Highly Resistant Microorganisms Research Articles

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prevalence of highly resistant microorganisms in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands, March 2020 to August 2022.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in adaptation in infection control measures, increased patient transfer, high occupancy of intensive cares, downscaling of non-urgent medical procedures and decreased travelling.AimTo gain insight in the influence of these changes on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevalence in the Netherlands, a country with a low AMR prevalence, we estimated changes in demographics and prevalence of six highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands during COVID-19 waves (March-June 2020, October 2020-June 2021, October 2021-May 2022 and June-August 2022) and interwaves (July-September 2020 and July-September 2021) compared with pre-COVID-19 (March 2019-February 2020).MethodsWe investigated data on routine bacteriology cultures of hospitalised patients, obtained from 37 clinical microbiological laboratories participating in the national AMR surveillance. Demographic characteristics and HRMO prevalence were calculated as proportions and rates per 10,000 hospital admissions.ResultsAlthough no significant persistent changes in HRMO prevalence were detected, some relevant non-significant patterns were recognised in intensive care units. Compared with pre-COVID-19 we found a tendency towards higher prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during waves and lower prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa during interwaves. Additionally, during the first three waves, we observed significantly higher proportions and rates of cultures with Enterococcus faecium (pooled 10% vs 6% and 240 vs 120 per 10,000 admissions) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (pooled 21% vs 14% and 500 vs 252 per 10,000 admissions) compared with pre-COVID-19.ConclusionWe observed no substantial changes in HRMO prevalence in hospitalised patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Description of a nationwide structure for monitoring nosocomial outbreaks of (highly resistant) microorganisms in the Netherlands: characteristics of outbreaks in 2012–2021

BackgroundBefore 2012, established national surveillance systems in the Netherlands were not able to provide a timely, comprehensive epidemiological view on nosocomial outbreaks. The Healthcare-associated Infections and AntiMicrobial Resistance Monitoring Group (SO-ZI/AMR) was initiated in 2012 for timely national nosocomial outbreak monitoring and risk assessment. This paper aims to describe the achievements of the SO-ZI/AMR by presenting characteristics of outbreaks reported in 2012–2021.MethodsHospitals and, since 2015, long-term care facilities (LTCF) were requested to report outbreaks when (1) continuity of care was threatened, or (2) transmission continued despite control measures. A multi-disciplinary expert panel (re-)assessed the public health risk of outbreaks during monthly meetings, using 5 severity phases and based on data collected via standardised questionnaires. We descriptively studied the panel’s consensus-based severity classification, distribution of (highly resistant) microorganisms, and duration and size of outbreaks between April 2012 and December 2021.ResultsIn total, 353 hospital outbreaks and 110 LTCF outbreaks were reported. Most outbreaks (hospitals: n = 309 (88%), LTCF: n = 103 (94%)) did not progress beyond phase 1 (no public health implications, outbreak expected to be controlled within two months), one hospital outbreak reached phase 4 (insufficient/ineffective response: possible public health threat, support offered). Highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) were involved in 269 (76%) hospital and 103 (94%) LTCF outbreaks. Most outbreaks were caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; n = 93 (26%) in hospitals, n = 80 (72%) in LTCF), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE; n = 116 (33%) in hospitals, n = 2 (2%) in LTCF) and highly resistant Enterobacterales (n = 41 (12%) in hospitals, n = 20 (18%) in LTCF). Carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria were involved in 32 (9.1%) hospital and five (4.5%) LTCF outbreaks. In hospitals, VRE outbreaks had the longest duration (median 2.3; range 0.0-22.8 months) and widest range of affected patients (median 9; range 2-483).ConclusionsThe SO-ZI/AMR provided national insight into the characteristics of nosocomial outbreaks over the past decade. HRMO outbreaks – mostly caused by MRSA, VRE (in hospitals) and highly resistant Enterobacterales – occurred regularly, but most of them were controlled quickly and did not develop into a public health threat. The SO-ZI/AMR has become a solid monitoring body, essential to assess risks and raise awareness of potential HRMO threats.

Swimming pool policies for carriers of highly-resistant micro-organisms receiving rehabilitation care in the Netherlands

Swimming pool policies for carriers of highly-resistant micro-organisms receiving rehabilitation care in the Netherlands

Environmental contamination with highly resistant microorganisms after relocating to a new hospital building with 100% single-occupancy rooms: A prospective observational before-and-after study with a three-year follow-up.

Inanimate surfaces within hospitals can be a source of transmission for highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO). While many hospitals are transitioning to single-occupancy rooms, the effect of single-occupancy rooms on environmental contamination is still unknown. We aimed to determine differences in environmental contamination with HRMO between an old hospital building with mainly multiple-occupancy rooms and a new hospital building with 100% single-occupancy rooms, and the environmental contamination in the new hospital building during three years after relocating. Environmental samples were taken twice in the old hospital, and fifteen times over a three-year period in the new hospital. Replicate Organism Direct Agar Contact-plates (RODACs) were used to determine colony forming units (CFU). Cotton swabs premoistened with PBS were used to determine presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa, highly resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. All identified isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS) using Illumina technology. In total, 4993 hospital sites were sampled, 724 in the old and 4269 in the new hospital. CFU counts fluctuated during the follow-up period in the new hospital building, with lower CFU counts observed two- and three years after relocating, which was during the COVID-19 pandemic. The CFU counts in the new building were equal to or surpassed the CFU counts in the old hospital building. In the old hospital building, 24 (3.3%) sample sites were positive for 49 HRMO isolates, compared to five (0.1%) sample sites for seven HRMO isolates in the new building (P<0.001). In the old hospital, 89.8% of HRMO were identified from the sink plug. In the new hospital, 71.4% of HRMO were identified from the shower drain, and no HRMO were found in sinks. Our results indicate that relocating to a new hospital building with 100% single-occupancy rooms significantly decreases HRMO in the environment. Given that environmental contamination is an important source for healthcare associated infections, this finding should be taken into account when considering hospital designs for renovations or the construction of hospitals.

Infection prevention and control policies in hospitals and prevalence of highly resistant microorganisms: an international comparative study

BackgroundThere are differences in infection prevention and control (IPC) policies to prevent transmission of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO). The aim of this study is to give an overview of the IPC policy of six European hospitals and their HRMO prevalence, to compare the IPC policies of these hospitals with international guidelines, and to investigate the hospitals’ adherence to their own IPC policy.MethodsThe participating hospitals were located in Salzburg (Austria), Vienna (Austria), Kayseri (Turkey), Piraeus (Greece), Rome (Italy) and Rotterdam (The Netherlands). Data were collected via an online survey. Questions were aimed at prevalence rates in the years 2014, 2015, 2016 of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPK), carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CPPA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) and hospitals’ IPC policies of 2017. Implemented IPC measures (i.e. with a self-reported adherence of > 90%) were counted (26 points maximal).ResultsThe self-reported prevalence of CPK per year was low in the Austrian and Dutch hospitals and high in the Turkish and Greek hospitals. CPPA was highly prevalent in the Turkish hospital only, while the prevalence of VRE in four hospitals, except the Austrian hospitals which reported lower prevalence numbers, was more evenly distributed. The Dutch hospital had implemented the most IPC measures (n = 21), the Turkish and Greek hospitals the least (n = 14 and 7, respectively).ConclusionHospitals with the highest self-reported prevalence of CPK and CPPA reported the least implemented IPC measures. Also, hospitals with a higher prevalence often reported a lower adherence to own IPC policy.

Pre-COVID-19 international travel and admission to hospital when back home: travel behavior, carriage of highly resistant microorganisms, and risk perception of patients admitted to a large tertiary care hospital

BackgroundWhen people who recently travelled abroad are admitted to a hospital back home, there is a risk of introducing highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) into the hospital. To minimize this risk, a feasible infection prevention strategy should be developed. In this study, we investigated patients’ travel history and behavior during travel and analyzed whether this was correlated to HRMO carriage at admission.MethodsFrom May 2018 until August 2019, adult patients admitted to a large tertiary care center in the Netherlands were asked upon hospital admission to participate in the study. Included patients received a questionnaire about risk perception, travel history in the last year, and behavior during travel, and were screened for HRMO carriage at admission using a perianal swab.ResultsSix hundred and eight questionnaires were handed out, of which 247 were returned (40.6%). One hundred and thirty (52.6%) patients did not travel abroad in the last year, of whom eight (6.2%) were HRMO carrier at admission. One hundred seventeen (47.4%) patients travelled in the preceding year, of whom seven patients (6.0%) were HRMO carrier at admission. Thirty patients (12%) travelled outside of Europe; in this group HRMO prevalence was 13.3% (4 out of 30). The majority of patients (71.3%) were aware that international travel could lead to carriage of HRMO, and an even larger majority (89.5%) would support a screening strategy upon hospital admission in case of a travel history, to minimize the risk of introducing HRMO.ConclusionsWe identified that half of admitted patients to a large tertiary care hospital travelled abroad in the last year, with only a small percentage outside Europe. We discuss several screening strategies and propose a strategy of screening and preemptive isolation of patients who travelled to Asia or Africa in the 2 months before their hospital admission; a strategy that patients would support.

The daily direct costs of isolating patients identified with highly resistant micro-organisms in a non-outbreak setting

Isolation precautions are recommended when caring for patients identified with highly resistant micro-organisms (HRMOs). However, the direct costs of patients in isolation are largely unknown. To obtain detailed information on the daily direct costs associated with isolating patients identified with HRMOs. This study was performed from November until December 2017 on a 12-bed surgical ward. This ward contained solely isolation rooms with anterooms. The daily direct costs of isolation were based on three cost items: (1) additional personal protective equipment (PPE), measured by counting the consumption of empty packaging materials; (2) cleaning and disinfection of the isolation room, based on the costs of an outsourced cleaning company; and (3) additional workload for healthcare workers, based on literature and multiplied by the average gross hourly salary of nurses. A distinction was made between the costs for strict isolation, contact-plus isolation, and contact isolation. During the study period, 26 patients were nursed in isolation because of HRMO carriage. Time for donning and doffing of PPE was 31 min per day. The average daily direct costs of isolation were the least expensive for contact isolation (gown, gloves), €28/$31, and the most expensive for strict isolation (surgical mask, gloves, gown, cap), €41/$47. Using a novel, easy method to estimate consumption of PPE, we conclude that the daily direct costs of isolating a patient differ per type of isolation. Insight into the direct costs of isolation is of utmost importance when developing or updating infection prevention policies.

Obtaining nasal and rectal swabs from general practice patients to assess carriage of antibiotic resistant microorganisms: a feasibility study.

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of obtaining nasal and rectal swabs from general practice patients for measuring carriage of antibiotic resistant microorganisms in an area in Rotterdam (the Netherlands) with low socioeconomic status and a large immigrant population. Data collection was from May to December 2017, in one general practice in Rotterdam. We asked adults (≥18 years) visiting the general practitioner (GP) with complaints not related to infections for one nasal and two rectal swabs and tested these for highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs). Indicators for feasibility were recruitment rate, implementation and acceptation of data collection procedures by the participants. We obtained a nasal swab from all included 234 patients and 164 (70%) also gave rectal swabs. On average, 3 out of 30 invited patients (10%) were recruited per day. The GPs considered the workload high to inform and refer to eligible patients for the study and did this inconsistently. Most participants experienced the rectal swab procedure as burdensome and preferred assistance of a medical assistant above self-swabbing. A monetary incentive increased the willingness to provide rectal swabs. Obtaining (nasal and) rectal swabs from general practice patients for study purposes proved difficult. Lessons learnt from this feasibility study will help increase participation in HRMO prevalence studies among asymptomatic general practice patients.

Value of Nontargeted Screening for Highly Resistant Microorganisms: The MOVE Study

Background: In the Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, patients considered at risk for carrying highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) are placed in isolation on admission, until tested negative for HRMO (ie, targeted screening). Patients without risk factors are not routinely screened (ie, nontargeted screening). However, nontargeted screening could identify patients colonized with HRMO missed by targeted screening. To determine the additional value of nontargeted screening, we compared the outcomes of the nontargeted screening approach with all available clinical cultures. Objective: We aim to identify patients colonized with HRMO, but missed by targeted screening, and to determine whether non-targeted screening has additional value. Methods: For the MOVE study, nontargeted admission and discharge cultures (nose and perianal) were obtained from randomly selected patients admitted to specific wards, regardless of HRMO risk factors. This study was part of a research initiative to identify the relation of a contaminated environment with the risk of becoming infected or colonized on a patient level. All bacteriological clinical samples positive for at least 1 HRMO from January 1, 2018, until August 31, 2019, were compared with the nontargeted screening samples. Samples were screened for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as well as highly resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterobacteriales. Broth enrichment was used for all cultures. Results: During the study period, 50,653 patients were admitted. 706 patients (1%) had a clinical sample positive for at least 1 HRMO during their hospital stay. 936 (1.8%) patients were included in the nontargeted screening for the MOVE study, and 40 patients were found to have at least 1 culture positive for HRMO (4.3%). Among these 40 patients, 28 were positive at admission and 12 were positive at discharge. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacteriales were most prevalent (n = 36, 90.0%) both at admission and discharge (n = 26 and n = 10, respectively). At admission, 1 patient was identified with MRSA and 1 patient was positive for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE). At discharge, 1 patient was identified with VRE and 1 had Verona Integron-encoded Metallo-β-lactamase (VIM)–positive P. aeruginosa. Conclusions: Our results show that the current targeted screening does not identify all HRMO carriers. Furthermore, patients who acquire an HRMO during admission are missed. The nontargeted screening identified 40 unknown carriers (4.3%). The limitations of the study are the restricted number of sample sites and the fact that we were unable to culture all patients. Therefore, it is likely that our study shows an underestimation of the true number of patients with HRMO.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

100% Single-Patient Rooms and Environmental Contamination With Highly Resistant Microorganisms: The MOVE Study

Background: Studies have shown that patients colonized with highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) contaminate the hospital environment, and that transmission from contaminated environments to patients occurs. In May 2018, the Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, moved from a hospital with mostly multiple-occupancy rooms to a new hospital with 100% single-patient rooms with private bathrooms. This move provided the unique opportunity to determine environmental contamination before the new hospital was open for admissions and thereafter and to compare the environmental contamination to the number of patients colonized with HRMO. Method: Environmental sampling took place twice in the old building and 12 times in the new building, from 2 weeks before to 15 months after relocating patients. At each moment, ~306 samples were taken from 13 locations (eg, nightstands, sinks) in 40 patient rooms. Samples were screened for Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible [MSSA] and methicillin resistant [MRSA]) and highly resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterobacteriales. During the study period, January 1, 2018, until August 31, 2019, all clinical samples positive for HRMO were included. Results: Environmental sampling revealed that 29 of 724 (4.0%) locations were positive for HRMO in the old building, whereas 4 of 3,358 (0.1%) samples in the new building were positive for HRMO (P &lt; .001). In the old building, 14 of 29 locations were positive for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing bacteria and 15 were positive for carbapenemase-producing bacteria. In the new building, 3 of 4 positive samples were positive for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE), 1 was positive for ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. For both HRMO, no carriers were detected. In the old building, 145 of 12,256 adult patients (1.2%) had clinical samples positive for HRMO, compared to 561 of 38,397 (1.5%) in the new building, a small but significant increase (P = .02). Conclusions: The transition from mainly 2- and 4-person rooms to 100% single-patient rooms resulted in a significant decrease in environmental contamination, even though the number of patients colonized with HRMO slightly increased. No molecular typing to determine transfer from environment to patients and vice versa has yet been performed. Future sampling is needed to determine whether the low environmental contamination is a long-term effect of the transition to single rooms.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

The Daily Direct Costs of Isolating Patients Identified With Highly Resistant Microorganisms

Background: Isolation precautions are recommended when caring for patients identified with highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs). However, the direct costs of isolating patients are largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to obtain detailed information on the daily direct costs associated with isolating patients identified with HRMO. Methods: This study was performed from November until December 2017 on a 12-bed surgical ward. This ward contained solely isolation rooms with an anteroom. The daily direct costs of isolation were based on three cost items: (1) additional personal protective equipment (PPE); measured by counting the consumption of empty packaging materials, (2) cleaning and disinfection of the isolation room; based on the costs of an outsourced cleaning company, and (3) additional workload for healthcare workers; based on literature and multiplied by the average gross hourly salary of nurses. A distinction was made between the costs for strict isolation, contact-plus isolation, and contact isolation. Results: During the study period, 26 patients were nursed in isolation because of HRMO carriage, resulting in a total of 304 isolation days (median 7 isolation days; range 1-44). Gloves were consumed the most and hair caps the least. The average daily direct costs of isolation were the least expensive for contact isolation, €28/$31, and the most expensive for strict isolation, €41/$47. Conclusions: By using a novel, easy method to estimate consumption of PPE, we conclude that the daily direct costs of isolating a patient, differs per type of isolation. Insight into the direct costs of isolation is of utmost importance when developing or revising policies.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Regional Supervision of Healthcare Institutions With a Focus on Antimicrobial Resistance

Background: Resistance to antibiotic drugs, also called antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious threat to (public) health. Surveillance reports throughout the world show that formation and spread of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs) continues to be substantial. In The Netherlands, 10 regional collaborative networks on AMR have been established among healthcare institutions to mitigate the existing risks concerning HRMO by collaborative actions in antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention. Objective: We sought to determine whether the healthcare institutions in one of the regional collaborative networks in The Netherlands contribute adequately to reducing the risks of formation and/or spread of HRMO. Methods: The Health and Youth Care Inspectorate in The Netherlands visited 37 institutions in the region of Limburg (the southern province). The following healthcare sectors were included: hospitals (n = 5), rehabilitation clinics (n = 2), long-term care facilities (n = 5), homecare institutions (n = 4), mental healthcare institutions (n = 2), dental care clinics (n = 4), general practitioners (GPs; n = 10), municipal health services (n = 2) and healthcare facilities for mentally disabled people (n = 3). In each visit, 5 topics were addressed: antibiotic policy, infection prevention, information transfer, governance and collaboration in the region. Results and Conclusions: In general, the healthcare institutions had an adequate to good score. Good results were seen in antibiotic policy (ie, the use of diagnostic tools to avoid the use of antibiotics); information transfer among GPs and in homecare institutions; and infection prevention in homecare institutions and dental care clinics. Exceptions with inadequate scores were observed in several areas: absence of prescription guidance specifically for antibiotics in various sectors; infection prevention among GPs, and dental care clinics. In 4 cases (ie, 3 GPs and 1 dental care clinic), we stopped using the autoclave because of lack of proof of proper maintenance.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Dutch guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of highly-resistant micro-organisms (HRMO) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs)

In 2012, the Dutch Working Party for Infection Control (WIP) issued the first Guideline for prevention of transmission of highly-resistant micro-organisms (HRMO) in Hospitals. The next step was to focus on long-term care facilities (LTCFs) both for nursing homes as for small-scale living facilities with nursing home care. These facilities providing care for residents with functional disabilities, chronical illnesses and cognitive disorders, such as dementia. The objective was to adapt the Guideline for prevention of transmission of HRMO in hospitals to LTCFs with a strong accent on living conditions and social interactions.Residents of LTCFs may be carriers of HRMO over a long period of time and most of the residents of the LTCF stay for extended periods of time. To respect individual living circumstances and to prevent unnecessary limitations in the social life of the residents due to the use of isolation measures, the WIP has chosen to describe infection control precautions per individual micro-organism instead of a ‘one size fits all’ method. The term “isolation” was therefore replaced by the term “additional” precautions. This guideline describes the screening policies for residents in LTCFs, definition and detection of HRMO carriage, standard and additional infection control precautions for HRMO positive residents, documentation and communication of HRMO carriage and discontinuation of additional infection control precautions. It also describes contact tracing of HRMO, environmental control/investigation, surveillance of HRMO and what is important when there is an outbreak.

Cost analysis of outbreaks with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Dutch long-term care facilities (LTCF).

ObjectivesHighly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs) are of high concern worldwide and are becoming increasingly less susceptible for antibiotics. To study the cost effectiveness of infection prevention measures in long-term care, it is essential to first fully understand the impact of HRMOs. The objective of this study is to identify the costs associated with outbreaks caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Dutch long-term care facilities (LTCF).MethodsAfter an outbreak of MRSA, Dutch LTCF can submit a reimbursement form to the Dutch Healthcare Authority (“Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit”; NZa) to get a part of the total costs reimbursed. In this study, we requested NZa forms for financial impact analysis. Details regarding the costs of the outbreak have been extracted from these forms and additionally specific LTCF have been visited in person to validate the data.Results34 complete reimbursement forms from the period between 2011 and 2016 were received from the NZa and have been included. The median cost per patient per day was estimated at €83.80, varying between €16.89 and €1,820.09. We validated five reimbursement forms by visiting the facility and recalculating the costs. We found a non-significant positive difference of €26.07 compared with the original data (p = 0.068).ConclusionsThis study is to our knowledge the first to give a national overview of total costs associated with an MRSA outbreak in LTCF in the Netherlands. Overall, costs per patient per day seem lower than in a hospital setting, although total costs are much higher due to the long term of care.

Diagnostic Evasion of Highly-Resistant Microorganisms: A Critical Factor in Nosocomial Outbreaks.

Highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs) may evade screening strategies used in routine diagnostics. Bacteria that have evolved to evade diagnostic tests may have a selective advantage in the nosocomial environment. Evasion of resistance detection can result from the following mechanisms: low-level expression of resistance genes not resulting in detectable resistance, slow growing variants, mimicry of wild-type-resistance, and resistance mechanisms that are only detected if induced by antibiotic pressure. We reviewed reports on hospital outbreaks in the Netherlands over the past 5 years. Remarkably, many outbreaks including major nation-wide outbreaks were caused by microorganisms able to evade resistance detection by diagnostic screening tests. We describe various examples of diagnostic evasion by several HRMOs and discuss this in a broad and international perspective. The epidemiology of hospital-associated bacteria may strongly be affected by diagnostic screening strategies. This may result in an increasing reservoir of resistance genes in hospital populations that is unnoticed. The resistance elements may horizontally transfer to hosts with systems for high-level expression, resulting in a clinically significant resistance problem. We advise to communicate the identification of HRMOs that evade diagnostics within national and regional networks. Such signaling networks may prevent inter-hospital outbreaks, and allow collaborative development of adapted diagnostic tests.

Extensive colonization with carbapenemase-producing microorganisms in Romanian burn patients: infectious consequences from the Colectiv fire disaster

Health care of severe burn patients is highly specialized and may require international patient transfer. Burn patients have an increased risk of developing infections. Patients that have been hospitalized in countries where carbapenemase-producing microorganisms (CPMO) are endemic may develop infections that are difficult to treat. In addition, there is a risk on outbreaks with CPMOs in burn centers. This study underlines that burn patients may extensively be colonized with CPMOs, and it provides best practice recommendations regarding clinical microbiology and infection control. We evaluated CPMO-carriage and wound colonization in a burn patient initially treated in Romania, and transported to the Netherlands. The sequence types and acquired beta-lactamase genes of highly-resistant microorganisms were derived from next generation sequencing data. Next, we searched literature for reports on CPMOs in burn patients. Five different carbapenemase-producing isolates were cultured: two unrelated OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumanii, OXA-48-producing Enterobacter cloacae, and NDM-1-producing Providencia stuartii. Also, multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were detected. Among the sampling sites, there was high variety in CPMOs. We found 46 reports on CPMOs in burn patients. We listed the epidemiology of CPMOs by country of initial treatment, and summarized recommendations for care of these patients based on these reports and our study.

What is new in selective decontamination of the digestive tract?

What is new in selective decontamination of the digestive tract?

Epidemiology of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens in a burn center in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2011.

The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiology in the bacteriological profile and susceptibility of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens in a burn center in the Netherlands over a 7-year period. The swab results of 693 patients of the period 2005 to 2008 and 539 patients of the period 2009 to 2011 were studied for change of microorganisms and antibiotic resistance. Definitions according to the Working Party on Infection Prevention were used as a tool for assessing the scale of the resistance problem at a local level. Between the studied periods only small changes were found in the bacteriological profile. Staphylococcus aureus showed a slight increase of prevalence in inventory swabs during the second period. In both inventory and wound swabs, S. aureus is the most frequently isolated clinically relevant bacterial pathogen. Resistance for ciprofloxacin in Escherichia coli increased from 3% in 2005 to 2008 to 7% in 2009 to 2011 (P = .028). Resistance for cefotaxim in E. coli increased from 4% in 2005 to 2008 to 14% in 2009 to 2011, although this decrease was not statistically significant (P = .24). The prevalence of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs) remained low in both time periods, 4.9% in 2005 to 2008 and 7.4% in 2009 to 2011 (P = .063). The Netherlands is considered a low-prevalence country for antimicrobial resistance, and the occurrence of HRMOs in our center is relatively rare. A large percentage of HRMO isolates were extended spectrum β-lactamase producers, indicating the rapid increase in the production of this resistance mechanism in recent years. The transmission of HRMOs in our center is controlled effectively, using well-established transmission-based precautions.

Patient safety -- mission for the future: Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are considered as one of the major challenges for modern health care. In the context of demographic change and the expected increase of invasive and complex patient treatment and concommittantrise in numbers of patients with underlying diseases with susceptibility to infections, quality of care and patient safety will in the near future depend strongly on the prevention of HAI. To avoid preventable HAI in terms of improved quality of care is beyond question, therefore mainly the prevalence of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) will becrucial for the success of treatment of unpreventable HAI. In addition to MRSA, the greatest danger in relation to antibiotic resistance worldwide are now considered tob e carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or multidrug-resistant Gram-negative (4MRGN) bacteria. In case oft he uncontrolled spread of HRMO unpreventable infections become also untreatable. The prevalence of HRMO varies between different countries. Especially in the Netherlands and Denmark HRMO such as MRSA, VRE and CRE/4MRGN are still significantly less common than in Germany or France. The reason lies in the fact that in nearly all Dutch hospitals anintegrative infectious disease service (clinical microbiology and/or infectious diseaseas wellinfection prevention) was established already years ago, while in Germany - with few exceptions - in most hospitals only a basic infectious disease services (consulting hygienist, microbiological diagnosis is held by laboratories often far away from the patient). As hospitals are connected with each other with respect to theircommon care of patients, one of the most important challenges in future infection prevention will be the implementation of regional and intersectoral infection prevention and control.

Prevalence and risk factors for highly resistant microorganisms in urinary isolates from newly admitted patients in the National Rehabilitation Center, Korea.

To determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) in urinary isolates from newly admitted patients in a rehabilitation hospital. A total of 906 patients transferred to a rehabilitation hospital from other hospitals. A screening study was performed from June 2012 through May 2013. Urine samples were collected from transferred patients on admission day. Of the total of 916 patients, 148 (16.2%) displayed growth of HRMO in urine cultures. Gram-negative species had a higher number and ratio of HRMO compared with Gram-positive species (141/325 (43.4%) vs 9/97 (9.3%)). Multivariate analysis revealed that age over 60 years, female sex, recent surgery, and use of urinary catheters were risk factors for HRMO among all admitted patients. Even among patients with bacteriuria, recent surgery and an indwelling urinary catheter were significant risk factors for HRMO colonization. The odds ratio for prevalence of HRMO in patients with 2 or more risk factors was 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.7-6.1), compared with those with single or no risk factors. The prevalence of HRMO in rehabilitation patients was higher than expected. Routine screening of urine culture for HRMO is therefore recommended in rehabilitation patients with multiple risk factors.