Mice of the BALB/c strain were bilaterally implanted with bipolar platinum electrodes either in the CA1 field of the dorsal hippocampus (HPC) or in the dorsolateral hypothalamus (HL) in order to compare the effects of postsession electrical stimulation on learning and memory. Two learning tasks were used, a discriminative food-reinforced conditioning task and a one-trial passive avoidance conditioning task. In the first two experiments, 30 sec after the end of the first learning session, subjects were stimulated during 80 sec. HPC stimulation intensity was half of afterdischarge threshold values; at HL stimulation intensity (10 μA per electrode) self-stimulation behavior (I.C.S.S.) was effective. Control groups constituted by nonoperated (n.i.) or operated nonstimulated animals (n.ST.HL and n.ST.HPC) were used. In the third experiment the HL stimulation intensities were lowered under the I.C.S.S. threshold values and their post-trial applications were tested on discriminative operant conditioning. Results from experiments I and II showed that HL as well as HPC stimulation improved performances registered during 24-hr delayed retention sessions. However, differences were observed between HL and HPC stimulation. First, HL appeared to be less effective than HPC stimulation on passive avoidance conditioning; second, compared to HPC-stimulated animals, HL-stimulated animals had over all the sessions significantly higher response rates during the food-reinforced sequences and during the nonreinforced sequences. In addition, the small lesions (200 μm in diameter) due to HL- and HPC-implanted electrodes disturbed in n.ST animals the pattern of retention, but this disruptive effect was task dependent and appears only in the discriminative operant conditioning. In the third experiment, subthreshold I.C.S.S. behavior intensities were found to have a significant facilitative effect. These data indicate (i) that post-trial HL as well as HPC stimulations have similar facilitative effects on retention of learning tasks whether controlled by positive or negative reinforcement; and (ii) that these effects are not dependent on a reward component. It was concluded that the facilitatory effects of these stimulations can be ascribed to their common ability to induce an arousal state during the post-training period.