Hispanic American Populations Research Articles

Identification of allele-specific KIV-2 repeats and impact on Lp(a) measurements for cardiovascular disease risk

The abundance of Lp(a) protein holds significant implications for the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is directly impacted by the copy number (CN) of KIV-2, a 5.5 kbp sub-region. KIV-2 is highly polymorphic in the population and accurate analysis is challenging. In this study, we present the DRAGEN KIV-2 CN caller, which utilizes short reads. Data across 166 WGS show that the caller has high accuracy, compared to optical mapping and can further phase approximately 50% of the samples. We compared KIV-2 CN numbers to 24 previously postulated KIV-2 relevant SNVs, revealing that many are ineffective predictors of KIV-2 copy number. Population studies, including USA-based cohorts, showed distinct KIV-2 CN, distributions for European-, African-, and Hispanic-American populations and further underscored the limitations of SNV predictors. We demonstrate that the CN estimates correlate significantly with the available Lp(a) protein levels and that phasing is highly important.

The Cancer Equity Compass: Interactive maps showing the association between social determinants of health and cancer disparities.

149 Background: Cancer incidence and mortality in Black, Hispanic and Native American populations is over twice that in the White population for some prevalent cancers. A new, publicly available mapping tool, the Cancer Equity Compass (CEC), was developed to inform data-driven initiatives to improve equity by identifying community factors associated with cancer disparities. The tool is comprised of interactive maps that visually reveal correlations between two variables. Development of the tool began with assembling a group of nine advisors with expertise in cancer prevention, treatment and health equity. These experts inform the strategy, data sources, variables of interest, and stakeholder value propositions for the CEC. Methods: The data source for the CEC is a national, multi-level database developed using individual, health system, and community data, aggregated by county. For the three most common cancers in the U.S., breast, prostate and lung, screening and prevalence rates were collected from 2021 Medicare 5% research identifiable files and mortality rates from 2020 SEER Medicare rates. These metrics were each mapped with a variety of social determinants of health (SDOH) variables. Population rates for minorities, education, poverty, income and unemployment, and an air quality measure were from the Area Health Resources File. Environmental risks were derived from the Environmental Justice Index and included environmental burden (ranked 0-17 for pollution, toxic sites, built environment, transportation infrastructure and water pollution), air pollution (ranked 0-4), and social vulnerability (ranked 0-14 across socioeconomic variables). Results: Each map includes one cancer metric and one SDOH variable. Each variable is stratified to show the top quartile, middle 50%, and bottom quartile. The choropleth heat maps, created on Tableau, display 9 colors representing each combination of the three levels (>75%, 25-75%, <25%) for both mapped variables. The CEC currently has 140 maps presenting visualizations of county SDOH associations with cancer disparities. Conclusions: The expert advisors on the project have outlined four avenues for the CEC to aid efforts to improve cancer equity: 1) Enhance diversity in clinical trial recruitment and data registries through targeted site recruitment; 2) Identify high opportunity targets for improving equity and informing solutions; 3) Identify common correlates of disparities within and across U.S. counties to direct priorities for national policy and programs for large-scale impact; and 4) Measure change to support improvement efforts and report impact of equity initiatives. The CEC will be expanded with additional measures including healthcare access. The goal is use by stakeholders and changemakers who can apply the reported data to fuel advocacy efforts and enact positive change.

Validation of Spanish-Language Surveys Utilized for the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) Program to Aid Hispanic-American Breast Cancer Patients.

