Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Research Articles

Arthroscopic Management of Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis of the Hip: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a benign proliferation of synovial tissue that can cause joint damage. The hip, although less commonly affected than the knee, presents a challenging diagnosis and treatment, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard for detection. Surgical excision, arthroscopic or open, is the main treatment approach, but there is no consensus on the best strategy for the hip. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complications, and revision rates associated with arthroscopic hip surgery for PVNS. Methods: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were identified by searching four databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. Selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence (LoE). For retrospective studies, the Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was used. This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Results: Six studies satisfied the criteria; these involved 77 patients (48% male, 52% female) with a mean age of 26.4 years and a mean follow-up of 54.3 months. MRI and biopsy confirmed the diagnoses, and arthroscopic synovectomy was the primary treatment. Success rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with a recurrence rate of 7.8%, 1.3% requiring revision surgery, and eight (10.4%) patients in three studies reporting conversion to THA. Complications included mild effusions and residual synovitis. All patients who underwent a subsequent total hip arthroplasty were affected by advanced osteoarthritis. Conclusions: Our systematic review reveals that the use of hip arthroscopy in diagnosing and treating PVNS has shown satisfactory results without increasing the risk of recurrence or complications and can return patients to their former activity levels, provided their preoperative osteochondral status is good and there is early management of PVNS of the hip joint.

A retrospective cohort study: dual cannula combined with modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique versus nonrepair in hip arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement

BackgroundOver the years, with the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for hip joint diseases and the advancements in surgical technology, hip arthroscopy has been extensively used. At present, there is ongoing controversy among scholars about whether it is necessary to close the joint capsule after hip arthroscopy. In addition, the clinical effect of repairing the hip joint capsule after hip arthroscopy remains uncertain.PurposeTo evaluate the effect of our modified shoelace suture technique on postoperative hip function and to investigate whether complete closure of the hip capsule is reliable and safe.Study DesignRetrospective study; Levels of evidence: III.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing hip arthroscopy by a solitary high-volume hip arthroscopic surgeon. The patients were categorized into two groups. The first group consisted of patients who underwent the modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique. The other group consisted of those who did not receive capsular closure after hip arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcomes including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score of Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) were obtained at a minimum of 12 months. Any complications during follow-up were identified and recorded.ResultsA total of 100 patients were followed up for 12–15 months, with an average of (12.3 ± 5.3) months in the study. There were 50 patients in the shoelace capsular closure group (CC group) and 50 patients in the non-capsular closure group (NC group). The surgical time in the suture group was significantly longer than that in the non-suture group. However, there was no statistically significant disparity in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. The mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS of the CC and NC group were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores at 6 and 12 postoperative months (P < 0.001). Compared with the NC group, the CC group showed a significant improvement in the mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS at 6 postoperative months (t = 4.885, P<0.001; t = 5.984, P<0.001; t = 4.279, P<0.001; t = 3.875, P<0.001). The mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS at 12 postoperative months were significantly better in the CC group than in the NC group (t = 5.165, P<0.001; t = 3.697, P<0.001; t = 4.840, P<0.001; t = 3.579, P = 0.001). There were no serious complications during the perioperative period.ConclusionThe modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique is a reliable and secure method that can be used as an alternative to the conventional capsular closure. It is recommended to perform routine intraoperative repair of the articular capsule at the end of hip arthroscopy, as this has a positive influences on the functional results at short-term follow-up.

Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The use of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been widely encouraged for hip surgery; however, meta-analyses showed mixed results in terms of its efficacy in reduction in analgesic consumption and pain score. These meta-analyses included all forms of FICB approaches, which may diminish the effect size of the therapy. Suprainguinal FICB (s-FICB) has been shown to be superior to other FICB approaches including the ultrasound-guided infrainguinal approach and the landmark approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare opioid consumption, pain score, and complications after s-FICB to control for patients undergoing hip surgery. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42023460377). We performed a systematic literature search in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases from inception to 16August 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of s-FICB versus control for patients undergoing hip surgery. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by consensus or by discussion with a third investigator. The primary outcome is the 24-houroral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMMED). The secondary outcome includes oMMED at different timepoints, and pain score. The Cochrane risk of biastool (Cochrane, London, England) was used to assess the risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model. Trial sequence analysis is performed on opioid consumption 24 hours post operation. Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Arthroscopic hip surgery was performed in three studies involving 222 patients, hip and femur fracture surgeries were performed in three studies involving 149 patients, and total hip arthroplasty was performed in five studies involving 483 patients. In studies involving arthroscopic hip surgery, s-FICB did not improve intra-operative and post-operative opioid consumption and post-operative pain score. In studies involving hip and femur fracture surgeries, s-FICB was associated with a non-significant difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery and post-operative pain score at 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery. However, the result of the trial sequential analysis (TSA) was not definitive, indicating that additional research is necessary to draw conclusive outcomes. In studies involving total hip arthroplasty, s-FICB was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours with conclusive results in trial sequential analysis. In conclusion, s-FICB is superior to placebo for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. For patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery, s-FICB is unlikely to be beneficial. With regardto hip fracture surgery, additional research is necessary to draw conclusive outcomes.

Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Reconstruction or Labral Repair and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Compromise of the acetabular labrum can lead to pain and loss of critical intra-articular fluid pressure. Revision labral preservation poses unique challenges due to adhesions and compromised tissue quality. The purpose of the study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with either labral reconstruction or labral repair after primary hip arthroscopy for labral tear. It was hypothesized that both procedures would lead to improved PROs. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A systematic review of the literature was conducted with the following keywords: (revision) AND (hip OR femoroacetabular impingement) AND (arthroscop*) AND (reconstruction OR repair) in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus in August 2023 using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria, yielding 2002 initial records. Only studies comparing PROMs between revision labral reconstruction or revision labral repair after primary hip arthroscopy for labral tear were included. Background article information was recorded, including article title, author, study design, level of evidence, patient demographics, radiographic information, intraoperative data, PROMs, psychometric thresholds, and secondary surgeries. Secondary surgery in our study was defined as any open or arthroscopic hip surgery secondary to the initial revision surgery. Forest plots were created for pre- and postoperative outcomes present in ≥3 studies. Heterogeneity was calculated using I 2 values. Four studies, including 215 revision labral reconstructions and 115 revision labral repairs of the hips, were included in this systematic review. All studies were level 3 evidence, and study periods ranged between 2009 and 2019. Mean follow-up for the reconstruction and repair groups ranged from 26.3 to 36.6 months and 30.7 to 56.4 months, respectively. The mean age for the reconstruction and repair groups varied between 27 to 34.6 years and 27.5 to 30 years, respectively. Mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Scores for the reconstruction and repair cohorts ranged from 72.0 to 81.2 and 70.8 to 84.1, respectively (I 2 = 0%). Mean visual analog scale for pain scores for the reconstruction and repair cohorts ranged from 3 to 3.5 and 2.3 to 3.9 (I 2 = 33%). Overall secondary surgery rates ranged from 10.0% to 26.7% in the labral reconstruction cohort, compared with 10.0% to 50.0% in the labral repair cohort. One study reported superior outcomes in the revision labral repair group, with 3 studies finding no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups. Our systematic review showed that patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative outcome measures. Postoperative outcomes were similar to those of a benchmark control group of patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy and labral repair. Labral reconstruction in the revision setting appears to be an effective treatment in clinically indicated patients.

Managing the Hip in Supraphysiologic Motion Athletes

The supraphysiologic hip in artistic athletes poses a unique challenge to the discerning sports medicine practitioner. Through stretching and repetitive microtraumatic motions, a cascade of soft tissue laxity, increased strain on surrounding soft tissue structures, and microinstability can develop, resulting in both soft tissue and bony injury. In addition, extra-articular pathology can predominantly affect the artistic athlete. Thus, a thorough understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology as the hip is ranged to the extremes is paramount to establishing an adequate diagnosis and developing a treatment plan. Through a careful history along with a targeted and thorough physical exam in addition to diagnostic imaging, one can accurately identify the sources of pain and dysfunction. Treatment can range from conservative and interventional non-operative modalities to open and/or arthroscopic hip surgery. Surgical techniques should not only address the identified pathology but also take care to not limit the extremes of hip motion required by the artistic athlete's sport. Despite the high demands of hip motion and function (supraphysiologic motion and function) the artistic athlete can return to high levels of performance if one pays attention to these factors.

Self-reported preoperative anxiety and depression associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for periacetabular osteotomy and hip arthroscopy surgery

Self-reported preoperative anxiety and depression associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for periacetabular osteotomy and hip arthroscopy surgery

How to Best Identify Acetabular Retroversion on Radiographs: Thresholds to Guide Clinical Practice

