High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Research Articles

Bone marrow macrophages are involved in the ineffective hematopoiesis of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of heterogeneous myeloid clonal disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis. Accumulating evidence has shown that macrophages (MΦs) are important components in the regulation of tumor progression and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). However, the roles of bone marrow (BM) MΦsin regulating normal and malignant hematopoiesis in different clinical stages of MDS are largely unknown. Age-paired patients with lower-risk MDS (N = 15), higher-risk MDS (N = 15), de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (N = 15), and healthy donors (HDs) (N = 15) were enrolled. Flow cytometry analysis showed increased pro-inflammatory monocyte subsets and a decreased classically activated (M1) MΦs/alternatively activated (M2) MΦs ratio in the BM of patients with higher-risk MDS compared to lower-risk MDS. BM MФs from patients with higher-risk MDS and AML showed impaired phagocytosis activity but increased migration compared with lower-risk MDS group. AML BM MΦs showed markedly higher S100A8/A9 levels than lower-risk MDS BM MΦs. More importantly, coculture experiments suggested that the HSC supporting abilities of BM MΦs from patients with higher-risk MDS decreased, whereas the malignant cell supporting abilities increased compared with lower-risk MDS. Gene Ontology enrichment comparing BM MΦs from lower-risk MDS and higher-risk MDS for genes was involved in hematopoiesis- and immunity-related pathways. Our results suggest that BM MΦs are involved in ineffective hematopoiesis in patients with MDS, which indicates that repairing aberrant BM MΦs may represent a promising therapeutic approach for patients with MDS.

Perspectives of Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome on Patient-Clinician Communication About Prognosis and the Future.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) experience unpredictable disease trajectories and high prognostic uncertainty, which serve as barriers to patient-clinician communication about prognosis and their values and preferences for the future in the event of worsening health. Little is known about patients' day-to-day lived experiences and how this shapes their willingness to engage in such conversations. To explore participant perspectives on living with their illness and patient-clinician communication about prognosis and the future. This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML and high-risk MDS from a northeastern U.S. cancer center. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to generate findings. Of the 14 participants, the mean age was 66 years, 79% were men, 93% were White, married, and had AML. The overarching theme that describes the experience was "Taking One Day at a Time" in a Fog of Uncertainty. Uncertainty was a universal perception related to the challenges for clinicians to predict prognosis. To cope with uncertainty, most participants tried to focus on the present and maintain normality in everyday life. Participants valued encouragement and positivity in patient-clinician communication, however, the majority were not ready to discuss prognosis and the future in the event of worsening health. Of note, 7 of 14 participants died within three months after the interview. These data describe a unique perspective of patients with R/R AML and high-risk MDS that clinicians could use to enhance communication strategies.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Retrospective, Current, and Future Perspective.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal disorder that affects hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), primarily occurring in the elderly population. Lower-risk MDS is characterized by a decrease in blood cells, whereas higher-risk MDS is associated with an increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Currently, the treatment of MDS is still unsatisfactory, although demethylating agents, azacitidine (AZA), and decitabine (Dec) have been successfully used to treat MDS and improve survival rates. However, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for MDS patients, effectively increasing patient survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, treatment-related toxicity, graft-versus-host disease, infectious complications, and relapse are still major post-transplant issues. In this review, through a retrospective analysis of past and present HSCT for the treatment of MDS, we provide insights for the future.

Integrated genetic, epigenetic, and immune landscape of TP53 mutant AML and higher risk MDS treated with azacitidine.

TP53 mutations are associated with an adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS). However, the integrated genetic, epigenetic, and immunologic landscape of TP53-mutated AML/HR-MDS is not well defined. To define the genetic, epigenetic, and immunologic landscape of TP53-mutant and TP53 wild-type AML and HR-MDS patients. Post hoc analysis of TP53-mutant and TP53 wild-type patients treated on the randomized FUSION trial with azacitidine ± the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab. We performed extensive molecular, epigenetic, and immunologic assays on a well-annotated clinical trial dataset of 61 patients with TP53-mutated disease (37 AML, 24 MDS) and 144 TP53 wild-type (89 AML, 55 MDS) patients, all of whom received azacitidine-based therapy. A 38 gene-targeted myeloid mutation analysis from screening bone marrow (BM) was performed. DNA methylation arrays, immunophenotyping and immune checkpoint expression by flow cytometry, and gene expression profiles by bulk RNA sequencing were assessed at baseline and serially during the trial. Global DNA methylation from peripheral blood was independent of TP53 mutation and allelic status. AZA therapy led to a statistically significant decrease in global DNA methylation scores independent of TP53 mutation status. In BM from TP53-mutant patients, we found both a higher T-cell population and upregulation of inhibitory immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-L1 compared to TP53 wild-type. RNA sequencing analyses revealed higher expression of the myeloid immune checkpoint gene LILRB3 in TP53-mutant samples suggesting a novel therapeutic target. This integrated analysis of the genetic, epigenetic, and immunophenotypic landscape of TP53 mutant AML/HR-MDS suggests that differences in the immune landscape resulting in an immunosuppressive microenvironment rather than epigenetic differences contribute to the poor prognosis of TP53-mutant AML/HR-MDS with mono- or multihit TP53 mutation status. FUSION trial (NCT02775903).