Cancer accounts for 22% of all mortality and is the leading cause of death among Hispanic and/or Latinx patients in the United States. The disparities in access to radiation therapy (RT), mortality rates, and treatment outcomes among Hispanic-American breast cancer patients compared with other populations highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions. The Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) program, with its innovative patient navigation approach and culturally sensitive survey, aims to better identify the specific barriers faced by this population. This study is a report of the NAVAH program experience piloting a Spanish-language culturally sensitive survey in Hispanic-American volunteers. Hispanic-American volunteers with fluency in Spanish were recruited to participate in survey conduction, identified from local networks. Survey information was assessed by topic category, and survey responses were amalgamated into a representative score for each category. Survey categories include acceptability (comfort and prejudice among interactions with the system), accessibility (transportation, distance to care, and health care literacy), accommodation (access to the internet, navigating transportation), affordability (financial considerations, employment, and level of education), and availability (access to a medical center, coordinating care, and overall quality of care). A total of 6 volunteers meeting inclusion criteria completed the survey; 4 in person and 2 by telephone. The median survey completion time was 12 minutes 38 seconds. Respondents noted satisfaction and trust in their interactions with medical providers; however, responses in the acceptability category highlighted a high perception of disparities in the medical system, including a high prevalence of racial and ethnic prejudice and a high prevalence of treatment differences between high-income and low-income patients in clinical settings. In the first Spanish-language survey of its kind, our findings indicate that this survey design is feasible in the Hispanic-American population. Implementation of this survey in breast cancer patients will provide more definitive and comprehensive answers regarding other categories in the survey, including financial challenges during treatment, access to accommodations, and perception of treatment during cancer care. The investigation involving patients actively receiving breast cancer RT is currently underway.

Spatial Accessibility and Uptake of Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccinations by Social Vulnerability.

Geographic accessibility predicts pediatric preventive care utilization, including vaccine uptake. However, spatial inequities in the pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination rollout remain underexplored. We assessed the spatial accessibility of vaccination sites and analyzed predictors of vaccine uptake. In this cross-sectional study of pediatric COVID-19 vaccinations from the US Vaccine Tracking System as of July 29, 2022, we described spatial accessibility by geocoding vaccination sites, measuring travel times from each Census tract population center to the nearest site, and weighting tracts by their population demographics to obtain nationally representative estimates. We used quasi-Poisson regressions to calculate incidence rate ratios, comparing vaccine uptake between counties with highest and lowest quartile Social Vulnerability Index scores: socioeconomic status (SES), household composition and disability (HCD), minority status and language (MSL), and housing type and transportation. We analyzed 15 233 956 doses administered across 27 526 sites. Rural, uninsured, white, and Native American populations experienced longer travel times to the nearest site than urban, insured, Hispanic, Black, and Asian American populations. Overall Social Vulnerability Index, SES, and HCD were associated with decreased vaccine uptake among children aged 6 months to 4 years (overall: incidence rate ratio 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.60-0.81]; SES: 0.66 [0.58-0.75]; HCD: 0.38 [0.33-0.44]) and 5 years to 11 years (overall: 0.85 [0.77-0.95]; SES: 0.71 [0.65-0.78]; HCD: 0.67 [0.61-0.74]), whereas social vulnerability by MSL was associated with increased uptake (6 months-4 years: 5.16 [3.59-7.42]; 5 years-11 years: 1.73 [1.44-2.08]). Pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake and accessibility differed by race, rurality, and social vulnerability. National supply data, spatial accessibility measurement, and place-based vulnerability indices can be applied throughout public health resource allocation, surveillance, and research.

Forecasting the Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke in the United States Through 2050: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.

Quantifying the economic burden of cardiovascular disease and stroke over the coming decades may inform policy, health system, and community-level interventions for prevention and treatment. We used nationally representative health, economic, and demographic data to project health care costs attributable to key cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia) and conditions (coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation) through 2050. The human capital approach was used to estimate productivity losses from morbidity and premature mortality due to cardiovascular conditions. One in 3 US adults received care for a cardiovascular risk factor or condition in 2020. Annual inflation-adjusted (2022 US dollars) health care costs of cardiovascular risk factors are projected to triple between 2020 and 2050, from $400 billion to $1344 billion. For cardiovascular conditions, annual health care costs are projected to almost quadruple, from $393 billion to $1490 billion, and productivity losses are projected to increase by 54%, from $234 billion to $361 billion. Stroke is projected to account for the largest absolute increase in costs. Large relative increases among the Asian American population (497%) and Hispanic American population (489%) reflect the projected increases in the size of these populations. The economic burden of cardiovascular risk factors and overt cardiovascular disease in the United States is projected to increase substantially in the coming decades. Development and deployment of cost-effective programs and policies to promote cardiovascular health are urgently needed to rein in costs and to equitably enhance population health.

