Introduction Ultrasound guidance for cannulation of the internal jugular vein has been shown to improve success and complication rates in comparison with the landmark techniques. The aim of this study is to verify if ultrasound is also cost-effective. Materials and Methods A systematic review of the literature in PubMed, Medline, and Google was performed between years 1966 and 2010. A decision tree model was built with failure and complication rates from the studies selected. A costeffectiveness analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed with this model. Randomised controlled trials on adult patients, with real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance, comparison between ultrasonography and landmark methods and reported outcomes (early complications, failures, time to successful cannulation) were included. Exclusion criteria were: enrolment of paediatric patients, ultrasound before puncture, Doppler ultrasound guidance, no clear description of outcomes, and no prospective clinical trial. Results About 8 randomised controlled trials were selected. The ultrasound guidance significantly reduces the occurrence of arterial puncture (risk ratio, risk ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.13–0.33), pneumothorax complications (risk ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.03–0.88), and cannulation failures (R 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.39). It proves to have € 1,225 additional cost every 1,000 procedures. The major determinants of ultrasound costs are the purchase cost of the ultrasound unit and the machine uses per week. Conclusion Although the ultrasound approach introduces a clinically relevant improvement of success and complication rates, it does not appear to be cost-effective. Introduction Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for the clinical management of many patients both in the acute care setting and in the chronic, longterm care. Studies have reported an associated complication rate >15% for central venous cannulations1,2. Up to recent years, the internal jugular vein (IJV) has gained the greatest popularity among the different central cannulation routes due to its consistent anatomical position, large diameter, and low likelihood of catheter obstruction or misplacement3. This route, however, is not devoid of early mechanical complications like arterial puncture and pneumothorax. Two meta-analyses have shown that ultrasound-guided CVC placement is associated with a significant improvement of early complication rates, length of execution, and firstpass success rate when compared with the landmark (LM) technique4,5. However, in a survey by the Society of Cardiovascular Anaesthesiologists only 15% of responders stated to routinely use ultrasound (US) for CVC placement6. A presumed higher procedural cost was among the most common objections for not utilizing this approach. According to many providers, the initial financial investments for equipment and operators’ training, and fixed costs for maintenance and additional supplies (e.g. sterile sheaths), may not be outweighed by the better clinical performances of US guidance. Calvert and coworkers have performed a decision analysis showing that B-mode US guidance for CVC placement is significantly cost-effective when compared with the traditional LM technique7,8. Their decision model considered a 12% incidence of arterial puncture and a 9% failure for internal jugular vein cannulations with the LM technique. Although the analysis used conservative assumptions against the US approach (such as no pneumothorax complications, expert operators, allowance of only one failed attempt), these complication rates are higher than data published in the studies on CVC placement with the LM approach9,10. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the existing literature and to update the economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness of real-time B-mode US guidance compared with the LM technique for IJV cannulation. Materials and Methods Selection of studies A search in PubMed, Medline, and Google was carried out with the following headings: central venous catheter, internal jugular vein, and ultrasound. Articles were limited to those in English. The time period was between 1966 and December 2010. Inclusion criteria were: * Corresponding author Email: riccardo.moretti77@gmail.com 1 Teaching Hospital of Val Vibrata, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Sant’Omero (Teramo) Italy 2 Department of Cost Analysis and Control, HBG, Rome, Italy
Read full abstract