Hill-Sachs Research Articles

Blind-Tie Remplissage: Technique and Sequence

Patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and an associated Hill-Sachs lesion are commonly encountered by orthopaedic surgeons. Effective management of the Hill-Sachs lesion can be performed using an arthroscopic remplissage technique to fill the bony defect with the infraspinatus and posterior capsule. Various surgical techniques, anchor configurations, and tying mechanisms can be used to accomplish the remplissage procedure. The goal of this Technical Note is to describe our technique and sequence for accomplishing an arthroscopic “blind-tie” remplissage procedure. In this remplissage technique, the suture anchor sutures placed into the Hill-Sachs defect are tied in a blind fashion over the infraspinatus fascia without direct visualization from within the subacromial space.

Case Report: Photobiomodulation improves shoulder functionality after acute traumatic anterior dislocation associated with Hill-Sachs bone lesion’

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has demonstrated positive effects on bone healing after fracture. This case report describes a skateboard-related shoulder anterior dislocation with Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions. After a non-invasive reduction, the patient received conservative treatment with PBM. PBM was started on the accident day and continued daily for 30 days, followed by bi-weekly irradiation for 33 months. In the initial 30 days, the patient’s pain decreased, and the shoulder function was recovered with no pain, swelling, or bruising. On day 28, there was a reduction in edema compared to the initial injury and a full shoulder recovery for daily and sports activities. Physical examinations confirmed shoulder joint stability and the images at 33 months demonstrated Hill-Sachs lesion healing and significant Bankart lesion repair. In conclusion, PBM can induce recovery, alleviate pain, and facilitate functional rehabilitation. Additional clinical trials are required to validate the efficacy of this complementary therapy.

Similar outcomes in collision athletes with subcritical glenoid bone loss and on-Track Hill Sachs lesion versus off-track Hill Sachs lesion managed with open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift has not yet been tested under the concept of glenoid track as a predictor of failure. The aim of this study was to compare the subjective and objective outcomes in collision athletes with subcritical glenoid bone loss and on-track Hill Sachs lesions versus those with off-track Hill Sachs lesions, all treated with open Bankart repair. Two study groups were created: 50 patients had on-track Hill Sachs lesions, while 38 had off-track lesions. The subcritical glenoid bone loss was ≤ 10%. A minimum follow-up period of 3 years was established. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of each group and between them was performed. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale were used to assess subjective outcomes. Recurrence rate, range of motion and return to sport were evaluated as objective outcomes. Significant differences were reported in the WOSI and ASES scores between preoperative and postoperative values in each group. There were no significant differences between the two groups (p-value = 0.36 and 0.71). Three dislocations (6%) in the on-track group and 3 (7.8%) in the off-track group were recorded, showing no differences between the two groups (p-value = 0.83). There were no differences in ROM between pre- and post-operatively in each group or when comparing the two groups. We found no differences between the outcomes of the two groups. According to the surgeon's preference, we recommend performing open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift as a treatment alternative in collision athletes with SGBL ≤ 10% independently of the type of Hill Sachs lesion.

Chronic anterior shoulder instability with bone loss: a practical approach.

The stability of the glenohumeral joint, known for its remarkable mobility, relies on several factors, including the congruency of the joint's bones and the integrity of capsulolabral structures, encompassing the labrum, the capsule, and the glenohumeral ligaments. In cases of anterior shoulder instability, bone lesions are a common occurrence, most frequently involving glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions. When both glenoid and humeral bone lesions coexist, the isolated Bankart procedure has exhibited a significant rate of failure. In such instances, the Latarjet procedure, especially when bone loss is present, retains its position as the gold standard, thanks to its consistent success in both short- and long-term outcomes. Recent advancements in research have explored alternative strategies to address bone loss, including the Remplissage procedure for humeral bone deficits and the use of bone block grafts to manage glenoid bone lesions, with a focus on achieving more anatomical techniques. However, it's crucial to recognize that, beyond bone loss, a multitude of intrinsic and extrinsic factors come into play when determining the most suitable treatment. The patient's profile, including factors like constitutional laxity and activity level, must be carefully considered in the decision-making process. The Latarjet procedure maintains its esteemed status as a benchmark in the field, thanks to its consistent excellence in both short- and long-term results. This article seeks to provide insights into the roles and placement of various surgical techniques within the context of chronic anterior shoulder instability, taking into account the intricate interplay of factors that influence treatment decisions.