Botánicas Function as Health Care Safety Nets Among Hispanic American Immigrants: A Brief Report.

As the U.S. population becomes more racially/ethnically diverse, the Hispanic American immigrant population has slowly grown in recent years. In the face of anti-immigrant policies, limited access to care, fear of deportation, discrimination, stigmatization, poverty, and other stressors, Hispanic American immigrants seek services from botánicas for religious, spiritual, medical, and psychosocial health reasons, including the accessibility and affordability of services from folk practitioners in these herbal dispensaries. Hispanics are the primary consumers of herbal remedies and complementary and alternative medicines in the United States. The purpose of this article is to emphasize the critical role of botánicas in the health and wellness of Hispanic American immigrants. Recommendations for health professionals are provided in the care of Hispanic Americans who utilize folk, traditional, and herbal medicines for health and healing.

Access to radiotherapy in Hispanic and Latinx populations in the United States: An update.

142 Background: Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay of oncology care and has been shown to optimize outcomes for patients in many settings. Disparities in access to RT therefore represent substandard care. The Hispanic/Latinx population has consistently faced disparities in oncology access and outcomes, with cancer being the leading cause of death in the Hispanic American population. In this study, we aim to evaluate recent research in RT disparities among the Hispanic/Latinx population in the United States since the seminal analysis from 2017 (PMID: 29904731). Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted for articles published from January 2017 through March 2023. Four term combinations were utilized, including: (1) “Hispanic” and “Radiotherapy” and “Disparities”, (2) “Latino” and “Radiotherapy” and “Hispanic”, (3) “Hispanic” and “Radiation” and “Disparities”, and (4) “Latino” and “Radiation” and “Disparities.” All articles returned from each search were documented and duplicates were removed. Following the initial search, research studies qualifying for inclusion included studies taking place in the United States, examination of radiation oncology care, and examination of health disparities in the Hispanic/Latinx population. Articles meeting criteria were then organized by disparity type that they address. Results: Our initial PubMed search returned 245 articles. Of these articles, 60 met inclusion criteria and spanned 5 disparity-types: (1) Time to Treatment Initiation & Completion, (2) Receipt of Treatment and Guideline-Concordant Care, (3) Geography, (4) RT Clinical Trial Access and (5) Insurance and Treatment Center Type. The most common disparity evaluated (n=23 studies) was receipt of treatment and guideline-concordant care, showing that the Hispanic/Latinx population was found to be less likely to receive any treatment. Another commonly identified disparity (n=10 studies) was the time to treatment initiation and completion, which highlighted that compared to the Non-Hispanic White population, the Hispanic/Latinx population had greater times to initiating RT and decreased likelihood of timely completion. Additionally, the Hispanic/Latinx population faced disparities in RT access due to geography (n=4 studies), RT clinical trial access (n=3 studies), insurance and treatment center access (n=5 studies). Conclusions: Disparities in radiotherapy access and quality care remain prominent for the Hispanic/Latinx population, despite increasing interest in health care disparities research. This population faces disparities in access via a multitude of barriers. Continued health care disparities research with tangible intervention is needed in radiation oncology in order to properly understand and address this problem.

School-Based Versus Family-Based Interventions for the Reversal and Prevention of Obesity Among Hispanic Youth: a Review of the Literature.

Childhood obesity prevalence in the USA continues to rise and the Hispanic American population is disproportionately affected. Obesity prevalence among Hispanic youth is 26.2%, the highest prevalence of any minority or non-minority group of children. Prevalence of related conditions including type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and stroke also are increased among Hispanic Americans. Physicians and other providers commonly utilize body mass index (BMI) to estimate percentage of bodily fat and risk of adverse health outcomes. BMI has been shown to track from childhood to adulthood, demonstrating necessity for early intervention. Interventions targeting the prevention and reversal of obesity among children are categorized as school-based or family-based. Interventions vary but may involve strategies such as meetings to discuss health-related curriculum, augmentation of physical activity, and/or improvement of nutritional quality of food. The aim of this article is to review the current literature to determine whether family-based or school-based interventions are more successful in the prevention and reversal of obesity among Hispanic youth. We reviewed twenty-eight studies describing these interventions and included ten (four school-based and six family-based) in our in-depth analysis. Inclusion criteria required trials were conducted among adequate population sizes of Hispanic youth within the age range of interest, analyzed the primary outcome of interest, and took place after the year 2000. Family-based interventions typically involved small population sizes, were dependent upon parent adherence, and were rarely effective. School-based interventions were more commonly effective and involved larger population sizes, allowing for greater generalizability and greater impact of the intervention. Of five family or school-based interventions which successfully reduced BMI among this population, four included a component involving structured physical activity. School-based interventions involving augmentation of physical activity with minimal limitations of study execution demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and reversal of obesity among Hispanic children.

368 Impact of a digital atopic dermatitis educational intervention on Hispanic patients and family members

Abstract With the increasing incidence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in the USA, the highest prevalence of AD being found in Hispanic countries, and the rising Hispanic-American population, educational resources on eczema focused on Spanish-speaking populations are needed more than ever. As such, the primary goal of this project was to assess the beneficial impact of an educational intervention conducted through a virtual platform for Hispanic individuals living with AD. Utilizing WhatsApp, the study enrolled 55 participants diagnosed with AD and/or parents of children diagnosed with AD. Participants were enrolled in a 7-day educational module with daily topics on AD health knowledge. A health knowledge survey was administered prior to the educational program, upon completion of the program and 1 month after completion. The program found a 14% increase in AD health knowledge upon completion of the program (P < 0.001). Most importantly, there was no significant difference found between the health knowledge survey submitted at program completion and 1 month after completion, signaling that health knowledge taught through the course was successfully retained by participants (P = 0.29). Qualitative themes involving atopic disease were additionally explored through group discussions, including mental health and peer stigma. This study is the first of its kind in dermatology utilizing the WhatsApp format. The success of retained health knowledge regarding AD demonstrates that future virtual endeavors can be effective methods of patient education overall, and be accessible interventions for populations that might not have ease of access to major medical centers, are in rural areas and/or in the international setting.

The LSU AgCenter Healthy Communities Initiative: Community-Participatory Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change

The LSU AgCenter Healthy Communities Initiative: Community-Participatory Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change

Abstract 4213: Comparison of benign breast disease subtypes and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico

Abstract Introduction: Benign breast disease (BBD) is an important breast cancer (BC) risk factor, which may be classified as non-proliferative disease (NPD), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH) for risk stratification. Data related to the frequency of specific types of BBD and their relationship to BC risk in the Hispanic American population are limited. To address this knowledge gap, we compared BBD and associated BC risk among Hispanic white (HW) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) in New Mexico (NM). Methodology: A retrospective IRB-approved study was performed of women 19 years or older residing in six counties in NM (Bernalillo, Sandoval, Sante Fe, Socorro, Torrance, Cibola/Valencia) between 1996 and mid-2007 to compare the frequency of BBD subtypes and BC risk among HW and NHW. We excluded women who had a history of BC prior to BBD diagnosis or who were diagnosed with BC within 6 months after BBD biopsy. Race and ethnicity were self-reported by women at the time of biopsy. BBD was categorized as NPD, PDWA, or AH based on medical records. Incident BC (in-situ or invasive) was ascertained via linkage to the NM Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) Registry and BC risk was assessed using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), comparing the observed number of BC events to that expected based on the NM SEER six-county race- and ethnicity-specific incidence rates, accounting for age and calendar period. Results: Our analysis included 3,870 HW and 6,996 NHW women with BBD. The HW were younger (47.1 vs. 51 years) compared to NHW. HW women had slightly more NPD (69.4% vs. 66.6%) but less PDWA (26.2% vs. 29.4%) and similar frequency of AH (4.3% vs. 3.9%) as compared to NHW. Over a median post-BBD follow-up period of 13 years (range 6 months-17 years), 644 BCs were observed (4.81% in HW and 6.55% in NHW). The observed BC risk among women with BBD was higher than population-based expected rates (SIR 1.98, 95% CI 1.82-2.13, p<0.001) and showed expected increases in risk with increasing degrees of BBD abnormality: SIR=1.90 for NPD, 2.00 for PDWA, and 3.01 for AH. Comparing BC risk by ethnic subgroups, HW women had an overall risk of BC after BBD that was statistically indistinguishable from NHW women (SIR=2.17, 95% CI 1.86-2.48 in HW women, and SIR=1.91, 95% CI 1.73-2.08 in NHW women). Within the major subgroups of the BBD findings, there were no significant differences in risk of BC after BBD for HW versus NHW women. Conclusions: In this population-based study, benign breast disease subtypes and their associated breast cancer risk were similar among the Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Citation Format: Kush Raj Lohani, Andrea M. Nibbe, Robert A. Vierkant, Laura M. Pacheco-Spann, Lisa R. Seymour, Celine M. Vachon, Mark E. Sherman, Amy C. Degnim, Deirdre Hill. Comparison of benign breast disease subtypes and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4213.

Impact of a Digital Atopic Dermatitis Educational Intervention on Hispanic Patients and Family Members.

With the increasing incidence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in the U.S., the highest prevalence of AD being found in Hispanic countries, and the rising Hispanic-American population, educational resources on eczema focused on Spanish-speaking populations are needed more than ever. As such, the primary goal of this project was to assess the beneficial impact of an educational intervention conducted through a virtual platform for Hispanic individuals living with atopic dermatitis. Utilizing WhatsApp, the study enrolled 55 participants diagnosed with AD and/or parents of children diagnosed with AD. Participants were enrolled in a seven-day educational module with daily topics on AD health knowledge. A health knowledge survey was administered before the educational program, upon completion of the program, and one month after completion. The program found a 14% increase in AD health knowledge upon completion of the program (p < 0.001). Most importantly, there was no significant difference found between the health knowledge survey submitted at program completion and one month after completion, signaling that health knowledge taught through the course was successfully retained by participants (p = 0.29). Qualitative themes involving atopic disease were additionally explored through group discussions, including mental health and peer stigma. This study is the first of its kind in dermatology utilizing the WhatsApp format. The success of retained health knowledge regarding AD demonstrates that future virtual endeavors can be effective and accessible methods of patient education overall for populations that might not have ease of access to major medical centers.

Variants in interferon gamma inducible protein 16 (IFI16) and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) genes that modulate inflammatory response are associated with periodontitis

ObjectiveEvaluate the association of genetic variants of the interferon gamma inducible protein 16 (IFI16) and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) genes with periodontitis. MethodsThe study involved 117 individuals with periodontitis and 389 without periodontitis, all Brazilians, miscegenated. Individuals with periodontitis presented at least 4 teeth with ≥ 1 site with probing depth ≥ 4 mm; clinical attachment level ≥ 3 mm on the same site and bleeding upon stimulus. Genotyping was performed using the Infinium Multi-Ethnic AMR/AFR-8 Bead Chip focused on Hispanic and African American populations with approximately 2 million markers of the human genome. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify associations in additive, dominant and recessive models adjusted for covariates age, obesity, mouth breathing, flossing, asthma, and ancestry. ResultsIn IFI16, the rs75985579-A is positively associated with periodontitis in the additive (Odds Ratio adjusted (ORadjusted) 2.65, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.25–5.60, p value: 0.007) and dominant models (ORadjusted 2.56, 95%CI:1.13–5.81, p value: 0.017). In AIM2, the rs76457189-G, is associated negatively with periodontitis in two genetic models evaluated, additive (ORadjusted 0.21, 95%CI:0.05–0.94, p value: 0.022) and dominant (ORadjusted 0.21, 95%CI:0.05–0.94, p value: 0.022). ConclusionsThese results have shown that variants in the IFI16 and AIM2 genes are associated with periodontitis. Individuals with at least one A (adenine) allele of the rs75985579 (IFI16) are more than twice as likely to have periodontitis, while individuals with the G (guanine) allele of rs76457189 (AIM2) are less likely to be diagnosed with periodontitis, providing a negative association with periodontitis.

