You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Epidemiology & Natural History (I)1 Apr 2013236 RISK STRATIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION (PT3AN0) AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: IDENTIFYING OPTIMAL CANDIDATES FOR ADJUVANT THERAPY Manuel S. Eisenberg, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Dharam Kaushik, Laureano Rangel, Eric Bergstralh, and Stephen A. Boorjian Manuel S. EisenbergManuel S. Eisenberg Rochester, MN More articles by this author , R. Jeffrey KarnesR. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Dharam KaushikDharam Kaushik Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Laureano RangelLaureano Rangel Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Eric BergstralhEric Bergstralh Rochester, MN More articles by this author , and Stephen A. BoorjianStephen A. Boorjian Rochester, MN More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1616AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit to adjuvant radiation (ART) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients found to have pathologically locally-advanced tumors. However, these studies have included heterogeneous cohorts of men, and thus ART in all such cases may represent overtreatment in a significant subset. Herein, we evaluated the long-term survival of patients with pT3aN0 disease at RP without adjuvant therapy, and determined predictors of disease recurrence in these men. METHODS We evaluated 17,862 patients who underwent RP at Mayo Clinic between 1987−2011. Of these, 1548 with pT3aN0 disease who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were identified. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the association of clinicopathologic features with BCR. Variables which were significantly associated with BCR in the Cox model (Table) went through a stepwise selection process. A weighted score was generated for each parameter, and cumulative weighted scores were used to stratify patients according to BCR risk. RESULTS Median follow−up after RP was 11.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 5.9,16.6), during which time 449 patients experienced BCR and 553 died, including 76 who died of prostate cancer. On multivariate analysis, preoperative PSA (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1,1.5; p=0.0003), clinical tumor stage (HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1,1.3; p=0.001), pathologic Gleason score (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.6,2.1; p<0.0001), surgical margin status (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3,1.9; p<0.0001), and a detectable first postoperative PSA (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.7,2.8; p<0.0001) were significantly associated with BCR. Cumulative weighted scores from these variables were used to stratify patients into quintiles according to BCR risk. 15-year BCR-free survival from lowest to highest risk quintile was 69%, 58%, 45%, 32%, and 24%, respectively (p<0.0001). C-index for this model was 0.69. CONCLUSIONS We present a model for individualizing estimation of BCR in men with pT3aN0 disease at RP. These data may be used for patient counseling, specifically with regard to risk stratification when discussing utilization of secondary therapies. Parameter Hazard Ratio p value Relative Weight Value Natural log preoperative PSA 1.3 0.0003 0.26 Per lab value Clinical Stage 1.2 0.0010 0.18 T1a/b = 0, T1c=1, T2a = 2, T2b = 3, T3/4 = 4 Pathologic Gleason sum 1.8 < 0.0001 0.61 2-6=6, 7=7, 8-10=8 Surgical Margins Status 1.6 < 0.0001 0.46 negative = 0, positive = 1 First Postoperative PSA 2.2 < 0.0001 0.77 < 0.15=0, ≥0.15=1 Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Quintile (Total Score)⁎ No. pts 5 year BCR free 10 year BCR free 15 year BCR free I (< 4.75) 215 90% (167) 79% (119) 69% (61) II (4.75 - 5.03) 215 85% (132) 66% (73) 58% (36) III (5.04 - 5.30) 213 75% (112) 53% (53) 45% (22) IV (5.31 - 5.75) 215 64% (105) 43% (49) 32% (21) V (≥5.76) 214 49% (82) 30% (38) 24% (15) Numbers in parentheses are number at risk unless otherwise indicated. ⁎ Group score calculated by the following equation: 0.26454*ln(preoperative PSA) + 0.18183*Clinical stage + 0.61439* Pathological Gleason + 0.46328* Positive surgical margin + 0.77047*Detectable PSA. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e97 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Manuel S. Eisenberg Rochester, MN More articles by this author R. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author Dharam Kaushik Rochester, MN More articles by this author Laureano Rangel Rochester, MN More articles by this author Eric Bergstralh Rochester, MN More articles by this author Stephen A. Boorjian Rochester, MN More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract