Hip Extension Test Research Articles

The clinical utility of the prone hip extension test in the diagnosis of motor control impairments associated with low back pain: A cross-sectional study using motion capture and electromyography

BackgroundThe prone hip extension test is used as a clinical tool to diagnose specific motor control impairments that have been identified in individuals with chronic low back pain. However, conventional protocols for performing the test are subjective and lack evidence for their effectiveness. The objective of the current study was to quantify lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation during this test and identify which motor control patterns best distinguish individuals with low back pain from asymptomatic controls. Methods18 individuals with sub-acute or chronic low back pain and 32 asymptomatic controls performed the prone hip extension test while a 3D motion capture system measured lumbar and pelvic movement patterns and an electromyography system measured the muscle activation patterns of the paraspinal, gluteus maximus, and hamstring muscles. A three-stage statistical analysis was performed, the final stage being a stepwise logistic regression analysis aimed at identifying the movement and muscle activation pattern variables that best distinguished the two groups. FindingsThe final regression model included three lumbar kinematic variables and several electromyographic amplitude variables for the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during right-sided prone hip extension. The final model correctly classified 86.7 % of the control group and 83.3 % of the low back pain group. InterpretationThe subject of asymmetrical gluteus maximus and hamstring muscle activation appears to be a potentially interesting area for future research on the utility of the prone hip extension test as a clinical tool in diagnosing motor control impairments associated with low back pain.

Ultrasound Characteristics of The Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Prone Hip Extension Test in Subjects with and without Lower Back Pain

Ultrasound Characteristics of The Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Prone Hip Extension Test in Subjects with and without Lower Back Pain

Women with low back pain do not show a pattern in the lumbopelvic muscle activation sequence that differentiates from women without low back pain

BackgroundOne of the causes of low back pain can be directly related to mechanical stability. Stability is the result of coordinated muscle patterns. One of the clinical tests used to assess the pattern of muscle activation is the hip extension test in the prone position, which is considered a reliable test to evaluate lumbopelvic stability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in the time of activation of these muscles between women with and without chronic low back pain. MethodIt is a cross-sectional study carried out with 28 women, 17 women without low back pain and 11 with pain complaints. The electromyographic signals from the spinal erector muscles, gluteus maximus and biceps femoris were collected during the performance of 3 repetitions of the tests. ResultsA total of 22 different sequences were found, 14 in the group without low back pain (NLBPG) and 16 in the group with low back pain (LBPG). Only 8 sequences were common in both groups. Muscle activation sequences were also compared between repetitions, the number of different sequences increased at each repetition and the accumulated percentage corresponding to the second most prevalent sequence decreased. ConclusionNo significant differences were found in onset values between groups. The results demonstrate that there is no pattern in the activation sequence of these muscles and we can understand that pelvic stabilization seems to depend on individual strategies.

The Effects of Kinesio Taping® on Muscle Interplay within the Lumbo–Pelvic–Hip Complex: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Coordination of muscle activity is determined by the recruitment order of agonists and synergists that results from their onset times. Motor recruitment deficits are possible. This study examined the acute and prolonged effects of three different techniques of the kinesio taping method in optimizing the intermuscular coordination within the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. The sample consisted of 56 healthy participants of both genders, randomly divided into equal groups by kinesio taping muscle facilitation, muscle inhibition and functional correction technique, and placebo kinesio taping condition. The onsets of the ipsilateral and contralateral erector spinae muscles, in relation to the semitendinosus muscle of the tested leg, were measured using the surface electromyography, during the active performance of the prone hip extension test. Time span was also determined. Measurements were performed at baseline, 60 min, and 48 h post-intervention. For the control group, we did not find statistically significant differences in the onset between the measurement points (p > 0.05), while in the experimental groups, there was a significant delay in the onset of the contralateral erector spinae (p < 0.001) in the second and third measurement points. These results indicate that the kinesio taping method can optimize the intermuscular coordination, with the potential for primary injury prevention.

Motor recruitment pattern during the prone hip extension test: is hip extension initiated by the hip or the lumbar extensor muscles?