COVID-19 in the U.S. during pre-vaccination period: Shifting impact of sociodemographic factors and air pollution.

Pandemic "wave" usually refers to the rise and fall of the infections with time, however, for a large country, the variations due to geographical location could be considerable. In this work, we investigated COVID-19 infection and fatality across the U.S. during the pandemic waves in the pre-vaccination period (January 2020-December 2020). Focusing on counties with a population ≥100,000, the data from the entire period were first segmented into two equal phases roughly corresponding to the first pandemic wave and subsequent surge, and each phase was further divided into two zones based on infection rate. We studied the potential influences of six sociodemographic variables (population density, age, poverty, education, and percentage of Hispanic and African American population) and four air pollutants (PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and O3) on the differences in infection and fatality observed among different phases and zones. We noticed a distinct difference in the overall impact of COVID-19 between the two phases of the pre-vaccination period with a substantial decrease in the fatality in the second phase despite an increase in the infection. Analysis using log-linear regression modeling further revealed a shift in the impact of several risk factors considered in this study. For example, population density and lesser education were found to be significant for infection during the first phase of the pandemic alone. Furthermore, population density and lesser education along with poverty and NO2 level had a significant contribution to fatality during the first phase of the pandemic, while age over 65 years was important in both phases. Interestingly, the effects of many of these factors were found to be significant only in the zones with higher infection rates. Our findings indicate that the impacts of several well-known sociodemographic and environmental risk factors for COVID-19 are not constant throughout the course of the pandemic, and therefore, careful considerations should be made about their role when developing preventative and mitigative measures.

Effects of language and acculturation on neurocognitive performance of Japanese Americans.

Despite significant work in African and Hispanic American populations, little information is available regarding performance of Japanese Americans on neuropsychological tests. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of dominant language and acculturation levels on the performance of Japanese Americans on selected neurocognitive tests. Based on their self-identified dominant language, 48 English-dominant speaking (ES) Japanese Americans (Mage = 64.48, SD = 10.52) and 52 Japanese-dominant speaking (JS) Japanese Americans (Mage = 60.17, SD = 11.15) were assessed on a neurocognitive battery. Significant differences in test performance were observed between the groups, with the JS group performing poorer on the measures of naming ability, verbal and olfactory learning/memory, and language, compared to the ES group. Levels of acculturation explained that group difference. The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) showed no group differences, suggesting lack of language proficiency and acculturation biases in this ethnic sample. Within the JS group, self-reported English proficiency and years of education obtained in Japan explained variance in addition to age, education, and gender, in performance on the Boston Naming Test and the Letter Fluency Test, respectively. The present study highlights the need for culturally sensitive evaluation in the neuropsychological assessment of this population. The variability in backgrounds contributed to the variability in performance between and within groups. Factors in addition to age and education, including the effects of primary language and acculturation, warrant consideration when evaluating the neuropsychological performance of Japanese Americans in research and clinical settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

35083 Inclusive dermatology: Creating a diverse visual atlas of skin conditions (with consideration of broader impacts on patient care and medical education)

The U.S. Census Bureau predicts that Hispanic, Black, and other minority groups will constitute more than half of the U.S. population by 2044. It is therefore problematic that only about 10% of images in dermatology textbooks illustrate dermatologic conditions in skin of color. This affects physician education and patient outcomes. A study several years ago found 47% of dermatologists and residents reported that their medical training on pathologies in Black skin was insufficient, and that there was a need for more training materials exhibiting Black skin. Black and Hispanic patients are also less likely to be diagnosed with skin cancer, but more likely to die from it than their white counterparts. There has been a call to expand the existing database of dermatology photographs to include more images of skin of color. We are therefore creating a freely accessible resource of different dermatologic conditions in all skin types and colors. Reviewing images in all skin types allows learners to better recognize lesions in diverse patients. We plan to illustrate a variety of skin colors, emphasizing that skin of color, which is often the term used for any non-white skin, encompasses multiple skin types that warrant their own attention and classification. We are retrospectively indexing images collected over the past several years in New Mexico, which has a large Hispanic and Native American population, and North Carolina, which has a large Black population. We hope the continuous expansion of this database will improve dermatology education and ultimately benefit patients.

Do social determinants of health impact access to neurosurgical care in the United States? A workforce perspective.

This study attempts to use neurosurgical workforce distribution to uncover the social determinants of health that are associated with disparate access to neurosurgical care. Data were compiled from public sources and aggregated at the county level. Socioeconomic data were provided by the Brookings Institute. Racial and ethnicity data were gathered from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research. Physician density was retrieved from the Health Resources and Services Administration Area Health Resources Files. Catchment areas were constructed based on the 628 counties with neurosurgical coverage, with counties lacking neurosurgical coverage being integrated with the nearest covered county based on distances from the National Bureau of Economic Research's County Distance Database. Catchment areas form a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive breakdown of the entire US population and licensed neurosurgeons. Socioeconomic factors, race, and ethnicity were chosen as independent variables for analysis. Characteristics for each catchment area were calculated as the population-weighted average across all contained counties. Linear regression analysis modeled two outcomes of interest: neurosurgeon density per capita and average distance to neurosurgical care. Coefficient estimates (CEs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and scaled by 1 SD to allow for comparison between variables. Catchment areas with higher poverty (CE = 0.64, 95% CI 0.34-0.93) and higher prime age employment (CE = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.76) were significantly associated with greater neurosurgeon density. Among categories of race and ethnicity, catchment areas with higher proportions of Black residents (CE = 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.35) were associated with greater neurosurgeon density. Meanwhile, catchment areas with higher proportions of Hispanic residents displayed lower neurosurgeon density (CE = -0.17, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.03). Residents of catchment areas with higher housing vacancy rates (CE = 2.37, 95% CI 1.31-3.43), higher proportions of Native American residents (CE = 4.97, 95% CI 3.99-5.95), and higher proportions of Hispanic residents (CE = 2.31, 95% CI 1.26-3.37) must travel farther, on average, to receive neurosurgical care, whereas people living in areas with a lower income (CE = -2.28, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.09) or higher proportion of Black residents (CE = -3.81, 95% CI -4.93 to -2.68) travel a shorter distance. Multiple factors demonstrate a significant correlation with neurosurgical workforce distribution in the US, most notably with Hispanic and Native American populations being associated with greater distances to care. Additionally, higher proportions of Hispanic residents correlated with fewer neurosurgeons per capita. These findings highlight the interwoven associations among socioeconomics, race, ethnicity, and access to neurosurgical care nationwide.

Leveraging Citizen Science and Low-Cost Sensors to Characterize Air Pollution Exposure of Disadvantaged Communities in Southern California.

