Commonly proposed risk factors for lower-extremity injury include high vertical peak ground reaction force (vGRF) and rate of force development (vRFD) during a backward single-legged jump-landing (SLJL), deficient hip external rotation (ER) and abduction (ABD) strength, and fatigue. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ER and ABD on vGRF and vRFD following SLJL. It was hypothesized low ER and ABD coupled with fatigue would be associated with high vGRF and vRFD. METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy males (n = 10) and females (n = 17) (24.0 ± 2.8 y, 1.73 ± .08 m, 75.0 ± 14.0 kg) participated in this repeated measure study which included rest (R) and fatigue (F) protocols. ER and ABD isometric torque (Nm·kg-1) on the dominate leg were measured using a handheld dynamometer. For R, participants performed SLJL (PRE), rested for 5 minutes, and then reperformed SLJL (POST). For F, participants performed SLJL (PRE), a 7 minute fatigue protocol, and then reperformed SLJL (POST). R and F were performed in a random order. SLJL was performed by jumping backward off the test leg over a .15 m hurdle, landing on the test leg on a force plate, and stabilizing quickly. vGRF (N·kg-1) and vRFD (N·kg-1·s-1) were calculated. Participants were stratified into high-strength (HS) and low-strength (LS) groups using ER and ABD and a k-means cluster analysis. Linear mixed-models were used to assess the effect of group and protocol on vGRF and vRFD with Bonferroni corrected post-hoc tests. Significance was initially set to p < .05. RESULTS: 16 participants were stratified into HS (ER = 4.3 ± .9, ABD = 8.3 ± 1.0) and 11 into LS (ER = 3.3 ± 1.0, ABD = 5.8 ± .9). There was no effect of group on vGRF (HS = 2.98 ± .59, LS = 3.03 ± .59, p = .627) or vRFD (HS = 35.8 ± 19.8, LS = 37.1 ± 18.9, p = .735). HS and LS did not responded differently to R and F for vGRF (p = .694) or vRFD (p = .899). Further, with all subjects pooled, they did not respond differently to R and F for vGRF (p = .081), but they did for vRFD (p < .001). vRFD POST F (41.2 ± 22.3) was higher than PRE F (34.9 ± 22.3, p < .001) and POST R (32.9 ± 22.3, p < .001). CONCLUSION: There is no effect of ER and ABD on vGRF and vRFD and vGRF does not increase with fatigue, but vRFD does increase with fatigue. This may suggest a reduction in the ability to quickly attenuate forces when fatigued and may potentially increase the risk for injury.