Poster 156: Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability in Glenoid Track Measurement

Objectives: The purpose of our study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of measuring on- and off-track lesions within our institution using the circle line method. Methods: Electronic medical records between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed for active-duty military personnel who underwent a Latarjet or had recurrent dislocations of the shoulder joint. Advanced imaging (CT and/or MRI) was reviewed for glenoid and humeral head bone loss; patients with both glenoid and humeral head bone loss were included in the study. Measurement of the Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) was standardized prior to the start of the study and measured as described by Di Giacomo. Results: All surgeons completed the review of all 38 images for 2 measurements. Intraobserver reliability was shown to have moderate reliability amongst all reviewers (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.459; p < 0.001). The kappa (κ) value for interobserver reliability amongst all reviewers was moderate for glenoid diameter (ICC = 0.567; 95% CI, 0.474-0.663), moderate for glenoid defect (ICC = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.517-0.702), poor for HSL (ICC = 0.328; 95% CI, 0.232-0.441), moderate for glenoid track (ICC = 0.668; 95% CI, 0.584-0.75) and fair for HSL on- and off-track assessment (κ = 0.267, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The intraobserver reliability of measuring advanced imaging for shoulder instability using the circle line method is overall good; however, the interobserver reliability is moderate to poor.

Poster 153: Decreased Coracoid Index in Patients with Recurrent Instability after an Arthroscopic Bankart Procedure: A Retrospective Analysis with a Mean Follow-Up of 12.9 Years

Objectives: Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is a common sports medicine pathology, disproportionally affecting competitive, contact athletic and military populations. Currently, arthroscopic Bankart repair is the gold standard for managing patients with anterior instability and associated labral injury with subcritical bone loss. However, recurrent instability remains common after the index operation, with rates between 5% and 20% reported in the literature. Multiple prognostic calculators and scoring indices have been developed in attempts to proactively determine which cohorts may benefit from a bony (Latarjet or free bone graft) or soft tissue (Remplissage) augmentation procedure to further stabilize the joint and decrease the risk of recurrence. Importantly, there has been a growing appreciation for the effects of coracoid process morphology on shoulder pathology, including subcoracoid impingement and subscapularis tears. However, there is a paucity of literature exploring the effect of coracoid morphology on anterior shoulder instability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare known osseous risk factors for recurrent instability, as well as the coracoid index, between patients with and without recurrent instability after an arthroscopic Bankart repair, and to compare long-term outcomes between the 2 cohorts. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective cohort comparison of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability treated at a single academic military medical facility was performed. After identifying the initial cohort, patients were invited to complete Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) surveys. Inclusion criteria included symptomatic anterior shoulder instability, surgical treatment with arthroscopic Bankart repair, and survey completion. Preoperative MRIs were obtained, and glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs interval, and coracoid index were quantified. Patients with recurrent instability at last follow up were age-matched in a 1:2 ratio for comparison with those without recurrent instability. Subsequently, unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to compare anatomic morphologies and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between the 2 cohorts. Finally, linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between the anatomic measurements and PROMs. Results: At a mean of 12.9 years follow-up, 12 patients were confirmed to have recurrent shoulder instability by survey and chart review and were age-matched to 24 patients without recurrent instability (n = 36; mean age 26.0 ± 5.2 years). Patients with recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair had lower coracoid indices (by 3.28 ± 1.55 mm; p = .0412), greater glenoid bone loss (by 6.67 ± 1.62%; p = .0002), and larger Hill-Sachs Intervals (by 5.88 ± 2.30 mm; p = .0153) on preoperative MRI. The cohort with recurrent instability had lower SANE scores (by 38.0 ± 9.1; p = .0002), and higher WOSI scores (by 692 ± 174; p = .0003) at final follow-up. Coracoid index, glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs interval were not correlated with PROMs at latest follow-up (p > 0.05). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess coracoid morphology in a cohort of patients with symptomatic shoulder instability. The current study findings suggest that a more laterally-projecting coracoid may be protective against recurrent shoulder instability after an arthroscopic Bankart repair. In accordance with recent literature, the recurrent instability cohort had greater glenoid bone loss and larger Hill-Sachs lesions on their index pre-operative MRI and had worse subjective outcomes at latest follow-up. As the shoulder is a complex joint with static and dynamic stabilizers, it is important to understand the effects of anatomic variation on pathoanatomy, as well as patient symptomatology. These preliminary findings highlight the need for further large cohort studies investigating the role of coracoid morphology on shoulder stability. A clearer understanding of the anatomic risk factors for recurrent instability will improve surgical planning and decision making, as well as minimizing time missed from athletic activities or military service.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability in 488 Adolescents Between 2000 and 2020: Risk Factors for Subsequent Recurrent Instability Requiring Revision Stabilization.

After arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for anterior glenohumeral instability (GHI), adolescent athletes have higher rates of subsequent recurrent GHI than any other subpopulation. Elucidating which adolescents are at highest risk of postoperative recurrent GHI may optimize surgical decision-making. To identify prognostic factors associated with subsequent recurrent GHI requiring revision stabilization surgery (RSS) after ABR. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. The study included patients 12 to 21 years old who had undergone ABR for anterior GHI at a pediatric tertiary care hospital by 1 of 5 sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeons between 2000 and 2020. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, with percentage of patients with recurrent GHI undergoing subsequent RSS, was used with a time-to-event outcome analysis. The Cox model effects were expressed as the hazard ratio (HR). All tests were 2-sided, with an alpha of .05. Records of 488 adolescent patients with ABR (78% male; mean age, 16.9 ± 1.98 years) were analyzed. Of these, 86 patients (17.6%) underwent subsequent RSS for recurrent GHI, yielding a cumulative risk of 8.8% at 2 years, 16.5% at 5 years, and 20% at 15 years. RSS occurred at a mean of 2.6 ± 2.1 years after ABR. Risk factors for RSS included >1 preoperative dislocation (2 dislocations: HR = 7.4, P = .0003; ≥3 dislocations: HR = 10.9, P < .0001), presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion (small: HR = 2.5, P = .0114; medium-large: HR = 4.2, P = .0004), younger age (1-year decrease: HR = 1.2, P = .0015), and participation in contact sports (HR = 1.8, P = .01). Adolescents with only 1 preoperative dislocation had a cumulative incidence of RSS (3.2%), which was significantly lower than those with 2 (24.2%) or ≥3 preoperative dislocations (33.5%). The number of dislocations before index ABR was the strongest risk factor for recurrent GHI requiring RSS in adolescents with anterior GHI, with 2 dislocations conferring >7-fold increased risk compared with a single preoperative dislocation. Other significant risk factors included the presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion, younger age, and participation in contact sports.

Paper 41: Does MR Arthrography Improve Evaluation of Patients with Posterior Shoulder Instability? An Analysis from the MOON Shoulder Instability Group