Background/Aims Prone hip extension motion pattern derives from the motor muscle firing pattern, and functional deficits are determined by comparing this pattern with a normal prone hip extension motion muscle recruitment pattern, defined more than 30 years ago by scientifically insufficient methods. The aim of this study was to examine the differences between electromyography recruitment onsets and orders of muscles participating in prone hip extension motion, and to determine whether there is a consistent and dominant motor pattern. Methods The sample consisted of 106 healthy participants. Onset times of semitendinosus, ipsilateral and contralateral erector spinae muscles were determined as 10% of the peak rectified amplitude of the electromyography signal for each of the 18 prone hip extension bilateral repetitions. These values were used to determine the recruitment order for each repetition, as well as to calculate the average ipsilateral and contralatral normalised onset times (ie relative times to firing of the semitendinosus muscle). The main analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance. The level of statistical significance was set at P&lt;0.05. Results One-way analysis of variance revealed a significantly delayed onset of prone hip extension of the contralateral erector spinae muscles compared to the other muscles (F=7.02; P&lt;0.001; Cohen's f=0.209). Muscle activation initiated by the semitendinosus and ipsilateral erector spinae muscles was the most common. Conclusions The ipsilateral erector spinae muscle contracts simultaneously with the semitendinosus muscle as a proximal stabiliser, enabling distal hip mobility. The use of the prone hip extension test in recognising dysfunction is limited to when the contralateral erector spinae muscle is initiated first during prone hip extension.

Trunk and hip muscles activation patterns in subjects with and without chronic low back pain: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to determine normal and abnormal patterns of activation of gluteus maximus (GM), hamstring (HAM), contralateral erector spinae (CES), and ipsilateral erector spinae (IES) muscles during a prone hip extension test in healthy or asymptomatic subjects and those with non-specific chronic low back pain through a systematic review. Studies were recognized by searching electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro [Physiotherapy Evidence Database], and CINAHL) and scanning articles reference lists from the beginning until July 2018. Limits involved studies in the English language and performed among humans. Of 2112 citations and reference lists scanned, 15 articles were determined to be relevant to this review. From these studies, 4 investigated 157 subjects (88 asymptomatic and 69 with low back pain), and 11 investigated 257 healthy subjects. The results of the moderate and weak quality studies indicate that the HAM and ES muscles are activated early and almost simultaneously, but GM is consistently delayed in relation to leg movement and the other 3 muscles in healthy individuals. In low back pain subjects, CES are delayed and GM is significantly delayed in individuals who showed abnormal lumbar motions when compared with healthy ones.

Electromyographic evaluation of selected muscles during active hip extension in men treated McKenzie method

The aim of this study was to evaluate objective results of short-term treatment with the use of electromyography and to determine changes in muscle recruitment during the prone hip extension test in individuals with chronic low back pain who underwent the McKenzie treatment. The studied group consisted of 17 male office workers aged 33-55 who underwent two experimental sessions comprising of 3 measurements and the McKenzie method of mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Electromyographic examination of selected muscles was performed during the test in order to assess changes in their activity before and after the McKenzie method and the Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess the level of pain. There was a tendency towards significance at the beginning of activation between the first and second test for the left erector spinae muscle ( p = 0.0684). In 18% of patients, the onset activation time decreased, which is indicative of correct direction of changes. No statistically significant changes were observed in the remaining muscles. Statistical significance ( p = 0.0131) was observed between the first and third test for the left erector spinae muscle. A decrease in the onset activation time was observed in 75% of the subjects. Effectiveness increased by as much as 57%. The level of pain decreased in the third test compared to the first one ( p = 0.0240). However, the change in pain sensations between the first and second test was not statistically significant. The study showed objective changes in the activation sequence of selected muscles and subjective changes in pain following short term McKenzie therapy.

ACC Research Agenda Conference 2019: Peer Reviewer Acknowledgments and Abstracts of Proceedings.

ACC Research Agenda Conference 2019: Peer Reviewer Acknowledgments and Abstracts of Proceedings.