Background: Acetabular retroversion is associated with impingement and instability. An adequate interpretation of acetabular version and coverage on radiographs is essential to determine the optimal treatment strategy (periacetabular osteotomy vs hip arthroscopic surgery). The crossover sign (COS) has been associated with the presence of acetabular retroversion, and the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) assess anteroposterior acetabular coverage. However, the radiographic appearance of the acetabulum is sensitive to anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) morphology and pelvic tilt (PT), which differs between the supine and standing positions. Purpose: To (1) identify differences in the acetabular appearance between the supine and standing positions among patients presenting with hip pain; (2) determine factors (acetabular version, AIIS morphology, and spinopelvic characteristics) associated with the crossover ratio (COR), AWI, and PWI; and (3) define relevant clinical thresholds to guide management. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who presented to a hip preservation surgical unit (n = 134) were included (mean age, 35 ± 8 years; 58% female; mean body mass index, 27 ± 6). All participants underwent supine and standing anteroposterior pelvic radiography to assess the COS, COR, AWI, and PWI as well as standing lateral radiography to determine standing PT. Computed tomography was used to measure supine PT, acetabular version, and AIIS morphology. Acetabular version was measured at 3 transverse levels, corresponding to the 1-, 2-, and 3-o’clock positions. The correlation between radiographic characteristics (COR, AWI, and PWI) and acetabular version, AIIS morphology, and PT was calculated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to define thresholds for the COR, AWI, and PWI to identify retroversion (version thresholds: <10°, <5°, and <0°). Results: The COS was present in 55% of hips when supine and 30% when standing, with a mean difference in the COR of 12%. The supine COR (rho = −0.661) and AWI/PWI ratio (rho = −0.618) strongly correlated with acetabular version. The COS was more prevalent among patients with type 2 AIIS morphology (71%) than among those with type 1 AIIS morphology (43%) (P = .003). COR thresholds of 23% and 28% were able to identify acetabular version <5° (sensitivity = 81%; specificity = 80%) and <0° (sensitivity = 88%; specificity = 85%), respectively. An AWI/PWI ratio >0.6 was able to reliably identify acetabular version <0° (sensitivity = 83%; specificity = 84%). In the presence of a COR >30% and an AWI/PWI ratio >0.6, the specificity to detect retroversion was significantly increased (>90%). Conclusions: The presence of the COS was very common among patients with hip pain. False-positive results (high COR/normal version) may occur because of AIIS morphology/low PT. Relevant thresholds of COR >30% and AWI/PWI ratio >0.6 can help with diagnostic accuracy. In cases in which either the COR or AWI/PWI ratio is high, axial cross-sectional imaging can further help to avoid false-positive results.

Midterm Outcomes After Simultaneous Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: Bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has demonstrated good outcomes at short-term follow-up, with significant improvements in pain, hip function, and patient-reported outcomes, coupled with a complication rate similar to that of unilateral surgery. Purpose: To investigate whether, in patients with bilateral symptomatic FAI, simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery is an efficacious option that produces effective midterm outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A prospective database of patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery between August 2012 and October 2020 was used to collect clinical data on 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of FAI. Group 2 represented a matched-pair control group of patients selected based on sex and age with signs and symptoms of unilateral FAI and in whom a single side was evaluated and treated. Differences in the International Hip Outcome Tool–12 and Non-Arthritic Hip Score scores were evaluated up to 5 years postoperatively. Results: In total, 171 patients (235 hips) were included, of whom 64 underwent simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery (128 hips) and a control group of 107 patients (107 hips) underwent unilateral hip arthroscopic surgery. No significant differences were observed in International Hip Outcome Tool–12 scores between the 2 groups at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively. No significant differences were observed in Non–Arthritic Hip Score scores between the simultaneous bilateral and control groups at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively. Overall, 18% of hips in the simultaneous bilateral group reported lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy at 2-week follow-up in comparison to 16% of hips in the control group. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of FAI represents a safe treatment option, producing effective midterm outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Outcomes of Painful Hips After Hip Arthroscopy Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

