High Risk Of Treatment Failure Research Articles

Risk-stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era

Introduction. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma represents a group of entities characterized by pathological and biological heterogeneity and different clinical outcomes. Due to pronounced heterogeneity, prognostic biomarkers are of great importance in identifying high-risk patients who might benefit from more aggressive approaches or new therapeutic modalities. Several prognostic score systems have been established and applied to predict the survival of patients with diffuse B-large cell lymphoma. The first established prognostic system for NHL patients is the International Prognostic Index, its variations Revised International Prognostic Index and National Comprehensive Cancer Network- International Prognostic Index were subsequently introduced in the era of immunochemotherapy. As the discriminative power of clinical scores is suboptimal, other strategies have been explored in order to improve risk stratification, especially in the high-risk group of patients who have the highest risk of treatment failure. In this regard, there is a tendency to integrate genetic and molecular biomarkers and prognostic somatic mutations into standardized and personalized models for risk stratification that would have a wide application in routine clinical practice. The results of recent studies based on machine learning methods have shown that the best risk stratification is achieved by a combination of clinical, genetic and molecular parameters, as well as a combination of clinical parameters with new quantitative Positron Emission Tomography parameters, such as Metabolic Tumor Volume and dissemination features and analysis of circulating tumor DNA levels. This paper provides an overview of studies in which these new risk stratification models were analyzed.

Tuberculosis in the Elderly.

The tuberculosis (TB) epidemic is most prevalent in the elderly, and there is a progressive increase in the notification rate with age. Most cases of TB in the elderly are linked to the reactivation of lesions that have remained dormant. The awakening of these lesions is attributable to changes in the immune system related to senescence. The mortality rate from tuberculosis remains higher in elderly patients. Symptoms of active TB are nonspecific and less pronounced in the elderly. Diagnostic difficulties in the elderly are common in many diseases but it is important to use all possible techniques to make a microbiological diagnosis. Recognising frailty to prevent loss of independence is a major challenge in dealing with the therapeutic aspects of elderly patients. Several studies report contrasting data about poorer tolerance of TB drugs in this population. Adherence to antituberculosis treatment is a fundamental issue for the outcome of treatment. Decreased completeness of treatment was shown in older people as well as a higher risk of treatment failure.

Comparison of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole vs. Clindamycin for the Treatment of Children with Musculoskeletal Infections

Background: 
 Musculoskeletal infections ([MSKI]; osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, pyomyositis) are common invasive infections in children. With increasing antibiotic resistance and allergies, treatment options are limited. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has activity against common MSKI pathogens, yet pediatric MSKI outcomes data are limited. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes of children with MSKI treated with TMP-SMX compared to clindamycin. We hypothesized that outcomes would be similar between groups.
 Methods: 
 We conducted a retrospective review of children <18 years old, admitted to Riley Hospital for Children from January 2010-June 2021 treated with TMP-SMX or clindamycin for MSKI. Patients were identified by ICD-9/10 codes. Patients were excluded if TMP-SMX or clindamycin was not the main treatment, they had symptoms >30 days, hardware associated infection, or an alternative diagnosis. Treatment success was defined as no evidence of infection at the end therapy. Treatment failure was defined as antibiotic intolerance, or development of recurrent/chronic osteomyelitis. Adverse drug reactions were recorded.
 Results:
 One-hundred-sixty-three patients (30 TMP-SMX, 133 clindamycin) met eligibility criteria. The majority were non-Hispanic white males, median age of 1.75 years (IQR, 1-3.75) for the TMP-SMX group, and 7 years (IQR 3-10) for the clindamycin group. Osteomyelitis was the most common infection type in both groups (TMP-SMX 43.3%, clindamycin 54.1%). S. aureus was the most common pathogen in both groups (TMP-SMX 36.7%, clindamycin 48.1%). Of the patients that completed follow-up, 84% successfully completed treatment with TMP-SMX, compared to 86.4% with clindamycin (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% CI 0.25-2.46, p=0.75). Adverse drug reactions occurred in 6.7% of the TMP-SMX group, compared to 10.5% in the clindamycin group (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.13-2.57, p=0.52).
 Conclusions:
 Preliminary results show that TMP-SMX is well tolerated and not associated with higher risk of treatment failure compared to clindamycin in the treatment of pediatric MSKI. Randomized controlled trials to evaluate optimal treatment are needed.

Efficacy of non-invasive and invasive respiratory management strategies in adult patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundAlthough non-invasive respiratory management strategies have been implemented to avoid intubation, patients with de novo acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) are high risk of treatment failure. In the previous meta-analyses, the effect of non-invasive ventilation was not evaluated according to ventilation modes in those patients. Furthermore, no meta-analyses comparing non-invasive respiratory management strategies with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) have been reported. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation according to ventilation modes with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), standard oxygen therapy (SOT), and IMV in adult patients with AHRF.MethodsThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichushi databases were searched. Studies including adults with AHRF and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two different respiratory management strategies (continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), pressure support ventilation (PSV), HFNO, SOT, or IMV) were reviewed.ResultsWe included 25 RCTs (3,302 participants: 27 comparisons). Using SOT as the reference, CPAP (risk ratio [RR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–0.95; very low certainty) was associated significantly with a lower risk of mortality. Compared with SOT, PSV (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.62–1.06; low certainty) and HFNO (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.65–1.25; very low certainty) were not associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality. Compared with IMV, no non-invasive respiratory management was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality, although all certainties of evidence were very low. The probability of being best in reducing short-term mortality among all possible interventions was higher for CPAP, followed by PSV and HFNO; IMV and SOT were tied for the worst (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value: 93.2, 65.0, 44.1, 23.9, and 23.9, respectively).ConclusionsWhen performing non-invasive ventilation among patients with de novo AHRF, it is important to avoid excessive tidal volume and lung injury. Although pressure support is needed for some of these patients, it should be applied with caution because this may lead to excessive tidal volume and lung injury.Trial registration protocols.io (Protocol integer ID 49375, April 23, 2021). https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.buf7ntrn.

NCOG-15. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUG DUOTHERAPIES IN GLIOMA PATIENTS: A MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Uncontrolled seizures on antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy are common in glioma patients and about a third of patients need an add-on AED. The aim of this study was to determine whether levetiracetam combined with valproic acid (LEV+VPA), a commonly prescribed duotherapy, was more effective than other duotherapy combinations, which included either LEV or VPA, in glioma patients. METHODS In this multicenter observational cohort study, data of patients with a diffuse grade 2-4 glioma and having uncontrolled seizures on their first-line monotherapy LEV or VPA, was retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcome was treatment failure (i.e. replacement by or addition of a new AED, or withdrawal of an AED) for any reason. Secondary outcomes included: 1) treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures; and 2) treatment failure due to adverse effects. Time to treatment failure was estimated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, from moment of AED duotherapy treatment initiation. The maximum duration of follow-up was 36 months. RESULTS A total of 355 patients received AED duotherapy after they showed treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures on monotherapy. LEV+VPA was prescribed in 66% (236/355) and other AED duotherapy combinations including LEV or VPA in 34% (119/355) of patients. Patients using other duotherapy versus LEV+VPA had higher risk of treatment failure for any reason (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR]=1.50 [95%CI=1.07-2.12], p=0.020), due to uncontrolled seizures (csHR=1.73 [95%CI=1.10-2.73], p=0.018), but not due to adverse effects (csHR=0.88 [95%CI=0.47-1.67]), p=0.703). CONCLUSIONS This observational cohort study showed that LEV+VPA has better efficacy than other AED combinations with either LEV or VPA, but toxicity was similar in the two groups.

Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA for Noninvasive Disease Detection, Risk Stratification, and MRD Monitoring in Patients with CNS Lymphoma