Objectives: Posterior shoulder instability is an uncommon injury, accounting for 2-12% of shoulder instability patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often utilized to non-invasively evaluate the joint for labral, cartilage, and bony injury. MR arthrography (MRA) may improve the evaluation of these intra-articular structures, but requires additional cost, time, and an invasive procedure. Moreover, its benefits for patients with posterior shoulder instability are unclear. Accurate imaging is critical in patients undergoing surgery because certain findings may influence the surgical approach. Thus, the purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of MRA and non-enhanced MRI in detecting labral, chondral, and osseous lesions in patients with posterior shoulder instability. Methods: There were 291 patients with unilateral posterior shoulder instability who had preoperative MRA or MRI between 2006 and 2021 in the MOON database. Images were reviewed by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist with 10+ years of experience and an orthopaedic surgeon. Evaluators were blinded to age, gender, medical history, MR report, and arthroscopic findings, but were aware of the patient's history of posterior shoulder instability. Examinations were evaluated for presence, location, morphology, and length of glenoid labral tears. Tear length and localization were noted using a standard clock face. The presence and size of humeral/glenoid osseous and cartilage lesions was also noted.Intraoperative findings from arthroscopic evaluation were documented by the surgeon using a standard response questionnaire. Diagnostic performance of standard MRA and MRI were evaluated using sensitivity and specificity with arthroscopic evaluation as the gold-standard. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the sensitivities and specificities of MRA and MRI. Significance was defined as P &lt; 0.05. Results: 200 patients (69%) had MRA, while 91 patients had non-contrast MRIs of the shoulder. On imaging evaluation, 273 (94%) patients had labral tears with a mean tear size of 156º. 39 (13%) patients had humeral cartilage lesions, whereas 40 (14%) patients had glenoid cartilage lesions. 34 (12%) patients had glenoid bone loss greater than 5%. The mean glenoid bone loss was 12% (range, 5% - 26%). A reverse Hill-Sachs lesion was present in 35 (12%) patients. 16 (6%) patients had bipolar bone loss. The sensitivity for detection of labral tears was high for both MRA (0.95) and standard MRI (0.98) (Tables 1 and 2), though the specificity was low for both modalities (0.25 and 0.40, respectively). There was no difference in the sensitivities or specificities of the two imaging modalities in the detection of labral tears. MRA had a lower sensitivity than MRI in the detection of glenoid cartilage lesions (0.31 vs 0.88, p &lt; 0.001), but no difference was observed for specificity. There was no difference in the sensitivities and specificities of MRA and MRI for humeral cartilage lesions (p = 0.354).MRA had a higher sensitivity than MRI in assessing glenoid bone loss (0.78 vs 0.50, p &lt; 0.001), though there was no difference in specificity. There was no difference between imaging modalities in the evaluation of humeral bone loss (p = 1.000). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, MRA was the most commonly utilized preoperative advanced imaging study for patients with posterior shoulder instability. MRA had a higher sensitivity in detecting glenoid bone loss but lower sensitivity in detecting glenoid cartilage lesions compared to standard non-contrast MRI. There was no difference in diagnostic performance between MRA and MRI in the diagnosis of labral tears and humeral chondral and osseous lesions. MRA may provide an advantage over standard MRI in the evaluation of glenoid bone loss, which can influence the treatment plan for patients undergoing surgical management of posterior shoulder instability.

Batter's Shoulder: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.

Batter's shoulder is characterized by posterior shoulder instability in the lead (front) shoulder of a batting athlete. This most commonly occurs as a discrete event, particularly a swing and miss at an outside pitch, which leads to an episode of shoulder subluxation. A thorough history and physical examination is key to diagnosis, with patients feeling pain and instability of the lead shoulder when attempting the baseball swing or during pushing-type activities, as well as positive posterior labral signs in tests such as the Kim, jerk, and modified dynamic labral shear tests. Magnetic resonance imaging can confirm the diagnosis of posterior labral tear and may show concomitant pathologies such as a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. Nonsurgical treatment is directed at rotator cuff and scapular strengthening; however, arthroscopic posterior labral repair is often required for definitive stabilization. Overall, this is a relatively rare diagnosis, but outcomes of surgical repair are favorable with high satisfaction and rates of return to competition.

Mid-term effectiveness of modified arthroscopic suture button fixation Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations

To summarize mid-term effectiveness of modified arthroscopic suture button fixation Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations. Between January 2018 and October 2020, 30 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations were treated with modified arthroscopic suture button fixation Latarjet procedure. There were 19 males and 11 females with an average age of 27.3 years (range, 18-41 years). The shoulder dislocation occurred 3-7 times, with an average of 4.9 times. The time from the last dislocation to operation was 3-10 days, with an average of 4.1 days. Glenoid defects exceeded 20% in all cases. There were 27 cases of Hill-Sachs lesions. The joint pain and function were estimated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Rowe score, American Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, Walch-Duplay score, and the range of external rotation at 0° and external rotation at 90° abduction of shoulder before operation and at 1 month, 6 months, and last follow-up. The X-ray film, CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction were reviewed to observe the position, healing, and absorption of the coracoid graft, correction of glenoid defect, and joint degeneration. The operation time ranged from 51 to 79 minutes, with an average of 68.4 minutes. All incisions healed without complications such as nerve or blood vessel injury. All patients were followed up 36-60 months with an average of 44.6 months. The VAS score, UCLA score, Rowe score, ASES score, Walch-Duplay score, and the range of external rotation at 0° and external rotation at 90° abduction after operation significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05). All indicators further improved with time, and the differences between different time points after operation were significant ( P<0.05). Imaging review showed that the coracoid graft was located in the anteroinferior glenoid at 1 day after operation, and no occurrence of shoulder osteoarthritis was found during follow-up. The anatomical structure of the glenoid was normal, and no delayed healing or non-union of the coracoid graft occurred. At 20 months after operation, arthroscopic re-exploration was performed in 1 case due to fracutre caused by falling injury revealed the good shaping of the coracoid graft, smooth glenoid, and no bone resorption or osteoarthritis. For recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations, the modified arthroscopic suture button fixation Latarjet procedure can obtain good recovery of shoulder function and low incidence of complications and has a good mid-term effectiveness.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Fewer Redislocations Than Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored. Purpose: To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability, and reoperation rate. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Recruitment and randomization for the original randomized trial occurred between 2011 and 2017. Patients ≥14 years diagnosed with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with an engaging Hill-Sachs defect of any size were included. Those with a glenoid defect >15% were excluded. In 2020, participants were contacted by telephone and asked standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation, or reoperation on their study shoulder. “Failure” was defined as a redislocation, and “overall recurrent instability” was described as a redislocation or ≥2 subluxations. Descriptive statistics, relative risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed. Results: A total of 108 participants were randomized, of whom 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to the final follow-up was 49.3 and 53.8 months for the NO REMP and REMP groups, respectively. Failure rates were 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP group versus 8% (4/52) in the REMP group. Rates of overall recurrent instability were 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group versus 10% (5/52) in the REMP group. Survival curves were significantly different, favoring REMP in both scenarios. Conclusion: For the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and subcritical glenoid bone loss (<15%), a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative recurrent instability was observed with arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage than with isolated Bankart repair at a medium-term follow-up (mean of 4 years). Patients who did not receive a remplissage experienced a failure (redislocated) earlier and had a higher rate of revision/reoperation than those who received a concomitant remplissage. Registration: NCT01324531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

How to salvage the fractured coracoid during the Latarjet Procedure? An empirical approach

The Latarjet procedure is a frequently used stabilization procedure in case of anterior shoulder instability with critical glenoid bone loss and/or off-track Hill Sachs lesions. Although uncommon, intra-operative graft fractures do occur. When confronted with this potentially challenging intra-operative complication, having a secondary solution is paramount to achieve a successful outcome. This technical note provides a treatment algorithm that may function as a useful guideline to assist surgeons that experience this potentially complex unintended event during a Latarjet procedure. Level of evidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.

Arthroscopic Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Study of Functional Outcome and Analysis.

Background The remarkable range of motion of the shoulder comes at the cost of increased instability, especially anterior instability. Arthroscopic Bankart repairwith or without remplissage, which is a minimally invasive surgery, is the preferred treatment for recurrent anterior instability. This study investigated the effectiveness of Bankart repair, with or without remplissage, in restoring function, preventing redislocation, and improving patient satisfaction. Methods A prospective observational study examined 40 patients (19-50years old) with recurrent anterior instability and MRI-confirmed Bankart or Bankartwith Hill-Sachs lesions. Patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without remplissage based on the inclusioncriteria of this study. Preoperative assessments included demographics, history, physical examination, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, ROWE score,and plain MRIof the shoulder joint. Post-operative radiographs and rehabilitation were advised. Functional recovery was evaluated at three months and six months after surgery. Results All patients underwent Bankart repair. Among them, 22 with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions received an additional remplissage procedure. Both groups showed significant improvements in their functional scores (p<0.05) and returned to their prior activities. However, the additional remplissage group had a slightly reduced meanexternal rotation (86.59°) compared with the Bankart repair-onlygroup (90°). Notably, the recurrence rate was very low, with only one patient (2.5%) experiencing instability. Conclusion Our study emphasizes the importance of propercapsulolabraltissue elevationto achieve a sufficient labral bump during Bankart repair. This technique allowed us to efficiently use only two suture anchors in 35 cases (87.5%). Additionally, remplissage was performed on all identified engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. We found that proper anchor placement and suturing techniques were crucial for successful Bankart repair.The emphasis on the potential cost benefits of a two-anchor approach is a valuable contribution to the field.

Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures

BackgroundGlenoid bone grafting procedures are often utilized to address glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative advanced imaging can accurately predict coracoid graft size and conversion of off-track to on-track Hill-Sachs lesions in patients undergoing Latarjet procedures. MethodsPatients who underwent Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability at a single institution from 2012-2020 with pre- and postoperative advanced shoulder imaging (computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans) were retrospectively reviewed. Glenoid diameter, HS interval (HSI), and measurements of the coracoid length, depth, and height were measured on preoperative imaging. Glenoid track (GT), percent glenoid bone loss, predicted restoration of glenoid track, and the difference between HSI and GT (ΔHSI-GT) were calculated. ResultsSeventeen patients with a mean age of 25± 9 years met inclusion criteria. Average glenoid bone loss preoperatively was 24± 7% and average HSI was 27 ± 5mm. The Latarjet procedure reconstructed 116 ± 8% of the native glenoid, and 104 ± 8% of the predicted diameter. Of the 15 patients that had off-track lesions preoperatively, 11 were successfully converted to on-track lesions (73%). The 4 persistent off-track lesions had a significantly higher HSI (32 ± 2 mm vs. 26 ± 4 mm, p=0.002). Preoperative measurements accurately predicted postoperative glenoid track status in 94% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 2 years, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate or rate of revision stabilization procedures between patients with on-track versus persistent off-track humeral lesions. ConclusionPreoperative advanced imaging measurements can accurately predict whether an off-track Hill-Sachs can be converted to on-track after Latarjet procedure, further enhancing shoulder stability.

Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability following Bankart Repair.

Background/Objectives: Recurrent shoulder instability following Bankart lesion repair often necessitates surgical revision. This systematic review aims to understand the failure rates of arthroscopic revision Bankart repair. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO, this systematic review examined twenty-five articles written between 2000 and 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility across three databases, focusing on recurrent instability as the primary endpoint, while also noting functional measures, adverse events, revision operations, and return-to-sport rates when available. Results: The key surgical techniques for recurrent instability post-Bankart repair were identified, with revision arthroscopic Bankart being the most common (685/1032). A comparative analysis revealed a significantly lower recurrence for open coracoid transfer compared to arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (9.67% vs. 17.14%; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between remplissage plus Bankart repair and Bankart repair alone (23.75% vs. 17.14%; p = 0.24). The majority of studies did not include supracritical glenoid bone loss or engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, and neither subcritical nor non-engaging lesions significantly influenced recurrence rates (p = 0.85 and p = 0.80, respectively). Conclusions: Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair remains a viable option in the absence of bipolar bone loss; however, open coracoid transfer appears to have lower recurrence rates than arthroscopic Bankart repair, consistent with prior evidence. Further studies should define cutoffs and investigate the roles of critical glenoid bone loss and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Preoperative measurements of GBL on three-dimensional computed tomography and characterizing lesions based on glenoid track will help surgeons to choose ideal candidates for arthroscopic revision Bankart repair.

Remplissage May Decrease the Redislocation Rate After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With an Engaging Hill-Sachs Defect: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Minimal 2-Year Follow-up.