The benefits of hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement are well-established. Hip arthroscopic surgery rates have risen dramatically over the last decade. Some patients, however, may continue to experience hip symptoms after surgery and are dissatisfied with their inability to return to desired optimal activity levels. The purpose of the study is to understand the long-term outcomes of patients with painful hips after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of painful hips after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, with four to 14-year follow-up from 2008 to 2022. A total of 84 hip arthroscopies were performed. Most of the patients had labral tear debridement and shaving of the aspherical femoral head also known as cam lesion, and five patients had repair for labral tear. There were eight patients who had bilateral hip involvement. There were 27 men and 57 females between the second to fifth decades. The electronic patient's records and radiological images were reviewed, and patient outcomes were graded as pain-free hip (asymptomatic) or painful hip (persistent pain and symptoms of instability). After hip arthroscopy surgery, 55% (46) of hips were graded pain-free in patients who were mostly in their 20s and 30s, while 45% (38) of hips had persistent pain. These patients were in their third or fifth decade. In the painful hip cohort, 33 patients had one hip arthroscopic surgery, while five patients had multiple repeat hip arthroscopies in the same hip over a three to six-year period. Bilateral hip arthroscopies were performed at different times in eight patients of which five individuals experienced painful hip outcomes. There were seven females and one male in their 30s and 40s. The labral tear was repaired in five patients, and two patients had painful hip outcomes. Both were females in their 20s and 30s. Patients with chronic painful hips after hip arthroscopic surgery were investigated to identify the cause of the pain. If no cause was established, then they were finally referred to pain specialist clinicians for pain management. This cohort had seven patients between 28 and 43 years. Six were female and one was male. Total hip replacement (THR) was performed in four patients (4.7%). Conversely, 95.3% of patients did not need THR during the study period of 14 years. Hip arthroscopy can be an effective treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Careful patient selection and a holistic approach are vital for a good patient outcome. The success rate of the pain-free hip after hip arthroscopy decreases with increasing age of the patient, particularly in the female gender.Patients with grade II and more degenerative chondral changes do not perform well. Patients in their fourth and fifth decade can benefit from hip arthroscopy provided a comprehensive discussion of the expected outcomes is conducted prior to surgery. Overall, hip arthroscopy remains a valuable tool, but it is important to be conscious of its limitations and potential challenges.

Hip Arthroscopy After Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Rare (0.04%) and May be Contralateral

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the patient demographics and incidence of hip arthroscopy after total hip arthroplasty using the PearlDiver database. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and arthroscopic hip surgery. The PearlDiver Claims Database was queried using CPT codes for records from 2010-2021. Inclusion criteria were presence of a hip arthroplasty CPT code, followed by a hip arthroscopy CPT code. Additional data collected included age, gender, and time between surgeries. A sub-analysis for ICD9/10 codes was completed to estimate association with iliopsoas tendinitis. ResultsQuery of the database showed that 314 patients had a hip arthroscopy code after a hip arthroplasty code. 0.04% of patientswho underwent arthroplasty subsequently underwent arthroscopy. 63.4% were female. Mean age was 58.2 ± 12.2 years at time of arthroscopy. 214 (72.3%) patients had a CPT code for synovectomy, 56 (18.9%) for loose body removal, and 44 (15.3%) for diagnostic arthroscopy. The mean time from arthroplasty code to arthroscopy code was 2.5 ± 2.0 years. 105 patients (33.4%) also had an ICD 10 diagnosis code for iliopsoas tendinitis and 116 (36.9.0%) had the ICD 9 code for enthesopathy of hip. ConclusionIn this limited study, we found that hip arthroscopy after hip arthroplasty is uncommon but occurs more frequently in female patients, is undertaken in a broad age range of patients, and is often associated with a diagnosis of iliopsoas or hip tendinitis. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Retrospective Case Series

The Association of Preoperative Hip Pain Duration With Delayed Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Background: Patients with hip pain ≥2 years before hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) have been shown to achieve inferior short-term and midterm outcomes compared with patients with a shorter pain duration, although there is limited literature that has evaluated the time to achieve clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) in this population. Purpose: To compare the time to achieve CSOs after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS in patients with and without prolonged hip pain and to identify independent predictors of the delayed achievement of CSOs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS between January 2012 and July 2019 with 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale (HOS-SS) scores were identified. Patients with prolonged hip pain (preoperative duration ≥2 years) were propensity score matched to a control group (preoperative duration <2 years), controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The times to achieve the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State were compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariate Cox regression considering age, sex, BMI, pain duration, activity level, and chondral status was used to identify independent predictors of the delayed achievement of CSOs. Results: A total of 179 patients with prolonged hip pain were matched to 179 control patients (mean pain duration, 60.5 ± 51.2 vs 9.7 ± 5.1 months, respectively; P < .001) of a similar age, sex, and BMI (P≥ .488) with similar baseline HOS-ADL and HOS-SS scores (P≥ .971). The prolonged hip pain group showed delayed achievement of the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for both the HOS-ADL and HOS-SS on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P≤ .020). On multivariate Cox regression, hip pain duration ≥2 years was shown to be an independent predictor of the delayed achievement of CSOs, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.32 to 1.65 (P≤ .029). Additional independent predictors of the delayed achievement of CSOs included increasing age, increasing BMI, female sex, self-endorsed weekly participation in physical activity, and high-grade chondral defects (hazard ratio range, 1.01-4.89; P≤ .045). Conclusion: Findings from this study demonstrate that preoperative hip pain duration ≥2 years was an independent predictor of the delayed achievement of CSOs after primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS.