High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Challenges of Complex Karyotype and TP53

High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Challenges of Complex Karyotype and TP53

Haploidentical Transplant with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients: The Role of Previous Lines of Therapy.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplant is an option, potentially curative, for high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide administration allows for the selection of haploidentical donors in patients who are eligible for the procedure but do not have a fully matched donor since it can overcome the HLA barrier. There is still an active debate on whether intensifying the conditioning regimen is necessary with haploidentical donors when peripheral blood stem cells are used as the graft source. Herein, we report our decennial experience of haploidentical stem-cell transplant using peripheral blood stem cells (haplo-PBSC) at King's College Hospital. The primary objective was to evaluate overall survival (OS) following haplo-PBSC. Secondary objectives were total OS for patients with less than two previous lines of therapy, OS according to cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and GVHD-relapse-free survival (GRFS). One-year and three-year total OS were 62% and 43%, respectively, with a median OS of 22 months. One-year and three-year OS for patients with ≤2 and those with >2 previous lines of therapy were 72% and 55%, and 60% and 22%, respectively (p-value=0.04). The median OS in patients with >2 previous and ≤2 lines of therapy was 16 and 49 months, respectively. Cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse was 25% with a median time to relapse of 5 months (range 1 - 38 months). Haploidentical haematopoietic stem-cell transplant is potentially curative in chemosensitive AML and MDS and offers a high rate of prolonged remission. Our cohort further confirms the role of consolidative haploidentical transplant in patients in complete remission and highlights that patients with heavily pre-treated disease may not benefit from this strategy.

Novel therapies for MDS and future prospects

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal diseases resulting from the accumulation of genetic mutations. In general, MDS is categorized into two risk groups, with management and treatment varying significantly based on this classification. Over the past two decades, allogeneic transplantation and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have become the standard of care and remain crucial for higher-risk MDS. Unfortunately, no new drugs have emerged to replace HMAs as the standard of care. However, the landscape of practice and research in MDS has evolved. In 2022, the focus of diagnostic classification of MDS shifted significantly from morphology to genetic alterations. As a result, treatment strategies centered on genetic mutations are now already used internationally. Revisions made to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria for assessing treatment response in 2023 are expected to further improve accuracy. Meanwhile, interest has increased in understanding the relationship between inflammation and the development and progression of lower-risk MDS. This year, luspatercept, an anti-anemic agent targeting the TGFβ pathway, became available for clinical use in Japan. Various research initiatives are currently underway to develop new medicines targeting specific molecules within innate immune and inflammasome-signaling pathways, including IL-1β, CD33, TLR, IRAK4, and p38MAPK.

Real-world Effectiveness of Azacitidine in Treatment-Naive Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

IntroductionAzacitidine (AZA) is an approved frontline therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS); however, poor survival denotes unmet needs to increase depth/duration of response (DOR). MethodsThis retrospective study with patient chart review evaluated AZA effectiveness in 382 treatment-naive patients with HR-MDS from a US electronic health record (EHR)–derived database. Responses were assessed using International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria; real-world equivalents were derived from EHRs. Primary endpoint was IWG 2006-based complete remission rate (CRR). Secondary endpoints were EHR-based CRR, IWG 2006- and EHR-based objective response rates (ORRs), duration of CR, DOR, progression-free survival, time-to-next-treatment, and overall survival (OS). ResultsUsing IWG 2006 criteria, the CRR was 7.9% (n = 30); median duration of CR was 12.0 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.6). In poor cytogenetic risk (n = 101) and TP53 mutation (n = 46) subgroups, CRRs were 7.9% (n = 8) and 8.7% (n = 4), respectively. ORR was 62.8% (n = 240), including a hematologic improvement rate (HIR) of 46.9% (n = 179). Using EHR-based data, CRR was 3.7% (n = 14); median duration of CR was 13.5 months (95% CI, 4.5-21.5). ORR was 67.8% (n = 259), including an HIR of 29.3% (n = 112). Median follow-up was 12.9 months; median OS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 15.5-21.7). ConclusionsConsistent with other studies, CRRs and median OS with AZA in treatment-naive patients with HR-MDS were low in this large, real-world cohort. Novel agents/combinations are urgently needed to improve these outcomes in HR-MDS.

Efficacy and safety of coadministration of venetoclax and anti-fungal agents under therapeutic drug monitor in unfit acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome with neutropenia: a single-center retrospective study

Unfit acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients with prolonged neutropenia demand coadministration of venetoclax and azoles. However, venetoclax dosing under drug–drug interaction with azoles remains controversial. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is expected to guide drug dosage adjustments. We retrospectively enrolled 17 patients under this coadministration and TDM. Venetoclax dosages were interfered when inappropriate drug concentrations appeared. The primary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Venetoclax concentration outliers were more frequently evaluated before than after dose adjustment (Cmax 60.87% vs. 0.00%, p < .0001). MRD negativity rate was higher in patients staying within reference range than those having outliers (90.91% vs. 33.33%, p = .028). Objective response rate was 100%. Hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (93.3%), febrile neutropenia (53.3%), and thrombocytopenia (81.3%). Median time to neutropenia and thrombocytopenia recovery was 20 (14–32) and 16.5 (6–34) days, respectively. No invasive fungal and other life-threatening infections were observed.

Experiences and Support Needs of Caregivers of Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome via Online Bulletin Board in the USA, Canada and UK.

Patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) face considerable challenges in disease management and often require caregiver support. Reports on the burden of caring for patients with advanced cancer suggest that caregivers receive insufficient support. Our research aimed to identify key challenges for caregivers of patients with higher-risk MDS. Online bulletin board is a qualitative research methodology which enables data collection via a web-based platform. A mix of moderator-led discussion guide and interparticipant discussion provides the caregiver insights as online dialogue, which then undergo content analysis to extract key findings. Sixteen caregivers participated from the USA (n = 5), UK (n = 6) and Canada (n = 5). Content analysis identified the caregiver experience in higher-risk MDS as multifactorial, with seven key categories of caregiver burden: caregiver role and burden, mental health, family dynamics, disease experience, treatment experience, healthcare professional (HCP) interactions and information and education. There is significant impact and burden on caregivers of patients with higher-risk MDS, which varies depending on disease stage, choice (or lack of choice) of treatments, and the personal situation of the caregiver. Emotional stress occurs mostly at diagnosis/prognosis stage and when told to 'watch and wait', which is amplified when HCPs are perceived to lack knowledge/expertise about MDS. There is a need for better education about MDS for HCPs, patients, caregivers and the general community; a need for improved communication between patients/caregivers and HCPs; and a high unmet need for better mental health and emotional support for both patient and caregiver.

Phase 1b trial of tagraxofusp in combination with azacitidine with or without venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia

AbstractCD123, a subunit of the interleukin-3 receptor, is expressed on ∼80% of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs). Tagraxofusp (TAG), recombinant interleukin-3 fused to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload, is a first-in-class drug targeting CD123 approved for treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. We previously found that AMLs with acquired resistance to TAG were re-sensitized by the DNA hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) and that TAG-exposed cells became more dependent on the antiapoptotic molecule BCL-2. Here, we report a phase 1b study in 56 adults with CD123-positive AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), first combining TAG with AZA in AML/MDS, and subsequently TAG, AZA, and the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in AML. Adverse events with 3-day TAG dosing were as expected, without indication of increased toxicity of TAG or AZA+/−VEN in combination. The recommended phase 2 dose of TAG was 12 μg/kg/day for 3 days, with 7-day AZA +/− 21-day VEN. In an expansion cohort of 26 patients (median age 71) with previously untreated European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk AML (50% TP53 mutated), triplet TAG-AZA-VEN induced response in 69% (n=18/26; 39% complete remission [CR], 19% complete remission with incomplete count recovery [CRi], 12% morphologic leukemia-free state [MLFS]). Among 13 patients with TP53 mutations, 7/13 (54%) achieved CR/CRi/MLFS (CR = 4, CRi = 2, MLFS = 1). Twelve of 17 (71%) tested responders had no flow measurable residual disease. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 14 months (95% CI, 9.5-NA) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-NA), respectively. In summary, TAG-AZA-VEN shows encouraging safety and activity in high-risk AML, including TP53-mutated disease, supporting further clinical development of TAG combinations. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03113643.

Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Sabatolimab is an immunotherapy targeting T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), an immuno-myeloid regulator expressed on immune cells and leukaemic stem cells. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agent with placebo plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. STIMULUS-MDS1 was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study done at 54 investigational sites in 17 countries. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (according to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria) who had not received previous treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous sabatolimab (400 mg on day 8 and 22) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (intravenous decitabine 20 mg/m2 on day 1-5 or intravenous or subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on day 1-7 or day 1-5 and day 8 and 9) every 28 days until treatment discontinuation. The two primary endpoints were complete response rate and progression-free survival, assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients. Complete response was analysed, as prespecified, 7 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. All other analyses presented, including progression-free survival, were done at the final data cutoff prespecified via a protocol amendment on Sept 2, 2021. Safety was assessed in in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03946670, and is ongoing. Between July 29, 2019, and Aug 10, 2020, 127 patients were randomly assigned to sabatolimab plus a hypomethylating agent group (sabatolimab group; n=65) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (placebo group; n=62). The median age of participants was 73 years (IQR 69-77), of whom 86 (68%) of 127 patients were male and 77 (61%) were White. The primary endpoints were not met. Complete response (cutoff date of March 10, 2021) was achieved in 14 (22%; 95% CI 12·3-33·5) of 65 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 11 (18%; 9·2-29·5) of 62 patients in the placebo group (p=0·77). At the cutoff date of the final analysis (March 1, 2022), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 17·8 months (IQR 16·6-19·4) in the sabatolimab group and 19·2 months (17·7-22·3) in the placebo group, and the median progression-free survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 7·6-17·6) in the sabatolimab group vs 8·5 months (6·9-11·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·48-1·17]; p=0·1022). The most common adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (35 [56%] of 62 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 43 [68%] of 63 patients in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (30 [48%] vs 32 [51%]), constipation (29 [47%] vs 24 [38%]), diarrhoea (27 [44%] vs 14 [22%]), anaemia (22 [35%] vs 34 [54%]), febrile neutropenia (22 [35%] vs 15 [24%]), and leukopenia (15 [24%] vs 20 [32%]). One patient developed a serious potential treatment-related immune-mediated adverse event in the sabatolimab group. There was one treatment-related death in the sabatolimab group due to pneumonitis. The addition of sabatolimab to hypomethylating agents in this study did not result in a significant improvement in complete response rates or progression-free survival. Sabatolimab had a manageable safety in most patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. A randomised phase 3 trial is ongoing to assess the potential benefit of sabatolimab plus azacitidine on overall survival in this setting. Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