Abstract Introduction: Clinical outcomes for patients with central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) are remarkably heterogeneous, yet identification of patients at high risk for treatment failure remains challenging with existing methods. In addition, diagnosis of CNSL requires invasive neurosurgical biopsies that carry procedural risks and often cannot be performed in frail or elderly patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown great potential as a noninvasive biomarker in systemic lymphomas. Yet, previous studies revealed low ctDNA detection rates in blood plasma of CNSL patients. In this study, we utilized ultrasensitive targeted high-throughput sequencing technologies to explore the role of ctDNA for disease classification, MRD detection, and early prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with CNSL. Methods: We applied Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq) and Phased Variant Enrichment and Detection Sequencing (PhasED-Seq, Kurtz et al, Nat Biotech 2021) to 85 tumor biopsies, 131 plasma samples, and 62 CSF specimens from 92 CNSL patients and 44 patients with other brain cancers or inflammatory cerebral diseases, targeting 794 distinct genetic regions. Concentrations of ctDNA were correlated with radiological measures of tumor burden and tested for associations with clinical outcomes at distinct clinical time points. We further developed a novel classifier to noninvasively distinguish CNS lymphomas from other CNS tumors based on their mutational landscapes in plasma and CSF, using supervised training of a machine learning approach from tumor whole genome sequencing data and own genotyping analyses, followed by its independent validation. Results: We identified genetic aberrations in 100% of CNSL tumor biopsies (n=63), with a median of 262 mutations per patient. Pretreatment plasma ctDNA was detectable in 78% of plasma samples and in 100% of CSF specimens (Fig. 1a), with ctDNA concentrations ranging from 0.0004 - 5.94% allele frequency (AF, median: 0.01%) in plasma and 0.0049 - 50.47% AF (median: 0.62%) in CSF (Fig. 1b). Compared to ctDNA concentrations in patients with systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, data from Kurtz et al., J Clin Oncol, 2018), plasma ctDNA levels in CNSL were in median more than 200-fold lower (Fig. 1b). We observed a significant correlation of ctDNA concentrations with total radiographic tumor volumes (TRTV) measured by MRI (Fig. 1c,d), but no association with clinical risk scores (i.e., MSKCC score) or concurrent steroid treatment. Assessment of ctDNA at pretreatment time points predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both as continuous and binary variable (Fig. 1e,f). Notably, patients could be stratified into risk groups with particularly favorable or poor prognoses by combining ctDNA and TRTV as pretreatment biomarkers (Fig. 1g). Furthermore, ctDNA positivity during curative-intent induction therapy was significantly associated with clinical outcomes, both PFS and OS (Fig. 1h). Finally, we applied our novel machine learning classifier to 207 specimens from an independent validation cohort of CNSL and Non-CNSL patients. We observed high specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (100%) for noninvasive diagnosis of CNSL, with a sensitivity of 57% for CSF and 21% for plasma, suggesting that a significant subset of CNSL patients might be able to forego invasive surgical biopsies. Conclusions: We demonstrate robust and ultrasensitive detection of ctDNA at various disease milestones in CNSL. Our findings suggest that ctDNA accurately mirrors tumor burden and serves as a valuable clinical biomarker for risk stratification, outcome prediction, and surgery-free lymphoma classification in CNSL. We foresee an important potential future role of ctDNA as a decision-making tool to guide treatment in patients with CNSL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Esfahani: Foresight Diagnostics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Kurtz: Genentech: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Foresight Diagnostics: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Schorb: Riemser Pharma GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Diehn: BioNTech: Consultancy; RefleXion: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Foresight Diagnostics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; CiberMed: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties; Illumina: Research Funding; Varian Medical Systems: Research Funding. Alizadeh: Foresight Diagnostics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; CAPP Medical: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Forty Seven: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Cibermed: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type and Treatment Platform on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis BMT CTN 1101