Femoral Anteversion Angle as a Predictor of Anterior Hip Labral Length in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

The relationship between hip rotational abnormalities and hip labral size has not been fully investigated. To (1) examine the correlation between rotational abnormalities of the hip and labral size, while also identifying other predictive values for hip labral size, and (2) explore whether femoral torsion will lead to increased labral size. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. A total of 180 patients (180 hips) with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) (mean age, 36.81 ± 10.17 years; 67 male, 113 female) who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery between January 2021 and May 2022 were included. The femoral version (FV), acetabular version, and combined version angles were measured on computed tomography, and the labral length and height at the 12-o'clock and 3-o'clock positions were measured on magnetic resonance imaging. The hips were categorized into 3 groups based on FV angle: small (SFV; <10°); moderate (MFV; ≥10° and ≤20°), and large (LFV; >20°), and group comparisons were performed. Linear correlation and regression analysis were employed. Predictive factors for labral length were FV angle (β = 0.298; P = .02), sex (β = -0.302; P < .001), and age (β = -0.169; P = .016) at 3 o'clock and lateral center-edge angle (LCEA; β = -0.208; P = .005) and age (β = -0.186; P = .011) at 12 o'clock. FV angle was positively correlated with labral length at 3 o'clock (r = 0.267; P < .001) and negatively correlated with age (r = -0.222; P = .003) and female sex (r = -0.202; P = .006). LCEA (r = -0.227; P = .002) and age (r = -0.205; P = .006) were negatively correlated with labral length at 12 o'clock. Labral length at 3 o'clock was significantly different between the LFV (n = 49 hips), MFV (n = 65 hips), and SFV (n = 66 hips) groups (9.85 ± 2.28, 8.89 ± 2.44, and 8.30 ± 2.05 mm, respectively; P = .027 for LFV vs MFV; P < .001 for LFV vs SFV). Patients with FAIS who exhibited a higher FV angle were at a greater likelihood of having a larger anterior labral length. Increased femoral anteversion and decreased LCEA, male sex, and younger age were significantly associated with longer hip labral length.

Computer-Assisted Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Secondary Femoroacetabular Impingement After Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy Using Capsular Takedown Techniques

Secondary femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a severe complication observed after acetabular osteotomy; however, the diagnostic and treatment strategies of FAI have not been well established, especially with respect to arthroscopic techniques. We here describe hip arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for secondary FAI using computer-assisted techniques. The main features and tips of our technique are preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based surgical planning and the intraoperative capsule takedown method. Computer modeling produces a patient-specific 3-dimensional CT bone model. Subsequently, we identify the impingement point between the acetabulum and the femoral neck using dynamic simulation. The excess bony bumps are resected through computer surgical simulation, and pre- and postoperative 3-dimensional CT bone models are combined to identify the appropriate resection area. For the surgical technique, it is important to detach the capsule to visualize the acetabulum bony excess. Once the resection area has been sufficiently visualized, the bone resection is performed. Finally, the capsule is reattached to the excavated acetabulum, and the delaminated labrum is sewn up with the capsule in a round bale shape.

Increased combined anteversion is associated with larger posterior acetabular rim ossification in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

(1) To determine the prevalence, magnitude and distribution pattern of acetabular rim ossification in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and (2) to determine the association between acetabular rim ossification and rotational abnormalities of the hip. Patients underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at our institute between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the operated hip and ipsilateral distal femur were available for the measurement of femoral and acetabular anteversion. The presence and size of acetabular rim ossification were evaluated on coronal CT sections for the superior half of the acetabulum on each clockface location. The associations between acetabular rim ossification and radiographic parameters of hip rotational morphology were examined. A total of 214 hips were included. Acetabular rim ossification was found in 167 hips (78%) and the most common locations were 10 and 11 o'clock. Patients presenting with acetabular rim ossification had a mean size of 4.6 ± 1.6 mm. It was the largest at 9 o'clock position (4.9 ± 2.2 mm), with a decreasing trend in size from posterior to anterior. Logistics regression analysis found age was associated with the occurrence of posterior ossification (p = 0.002). Linear regression analysis found age (p = 0.049) and male sex (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the size of ossification. Patients with increased cranial combined anteversion had larger posterior ossification than patients with normal and decreased cranial combined anteversion (4.2 ± 2.9 vs. 3.1 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.016; 4.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.5 ± 2.4 mm, p = 0.005). Increased combined anteversion is associated with greater posterior acetabular rim ossification. The presence and size of acetabular rim ossification are positively associated with older age and male sex. Level III.