The redislocation rate after arthroscopic Bankart repair (BR) among patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) may be reduced with the use of remplissage. To investigate the outcomes of adding remplissage to an arthroscopic BR in patients with concomitant HSL. Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3. PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched between February 2022 and April 2023 with the terms "remplissage" and "shoulder instability" according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were formed using the population, intervention, control, and outcome method; the investigation included studies that compared BR with and without remplissage and had ≥24 months of follow-up. From 802 articles found during the initial search, 7 studies with a total of 837 patients-558 receiving isolated BR (BR group) and 279 receiving BR with remplissage (BR+REMP)-were included. The probability of recurrence of instability among patients with an engaging HSL was significantly diminished in the BR+REMP group compared with the BR group (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.24; P < .001). Regarding shoulder range of motion, the BR+REMP group achieved increased forward flexion (mean difference [MD], 1.97°; 95% CI, 1.49° to 2.46°; P < .001) and decreased external rotation in adduction (MD, -1.43°; 95% CI, -2.40° to -0.46°; P = .004) compared with the BR group. Regarding patient-reported outcome measures, the BR+REMP group had Rowe (MD, 2.53; 95% CI, -1.48 to 6.54; P = .21) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) (MD, -61.60; 95% CI, -148.03 to 24.82; P = .162) scores that were comparable with those of the BR group. Remplissage resulted in a 9-fold decrease in the recurrence of instability after arthroscopic BR in patients with HSL. Remplissage not only led to an increase in forward flexion but also only slightly limited patients' external rotation in adduction. WOSI and Rowe scores after remplissage at the final 24-month follow-up were comparable with those obtained after isolated Bankart repair.

Periostin Is a Biomarker for Anterior Shoulder Instability: Proteomic Analysis of Synovial Fluid

Background: The incremental biological changes in the synovial microenvironment of the shoulder in acute and chronic instability that may contribute to joint degeneration are poorly understood. Proteomic analysis of synovial fluid in patients with shoulder instability may improve our understanding of proteins that are shed into shoulder synovial fluid after an injury. Hypothesis: Injury-specific factors such as the direction of instability and the severity of glenoid and humeral bone loss are associated with the proteome of synovial fluid in patients with shoulder instability. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Synovial fluid lavage samples were compared between patients with anterior (n = 12) and posterior (n = 8) instability and those without instability (n = 5). Synovial proteins were identified with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Orthogonal validation of protein targets found to be significant on tandem mass spectrometry was performed in a separate set of prospective patients with Western blotting. Data were processed and analyzed, and P values were adjusted with the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. Results: A total of 25 patients were included. Tandem mass spectrometry identified 720 protein groups in synovial fluid of patients with shoulder instability. There were 4 synovial proteins that were significantly expressed in patients with anterior instability relative to posterior instability: periostin (POSTN) (adjusted P value = .03; log fold change [logFc] = 4.7), transforming growth factor beta–induced protein ig-h3 (adjusted P value = .05; logFc = 1.7), collagen type VI alpha-3 chain (adjusted P value = .04; logFc = 2.6), and coagulation factor V (adjusted P value = .04; logFc = −3.3). Among these targets, POSTN showed a moderate correlation with the Hill-Sachs lesion size (r = 0.7). Prospective validation with Western blotting confirmed a significantly higher level of POSTN in synovial fluid of patients with anterior instability (P = .00025; logFc = 5.1). Conclusion: Proteomic analysis enriched our understanding of proteins that were secreted into shoulder synovial fluid of patients with shoulder instability. The identification of POSTN, a proinflammatory catabolic protein involved with tissue remodeling and repair, as a significant target in anterior shoulder instability is a novel finding. Therefore, further study is warranted to determine the role that POSTN may play in the progression of bone loss and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Clinical Relevance: Proteomic analysis of synovial fluid in patients with shoulder instability improved our understanding of this abnormality after an injury.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study

BackgroundOpen Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair have never been prospectively compared under the concept of glenoid track in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, range of motion and recurrence rate between these two surgical techniques. We hypothesized that open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift would provide similar functional outcomes to isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair but with a lower recurrence rate. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted with 86 collision athletes divided into two groups of 43 patients each. All patients had a subcritical glenoid bone loss ≤ 13.5% and an on-track Hill Sachs lesion. The average follow-up was 66 (60-93) months for the open group and 68 (60-97) months for the arthroscopic group. The primary functional outcomes of each group were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and for a minimum of 5 years after surgery. The functional outcomes were also compared between the two groups. The assessment tools included the WOSI and ASES scores. In addition, recurrent instability and range of motion were also evaluated. ResultsIn each group, there were significant differences in WOSI and ASES scores between the pre and postoperative periods. There were no differences between the groups at the end of follow-up (P = 0.47 and 0.22). Three dislocations (6.9%) in the open group and 10 dislocations (23.2%) in the arthroscopic group were reported showing significant differences (P = .012). In addition, there were no differences in range of motion between pre and postoperative periods for each group as well as between them. ConclusionWe found no differences in functional outcomes and range of motion between the two groups. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the arthroscopic group. We recommend performing open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift as a treatment alternative in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Determinants of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability more than two years after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability

PurposeIndividuals treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair after anterior shoulder dislocations experience varied discomfort and incapability. The aim of this study was to determine the relative association of mental health and physical health factors with 1) magnitude of capability and 2) pain intensity 2 or more years after surgery. MethodsThis cross-sectional study evaluated 80 military patients that experienced one or more traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic Bankart repair without remplissage. We measured capability (Oxford Shoulder Instability Score), pain intensity using an 11-point ordinal scale, symptoms of anxiety (GAD-2), symptoms of depression (PHQ-2), catastrophic thinking (PCS-4), and kinesiophobia (Tampa scale for kinesiophobia-4). We also identified preoperative presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion on radiographs and postoperative occurrence of subluxation or a dislocation episode. A negative binominal regression analysis sought factors associated with magnitude of incapability and pain intensity. ResultsGreater incapability was strongly associated with both greater kinesiophobia (Regression Coefficient [RC] = -0.50; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = -0.73 to -0.26; P = <0.01) and repeat surgery (RC = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.41 to -0.13; P = <0.01). Greater pain intensity was only strongly associated with greater kinesiophobia (RC = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.039 to 0.46; P = 0.021). ConclusionsThe observation that greater unhelpful thinking is associated with greater pain intensity and greater magnitude of incapability after a Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability, whereas pathophysiological factors such as glenoid bone loss were not, emphasizes the degree to which mindset is associated with musculoskeletal health.

Management of the failed Latarjet procedure

AimTo analyze the causes of failure after a Latarjet procedure and to evaluate the results of revision surgery. MethodsSingle-cohort, retrospective, observational study. Fifteen patients, 13 males, mean age at revision failed Latarjet 38.9 years (range, 20-57), with anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent a revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure were reviewed. Failure was defined as subluxation or dislocation. Demographic features, the reason for failure, type of lesions observed, and postoperative clinical and functional status were recorded. Functional status was assessed with the Rowe score. Subjective clinical evaluation was performed using the WOSI Index and subjective shoulder value (SSV). ResultsRecurrence occurred in the first year following the Latarjet procedure in 11 (73.3%) patients. The causes of failure were graft avulsion in 3 cases, fracture in 1, coracoid misposition in 2 cases, graft non-union in 1, advanced osteolysis in 4 cases and persistence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion in one. In 3 cases no identifiable cause of failure, but patients generalized severe hyperlaxity was found. Regarding revision surgery after the Latarjet procedure, 8 patients underwent an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure and in 3 patients the graft was repositioned. In the remaining 4 patients an extraarticular capsular reinforcement was performed. Regarding the latter, one patient suffered new dislocations and required an additional revision surgery consisting of an Eden-Hybinette procedure. All patients remained stable after the revision surgery at the latest follow-up, except two who reported subluxations after an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette and an extraarticular capsular reinforcement, but no additional surgical procedure was required. Functional status after revision surgery was satisfactory, with a Rowe mean score noted at 78 (10-100), WOSI score at 829 (225-1425) and a subjective shoulder value scale at 67 points (40-90). ConclusionThe causes of failure after a Latarjet procedure were poor bone graft due to mispositioning, avulsion, fracture or resorption, generalized hyperlaxity, and incomplete restoration of the glenoid track. Our study demonstrates that when the cause of failure is identified and addressed, stability is restored, and clinical and functional scores improved.