BACKGROUND: Our group recently reported on the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) 1101 a randomized comparison between double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) and haploidentical bone marrow (haplo) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting that showed similar progression free survival (PFS) between the two treatment groups, but lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and better of overall survival (OS) in the haplo arm. In this secondary analysis we sought to investigate if transplant center experience with haplo and or cord blood HCT had an impact on outcomes.PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patient randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. In order to determine the transplant center experience with either haplo or dUCB we queried the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) for number of transplants with each platform in the year prior to initiation of the study. Centers were then grouped as dUCB center (> 10 dUCB, n=117, 10 centers), Haplo center (>10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB, n=110, 2 centers), and ≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs (other center, n=140, 21 centers). Further analysis considered the alternative cut-off for haplo (> 5 vs ≤ 5) experience, and considered the outcomes based on the donor experience vs. others (e.g. dUCB > 10 vs. ≤ 10; haplo > 5 vs. ≤ 5).RESULTS: The effect of center experience on HCT outcomes shown in Figure, below . After adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance score and, disease risk index we found that there was no difference in outcomes between haplo and dUCB for centers that were experienced with dUCB or had limited to no experience with either dUCB or haplo. In contrast, in centers that were primarily experienced with haplo had better outcomes with this donor type, as compared to dUCB. The higher risk of treatment failure (relapse or death) and overall mortality in dUCB in haplo experienced centers was driven by significantly higher risk of relapse. We then considered the transplant experience with each of the donor types separately. In transplant centers that had performed > 10 dUCB, there were similar outcomes for recipients of both dUCB and haplo. Similarly, centers that had ≤ 5 haplo HCTs had no difference in outcomes between donor types suggesting an overlap with centers that had performed > 10 dUCB HCTs. Overall mortality was higher among dUCB recipients in centers that had performed ≤ 10 dUCB. Notably, the hazard ratio of non-relapse mortality favored haplo in all four donor experience type of transplant center, albeit not statistically significant.CONCLUSION: Except for dUCB recipients in centers with < 10 dUCB/year had worse overall mortality, primarily driven by relapse, the transplant center experience in the year prior to the initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial. [Display omitted] DisclosuresBrunstein: NANT: Research Funding; FATE: Research Funding; GamidaCell: Research Funding; BlueRock: Research Funding; AlloVir: Consultancy. Costa: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cutler: Deciphera: Consultancy; Cimeio: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Horowitz: Sobi: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mesoblast: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Actinium: Research Funding. Horwitz: Gamida Cell: Research Funding. McGuirk: Novartis: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rezvani: US Department of Justice: Consultancy; Kaleido: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Nohla Therapeutics: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Pharmacyclics-Abbvie: Research Funding. Rybka: Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Vasu: Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Optimizing First-Line Therapy for Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

Goals of first-line therapy in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) should focus on balancing risk versus benefit to the individual while increasing efficacy and decreasing toxicity. Overall, the ABVD regimen is well tolerated but slightly less effective, with a better safety profile compared with escalated BEACOPP. BV-AVD is somewhere in between ABVD and escalated BEACOPP on the cure/morbidity scale. Interim PET is predictive, but new prognostic biomarkers are emerging that may better identify patients at high risk for treatment failure. In patients with interim PET-negative cHL, de-escalating therapy does not impact overall survival along 1) with no proven role for radiotherapy. cHL is largely a disease of young people, and the choice of treatment should always take into account the potential for both short- and long-term toxicity with the goal of optimizing survivorship.

Personalized Treatment Selection Leads to Low Rates of Local Salvage Therapy for Bone Metastases

Local therapy for patients with nonspine bone metastases is evolving, with data supporting the use of single-fraction treatments, and more recently, showing possible benefit from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, the rate of local salvage therapy (LST) after each technique has not been characterized in real-world clinic settings where patients are selected at physician discretion. We examined rates of LST in patients with nonspine bone metastases. We reviewed records of RT for nonspine bone metastases at our institution from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We defined LST as the first occurrence of RT or surgery for oncologic progression to a bone metastasis after initial RT. Cumulative incidence functions for retreatment were generated. We conducted multivariate analysis to identify variables associated with LST. A total of 1754 patients were analyzed, with median follow-up of 16.2 months (range, 0-36.8 months). Of all episodes of RT, 51.5% were multifraction external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), 7.0% were single-fraction EBRT, and 41.4% were SBRT. Altogether, 88 patients (5.0%) required LST, with an incidence at 6 months of 2.5%. Incidence of LST at 6 months was 2.1% for SBRT, 5.3% for single-fraction conventional regimens, and 2.4% for multifraction conventional regimens (P=.26). Patients of younger age, who had a higher Karnofsky performance status, and/or who had lesions in the pelvis had a higher risk of retreatment. In this large institutional cohort, the rate of LST was low, with no difference between RT techniques. The findings indicated that SBRT for patients at high risk for treatment failure may reduce the rate of retreatment overall. When treatment modality was selected based on patient characteristics, rates of LST were lower than when treatment was randomly selected.

Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: a noncomparative cohort analysis

AbstractAllogeneic transplant (alloHCT) and chimeric antigen receptor modified (CAR)-T cell therapy are potentially cuarative options of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after an autologous (auto)HCT. Although the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prognostic model can predict outcomes of alloHCT in DLBCL after autoHCT failure, corresponding models of CAR-T treatment in similar patient populations are not available. In this noncomparative registry analysis, we report outcomes of patients with DLBCL (≥18 years) undergoing a reduced intensity alloHCT or CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel during 2012 to 2019 after a prior auto-HCT failure and apply the CIBMTR prognostic model to CAR-T recipients. A total of 584 patients were included. The 1-year relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival for CAR-T treatment after autoHCT failure were 39.5%, 4.8%, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates in the alloHCT cohort were 26.2%, 20.0%, 65.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. The 1-year OS of alloHCT recipients classified as low-, intermediate- and high/very high-risk groups according to the CIBMTR prognostic score was 73.3%, 59.9%, and 46.3%, respectively (P = .002). The corresponding rates for low-, intermediate-, and high/very high-risk CAR-T patients were 88.4%, 76.4%, and 52.8%, respectively (P < .001). This registry analysis shows that both CAR-T and alloHCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with DLBCL relapsing after a prior autoHCT. The simple CIBMTR prognostic score can be used to identify patients at high risk of treatment failure after either procedure. Evaluation of novel relapse mitigations strategies after cellular immunotherapies are warranted in these high-risk patients.

Factors Associated With Treatment Failure in Moderately Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Failure of treatment is the most serious complication in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). To assess the potential risk factors for treatment failure in clinically stable patients with CAP. This secondary analysis assesses data from a randomized clinical trial on CAP (Pneumonia Short Treatment [PTC] trial) conducted from December 19, 2013, to February 1, 2018. Data analysis was performed from July 18, 2019, to February 15, 2020. Patients hospitalized at 1 of 16 centers in France for moderately severe CAP who were clinically stable at day 3 of antibiotic treatment were included in the PTC trial and analyzed in the per-protocol trial population. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) on day 3 of antibiotic treatment to receive β-lactam (amoxicillin-clavulanate [1 g/125 mg] 3 times daily) or placebo for 5 extra days. The main outcome was failure at 15 days after first antibiotic intake, defined as a temperature greater than 37.9 °C and/or absence of resolution or improvement of respiratory symptoms and/or additional antibiotic treatment for any cause. The association among demographic characteristics, baseline clinical and biological variables available (ie, at the first day of β-lactam treatment), and treatment failure at day 15 among the per-protocol trial population was assessed by univariate and multivariable logistic regressions. Overall, 310 patients were included in the study; this secondary analysis comprised 291 patients (174 [59.8%] male; mean [SD] age, 69.6 [18.5] years). The failure rate was 26.8%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.01-3.07), age per year (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05), Pneumonia Severe Index score (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02), the presence of chronic lung disease (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.03-3.30), and creatinine clearance (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00) were significantly associated with failure in the univariate analysis. When the Pneumonia Severe Index score was excluded to avoid collinearity with age and sex in the regression model, only male sex (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.08-3.49) and age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05) were associated with failure in the multivariable analysis. In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, among patients with CAP who reached clinical stability after 3 days of antibiotic treatment, only male sex and age were associated with higher risk of failure, independent of antibiotic treatment duration and biomarker levels. Another randomized clinical trial is needed to evaluate the impact of treatment duration in populations at higher risk for treatment failure.

Prognostic Gene Signature for Squamous Cell Carcinoma with a Higher Risk for Treatment Failure and Accelerated MEK-ERK Pathway Activity.