Reliability of four tests to assess body posture and the range of selected movements in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy

BackgroundThe majority of individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) experience progressive skeletal deformities which may affect the quality of life and mobility. To date, no studies have evaluated the reliability of tests assessing body posture and joint mobility in SMA patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of Cervical Rotation test (CR), Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation test (SATR), Hip Extension test (HE) and Pelvic Obliquity test (PO) developed to evaluate the musculoskeletal system in SMA individuals.MethodsThirty individuals (12 girls and 18 boys) aged 4–15 with SMA type II (n = 24) and III (n = 6) confirmed by genetic examinations were qualified for the study. The participants were examined twice by three physiotherapists on the same day. The examination included four tests, i.e. CR, SATR, HE and PO tests aimed at assessing ranges of rotation in the cervical spine, chest deformities, ranges of hip extension and pelvis position while sitting. Statistical calculations were made with the use of statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsIntraobserver reliability was excellent for CR (ICC range 0.839–0.911), SATR (ICC range 0.918–0.939 - the upper part of the sternum; ICC range 0.951–0.975 - the lower part of the sternum), HE (ICC range 0.988–0,991) and PO (ICC range 0.896–0.935) tests.The interobserver ICC reached the excellent values in CR (ICC range 0.912–0.920), SATR (ICC = 0.888 - the upper part of the sternum, ICC = 0.951 - the lower part of the sternum), HE (ICC range 0.922–0.923) and PO (ICC = 0.928) tests.ConclusionsCR, SATR, HE and PO tests are reliable and may be used for examining individuals with SMA. The application of these tests provides a possibility to detect early changes in the musculoskeletal system in children and adolescents and to assess the effectiveness of the implemented pharmacotherapy and rehabilitation.

Effects of back belt on vertical load transfer among adults with non-specific low back pain during asymmetrical manual load carrying

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of a back belt on vertical load transfer in terms of carrying using a single dominant hand, lumbopelvic muscle strength, and perceived difficulty in performing an active straight lower limb raise (ASLR) test among adults with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). A total of 20 adults with NSLBP and 20 matched individuals without low back pain (LBP) participated in this study. Vertical load transfer was measured via a Matscan pressure assessment system for both standing and walking scenarios while carrying incremental loads. Lumbopelvic muscle strength during prone hip extension (PHE) test was assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Perceived difficulty in performing the ASLR test was measured with a 6-point Likert scale. A three-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of vertical load transfer. Lumbopelvic muscle strength and perceived difficulty were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. The results demonstrated an increase in vertical load transfer, increased lumbopelvic muscle strength, and decreased perceived difficulty in performing ASLR test with use of a back belt. The findings suggest that the use of a back belt in adults with NSLBP may improve vertical load transfer during load-carrying tasks, maximize lumbopelvic muscle strength, and decrease perceived difficulty in performing a task. This is relevant to industry, as use of a back belt is an option for industrial workers with NSLBP during manual load carrying to optimize vertical load transfer and personal comfort.

Lumbar lordosis in prone position and prone hip extension test: comparison between subjects with and without low back pain

BackgroundProne hip extension (PHE) is a common and widely accepted test used for assessment of the lumbo-pelvic movement pattern. Considerable increased in lumbar lordosis during this test has been considered as impairment of movement patterns in lumbo-pelvic region. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change of lumbar lordosis in PHE test in subjects with and without low back pain (LBP).MethodA two-way mixed design with repeated measurements was used to investigate the lumbar lordosis changes during PHE in two groups of subjects with and without LBP. An equal number of subjects (N = 30) were allocated to each group. A standard flexible ruler was used to measure the size of lumbar lordosis in prone-relaxed position and PHE test in each group.ResultThe result of two-way mixed-design analysis of variance revealed significant health status by position interaction effect for lumbar lordosis (P < 0.001). The main effect of test position on lumbar lordosis was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The lumbar lordosis was significantly greater in the PHE compared to prone-relaxed position in both subjects with and without LBP. The amount of difference in positions was statistically significant between two groups (P < 0.001) and greater change in lumbar lordosis was found in the healthy group compared to the subjects with LBP.ConclusionsGreater change in lumbar lordosis during this test may be due to more stiffness in lumbopelvic muscles in the individuals with LBP.

