This paper considers, in the presence of a nuisance parameter, a very large class of tests that includes the conditional and the usual versions of the likelihood ratio (LR), Rao’s and Wald’s tests. Under contiguous alternatives and orthogonal parametrization, the power functions of the conditional and the usual versions of these tests have been compared and, in particular, it is seen that the power functions of the conditional versions, unlike those of the usual versions, are identical, up to the second-order, with the power functions of the corresponding tests with known nuisance parameter. An optimality property of the conditional LR test, in terms of second-order local maximinity, has been established. A test, optimal in the sense of third-order average power under contiguous alternatives, has been proposed. A weaker optimality property of Rao’s test, in terms of third-order average power, has also been indicated.
Read full abstract