Simple SummarySquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most prevalent type of human cancer worldwide and represents the majority of head and neck tumors. As SCC from aerodigestive or genitourinary tracts share not only common etiology and histological features but also molecular patterns, the major objectives of this study were the establishment of a pan-SCC-related prognostic gene signature by an integrative analysis of multi-omics data and the elucidation of underlying oncogenic pathway activities as potential vulnerabilities for a more efficient and less toxic therapy. Our approach delivers a reliable molecular classifier to identify HNSCC and other SCC patients at higher risk for treatment failure with tumors characterized by a more prominent MAPK activity, who might benefit from a targeted treatment with MEK inhibitors.Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most prevalent histological type of human cancer, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, reliable prognostic gene signatures for SCC and underlying genetic and/or epigenetic principles are still unclear. We identified 37 prognostic candidate genes by best cutoff computation based on survival in a pan-SCC cohort (n = 1334) of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), whose expression stratified not only the pan-SCC cohort but also independent HNSCC validation cohorts into three distinct prognostic subgroups. The most relevant prognostic genes were prioritized by a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Cox regression model and were used to identify subgroups with high or low risks for unfavorable survival. An integrative analysis of multi-omics data identified FN1, SEMA3A, CDH2, FBN1, COL5A1, and ADAM12 as key nodes in a regulatory network related to the prognostic phenotype. An in-silico drug screen predicted two MEK inhibitors (Trametinib and Selumetinib) as effective compounds for high-risk SCC based on the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, which is supported by a higher p-MEK1/2 immunohistochemical staining of high-risk HNSCC. In conclusion, our data identified a molecular classifier for high-risk HNSCC as well as other SCC patients, who might benefit from treatment with MEK inhibitors.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

A large body of evidence is emerging to implicate that dysregulation of the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) increases the risk of surgical site infections. Gut dysbiosis is known to occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for translocation of bacteria across the inflamed and highly permeable intestinal mucosal wall. The null hypothesis was that IBD was not associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. A matched cohort study was designed. The primary end point was the occurrence of PJI at 2 years postoperatively. The secondary end points were aseptic revisions at 2 years postoperatively, discharge to a rehabilitation facility, complications up to 30 days after total joint arthroplasty, and readmission up to 90 days after total joint arthroplasty. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes were used to identify patients with IBD and the control cohort. A chart review was performed to confirm the diagnosis of IBD. Using our institutional database, 152 patients with IBD were identified and matched (3:1) for age, sex, body mass index, year of surgical procedure, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and involved joint with 456 patients without IBD undergoing total joint arthroplasty. The cumulative incidence of PJI was 4.61% for the patients with IBD compared with 0.88% for the control cohort (p = 0.0024). When univariable Cox regression was performed, a diagnosis of IBD was found to be an independent risk factor for PJI (hazard ratio [HR], 5.44 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.59 to 18.60]; p = 0.007) and aseptic revisions (HR, 4.02 [95% CI, 1.50 to 10.79]; p = 0.006). The rate of postoperative complications was also higher in patients with IBD. Based on the findings of this study, it appears that patients with IBD are at higher risk for treatment failure due to PJI or aseptic loosening after primary total joint arthroplasty. The exact reason for this finding is not known, but could be related to bacterial translocation from the inflamed intestinal mucosa, the dysregulated inflammatory status of these patients, malnutrition, and potentially other factors. Some of the aseptic failures could be as a result of infection that may have escaped detection and/or recognition. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia

BackgroundMeropenem is commonly used in the ICU to treat gram-negative infections. Due to various pathophysiological changes, critically ill patients are at higher risk of having subtherapeutic concentrations and hence have a higher risk of treatment failure—especially in regions where gram-negative drug resistance is increasing, such as Saudi Arabia. No studies have evaluated the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia. Our primary objective is to assess the percentage of patients achieving the therapeutic target for meropenem. MethodsThis prospective observational study was conducted in the ICUs of King Khalid University Hospital. Patient were included if >18 years-of-age and received meropenem for a clinically suspected or proven bacterial infection. The primary outcome was to assess the percentage of patients who achieved the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) therapeutic target of a free trough concentration four times the MIC. The secondary outcome was to estimate the pharmacokinetics of meropenem. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Monolix Suite 2020R1 (Lixoft, France). ResultsTrough concentrations were highly variable and ranged from <0.5 µg/mL to 39 µg/mL, with a mean ± SD trough concentration of 8.5 ± 8 µg/mL. Only 46% of patients achieved the therapeutic target. The only significant predictor of failing to achieve the PKPD target was augmented renal clearance. ConclusionIn conclusion, more than half of our patients did not achieve the PKPD target. Thus, there is a need for better dosing strategies of meropenem in critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia such as extended and continuous infusion.

The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with portal hypertension: Advantages and pitfalls.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective interventional procedure to relieve portal hypertension, which is a main mechanism for the development of complications of liver cirrhosis (LC), such as variceal hemorrhage, ascites, and hepatorenal syndrome. However, the high incidence of adverse events after TIPS implementation limits its application in clinical practice. Esophageal variceal hemorrhage is one of the major indications for TIPS. Recently, preemptively performed TIPS has been recommended, as several studies have shown that TIPS significantly reduced mortality as well as rebleeding or failure to control bleeding in patients who are at high risk of treatment failure for bleeding control with endoscopic variceal ligation and vasoactive drugs. Meanwhile, recurrent ascites is another indication for TIPS with a proven survival benefit. TIPS may also be considered as an effective treatment for other LC complications, usually as an alternative therapy. Although there are concerns about the development of hepatic encephalopathy and hepatic dysfunction after TIPS implementation, careful patient selection using prognostic scores can lead to excellent outcomes. Assessments of cardiac and renal function prior to TIPS may also be considered to improve patient prognosis.

Survival impact of increasing time to IMRT initiation following induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis

PurposeTo explore the prognostic impact of waiting time for radiotherapy (RT) after induction chemotherapy (IC) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and materialsA total of 648 NPC patients receiving IC between 2009 and 2011 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the variables. Survival outcomes were compared in subgroups based on time to RT (TTR) after IC. ResultsThe optimal cutoff point for TTR was 28 days. A total of 330 patients were selected by 1:2 PSM. Stratified and dichotomized TTRs were both strongly correlated with prognosis. Patients with TTR > 28 days had significantly worse 5-year LRFS, DMFS, DFS and OS than those with TTR ≤ 28 days (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, TTR > 28 days was an independent predictor of worse LRFS [HR=2.08; 95% CI, 1.18-3.66; P = 0.011), DMFS (HR=1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.62; P = 0.033), DFS (HR=1.86; 95% CI, 1.35-2.62; P < 0.001) and OS (HR=1.90; 95% CI, 1.26-2.85; P < 0.001). High-risk patients with T4 or N2-3 disease were highly susceptible to RT delay with impaired DFS and OS. In high-risk patients with TTR > 28 days, concurrent chemotherapy yielded better DMFS (70.9% vs. 52.0%, P = 0.041), DFS (52.5% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.039) and OS (70.3% vs. 53.2%, P = 0.048). ConclusionsProlonged waiting is detrimental to survival in NPC, and it is strongly recommended to start RT within 28 days after IC. T4/N2-3 NPC has a higher risk of treatment failure with delayed RT. With potential protection against RT delay, concurrent chemotherapy should be performed in high-risk patients as salvage therapy.

OS10.8.A The effectiveness of antiepileptic drug duotherapies in glioma patients: a multicenter observational cohort study

Abstract BACKGROUND About 30% of glioma patients need an add-on antiepileptic drug (AED) due to uncontrolled seizures on AED monotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether levetiracetam combined with valproic acid (LEV+VPA), a commonly prescribed duotherapy, is more effective than other duotherapy combinations including either LEV or VPA in glioma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this multicenter retrospective observational cohort study, treatment failure (i.e. replacement by or addition of a new AED, or withdrawal of an AED) for any reason was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included: 1) treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures; and 2) treatment failure due to adverse effects. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the start of AED duotherapy until the time of treatment failure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were estimated to study the association between risk factors and treatment failure. The maximum duration of follow-up was 36 months. RESULTS A total of 1435 patients were treated with first-line monotherapy LEV or VPA, of which 355 patients received AED duotherapy after they had treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures on monotherapy. LEV+VPA was prescribed in 66% (236/355) and other AED duotherapy combinations including LEV or VPA in 34% (119/355) of patients. Patients using other duotherapy versus LEV+VPA had higher risk of treatment failure for any reason (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR]=1.50 [95%CI=1.07–2.12], p=0.020), treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures (csHR=1.73 [95%CI=1.10–2.73], p=0.018). There were no differences in failure due to adverse effects (csHR=0.88 [95%CI=0.47–1.67]), p=0.703) between the two groups. CONCLUSION This observational cohort study suggests that LEV+VPA has better efficacy than other AED combinations. Similar toxicities were experienced in the two groups.

Minimal and Maximal Extent of Band Ligation for Acute Variceal Bleeding during the First Endoscopic Session.

Background/AimsThe appropriate number of band ligations during the first endoscopic session for acute variceal bleeding is debatable. We aimed to compare the technical aspects of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in patients with variceal bleeding according to the number of bands placed per session.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed multicenter data from patients who underwent EVL for acute variceal bleeding. Patients were classified into minimal EVL (targeting only the foci with active bleeding or stigmata of recent bleeding) and maximal EVL (targeting potential bleeding sources in addition to the aforementioned targets) groups. The primary endpoint was 5-day treatment failure. The secondary endpoints were 30-day rebleeding, 30-day mortality, and intraprocedural adverse events.ResultsMinimal EVL was associated with lower rates of hypoxia and shock during EVL than maximal EVL (hypoxia, 0.9% vs 2.9%; shock, 1.3% vs 3.4%). However, treatment failure was higher in the minimal EVL group than in the maximal EVL group (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 2.41). Age ≥60 years, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥15, Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification C, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg at initial presentation were also associated with treatment failure. In contrast, 30-day rebleeding and 30-day mortality did not differ between the minimal and maximal EVL groups.ConclusionsGiven that minimal EVL was associated with a high risk of treatment failure, maximal EVL may be a better option for variceal bleeding. However, the minimal EVL strategy should be considered in select patients because it does not affect 30-day rebleeding and mortality.

Real-world efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC patients without identification of T790M mutation.

The efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC without identification of T790M mutational status remains unclear in real-world practice. 417 patients had stage III-IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation and 154 out of 417 patients receiving osimertinib as ≥ second-line EGFR-TKI were identified. The time to treatment failure and risk of death were analyzed. Higher risk of death was found in EGFR-mutant patients with age ≥ 65years, non-adenocarcinoma, no surgery or radiation, non-exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R, higher ECOG PS (2-4), PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, and bone/liver/adrenal metastasis (all p < 0.05). Osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients with/without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib (p = 0.0002; 0.0232, respectively). However, osimertinib-treated patients with T790M did not have superior survival than those without (p = 0.2803). A higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib was found in males, patients with first-line TKI duration ≤ 12months, BMI drop > 10%, and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% (All p < 0.05). Nonetheless, osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients without identification of 790M did not have higher risk of treatment failure than those with T790M (p = 0.1236). This study demonstrates that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI in EGFR-TKI-treated patients without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib, in real-world practice. Additionally, EGFR-mutant patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% had a higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib and worse overall survival than those with PD-L1 expression < 50%. These results suggest that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI may be a potential alternative option for the treatment of patients without identification of T790M and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% is associated with a significantly poor outcome in patients receiving osimertinib.

Time to First-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Failure and Its Predictors among HIV-Positive Children in Shashemene Town Health Facilities, Oromia Region, Ethiopia, 2019.

With expanding pediatric antiretroviral therapy access, children will begin to experience treatment failure and require second-line therapy. In resource-limited settings, treatment failure is often diagnosed based on the clinical or immunological criteria which occur way after the occurrence of virological failure. Previous limited studies have evaluated immunological and clinical failure without considering virological failure in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to investigate time to first-line antiretroviral treatment failure and its predictors in Shashamene town health facilities with a focus on virological criteria. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in three health facilities of Shashamene town, Oromia Regional State, from March 1 to 26, 2019. Children aged less than 15 years living with HIV/AIDS that were enrolled on ART between January 1, 2011, and December 30, 2015, in Shashamene town health facilities were the study population. Data were extracted using a checklist, entered into EpiData version 3.1, and exported to SPSS version 20 for data analysis. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine the predictors of time to first-line treatment failure. Result. The median survival time to virological failure was 30 months with IQR of 24.42 to 44.25. Baseline WHO stages 3 and 4 with AHR = 5.69 (95% CI: 2.07–15.66) and NVP-based NNRT at initial treatment with AHR = 2.72 (1.13–6.54) were the independent predictors of time to treatment failure. Conclusion. The median survival time of first-line antiretroviral treatment failure was moderate in the study area as compared to other studies. The incidence density of treatment failure in this study was low as compared to other studies. The finding also demonstrated that children treated with nevirapine-based nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors at initial and advanced WHO clinical stages at baseline were at higher risk of treatment failure.