Test-retest reliability of seven common clinical tests for assessing lower extremity muscle flexibility in futsal and handball players

ObjectiveTo determine the inter-session reliability of seven lower limb muscle flexibility measures obtained from the passive hip extension test (PHE), passive hip flexion test (PHF), passive hip abduction test (PHA), passive straight leg raise test (PSLR), modified Thomas test (MTh), the ankle dorsi-flexion with knee extended (ADFKE) and flexed (ADFKF) tests. DesignRepeated measures design. SettingControlled laboratory environment. Participants60 futsal and 30 handball players. Main outcome measuresReliability was examined through the change in the mean (ChM), standard error of measurement expressed in absolute values (SEM) and as a percentage of the mean score (%SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC95), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,k). ResultsThe findings showed negligible ChM values for all the flexibility measures analysed (<1°). Furthermore, the SEM and MDC95 for each flexibility measure ranged from 1.3° to 2.5° and from 3.8° to 6.9°, respectively, with %SEM scores lower than 10% and ICC scores higher than 0.88. ConclusionsClinicians can be 95% confident that an observed change between 2 measures larger than 3.7°, 6.2°, 5.5°, 6.1°, 6.9°, 4.7°, and 5.0° for the flexibility measures obtained from the PHE, PHF, PHA, PSLR, MTh, ADFKE and ADFKF, respectively, likely indicates a real change in muscle flexibility.

Inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the prone hip extension test and active straight leg raise test.

BackgroundTwo clinical tests used to assess for neuromuscular control deficits in low back pain (LBP) patients are the prone hip extension (PHE) test and active straight leg raise (ASLR) test. For these tests, it has been suggested examiners classify patients as “positive” or “negative” based on the presence or absence (respectively) of specific “abnormal” lumbopelvic motion patterns. The inter-rater agreement of such a classification scheme has been reported for the PHE test, but not for the ASLR test. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of such classification schemes have not been reported for either test. The primary objectives of the current study were to investigate: 1) the inter-rater agreement of the examiner-reported classification schemes for these two tests, and 2) the sensitivity and specificity of the classification schemes.MethodsThirty participants with LBP and 40 asymptomatic controls took part in this cross-sectional observational study. Participants performed 3–4 repetitions of each test whilst two examiners classified them as “positive” or “negative” based on the presence or absence (respectively) of specific “abnormal” lumbopelvic motion patterns. The inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic), sensitivity (LBP patients), and specificity (controls) were calculated for each test.ResultsBoth tests demonstrated substantial inter-rater agreement (PHE test: Kappa = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.57-0.95, p < 0.001; ASLR test: Kappa = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.57-0.96, p < 0.001). For the PHE test, the sensitivity was 0.18-0.27 and the specificity was 0.63-0.78; the odds ratio (OR) of “positive” classifications in the LBP group was 1.25 (95% CI = 0.58-2.72; Examiner 1) and 1.27 (95% CI = 0.52-3.12; Examiner 2). For the ASLR test, the sensitivity was 0.20-0.25 and the specificity was 0.84-0.86; the OR of “positive” classifications in the LBP group was 1.72 (95% CI = 0.75-3.95; Examiner 1) and 1.57 (95% CI = 0.64-3.85; Examiner 2).ConclusionClassification schemes for the PHE test and ASLR test based on the presence or absence of specific “abnormal” lumbopelvic motion patterns demonstrated substantial inter-rater agreement. However, additional investigation is required to further comment on the clinical usefulness of the motion patterns demonstrated by LBP patients during these tests as a diagnostic tool or treatment outcome.