Assessing exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) across disadvantaged communities is understudied, and the air monitoring network is inadequate. We leveraged emerging low-cost sensors (PurpleAir) and engaged community residents to develop a community-based monitoring program across disadvantaged communities (high proportions of low-income and minority populations) in Southern California. We recruited 22 households from 8 communities to measure residential outdoor PM2.5 concentrations from June 2021 to December 2021. We identified the spatial and temporal patterns of PM2.5 measurements as well as the relationship between the total PM2.5 measurements and diesel PM emissions. We found that communities with a higher percentage of Hispanic and African American population and higher rates of unemployment, poverty, and housing burden were exposed to higher PM2.5 concentrations. The average PM2.5 concentrations in winter (25.8 µg/m3) were much higher compared with the summer concentrations (12.4 µg/m3). We also identified valuable hour-of-day and day-of-week patterns among disadvantaged communities. Our results suggest that the built environment can be targeted to reduce the exposure disparity. Integrating low-cost sensors into a citizen-science-based air monitoring program has promising applications to resolve monitoring disparity and capture “hotspots” to inform emission control and urban planning policies, thus improving exposure assessment and promoting environmental justice.

Financial toxicity in Hispanic cancer survivors: A nationally representative pancancer analysis.

6528 Background: A cancer diagnosis can pose a significant financial burden to patients and their families, both during and after treatment. Financial toxicity has long-term consequences, with cancer being the most commonly cited reason for medical cost-associated bankruptcy in the United States. We used nationally representative survey data to assess financial toxicity in cancer survivors, with a focus on Hispanic patients given known disparities in socioeconomic and cancer outcomes. Methods: 2013-2018 data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to select individuals aged 18 years old and older who reported any previous diagnosis of cancer. Financial toxicity was defined as unmet healthcare need, health care unaffordability, and/or general financial stress. Individuals were disaggregated by race/ethnicity, and patients who self-identified as Hispanic were further classified by country of origin. Survey-adjusted percentages characterize the cohort. Multivariable logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CI for each category of financial toxicity, with non-Hispanic White (NHW) used as reference. Results: Hispanic patients in aggregate had the highest prevalence of all 3 categories of financial toxicity when compared to other racial/ethnicity groups (35% unmet healthcare need, 61% healthcare unaffordability, 61% financial stress). Mexican (aOR: 2.53 95%CI: 1.82–3.52), Cuban/Cuban-American (aOR: 1.97 95%CI: 1.17–3.34), and patients of Central/South American heritage (aOR: 2.61 95%CI: 1.67–4.10) were more likely to have healthcare unaffordability. Unmet healthcare needs were higher in Mexican patients (aOR: 1.43 95%CI: 1.03-1.99) and patients of Cuban descent (aOR: 1.96 95%CI: 1.07-3.58). Financial stress was highest among patients of Central/South American heritage (aOR: 4.20 95%CI: 2.50-7.05) and Mexican patients (aOR: 1.84 95%CI: 1.27-2.66). Mediator analyses further revealed that disparities persisted even after adjusting for socioeconomic status in Mexican patients (healthcare unaffordability - aOR: 1.65 95%CI: 1.14-2.40) and patients of Central/South American heritage (healthcare unaffordability – aOR: 1.99 95%CI: 1.23-3.21; general financial stress – aOR: 2.97 95%CI: 1.71 – 5.17). Conclusions: Our study highlights significant disparities in the financial impact of cancer treatments on Hispanic patients. Disaggregation by Hispanic country of origin illustrates differences within the Hispanic and Hispanic-American population and reveals specific groups that may be at particular risk of financial harm. Targeted interventions to improve health care access and affordability are needed to increase equity and improve outcomes.

Impact of beta blockade therapy on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Background: Heart failure preserved ejection fraction does not have clear guidelines. Because of past meta-analyses investigations, the Beta-blockade has sparked the most attention. Method &amp; Results: We performed a retrospective observational where 1500 adult patients were studied from the period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017. After the review, 625 met the criteria to be included in the study. Cardiac reasons for inpatient admission between patients on beta-blockers vs. not on beta-blockers do not differ. The likelihood of requiring critical care admission was similar, and the likelihood of death due to cardiovascular causes between both groups did not differ. Conclusion: The use of beta-blockade therapy is still a subject of debate, especially in the minority (Hispanic and African American) population.