EE541 Cost-Effectiveness, Health-State Utility Values (HSUVs) and Cost and Resource Use (CRU) Associated with Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (HR-MDS): An Economic Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

EE541 Cost-Effectiveness, Health-State Utility Values (HSUVs) and Cost and Resource Use (CRU) Associated with Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (HR-MDS): An Economic Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

Venetoclax+Azacytidine Followed By Modified BuCy Conditioning Regimen for High Risk or Refractory/Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Background:Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only potential curable treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, for patients with high-risk or refractory relapsed (R/R) B-ALL with allo-HSCT, the three-year overall survival (OS) rate is only 5-10%, more worse in T-ALL. It is widely known that MDS patients in the high-risk group do not benefit from induction chemotherapy, the five-year OS rate is 23-39% when they received allo-HSCT. Nevertheless, relapse remains a significant cause of treatment failure after allo-HSCT, highlighting the urgent need for improved conditioning regimens that can improve prognosis and reduce relapse rates. Azacytidine (AZA) combined with Venetoclax (VEN), showed a synergistic anti-tumor activity against several hematological malignancies, Therefore, we explored AZA+VEN (VA) combined with modified BuCy(mBuCy) (semustine, cytarabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide) conditioning regimen and assessed the safety and effectiveness. Aims ：The aim of this study is to assess the safety, and effectiveness of the VA treatment regimen followed by mBuCy as conditioning regimen for high-risk or R/R ALL(NCT05809167) and high-risk MDS(NCT03256071) . Methods:Patients diagnosed with high-risk or R/R ALL or high-risk MDS (IPSS-R score), undergoing VA+mBuCy as conditioning regimen, and consolidation treatment with demethylating drugs every three months after transplantation, for a total of 8-12 cycles. Results:Patients diagnosed with high-risk or R/R ALL(n=11) or high-risk MDS (IPSS-R score)(n=8) were enrolled between January 13, 2022, and June 9, 2023. The ALL cohort comprised of 5 Ph-negative B-ALL, 2 Ph-positive B-ALL, 3 mixed phenotype leukemias (MPAL), and one T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia (T-ALL/LBL). There were 7 males and 4 females, with a median age of 33 years (17-54 years) (Table 1). Out of the eleven patients, four had previously undergone Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Immunotherapy (CAR-T) therapy, and one patient had received Blinatumomab. One patient experienced relapse, another patient was refractory, and 3 patients had extramedullary infiltration. All patients achieved morphological complete remission prior to transplantation, and 10 patients (90.9%) achieved a MRD negative remission. Additionally, all the transplantations successfully completed, with a median time to absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) recovery of 12 days (11-15 days) and platelet (PLT) recovery of 16 days (15-21 days). The median follow-up time was 6.4 months (2.4 -13.6 months), no patient experienced relapse or death, the OS and DFS are both 100%. There were no grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD),and the transplant-related mortality (TRM). Four patients who developed acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) post-transplantation, all cases involved grade I/II skin aGVHD, and one of them involved grade III GI aGVHD, and no chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) were observed during the follow-up period. By the endpoint of follow-up, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) activation was 45.4% (5/11) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) activation was 27.3% (3/11). The MDS cohort consisted of 7 cases of MDS-EB-I, 1 case of MDS-EB-II. There were 5 males and 3 females, with a median age of 42 years (23-57 years)(Table 2). Two patients received chemotherapy before transplantation, and the other six patients directly received allo-HSCT. In MDS cohort, the median recovery time for ANC was 12 days (11-13 days) and PLT was 17.5 days (16-20 days). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (1.2-18.3 months), no patient had relapsed or died, both OS and DFS are 100%. There were no grade 3 or higher AEs, and TRM. One patient developed VOD. Three patients developed aGVHD after transplantation, all involving degree I/II skin aGVHD, and there was one case of cGVHD during the follow-up period, where the patient developed a mild pulmonary cGVHD. By the endpoint of the follow-up, the rate of CMV activation was 37.5% (3/8) and EBV activation was 25% (2/8). Conclusion:The VA combined with the mBuCy proves to be a effective and safe conditioning regimen for high-risk ALL and MDS patients. However, more patients are needed for follow-up and validation.

Results of a Phase II Study of Cladribine, Low Dose Cytarabine and Venetoclax, Alternating with Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Patients with Higher Risk Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes

INTRODUCTION: Clinical responses to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients (pts) with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and myeloproliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) remain short-lived, with high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prior data suggests use of the purine analogue cladribine can induce monocyte apoptosis and is active in AML, particularly in combination with low dose cytarabine (LDAC) and venetoclax. We aimed to evaluate the safety and activity of cladribine, LDAC and venetoclax in HR-MDS and CMML. METHODS: We designed a phase II basket clinical trial of cladribine combined with LDAC and venetoclax alternating with azacitidine and venetoclax for pts with HR-MDS or CMML. Pts were divided into 4 cohorts: cohort A: MDS with int-1 to high risk by IPSS and &amp;gt;5% blasts with prior HMA-failure (HMA-F); cohort B: CMML-1/CMML-2 with prior HMA-F; cohort C: previously untreated MDS with Int-2 or High risk by IPSS and &amp;gt;10% bone marrow (BM) blasts; cohort D: previously untreated CMML-2 or CMML-1 with at least one high-risk feature (extramedullary disease, splenomegaly of &amp;gt;5cm below costal margin, platelets &amp;lt;100x10 9/L, Hgb level &amp;lt;10g/dL, WBC &amp;gt;13x10 9/L, clonal cytogenetic abnormality [other than monosomy Y]). HMA-F was defined as no response after 6 cycles of therapy with HMA or relapse/progression after any number of cycles. Induction consisted of cladribine 5mg/m 2 daily IV on days 1-3, cytarabine 20mg s.c bid days 1-5 and venetoclax 400mg daily days 1-5. Re-induction was allowed in pts not achieving response after induction. Consolidations consisted of azacitidine 75mg/m 2 daily days 1-7 with venetoclax 400mg daily days 1-7 alternating with cladribine 5mg/m 2 days 1-3, cytarabine 20mg s.c bid days 1-5 and venetoclax 400mg days 1-5 every two 28-day cycles. The primary end point was to evaluate safety, efficacy, and tolerability of the combination. Responses were evaluated following 2006 IWG criteria. The Kaplan-Meir product-limit method was used to estimate median survival. RESULTS: Between October 2022 and June 2023, 20 pts have been treated: 10, 5, 3 and 2 in cohorts A, B, C and D, respectively. Thirteen pts had MDS, and 7 had CMML. Median age was 74 years (range 52-83). Among MDS pts, 8 (62%) had int-2 and 5 (38%) had high risk by IPSS. By the Molecular IPSS, 10 (79%) had very high, 1 (8%) had high, 1 (8%) had moderate high and 1 (8%) had low risk. Among CMML pts, 4 (57%) had high, 2 (29%) had intermediate-2 and 1 (14%) had intermediate-1 risk by the CPSS Molecular score. Among HMA-F cohorts, median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-4), median cycles of prior HMA was 6 (range 2-63) and 4 (27%) pts had failure to prior venetoclax therapy. Most common adverse events (AEs) were hypoalbuminemia (40%), nausea (40%), sinus bradycardia (40%), alanine aminotransferase increase (35%), constipation (35%), lower extremity edema (35%), fatigue (35%) and hypocalcemia (35%) Most common grade 3-4 AEs were leukopenia (20%) and febrile neutropenia (15%). The 4-week and 8-week cumulative incidences of mortality were 0%. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-6). Median cycles to best response was 1 (range 1-3). Among HMA naïve pts (cohorts C and D), the ORR was 80% (n=4): CR in 2 (40%), mCR in 2 (40%). Based on 2023 IWG response criteria, responses in cohort C (n=3) included: CR in 2 (67%) and CR bilineage (CRbi) in 1 (33%). Based on 2015 IWG MDS/MPN criteria, responses in cohort D (n=2) included optimal marrow response and clinical benefit in 1 (50%) and 1 (50%) pts, respectively. Among HMA-F pts (cohorts A and B) the ORR was 20%: 1 CR (10%) and 1 (10%) mCR with HI. Median follow up is 5.3 months (95% CI 2.4-81). Median EFS is 2.1 months in cohorts A and B and not reached in C and D (Fig 1A). Median OS has not been reached for all cohorts (Fig 1B). At the time of data cut-off, all pts in cohorts C and D discontinued study to proceed with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Among cohorts A and B, 2 pts (13%) discontinued study to proceed with HSCT, 5 (33%) due to transformation to AML, 2 (13%) due to no response, 2 (13%) due to physician choice, 1 (7%) due to patient choice and 2 (13%) pts remain on study. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggests the use of cladribine, LDAC and venetoclax can be safely administered in pts with very high risk MDS and CMML with early promising results in pts with de novo disease.

Evaluation of Disparities in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS) Patient Treatment Patterns in a Large US Health System

BACKGROUND Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of myeloid neoplasms. Patients may present with nonspecific signs and symptoms such as fatigue, infections, bleeding, and bruising. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy are used to confirm diagnosis and are critical in the evaluation of bone marrow cell morphology and cellularity necessary for risk classification. Patients stratified as higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) have worse overall survival and a higher risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment of HR-MDS can be challenging. While hypomethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine are the only approved drugs for HR-MDS, there are clinical and translational studies for other treatment approaches. The only curative treatment at present is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), for which only a portion of patients may qualify. This study sought to identify potential missed opportunities in care, including time to diagnosis (Dx) and treatment, by evaluating differences based on underlying sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of newly diagnosed patients with HR-MDS. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan members with evidence of newly diagnosed HR-MDS in the Optum Research Database (ORD). Additional Optum datasets were linked to the standard ORD to allow for the inclusion of additional socioeconomic (SES) and social determinants of health (SDoH) variables. The study period was 1 January 2016 to 31 July 2022. Adults with ≥1 inpatient claim for HR-MDS or ≥2 outpatient claims for either MDS or HR-MDS (requiring at least 1 to be HR-MDS) on 2 separate dates between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2022 were eligible for inclusion. The earliest HR-MDS claim was the index date. A period of 12 months prior to the index date was used to assess baseline characteristics. Patients were followed for at least 3 months post-index until the earliest of AML Dx, death, end of continuous enrollment, or end of the study period. RESULTS The study criteria were met by 1710 patients. Median age at HR-MDS Dx was 77 years, and 40% of patients had baseline Charlson comorbidity score ≥3; 22% had no claim for a bone marrow biopsy or aspiration in the 12 months prior to index or during variable follow-up. Patients were categorized hierarchically based on level of treatment received: HSCT occurred in 4% of patients, 33% had evidence of active treatment, 26% received MDS supportive treatment, and 37% had no treatment in the variable follow-up period. Patients who received HSCT had the lowest Charlson score (mean 1.3), followed by those who received active treatment (mean 2.2), no treatment (mean 2.3), and MDS supportive treatment (mean 2.8). Patients who received active treatment and those who received no treatment appeared to have a similar average age (76 years), similarities in baseline comorbidities (autoimmune conditions, diabetes, and hepatic and renal diseases), and similarities in underlying SDoH and SES characteristics. Male patients made up 58% of the total study population; the prevalence by sex varied within treatment groups where male patients were 64% of the active treatment group but only 54% of the MDS supportive treatment group (Fig. 1a). HSCT patients had the least likelihood of unmet SDoH need, whereas those in MDS supportive care generally had the lowest chance of no unmet need (Fig. 1b). Few patients (7%) had claims indicative of clinical trial participation after index; clinical trial participants were healthier (mean Charlson score 1.9 vs 2.4) and younger (only 37% were aged 75+ vs 64% of non-participants in this age group). Patients not participating in clinical trials were more likely to have unmet financial or housing security and transportation access challenges. White and Asian patients had the highest rates of whole blood transfusions (5.4 and 5.7 per 100 person-months, respectively), while Hispanic patients had the lowest rate (2.5 per 100 person-months). CONCLUSION A large proportion of HR-MDS patients had no evidence of active treatment during the variable follow-up. HSCT and clinical trial participation were low in the study; these patients were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and did not experience financial, housing, or transportation issues. To ensure guideline concordant care, there is a need to further contextualize drivers of treatment in clinical practice, including patients' preferences.

