You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Radiation Therapy1 Apr 2016MP14-01 HYPOFRACTIONATED VERSUS CONVENTIONALLY FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF THE DUTCH RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 HYPRO TRIAL Ruud Wortel, Luca Incrocci, Shafak Aluwini, Erik Schimmel, Stijn Krol, Peter-Paul van der Toorn, Hanja de Jager, Maarten Dirkx, Wendim Ghidey, Ben Heijmen, and Floris Pos Ruud WortelRuud Wortel More articles by this author , Luca IncrocciLuca Incrocci More articles by this author , Shafak AluwiniShafak Aluwini More articles by this author , Erik SchimmelErik Schimmel More articles by this author , Stijn KrolStijn Krol More articles by this author , Peter-Paul van der ToornPeter-Paul van der Toorn More articles by this author , Hanja de JagerHanja de Jager More articles by this author , Maarten DirkxMaarten Dirkx More articles by this author , Wendim GhideyWendim Ghidey More articles by this author , Ben HeijmenBen Heijmen More articles by this author , and Floris PosFloris Pos More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2504AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Hypofractionated radiotherapy might increase the radiobiological tumor dose without increasing toxicity due to the reported high radiation-fraction sensitivity of prostate cancer. Hypofractionated treatment is delivered in less fractions, offering both economic and logistical advantages. Here, we present the first results on oncologic outcome from the Dutch randomized HYPRO trial. METHODS Between 2007-2010, we conducted a multicenter, randomized phase 3 superiority trial, including intermediate-to high risk patients with localized T1b-4NX-0MX-0 prostate cancer. Inclusion criteria were a PSA concentration ≤60 ng/ml, and a WHO performance status 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive conventional treatment with 39 fractions of 2 Gy in 8 weeks, or hypofractionated treatment with 19 fractions of 3.4 Gy in 6.5 weeks. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival (RFS) after treatment. Relapse is defined as biochemical relapse (Phoenix definition), clinical relapse, or start of hormonal therapy, whichever occurs first. The aim of this trial was to detect an absolute reduction of 10% of the relapse rate at 5 years in the hypofractionation arm. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate RFS probabilities and Cox regression analysis was applied to compare the RFS between the treatment arms. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. An α of 0.05 was considered the level of statistical significance. RESULTS Of the enrolled 820 patients, 804 men were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 60 months. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was prescribed to 534 patients (66%). The 5-year RFS rates were 77% for conventional treatment and 80% for hypofractionated treatment (p=0.36)(Figure 1). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.86 (95% CI 0.63-1.16). Factors associated with RFS in multivariate analysis were Gleason score ≤7 (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.3-0.7, p<0.001), long-term ADT (≥12 months) vs none (HR=0.50, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, p=0.004), and >25% risk of seminal vesicle involvement (HR=2.59, 95% CI 1.4-4.9, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated radiotherapy (19 fractions of 3.4 Gy) resulted in higher RFS rates, but we found no evidence of superiority of hypofractionation over conventional treatment. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e142-e143 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Ruud Wortel More articles by this author Luca Incrocci More articles by this author Shafak Aluwini More articles by this author Erik Schimmel More articles by this author Stijn Krol More articles by this author Peter-Paul van der Toorn More articles by this author Hanja de Jager More articles by this author Maarten Dirkx More articles by this author Wendim Ghidey More articles by this author Ben Heijmen More articles by this author Floris Pos More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract