboptimal specificity. Adequate triage tests to reduce unnecessary colposcopy referrals and overdiagnosis/overtreatment are crucial. Hence, we aimed to validate a panel of DNA methylation-based markers as triage test for women hr-HPV+ in the population-based Regional Cervical Cancer Screening Program of Northern Portugal. Firstly, CADM1, MAL, FAM19A4 and hsa-miR124-2 promoter methylation levels were assessed by multiplex QMSP in a testing set of 402 FFPE tissue samples (159 normal samples and 243 cervical lesions, including 39 low-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions [LSIL], 59 high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions [HSIL] and 145 cancerous lesions). Then, preliminary validation was performed in 125 hr-HPV+ cervical scrapes (including 59 normal samples, 30 LSIL, 34 HSIL and 2 cancerous lesions). Higher MALme , FAM19A4me and hsa-miR124-2me methylation levels were disclosed in histological HSIL or worse (HSIL+) in testing set. Individually, markers depicted over 86% specificity for HSIL+ detection. In validation set, all these genes significantly differed between histological HSIL+ and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or less. In combination, these markers reached 74% specificity and 61% sensitivity for identification of histological HSIL+. We concluded that host gene methylation might constitute a useful referral triage tool of hr-HPV+ women enrolled in the Cervical Cancer Screening Program of Northern Portugal.

HPV Test: A Tool Against Inequity in Healthcare? Cytology: A Prognostic Factor? Lessons Learned From a Cervical Cancer Screening Program via Co-Testing at a University Hospital in Buenos Aires - Latin American Overview

Background: In 2020, cervical cancer was the fourth most common cancer globally, with an incidence of 13·3. In Argentina, 7548 new cases are diagnosed each year, with 3932 women dying from this cause. This study aims to show the clinical implementation of a cervical cancer screening program by concurrent HPV testing and cervical cytology (co-testing), in women aged 30-65 years, at a University Hospital setting; and to analyze the five-year cumulative incidence rate of cervical cancer. Methods: Between July 2013 and June 2018, cervical samples were collected from women between the ages of 30 to 65 for cervical cancer screening via co-testing (HC2/PAP). Descriptive statistical analysis, multinomial logistic regression and classification metrics were applied over the data. Findings: A total of 2273 women were included. 91·11% of the participants tested double negative, 2·55% double positive, 5·90% HC2-positive/PAP-negative, and 0·44% HC2-negative/PAP-positive. Of the 171 women with follow-up who tested HC2-positive, 39·77% cleared the viral infection, 37·43% showed viral persistence, and 22·81% were treated after the detection via colposcopy/biopsy of histological HSIL. Interpretation: The prevalence of hrHPV in this population was 0·08, with HSIL histology detection rates of 17·32 per 1000 screened women. Cytology could be considered a prognostic factor in women with an HC2-positive test, an association which has not yet been described. This evidence suggests that the introduction of co-testing could diminish the burden of cervical cancer in low- and middle-income countries, acting as a tool against inequity in healthcare. Funding: The implementation of this program was possible thanks to the inclusion of cotesting into CEMIC’s private health insurance coverage. Declaration of Interest: VD has received personal fees (as a consultant and/or speaker bureau) from Thermo Fisher, BMS, Novartis, Amgen, and Roche; and their researches are sponsored by BMS, Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Roche, unrelated to the current work. FvP has been sponsored by Roche and Megablabs (academic grant/attending meetings), unrelated to the current work. VF has been sponsored by Roche (academic grant), unrelated to the current work. AA has been sponsored by AMGEN (academic grant), unrelated to the current work. FM has been sponsored by Tecnolab and Roche (academic grant/attending meetings), unrelated to the current work. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethical Approval: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB).

The role of human papillomavirus genotyping for detecting high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer in HPV-positive women with normal cytology: a study from a hospital in northeastern China

BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting cervical cancer and its precursors. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of high-risk HPV genotypes and evaluate the role of HPV genotyping triage for detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ and cervical cancer (HSIL+) in HPV-positive women with normal cytology.MethodsA retrospective study was performed in women who had undergone co-screening at the China Medical University-affiliated Shengjing Hospital between 2012 and 2014.ResultsOf the 34,587 women, 2665 HPV-positive women with normal cytology who had received colposcopy were eligible for analysis. In HSIL+ groups of 204 women, the common genotypes were HPV16, HPV52, HPV58, HPV33, HPV31 and HPV18 in order of prevalence. The proportion of histological HSIL+ in women infected with HPV33 or HPV31 was not significantly different compared to women infected with HPV16 (P = 0.30, P = 0.19, respectively). The odds ratios for histological HSIL+ were 3.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.41–4.40) in women with HPV16/18, 4.21 (95% CI: 2.99–5.93) in those with HPV16/18/31/33, and 5.73 (95% CI: 3.30–9.97) in those with HPV16/18/31/33/52/58. Including HPV31/33 genotyping together with HPV16/18 significantly increased the proportion of HSIL+ detection from 63.2 to 77.5% (P = 0.002) without significantly increasing the colposcopy per HSIL+ detection ratio (7.7 to 8.1, P = 0.66).ConclusionsHPV genotyping played an important role in managing HPV-positive women with normal cytology. Genotyping for HPV31/33 should be added to the previously recommended HPV16/18 genotyping in triaging HPV-positive women in northeastern China.

HPV-based screening for cervical cancer among women 55-59 years of age

AimMany cervical cancers occurs among women over 65 and prevalence of HPV genotypes in this age cohort is sparingly studied. One aim of this study was to study the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes in women 55–59 years, with normal cytology when exiting the screening program. Secondly, HPV clearance as well as the value of HPV genotyping and/or liquid based cytology as triage tests for identifying histological dysplasia among women with persistent HPV was studied.MethodsWomen that exited the screening program with normal cytology, between the years 2012–2014, in Örebro County, Sweden, were invited to this study. A total of 2946 samples were analyzed with a broad-spectrum assay to detect both hrHPV and lrHPV in order to investigate the distribution of genotypes. In the consent group, women with a positive hrHPV test were offered a follow-up test and a cone biopsy for histological confirmation, and a follow up sample 6 months post cone.ResultsThe overall prevalence of hrHPV was 7.4% and 59% of them remained hrHPV positive in a follow-up test after 12 months. A total of 99 women had a cone biopsy done, where 19% showed histological dysplasia. HPV 53 was the most common genotype, and among women with histology confirmed LSIL or HSIL, HPV 31 was most common. A positive hrHPV result showed a PPV of 25% for LSIL+ and 12.5%for HSIL+. Using detection of HPV 16/18 genotypes as a triage test for hrHPV positive tests, indicated FNR for histological LSIL+ and HSIL+ of 94% and 87.5% respectively, whilst triage based on cervical cytology had a FNR of 69% for LSIL+ and 37.5% for HSIL+.ConclusionThe most common hrHPV genotypes among women 55–59 years of age were non HPV16/18 genotypes, and in this population, these genotypes represented most of the histological verified HSIL lesions. This result does not support the proposition of a HPV 16/18 triaging test after a positive hrHPV test as a marker of histological HSIL+ cervical lesions in women over 55 years of age. Similarly, cytological triage after a positive hrHPV showed no additional benefit in this population. Specific triaging tests should be validated to follow post-menopausal women with a positive hrHPV test.

Performance of an HPV 16/18 E6 oncoprotein test for detection of cervical precancer and cancer.

HPV testing is a better alternative for cervical cancer screening, but additional procedures are required for triage of HPV positive women. HPV encoded oncoproteins E6 and E7, as the main effectors of HPV carcinogenicity represent promising triage alternatives. To evaluate performance of the test, we included 155 women from a screening study and 59 from the same referral population attending colposcopy and with precancerous lesions. All were HPV-tested with HC2 and genotyped with LiPA, and cervical swabs were tested for HPV16/18 E6 oncoproteins. Histologic specimens were reviewed and adjudicated using p16 immunohistochemistry and 55 women had confirmed histologic HSIL, 31 (56.3%) associated with HPV 16/18, 23 with other HPV types and one HPV negative. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated with histologic HSIL/cancer as gold standard. E6 oncoprotein was detectable in all but one HSIL and in all cancers where HPV16/18 DNA was detected, but in none of the cases associated with other HPV types or HPV negatives. Among the few HPV16/18 DNA positive subjects initially without HSIL (n = 4) who were E6 oncoprotein positive, precancer was detected during follow-up in 2 out of 3 with available information. Estimated sensitivity for HPV16/18-related HSIL+ was 96.8% (95%CI = 83.8-99.8) and for all HSIL+ regardless of HPV type it was 56.4% (95%CI = 43.3-68.6). Specificity was 97.5% (95%CI = 93.7-99.0). E6 oncoprotein proved as a highly sensitive and specific marker for detection of HPV16/18-related HSIL lesions in this Honduran population with limited previous screening and may be useful as a triage method in screening programs, particularly in low income countries.

Role of genomic DNA methylation in detection of cytologic and histologic abnormalities in high risk HPV-infected women.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy affecting women worldwide. The development of disease is related to high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection. Cytology has been the most recommended triage for primary cervical (pre)cancer screening despite relatively low sensitivity. Recently, genomic DNA methylation has been proposed as an additional marker to increase sensitivity for detecting cervical precancerous lesion. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of methylation status of three tumor suppressor genes (CADM1, FAM19A4, and MAL) and HPV genotyping in detection of cytologic and histologic abnormalities in cervical cancer screening. Two hundred and sixty samples with available frozen cell pellets including 70 randomly selected cases of negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM)&HPV-negative, 70 randomly selected cases of NILM&HPV-positive, and 120 cytologic abnormalities & HPV-positive from a population-based cervical cancer screening program (n = 7,604) were investigated for the DNA methylation pattern of CADM1, FAM19A4, and MAL. Of 120 cytologic abnormalities & HPV-positive cases, there were 115 available histologic results. HPV52 and HPV58 were most commonly found in histologic HSIL+. The methylation levels of CADM1, FAM19A4, and MAL were elevated with the severity of cytologic abnormality which significantly increased by 3.37, 6.65 and 2 folds, respectively, in cytologic HSIL comparing with NILM. A significant increase in methylation levels of these three genes was also observed in histologic HSIL+ compared with negative histology but only CADM1 showed a significant higher methylation level than histologic LSIL. Using the ROC curve analysis, DNA methylation levels of FAM19A4 performed best in differentiating high-grade cytology (ASC-H+ from NILM/ASC-US/LSIL), followed by CADM1 and MAL. Whilst the CADM1 methylation performed best in distinguishing histologic HSIL+ from negative/LSIL with an area under the ROC curve of 0.684, followed by MAL (0.663) and FAM19A4 (0.642). Interestingly, after combining high DNA methylation levels to HPV16/18 genotypes, rates of histologic HSIL+ detection were substantially increased from 25% to 79.55% for CADM1, 77.27% for FAM19A4, and 72.73% for MAL, respectively. The rate further increased up to 95.45% when at least one of three genes had a high methylation level. This suggests a possible role of genomic DNA methylation, especially CADM1, in detecting histologic HSIL+ lesions in combination with hrHPV testing.

13 - Anal cytological abnormalities and human papilloma virus in kidney transplant recipients

Background Transplant recipients have significantly elevated risk of anal cancer, compared to the general population. We sought to determine the presence of high risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) and anal cytological abnormalities in kidney transplant recipients, and assess the feasibility of an anal cancer screening intervention. Methods Kidney transplant recipients, over 18 years old, attending a Transplant Clinic, had anal swab specimens collected. These were then eluted into liquid-based cytology collection vials for cytological examination and HPV genotyping by Linear Array. Results Of 102 participants approached, 73 (72%) consented to join the study and completed testing. The mean age was 47 (range 20–76 years). 64 (88%) had technically satisfactory cellularity. Of these, 8 (12.5%) were abnormal; 6 (9.4%) LSIL; 2 (3.1%) HSIL and 56 negative. 70 (96%) specimens were assessable for genotyping and 15 (21%) had HPV detected. 63 had both HPV and cytology assessable. Of the 15 with HPV, 4 (27%) had abnormal cytology, compared to 4 (7%) of 48 with no HPV. However, there was no evidence of an association between any HPV detection (low or high risk) and abnormal anal cytology (OR 2.75, 95% CI 0.82–11.84); p=0.12). Both participants with cytological HSIL had histological HSIL on HRA, both with multiple hrHPV. Conclusions Transplant recipients were generally willing to consent to the study procedures, including anal swabbing. The prevalence of abnormal cytology was 12.5% and high risk HPV genotypes 12.3%. Anal swabbing was able to identify individuals at increased risk of anal cancer for future close monitoring.

Genotyping for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18/52/58 Has a Higher Performance than HPV16/18 Genotyping in Triaging Women with Positive High-risk HPV Test in Northern Thailand.

BackgroundTesting for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA (HPV test) has gained increasing acceptance as an alternative method to cytology in cervical cancer screening. Compared to cytology, HPV test has a higher sensitivity for the detection of histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), but this could lead to a large colposcopy burden. Genotyping for HPV16/18 has been recommended in triaging HPV-positive women. This study was aimed to evaluate the screening performance of HPV testing and the role of genotyping triage in Northern Thailand.MethodsA population-based cervical screening program was performed in Chiang Mai (Northern Thailand) using cytology (conventional Pap test) and HPV test (Hybrid Capture 2). Women who had abnormal cytology or were HPV-positive were referred for colposcopy. Cervical samples from these women were genotyped using the Linear Array assay.ResultsOf 5,456 women, 2.0% had abnormal Pap test results and 6.5% tested positive with Hybrid Capture 2. Of 5,433 women eligible for analysis, 355 with any positive test had histologic confirmation and 57 of these had histologic HSIL+. The sensitivity for histologic HSIL+ detection was 64.9% for Pap test and 100% for Hybrid Capture 2, but the ratio of colposcopy per detection of each HSIL+ was more than two-fold higher with Hybrid Capture 2 than Pap test (5.9 versus 2.8). Genotyping results were available in 316 samples. HPV52, HPV16, and HPV58 were the three most common genotypes among women with histologic HSIL+. Performance of genotyping triage using HPV16/18/52/58 was superior to that of HPV16/18, with a higher sensitivity (85.7% versus 28.6%) and negative predictive value (94.2% versus 83.9%).ConclusionsIn Northern Thailand, HPV testing with genotyping triage shows better screening performance than cervical cytology alone. In this region, the addition of genotyping for HPV52/58 to HPV16/18 is deemed necessary in triaging women with positive HPV test.

Comparison of Human Papillomavirus Detection in Urine and Cervical Samples Using High-Risk HPV DNA Testing in Northern Thailand.

Objective. To evaluate the performance of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing in urine samples compared to that of cervical sample testing in Northern Thailand. Methods. Paired urine and cervical samples were collected during the follow-up of women with a previous positive HPV test. HPV testing was performed using the Cobas 4800 HPV Test. Linear Array assay was used for genotyping in selected cases. Results. Paired urine and cervical samples were obtained from 168 women. Of 123 paired samples with valid results, agreement in the detection of high-risk HPV DNA was present in 106 cases (86.2%), with a kappa statistic of 0.65 (substantial agreement). Using the cervical HPV results as a reference, the sensitivity of urine HPV testing was 68.6% (24/35) and the specificity 93.2% (82/88). For the detection of histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), the sensitivity of urine HPV testing was 80.0% (4/5) and the specificity 78.0% (92/118). Conclusion. Although urine HPV testing had a rather low sensitivity for HPV detection, its sensitivity for histologic HSIL+ detection was high. For clinical use of urine HPV testing, standardization of specimen collection and processing techniques or application of a more sensitive test, especially in the detection of HPV52 and HPV58, is necessary.

Non-16/non-18 high-risk human papillomavirus types predominate in anal cytology categories of negative for intraepithelial lesion and atypical cells of undetermined significance

Screening for anal carcinoma continues to grow despite controversy regarding its efficacy. High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) has been adopted as a cotest with anal Papanicolaou tests. We sought to identify the prevalence of HR-HPV types in the most common anal cytology specimens: negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) and atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US). Anal cytology specimens were identified and tested for HR-HPV using Roche cobas4800 HR-HPV analysis (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind) and, if positive, typed further for: HPV-16, -18, and/or non-16/non-18 "other" HR-HPV type. There were 642 specimens from 538 patients. The most common interpretation was NILM (48.6%) and ASC-US (25.7%). Of NILM cases, 47% were HR-HPV+ (53% in men, 33% in women, P= 0.03, χ2). In ASC-US cases, 73% were HR-HPV+ (74% in male patients, 70% in female patients). The most common HPV subtype was non-16/non-18 HR-HPV "other" types in 89% of cases. HPV-16 and HPV-18 were positive in 35% and 18% of cases, respectively. In patients with non-16/non-18 HR-HPV+ anal cytology, 16 of 79 had biopsies histologically diagnosed as at least high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL+). However, the relative risk of having HSIL+ was 2.3-times higher for anal cytology positive for HPV-16, -18, with/without coinfection with non-16/non-18 HR-HPV than those positive for non-16/non-18 "other" HR-HPV types alone. Non-16/non-18 "other" HR-HPV types are most prevalent in anal cytology interpretations of NILM and ASC-US. Patients with HR-HPV+ NILM or ASC-US, negative for HPV-16/-18, are at lower relative risk of having subsequent histologic HSIL+, but a percentage of these patients still harbor HSIL+ on biopsy.

Performance of HPV DNA testing with hybrid capture 2 in triaging women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand.

Minor cervical cytologic abnormalities include atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Approximately 10-20% of women with minor cytologic abnormalities have histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (HSIL+). In Thailand, women with minor cytologic abnormalities have a relatively high risk of cervical cancer, and referral for colposcopy has been suggested. A triage test is useful in the selection of women at risk for histologic HSIL+ to reduce the colposcopy burden. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of high-risk HPV DNA test in triage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. All women with ASC-US/LSIL cytology who were referred to our colposcopy clinic from October 2010 to February 2014 were included. HPV DNA testing was performed using Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2). All patients received colposcopic examination. Accuracy values of HC2 in predicting the presence of histologic HSIL+ were calculated. There were 238 women in this study (121 ASC-US and 117 LSIL). The HC2 positivity rate was significantly higher in the LSIL group than in ASC-US group (74.8% versus 41.0%, p<0.001). Histologic HSIL+ was detected in 9 women (7.4%) in the ASC-US group and 16 women (13.7%) in the LSIL group (p=0.141). There was no histologic HSIL+ detected among HC2-negative cases (sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%). The performance of HC2 triage was highest among women aged >50 years with ASC-US cytology. An increase in the cut-off threshold for positive HC2 resulted in a substantial decrease of sensitivity and negative predictive value. HPV DNA testing with HC2 shows very high sensitivity and negative predictive value in triage of women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. An increase of the cut-off threshold for HC2 triage is not recommended in this region.

Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy.

Women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results are referred to colposcopy and biopsy for diagnosis of cervical cancer precursors (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]). Colposcopy with a single biopsy can miss identification of HSILs. No systematic study has quantified the improved detection of HSIL by taking multiple lesion-directed biopsies. The Biopsy Study was an observational study of 690 women referred to colposcopy after abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Up to four directed biopsies were taken from distinct acetowhite lesions and ranked by colposcopic impression. A nondirected biopsy of a normal-appearing area was added if fewer than four directed biopsies were taken. HSIL identified by any biopsy was the reference standard of disease used to evaluate the incremental yield and sensitivity of multiple biopsies. In the overall population, sensitivities for detecting HSIL increased from 60.6% (95% CI, 54.8% to 66.6%) from a single biopsy to 85.6% (95% CI, 80.3% to 90.2%) after two biopsies and to 95.6% (95% CI, 91.3% to 99.2%) after three biopsies. A significant increase in sensitivity of multiple biopsies was observed in all subgroups. The highest increase in yield of HSIL was observed for women with a high-grade colposcopic impression, HSIL cytology, and human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 positivity. Only 2% of all HSILs diagnosed in the participants were detected by biopsies of normal-appearing transformation zone. Collection of additional lesion-directed biopsies during colposcopy increased detection of histologic HSIL, regardless of patient characteristics. Taking additional biopsies when multiple lesions are present should become the standard practice of colposcopic biopsy.

Population-based cervical cancer screening using high-risk HPV DNA test and liquid-based cytology in northern Thailand.

Northern Thailand is a region with a high cervical cancer incidence. Combined high-risk HPV (hrHPV) DNA testing and cytology (co-testing) has increasingly gained acceptance for cervical cancer screening. However, to our knowledge, data from a population-based screening using co-testing have not been available in this region. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the performance of cytology and hrHPV test in women in northern Thailand. Cervical samples were collected for hybrid capture 2 (HC2) testing and liquid-based cytology from women aged 30 to 60 years who were residents in 3 prefectures of Chiang Mai in northern Thailand between May and September 2011. Women with positive cytology were referred to colposcopy, while women with positive for HC2 only were followed for 2 years. Of 2,752 women included in this study, 3.0% were positive in both tests, 4.1% for HC2 only, and 1.3% had positive cytology only. At baseline screening, positive HC2 was observed in 70.6% among cytology-positive women compared with 4.3% among cytology-negative women. The prevalence of positive HC2 or cytology peaked in the age group 35-39 years and was lowest in the age group 55-60 years. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse lesions (HSIL+) were histologically detected in 23.5% of women with positive baseline cytology and in 9.8% of women with positive baseline HC2 only on follow-up. All women with histologic HSIL+ had positive baseline HC2. The hrHPV test is superior to cytology in the early detection of high-grade cervical epithelial lesions. In this study, the prevalence of histologic HSIL+ on follow-up of women with positive hrHPV test was rather high, and these women should be kept under careful surveillance. In northern Thailand, hrHPV testing has a potential to be used as a primary screening test for cervical cancer with cytology applied as a triage test.