Depicting a Meritocratic Empire Vera Kaplan (bio) A. E. Ivanov, Uchenoe dostoinstvo v Rossiiskoi imperii, XVIII–nachalo XX veka: Podgotovka i nauchnaia attestatsiia professorov i prepodavatelei vysshei shkoly (Scholarly Merit in the Russian Empire, 18th–Early 20th Centuries: Preparation and Scholarly Evaluation of Professors and Lecturers in Institutions of Higher Education). 656 pp. Moscow: Novyi khronograf, 2016. ISBN-13 978-5948813349. Frances Nethercott, Writing History in Late Imperial Russia: Scholarship and the Literary Canon. 280 pp. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. ISBN-13 978-1350130401. $120.00. E. A. Rostovtsev, Stolichnyi universitet Rossiiskoi imperii: Uchenoe soslovie, ob shchestvo i vlast´, vtoraia polovina XIX–nachalo XX veka (The University of the Russian Empire's Capital City: The Learned Estate, Society, and Power in the Second Half of the 19th–Early 20th Centuries). 903 pp. Moscow: Rosspen, 2017. ISBN-13 978-5824320220. T. N. Zhukovskaia and K. S. Kazakova, Anima universitatis: Studenchestvo Peterburgskogo universiteta v pervoi polovine XIX veka (Anima Universitatis: The Students of St. Petersburg University in the First Half of the 19th Century). 576 pp. Moscow: Novyi khronograf, 2018. ISBN-13 978-5948814216. At the dawn of perestroika, when the desire for change affected almost every aspect of public life in the Soviet Union, somebody once suggested cancelling a minuscule addition to the salary of people with a Candidate of Sciences degree (kandidat nauk, a Soviet version of the PhD) who had written their dissertation on absolutely useless topics—for example, a history of education [End Page 129] in tsarist Russia. However, the political and social reforms of the late 1980s, the eventual dismantling of the Soviet Union and reemergence of Russia out of its rubble moved the issue of education, and especially its prerevolutionary history, into the limelight of public discussion and scholarly research. There were several reasons for this. The aspiration to break from the recent Soviet past and to find a line of continuity with imperial Russia led to growing interest in this period of history. The attempt to get rid of the suffocating straitjacket of the Marxist scheme of historical development, which underlined the centrality of the "class struggle," and hence of political history, contributed to the growing popularity of cultural studies, especially of the Moscow-Tartu school of semiotics. This trend was strengthened in the following decade as a result of the increased interaction between Russian and Western scholars precisely at a time when Western Slavic studies underwent the "cultural turn." Last, but definitely not least, the opening of the Russian archives provided fertile ground for launching new research on various aspects of Russian preand postrevolutionary education, while new perspectives on the topic led to a significant broadening of this field. In the past two decades, important new studies have enriched the field of the history of Russian higher education, and especially of its pillar—the universities.1 These studies, produced inside and outside Russia, depict the image of a meritocratic empire and explore its distinct formation as well as the resilience of its educational culture, which outlived the tsarist state as a political entity. This review surveys four such studies that have appeared in recent years. [End Page 130] ________ Ivanov's book is devoted to the history of academic degrees (uchenye stepeni) in the Russian Empire. The author already published a book on this subject in 1994, and his new book presents the results of his continuing work on the problem, including a survey of the practice of awarding academic degrees not only by the universities but also by the ecclesiastical academies and higher professional schools. Ivanov demonstrates the significance of academic degrees from two interconnected perspectives.2 On the one hand, they constituted part of the system of titles and ranks that permeated Russian imperial society and served the government as an instrument for forming the national scholarly elite; on the other hand, they contributed to the cohesive functioning of scholarship as a distinct social and cultural institution. Academic degrees, Ivanov claims, provided their bearers with distinct rights and privileges: a respected position in the system of higher education, advancement through the Table of Ranks, and an opportunity to achieve high social status for those who did not belong to the nobility...