Treatment of Elderly Patients with Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Oral Azacitidine

Background Oral formulations ofhypomethylating agents decitabine (ASTX727) and azacitidine (cc-486, AZA) were approved respectively for treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and for maintenance of acute myeloid leukemia after remission. Management of MDS patients with oral agents is relevant to improve quality of life. Oral-AZA has shown activity in lower risk MDS and its use is under evaluation in that setting. There are no data regarding maintenance of response achieved by subcutaneous (sc) AZA in HR-MDS cases by switching to the oral formulation. Aim The primary objective of the study was to explore the feasibility of replacing sc-AZA by its oral formulation in patients with HR-MDS in response. Maintenance or improvement of response and, as secondary objectives, patient reported outcome (PRO) and DNA methylation pattern were evaluated. Methods A monocentric, pilot phase 2 study was planned to enroll 11 subjects with confirmed diagnosis of MDS, IPSS-R higher risks, aged ≥ 65 years, in CR/CRi, PR or SD with HI after &amp;gt; 6 cycles of sc-AZA therapy (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04806906). Patients were to receive 300 mg oral-AZA for the first 14-days of each 28-day treatment cycle until absence of benefit or disease progression. Dose of oral-AZA could be de-escalated based on toxicity. At screening and every 4 cycles, IWG response was evaluated. NGS evaluation of somatic mutations and DNA methylation analysis were performed at the same time points. DNA methylation pattern of separated BM CD34 positive cells was determined by Oxford Nanopore. At day1 of every cycle the EQ-5D questionnaire for QoL was administered. Feasibility, safety, tolerability as well as efficacy of oral-AZA were evaluated by monitoring AEs and response/loss of response, time to treatment discontinuation, and PRO. Results. As per July 31 st 2023, 11 HR-MDS patients with a median follow up of 167 days (range 47-805) were enrolled in this study. Male/female ratio was 4.5/1 with a median age of 81 yrs (67-88). At diagnosis patients belonged to IPSS-R risk categories intermediate 1/11, high 8/11, very high 2/11; IPSS-M risk categories at start of oral AZA: 3/11 very high, 6/11 high and 2/11 very low. Median number of sc-AZA cycles was 9 (range 7-52), while for oral-AZA median number of cycles was 4 (range 1-10). Oral AZA dose of 300 mg/day was maintained for all patients. DNA methylation was determined with success at baseline and every 4 cycles for all treated patients, and methylation status analyzed. None of the patients had serious adverse events related to study drug. Myelosuppressive effects were transient and Grade1/2. Patients maintained CR (4/11), PR (6/11) and SD with HI (1/11) achieved with sc-AZA, until progression. Therapy was interrupted for progression in 4 patients who evolved to AML after a median of 9 cycles of treatment with oral-AZA. Early discontinuation was experienced in 2/11 patients: in one case following a GI event grade 3 and patient decision to avoid de-escalation of the dose for subsequent cycles, in the second case because of patient reduced compliance. Both patients re-switched from oral to sc-AZA treatment and are still in response (PR). PRO analyses indicated that oral-AZA therapy improved most quality-of-life domains compared to sc-AZA. Treatment is ongoing for 4/11 patients in CR (3/4) and PR (1/4). Responses were observed across all IPSS-M risk categories. Conclusions Treatment of HR-MDS elderly patients with oral-AZAis feasible and effective. We observed duration of hematological response with a length consistent with what shown in this patient subgroup, and even after a very prolonged treatment with sc-AZA. Oral AZA was generally well tolerated and AEs did not differ from those observed for sc-AZA.

A First-in-Human, Phase 1, Dose Escalation Study of Sgr-2921 As Monotherapy in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Background Cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (CDC7), or DBF4-dependent CDC7 kinase (DDK), is a cell cycle kinase that maintains DNA replication by phosphorylation and activation of the minichromosome maintenance protein 2 and 4 (MCMs), components of the replicative DNA helicase. Due to the central role of CDC7 in maintenance of the replication fork integrity, chemical inhibition of CDC7 kinase can ultimately lead to cancer cell death. SGR-2921 is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of CDC7. Preclinical studies demonstrate that, among all cell lines tested, SGR-2921 has the most potent anti-proliferative activity in AML. Potent antitumor activity has also been demonstrated in cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) AML models. This antitumor response is observed in animal models representative of difficult to treat patient populations and appears to be agnostic of serious mutations (including those with p53 mutations and FLT3 mutations), BTK resistance, and multiple prior lines of treatment. Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk (HR) or very high-risk (VHR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have low response rates and poor overall survival. Considering the potent preclinical activity of SGR-2921 in AML and MDS models, coupled with the high unmet medical need in this population, SGR-2921 is being evaluated in patients with R/R AML and HR/VHR MDS. Study Design and Methods This is a phase 1, FIH, open-label, single-agent, two-arm, dose escalation study (NCT#05961839) designed to evaluate safety and tolerability and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of SGR-2921 as monotherapy in subjects with R/R AML, HR MDS, or VHR MDS. The study utilizes a hybrid accelerated titration design with single patient cohorts that transitions to a 3+3 design once a single Grade 2 event or DLT is observed. This is a multicenter global study (US, Spain and France) with an estimated study recruitment start date in October, 2023. SGR-2921 will be administered orally, once daily, utilizing a 5-day on and 9-day off dosing schedule over a 28-day cycle. Up to a maximum of 144 patients will be enrolled in the dose escalation and exploratory cohort phase of the study. To evaluate the effect of CYP3A4 inhibition on SGR-2921 exposure, subjects will be enrolled into one of two staggered, parallel study treatment arms, according to concomitant administration with (Arm B) or without (Arm A) azole antifungals that are strong CYP3A4 inhibitors at time of first dose. Safety and tolerability must be demonstrated in treatment Arm A, at the first two dose levels before initiating treatment Arm B. A single dose PK run-in will be required for subjects enrolled into the first 3 cohorts of each treatment arm. Subjects will be treated at increasing doses of study drug until all dose levels have been investigated or any dose level is found to exceed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A RP2D will be selected from one of the tolerable dose levels which will not exceed the MTD (see Figure 1 for study design). Key study inclusion criteria include: Age ≥ 18 years of age; Life expectancy ≥ 8 weeks; Confirmed diagnosis of R/R AML or HR and VHR MDS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2. Key study exclusion criteria include: Active malignancies not related to AML or MDS within two years prior to the first dose or requiring ongoing treatment; Clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) or pulmonary leukostasis; ≥ Grade 3 disseminated intravascular coagulation, or active CNS leukemia; QT interval corrected for heart rate per Fridericia's formula ≥470 msec during screening ECG. The study primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SGR-2921 as monotherapy and identify RP2D including MTD. Secondary objectives include evaluating the pharmacokinetics (PK) of SGR-2921 and investigating preliminary antitumor activity (composite complete remission rate, objective response rate, duration of response, etc.).

Reclassification of Ascertain (ASTX727-02) Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Patients: Outcomes Including Clinical Response, Overall Survival (OS), and Leukemia Free Survival (LFS) Based on IPSS-R and IPSS-M Scoring Systems

Background: Oral decitabine/cedazuridine (ASTX727) is a fixed dose combination of decitabine (35 mg) and the cytidine deaminase inhibitor cedazuridine (100 mg) given once daily X 5 days on a 28-day cycle producing pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure equivalent to the standard intravenous (IV) decitabine regimen of 20 mg/m 2 daily X 5 days on a 28-day cycle. This was demonstrated in the pivotal ASCERTAIN study (Garcia-Manero, et al, ASH 2019) as it provided a PK bridge to existing decitabine data and demonstrated median OS was 31.7 mo. (Savona,et al. Intl. MDSF International Congress on MDS, 2021). Subjects were initially classified by the International Prognosis Scoring System (IPSS) for historical reasons, however IPSS-R and IPSS-M are enhancements to IPSS that provide dynamic risk assessment for predicting clinical outcomes in MDS. Here, the objective was to re-classify the MDS subjects enrolled on the ASCERTAIN study by IPSS-R and IPSS-M and measure the impact of informing patient outcomes based on re-calculated risk assessment. Methods: One hundred thirty-three subjects with MDS/CMML (chronic myelomonocytic leukemia) were enrolled in ASCERTAIN and were randomly assigned either IV decitabine for cycle 1 and oral decitabine/cedazuridine for cycle 2 or the opposite treatment sequence. All subjects continuing beyond cycle 2 received oral decitabine/cedazuridine for all subsequent cycles until treatment discontinuation for disease progression, toxicity, patient's decision, or HSCT. Whole blood collected prior to treatment was used for DNA isolation and molecular abnormalities identified using next-generation sequencing (NGS) hematologic malignancy panel of 179 genes including all genes commonly mutated in MDS. In the initial analysis of clinical outcomes, subjects were classified by IPSS with response assessment by IWG 2006 IPSS low and Int-1 risk levels were categorized as lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS), whereas IPSS Int-2 and high-risk categories were categorized as higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS). Subjects with sufficient data based on (e.g., available heme parameters, cytogenetics, NGS etc.) were reclassified by IPSS-R and IPSS-M. Subjects with IPSS-R score of ≤3.5 or IPSS-M of either very low, low, or moderate low were categorized as LR-MDS. Similarly subjects with IPSS-R score of &amp;gt;3.5 or an IPSS-M categorization of either moderate high, high, or very high were categorized as HR-MDS. Reclassified subjects were reassessed for CR (Complete Response), OS, and LFS and Harrell's concordance index (c-index) was used to describe the level of agreement between each scale and outcomes. Results: Based on the available data, the number of MDS subjects in the different risk classifications were the following: IPSS: 117, IPSS-R: 104, and IPSS-M: 105. Thirteen and 12 subjects on the IPSS could not be reclassified in the IPSS-R and IPSS-M, respectively, including 5 Int-1 and 2 low-risk MDS cases. CMML subjects were excluded from these analyses. Re-classification generally resulted in the upgrade of the subjects from LR-MDS to HR-MDS (Fig. 1). Thirty-one (26.5%) subjects from IPSS were reallocated in the IPSS-R to different risk categories; 3 (9.7%) were downgraded and 28 (90.3%) were upgraded. Similarly on reclassification with IPSS-M 34 (32.4%) of the patients reclassified; 5 (14.8%) were downgraded and 29 (85.3%) were upgraded. For IPSS LR-MDS, 23.2% of patients achieved CR, and 22.9% in the IPSS HR-MDS. Similarly, 21.6% patients achieved CR in the IPSS-R LR-MDS, and 23.9% in the IPSS-R HR-MDS; 26.3% patients achieved CR in the IPSS-M LR-MDS, and 20.9% in the IPSS-M HR-MDS. The c-index for the IPSS was .64 (OS) and .67 (LFS), IPSS-R was .70 (OS) and .71 (LFS), and .75 (OS) and .78 (LFS) for the IPSS-M (Table1). Conclusion: Reclassification from IPSS to IPSS-R or IPSS-M upgraded multiple subjects from a LR to a HR category, describing the ASCERTAIN patient population as a majority higher risk population with worse prognosis than previously assumed based on the IPSS. The efficacy as measured by the CR rates did not change when the LR and HR categories were defined by the different risk stratification systems. In contrast, the c-index improves with migration from IPSS to IPSS-R to IPSS-M, indicating an increased discriminatory ability of IPSS-M score in comparison to IPSS and IPSS-R, to predict patient outcomes.

Combination of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients with Treatment-Naive, High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Responses Leading to Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction: The standard of care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) who are eligible for intensive therapy includes allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), which is potentially curative. Venetoclax (Ven) is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor, which has a synergistic effect when combined with hypomethylating agents in preclinical and clinical investigations of myeloid malignancies. Previous results showed that the combination of Ven and azacitidine (Aza) is associated with an acceptable safety profile and leads to rapid and durable responses in patients with treatment-naive HR-MDS. Here, we report the clinical outcomes of patients with HR-MDS who proceeded to SCT following combination Ven+Aza treatment on the M15-531 clinical trial. Methods: M15-531 is a global, open-label, phase 1b clinical trial (NCT02942290) to identify the recommended phase 2 dose and to study the safety and efficacy of Ven+Aza. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with the following criteria: de novo treatment-naïve HR-MDS; International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk categories of Int-2 or High, or Revised IPSS (IPSS-R) categories of Intermediate, High, or Very High; &amp;lt;20% blasts in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of ≤2. Aza was administered at 75 mg/m 2 subcutaneously or intravenously on Days 1-7 or on Days 1-5, 8, and 9 of each 28-day cycle. Ven was first evaluated at 100 once daily for 14 days of a 28-day cycle, then escalated to 200 and 400 mg in separate cohorts. Clinical outcomes with Ven+Aza treatment for patients who discontinued study treatment to undergo SCT and who did not experience disease progression are reported. Results: At the data cutoff of May 31, 2023, 124 patients were treated with all doses of Ven-based therapy, and 51 (41.1%) proceeded to allogeneic SCT. Key demographics and baseline characteristics for those who received SCT are shown in the Table. Median age was 64 years (range, 26-78), 58% had an ECOG PS of 0, and 25% had poor or very poor cytogenetic risk by IPSS-R. The median number of cycles of Ven+Aza was 3 (range, 1-22). Median time on study drug was 124 days (range, 28-763), and the median time from first dose of study treatment to SCT was 5.6 months (range, 1.4-29.7). Before SCT, 21 of 51 (41.2%) patients achieved complete remission (CR). Marrow CR (mCR) was achieved by 23 of 51 (45.1%) patients, and the composite response rate (mCR with Hematologic Improvement) was 30.4% (7 of 23; 95% CI, 13.2-52.9). The median time to best overall response (time from first dose of study drug to best response of CR, mCR, partial response, or stable disease) for Ven+Aza was 2.0 months (range, 1.0-10.4). The median overall survival was not reached for patients who achieved CR or mCR and proceeded to transplant. Among patients who underwent transplant, 64.7% (33/51) remained alive at the data cut-off date Conclusion: Early responses after Ven+Aza in patients with HR-MDS enabled them to receive allogeneic SCT. After escalating doses of the combination of Ven+Aza, 41% of patients went on to SCT. These results suggest that Ven-based regimens before SCT may provide a path to curative therapy.