Paper 16: Long-term Outcomes of Primary Hip Arthroscopy: Multicenter Analysis at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up with Attention to Labral and Capsular Management

Objectives: Hip arthroscopy is rapidly advancing, with literature increasingly reporting positive outcomes at short- and mid-term follow-up; however, available long-term data remains limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy at minimum 10-year follow-up at two academic centers by describing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and determining reoperation, revision, and total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates. Methods: Primary hip arthroscopies performed between January 1988 and April 2013 at 2 academic centers were evaluated for postoperative PROs including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale score, Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sport Scale (HOS-ADL/HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), surgery satisfaction, function, and reoperations. Results: Two-hundred ninety-four primary hip arthroscopies with a mean age of 40±14 years; 66% female; and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27±6 kg/m2 were followed for mean 12±3 years (range: 10-24). Labral debridement and repair were performed in 41% and 59% of patients, respectively. All patients underwent interportal capsulotomy and 2% underwent T-capsulotomy. Eleven percent of patients underwent capsular repair. At final follow-up, patients reported mean VAS at rest of 2±2, with use of 3±3, iHOT-12 of 68±27, NAHS of 81±18, mHHS of 79±17, HOS-ADL of 82±19, and HOS-SS of 74±25. Mean surgical satisfaction was 8.4±2.4 (Table 1). Sixty-five hips (23%) underwent THA and 33 (11%) underwent revision arthroscopy (Table 2). Risk factors for THA included older age (p&lt;0.001), higher BMI (p&lt;0.001), lower lateral center-edge angle (p=0.039), larger alpha angle (p=0.001), higher Tönnis grade (p=0.011), labral debridement (p=0.004), and capsular nonrepair (p=0.030). Patients undergoing combined labral and capsular repair demonstrated a THA conversion rate of 3% compared to 31% for patients undergoing combined labral debridement and capsular nonrepair (p=0.006) (Table 3). Labral repair trended towards increased 10-year THA-free survival (84% vs. 77%, p=0.085) while capsular repair demonstrated significantly increased 10-year THA-free survival (97% vs 79%, p=0.032) (Figure 1). Conclusions: At minimum 10-year follow-up, patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated high rates of satisfaction and acceptable outcome scores. In total, 11% of patients underwent revision hip arthroscopic surgery with a THA conversion rate of 23%. Conversion to THA was associated with patient factors including older age and higher Tönnis grade as well as potentially modifiable surgical factors including labral debridement and capsular nonrepair.

Poster 214: Cross Sectional Area of Hip Muscles Before and After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Objectives: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is a common cause of hip pain and surgery is a treatment option for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. Previous studies have identified increases in postoperative hip muscle volume and cross-sectional area (CSA) as associated with increases in patient reported outcomes following hip surgery. There has been a lack of literature analyzing the change of hip muscle cross sectional CSA on MRI following arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI and the effect of changes in hip muscle CSA on patient reported outcomes following surgery. The purpose of this study is to analyze the change in hip muscle cross sectional area (CSA) after arthroscopic surgery for FAI syndrome. Methods: This is a single center, single surgeon, retrospective analysis performed between August 2007 and May 2023. All patients who had a pre-operative MRI within 1 year of their date of surgery and at least one postoperative MRI were included in the study. Cross sectional areas were measured by one blinded researcher and results were checked for reliability by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS, Version 24 and normally distributed continuous variables between cohorts were compared using the two-sample Student t test. Results: Initially 1390 patients were included in the study but only 95 were found to have a preoperative hip MRI within 1 year of their date of surgery as well as a postoperative MRI. The average age of the cohort was 35.8 ± 15.7, the cohort was 33.7% male and 66.3% female, and had an average BMI of 23.3 ± 8.1. The mean time between surgery and postoperative MRI was 14.8 ± 8.3 months. There was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative hip muscle CSA for gluteus maximus (4298.6±883.6 mm2 vs. 4384.6±967.6 mm2, p&lt;0.01), gluteus minimus (1037.0±199.2 mm2 vs. 1074.9±202.3 mm2, p&lt;0.001), and pectineus (415.7±121.9 mm2 vs. 426.7±106.3 mm2, p=0.04). There were no other significant differences between preoperative and postoperative hip muscle CSA values between the other muscles analyzed. A linear regression found that an increase in the change in CSA of the gluteus maximus significantly predicted an increase in mHHS at 1 year (β=3.103, p=0.046) when controlling for age, sex, BMI and time from surgery to postoperative MRI. A linear regression found that an increase in the change in cross sectional area of the pectineus significantly predicted an increase in NAHS at 1 year when controlling for age, sex, BMI and time from surgery to post-op MRI (β=0.186, p=0.037). Conclusions: Patients who undergo surgery for FAI have significantly increased gluteus maximus, gluteus minimus and pectineus muscle CSA on post-operative MRIs. Furthermore, increases in both gluteus maximus and pectineus muscle CSA was found to be significantly associated with increases in mHHS and NAHS at 1 year follow up respectively.