Patient-reported perception of difficulty as a clinical indicator of dysfunctional neuromuscular control during the prone hip extension test and active straight leg raise test

Two clinical tests used to assess for neuromuscular control deficits in patients with low back pain (LBP) are the prone hip extension (PHE) test and active straight leg raise (ASLR) test. For these tests, it has been suggested that patients be classified as “positive” if they demonstrate specific “abnormal” lumbopelvic motion patterns. For the ASLR test, the use of patient-reported perception of difficulty is also used to assess neuromuscular control. Thirty participants with LBP and 40 asymptomatic controls took part in this cross-sectional observational study. Participants performed both tests and were classified as “positive” or “negative” based on the presence or absence (respectively) of specific “abnormal” motion patterns. The participants also rated their perceived difficulty in performing the tests using a six-point scale. A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine the effects of group (LBP/control) and examiner classification (positive/negative) on the perceived difficulty scores for each test. The LBP group perceived greater difficulty in performing both tests compared to the control group. Conversely, there was no significant difference in the perceived difficulties of the positive and negative examiner classifications for either test. Additional investigation is required to comment further on the relative usefulness of the perceived difficulty and observable motion patterns during these tests in assessing the neuromuscular control strategies of the lumbopelvic region, and their potential as a diagnostic tool or treatment outcome.

The Influence of Self-Stretching Based on Postisometrical Relaxation, Static Stretching Combined with Stabilizing Exercises, and Stabilizing Exercises Only on the Flexibility of One-Joint and Two-Joint Hip Flexors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE. The limitations of muscle flexibility are a common dysfunction of the musculoskeletal system. Therefore, various therapeutic techniques are used in rehabilitation programs to increase their flexibility. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blind study was to evaluate the changes in the flexibility of hip flexors in children who participated in a 6-week therapeutic program consisting of one physiotherapy session per week with a physiotherapist and daily home exercises. MATERIAL AND METHODS. A total of 94 children aged 10-13 years were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups: postisometrical relaxation group (PIR group), static stretching combined with stabilizing exercise group (SE/SS group), and stabilizing exercise group (SS group). To assess the flexibility of one- and two-joint hip flexors, the modified Thomas test was used. The examination was conducted by blinded observers. RESULTS. A significant improvement in the flexibility of one-joint hip flexors was documented in all 3 groups (P<0.01). The flexibility of two-joint hip flexors increased significantly only in the SS/SE group (P<0.05). After the program, the highest range of motion of the hip extension (test for one-joint hip flexors) was recorded in the SS/SE group (20.6° ± 4.5°), and it was significantly greater than in the SE group (16.6° ± 4.0°, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the knee flexion (test for two-joint hip flexors) among all 3 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS. The 6-week therapeutic program regardless of the technique applied (postisometrical muscle relaxation, static stretching with stabilizing exercises, and stabilizing exercises only) resulted in the increased flexibility of one-joint hip flexors. Only static stretching combined with stabilizing exercises led to a significant increase in the flexibility of two-joint hip flexors.

Pattern of change in core muscles thickness during active straight leg raise test &amp; prone hip extension test

Pattern of change in core muscles thickness during active straight leg raise test &amp; prone hip extension test

An Investigation of Neck Muscle Activity in Asymptomatic Participants Who Show Different Lumbar Spine Motion Patterns During Prone Hip Extension

Objective The objective of the current study was to investigate whether any differences exist in the activity of the cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius (TRA) muscles between asymptomatic participants who show “normal” and “abnormal” lumbar spine motion patterns during the prone hip extension (PHE) test. Methods Twenty-six asymptomatic participants recruited from a chiropractic college participated in the study. Surface electromyography was used to record the activity of the cervical erector spinae and upper TRA muscles as each participant performed a set of 4 repetitions of PHE for each leg. An examiner observed the participant perform the movement and classified him/her as “positive” or “negative” based on the presence or absence (respectively) of 1 of 3 lumbar spine motion patterns. The mean activity levels of each muscle during the positive sets of PHE were compared with those during the negative sets. Results The mean activity of the upper TRA ipsilateral to the side of hip extension was significantly higher in the positive group compared with the negative group (difference, 13.3%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2%-24.4%; P = .0465). No other significant between-group differences were noted. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that the presence of abnormal lumbar spine motion patterns during the PHE test may be associated with altered cervicothoracic motor control strategies in asymptomatic individuals. Similar investigations using patients with neck pain are required to comment further on the generalizability and potential clinical importance of these findings.

Altered muscular activation during prone hip extension in women with and without low back pain

BackgroundAltered movement pattern has been associated with the development of low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity pattern of the ipsilateral erector spinae (IES) and contralateral erectorspinae (CES), gluteus maximus (GM) and hamstring (HAM) muscles during prone hip extension (PHE) test in women with and without LBP. A cross-sectional non-experimental design was used.MethodsConvenience sample of 20 female participated in the study. Subjects were categorized into two groups: with LBP (n = 10) and without LBP (n = 10). The electromyography (EMG) signal amplitude of the tested muscles during PHE (normalized to maximum voluntary electrical activity (MVE)) was measured in the dominant lower extremity in all subjects.ResultsStatistical analysis revealed greater normalized EMG signal amplitude in women with LBP compared to non-LBP women. There was significant difference in EMG activity of the IES (P = 0.03) and CES (P = 0.03) between two groups. However, no significant difference was found in EMG signals of the GM (P = 0.11) and HAM (P = 0.14) among two groups.ConclusionThe findings of this study demonstrated altered activation pattern of the lumbo-pelvic muscles during PHE in the women with chronic LBP. This information is important for investigators using PHE as either an evaluation tool or a rehabilitation exercise.

Reliability of Physical Examination in the Measurement of Hip Flexion Contracture and Correlation with Gait Parameters in Cerebral Palsy

this study was undertaken to determine the validity and reliability of the physical examination tests commonly used to measure hip flexion contracture in patients with cerebral palsy who are able to walk. thirty-six consecutive patients (twenty-two male and fourteen female patients), with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 9.8 ± 3.9 years, who had cerebral palsy (level I, II, or III on the Gross Motor Function Classification System) and thirty-seven children without cerebral palsy (nineteen male and eighteen female subjects), with a mean age of 10.0 ± 3.0 years, were enrolled prospectively for this study. Hip flexion contracture was determined by three physical examination tests: the Thomas test, the prone hip extension test (the Staheli test), and the hamstring shift test. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed in all subjects. The interobserver reliabilities of the three physical examination tests were determined with use of three observers. Convergent validity was assessed by evaluating the relationships between the findings on physical examination and kinematic and kinetic gait variables (maximum hip extension during stance and hip flexor index) and three-dimensional modeled psoas lengths. the Thomas test showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (0.501 in patients and 0.207 in controls) and the smallest mean absolute difference (5.8° in patients and 1.2° in controls). The Staheli test was found to be the most valid method in the patient group (r = 0.568 with hip flexor index), whereas the Thomas test was the most valid in the control group (r = 0.526 with maximum hip extension in stance, and r = 0.532 with the hip flexor index). The hamstring shift test had the lowest intraclass correlation coefficient and the lowest convergent validity. while the Thomas test showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient and the smallest mean absolute difference, the Staheli test was the most valid method for detecting hip flexion contractures in patients with cerebral palsy. Although the Staheli test cannot be used for intraoperative assessment, we recommend that this test be included in preoperative physical examinations to determine the role of a hip flexion contracture in the abnormal gait of patients with cerebral palsy.

Alterations in Hip Angles Following of Juvenile Pubic Symphysiodesis in Ten Dogs with Hip Dysplasia

The purpose of this study is to evaluate of preand postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes of 3-5 month-old, 10 dogs with hip dysplasia after juvenile pubic symphysiodesis. Pain scoring of hip extension test, Ortolani signs and Bardens palpations were performed preand postoperatively, on 1st, 3rd, and 6th months by clinical examinations. Norberg-Olsson angles on standard ventrodorsal on extended radiological views and distraction index on distracted hip radiological views were evaluated by radiological examinations. Juvenile pubic symphysiodesis was applied every 2.0 to 3.0 mm among to the entire length of the growth plate of the pubis via unipolar needle electrocautery (40 W, for 12 to 30 seconds). Acetabular full coverage on the femoral head was provided as a result of ventrolateral rotation of the acetabulum following juvenile pubic symphysiodesis procedure. The hip extension test, Ortolani signs and Bardens palpations were turned from positive to negative. In conclusion, juvenile pubic symphysiodesis is a successful and safe procedure which can be easily applied for prophylaxis and/or treatment of hip dysplasia (HD) in 3-5-month-old, large-breed puppies, which are predisposed to hip dysplasia or showing the initial clinical signs of hip dysplasia.