Poster 199: High Prevalence of Elevated Beighton Scores in Females Undergoing FAI Surgery

Objectives: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is classically described as restricted internal rotation in flexion resulting in labral and cartilage pathology. Despite 20 years of FAI research, there is still limited understanding of the drivers of symptomatology in the subset of patients with underlying FAI morphology. While the prevalence of FAI morphologies is substantially higher in men, numerous studies have shown more women being treated for FAI compared to men. Soft-tissue laxity and hip instability are increasingly recognized as a potential contributor to symptoms in addition to FAI. The Beighton score is a well-accepted means to quantify soft-tissue laxity and has been validated for self-scoring. The purpose of the current study was to (1) investigate the prevalence of soft-tissue laxity in male and female patients presenting with symptomatic FAI in a multicenter prospective cohort study, and (2) correlate soft-tissue laxity with patient primary complaints of either mobility, stability, or pain. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or Tonnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis. The Beighton score was assessed by electronic patient self-scoring. Beighton scores &gt;4 were considered a marker of soft-tissue laxity. The MSP index was utilized to have patients rank from most to least the biggest problems with their hip: Mobility (M), Stability (S), or Pain (P). The chi-square or Fisher exact test were utilized to compare groups. Results: The prevalence of Beighton scores &gt;4 was 57.2% in female patients, compared to 29.3% in male patients (p &lt; 0.001). In female patients, 44.4%, 22.6%, and 7.7% had Beighton scores of 5+, 7+, and 9 respectively, compared to 16.7%, 5.8%, and 1.8% in male patients (all p &lt; 0.005). In the overall FAI cohort, pain was the primary complaint in 72.1% of patients, compared to 24.2% complaining primarily of mobility and 3.7% complaining primarily of stability. Among female patients, the presence of soft-tissue laxity (relative to thresholds of Beighton 4, 5, 7, and 9) did not significantly influence the patient primary complaints (with pain being the predominant complaint). Overall, 85 female patients had a Beighton score of 7 or greater and only 2.4% reported stability of the hip as a primary complaint, compared to 2.4% of female patients with a Beighton &lt;7. Stability was more commonly indicated as a second most important factor in the setting of soft-tissue laxity, compared to mobility. Among female patients with a Beighton &gt;7, 29.5% reported stability as a primary or secondary complaint, compared to 15.2% of female patients with a Beighton score &lt;7. Conclusions: Over half of female patients undergoing FAI surgery have underlying soft-tissue laxity as measured by the Beighton score. In the setting of soft-tissue laxity, patient primary symptomatic complaint remains pain, but a secondary complaint is significant more likely to be stability rather than mobility (compared to FAI patients without soft tissue laxity complain of mobility secondarily over stability). Further research is needed to better understand the role of soft-tissue laxity in the pathophysiology of FAI and the outcomes of surgical treatment.

Poster 189: Does Patient Resiliency Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes at Presentation in Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Objectives: The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of treated is increasingly recognized in orthopaedic surgery. Particularly, in prearthritic hip disorders, young adult hip patients often have significant psychological undertones. Patient resiliency, as quantified by the brief resiliency scale (BRS), is a static patient characteristic and has been increasingly recognized for its potential role in pain and symptomatology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the correlation between BRS and traditional hip patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 patients undergoing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or high-grade osteoarthritis. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of pain interference, physical function, mobility, anxiety, and depression, as well as hip disability and osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), and short form-12 (SF-12). Resiliency was divided into low resiliency (score &lt; 3), normal resiliency (score 3 to 4.3), and high resiliency (score &gt; 4.3) as described by Smith et al1 to use as categorical variables to compare to the other patient-reported scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated and the Kruskall Willis test was used to measure association between BRS and the other PROMs for continuous and categorical values, respectively. R values ≥0.7, ≥0.4, and ≥0.1 signify a strong, moderate, and weak correlation, respectively. For categorical analysis, P values &lt; 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The cohort of 696 patients had mean age was 24.9 ± 7.9 years and a female predominance at 56%. Average BRS scores were 3.7 ± 0.7. Overall, 13.7% of patients had low resiliency, while 65.8% had normal resiliency and 20.5% had high resiliency. Linear correlation, using Pearson coefficients, found associations between BRS and all other scores. There were only weak associations between BRS scores and PROs (all r &lt; 0.25) except a moderate correlation with PROMIS depression (r = -0.476, p &lt; 0.001) and PROMIS anxiety (r = -0.481, p &lt; 0.001). Patients in higher resiliency groups reported less severe symptoms in HOOS – quality of life (p &lt; 0.001), HOOS – sports and recreation (p = 0.004), HOOS – activities of daily living (p = 0.004), HOOS – pain (p = 0.026), iHOT-12 (p = 0.01), mHHS (p = 0.004), SF-12 mental (p &lt; 0.001), PROMIS physical function (p = 0.003), PROMIS pain (p &lt; 0.001), PROMIS mobility (p &lt; 0.001), PROMIS depression (p &lt; 0.001), and PROMIS anxiety (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with higher activity levels (UCLA ≥9) demonstrated higher resiliency (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In FAI patients, patient resiliency appears to influence baseline PROs. Overall, 14% of patients had low resiliency while 21% had high resiliency. Further studies are needed to investigate this relationship and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI. [Figure: see text]

Short-term Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients Participating in Formal Physical Therapy Versus a Home Exercise Program: A Prospectively Enrolled Cohort Analysis

Background: Physical therapy is frequently utilized in the postoperative care of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). There has been limited research into the efficacy of a structured home exercise program (HEP) compared with formal physical therapy (FPT) in this patient population. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients utilizing FPT versus an HEP after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS. It was hypothesized that both groups would show similar improvements regarding outcome scores, which would improve significantly compared with their preoperative scores. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at a single center between October 2020 and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were allowed to self-select FPT or an HEP and were administered a survey preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The survey included the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, visual analog scale for pain, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, and patient satisfaction with physical therapy and overall care. Statistical analysis was conducted between the 2 groups and within groups to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. Results: The patients’ mean age was 32.6 ± 10.4 years, with 47.2% being female and 57.4% choosing the HEP. At 12 months postoperatively, no significant differences were reported between the FPT and HEP groups regarding the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (P = .795), visual analog scale for pain score (P > .05), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function T-score (P = .699), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool score (P = .582), and patient satisfaction (P > .05). Outcome scores at 12 months postoperatively were significantly improved from the preoperative scores across all measures in both groups (P < .001). Conclusion: There were no significant differences regarding patient outcomes between FPT and the HEP at 1-year follow-up after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS when patients selected their own treatment, with both groups demonstrating significant improvements in their outcome scores from their preoperative values. These findings suggest that a structured HEP may be a viable alternative to FPT after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients who prefer a self-directed rehabilitation program.

THE MEDIUM-TERM RESULTS OF ARTHROSCOPIC HIP SURGERY COMPARED WITH PHYSIOTHERAPY AND ACTIVITY MODIFICATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME: A MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

The primary treatment goal for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, a common hip condition in athletes, is to improve pain and function. In selected patients, in the short term following intervention, arthroscopic hip surgery is superior to a pragmatic NHS- type physiotherapy programme. Here, we report the three-year follow-up results from the FemoroAcetabular Impingement Trial (FAIT), comparing arthroscopic hip surgery with physiotherapy in the management of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome.Two-group parallel, assessor-blinded, pragmatic randomised controlled study across seven NHS England sites. 222 participants aged 18 to 60 years with FAI syndrome confirmed clinically and radiologically were randomised (1:1) to receive arthroscopic hip surgery (n = 112) or physiotherapy and activity modification (n = 110). We previously reported on the hip outcome score at eight months. The primary outcome measure of this study was minimum Joint Space Width (mJSW) on Anteroposterior Radiograph at 38 months post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures included the Hip Outcome Score and Scoring Hip Osteoarthritis with MRI (SHOMRI) score.Minimum Joint Space Width data were available for 101 participants (45%) at 38 months post randomisation. Hip outcome score and MRI data were available for 77% and 62% of participants respectively. mJSW was higher in the arthroscopy group (mean (SD) 3.34mm (1.01)) compared to the physiotherapy group (2.99mm (1.33)) at 38 months, p=0.017, however this did not exceed the minimally clinically important difference of 0.48mm. SHOMRI score was significantly lower in the arthroscopy group (mean (SD) 9.22 (11.43)) compared to the physiotherapy group (22.76 (15.26)), p-value &lt;0.001. Hip outcome score was higher in the arthroscopy group (mean (SD) 84.2 (17.4)) compared with the physiotherapy group (74.2 (21.9)), p-value &lt; 0.001).Patients with FAI syndrome treated surgically may experience slowing of osteoarthritisprogression and superior pain and function compared with patients treated non- operatively.