Higher Incidence Of Adverse Events Research Articles

Comparing intravenous lidocaine and pethidine for pain management in emergency department patients with femoral bone fracture: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIntravenous lidocaine has shown promise as an effective analgesic in various clinical settings, but its utility for pain management in emergency departments, especially for bone fractures, remains relatively understudied.ObjectiveThis study compared intravenous lidocaine to pethidine for femoral bone fracture pain management.MethodsThis double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in the emergency department of AJA University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals. Patients aged 18–70 years-old with femoral bone fracture and experiencing severe pain, defined as a numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain ≥ 7, were included in the study. One group received intravenous pethidine (25 mg), while the other group received intravenous lidocaine (3 mg/kg, not exceeding 200 mg), infused with 250 ml saline over 20 min. Pain levels were evaluated before treatment administration (0 min) and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after treatment administration using the NRS.ResultsSeventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. Demographic characteristics and pain scores were similar between the two groups. The mean pain scores upon arrival for the lidocaine and pethidine groups were 8.50 ± 1 and 8.0 ± 1, respectively; after one hour, they were 4.0 ± 1 and 4.0 ± 1, respectively. While there was a statistically significant reduction in pain in both groups after one hour, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.262). Pethidine had a higher incidence of adverse events, though not statistically significant. Additionally, females required more rescue analgesics.ConclusionThe administration of intravenous lidocaine is beneficial for managing pain in femoral bone fractures, suggesting that lidocaine could be a potent alternative to opioids.Trial RegistrationIRCT20231213060355N1 (https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/74624) (30/12/2023).

Safety of treating acute pulmonary embolism at home: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Home treatment is considered safe in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients selected by a validated triage tool (e.g. simplified PE severity index score or Hestia rule), but there is uncertainty regarding the applicability in underrepresented subgroups. The aim was to evaluate the safety of home treatment by performing an individual patient-level data meta-analysis. Ten prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials were identified in a systematic search, totalling 2694 PE patients treated at home (discharged within 24 h) and identified by a predefined triage tool. The 14- and 30-day incidences of all-cause mortality and adverse events (combined endpoint of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and/or all-cause mortality) were evaluated. The relative risk (RR) for 14- and 30-day mortalities and adverse events is calculated in subgroups using a random effects model. The 14- and 30-day mortalities were 0.11% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0-0.24, I2 = 0) and 0.30% (95% CI 0.09-0.51, I2 = 0). The 14- and 30-day incidences of adverse events were 0.56% (95% CI 0.28-0.84, I2 = 0) and 1.2% (95% CI 0.79-1.6, I2 = 0). Cancer was associated with increased 30-day mortality [RR 4.9; 95% prediction interval (PI) 2.7-9.1; I2 = 0]. Pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease, abnormal troponin, and abnormal (N-terminal pro-)B-type natriuretic peptide [(NT-pro)BNP] at presentation were associated with an increased incidence of 14-day adverse events [RR 3.5 (95% PI 1.5-7.9, I2 = 0), 2.5 (95% PI 1.3-4.9, I2 = 0), and 3.9 (95% PI 1.6-9.8, I2 = 0), respectively], but not mortality. At 30 days, cancer, abnormal troponin, and abnormal (NT-pro)BNP were associated with an increased incidence of adverse events [RR 2.7 (95% PI 1.4-5.2, I2 = 0), 2.9 (95% PI 1.5-5.7, I2 = 0), and 3.3 (95% PI 1.6-7.1, I2 = 0), respectively]. The incidence of adverse events in home-treated PE patients, selected by a validated triage tool, was very low. Patients with cancer had a three- to five-fold higher incidence of adverse events and death. Patients with increased troponin or (NT-pro)BNP had a three-fold higher risk of adverse events, driven by recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding.

Reasons for non-feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted therapies in oncology – an analysis of the closed cohorts of a multicentre prospective study

BackgroundTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) – performing dose adjustments based on measured drug levels and established pharmacokinetic (PK) targets – could optimise treatment with drugs that show large interpatient variability in exposure. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM for multiple oral targeted therapies. Here we report on drugs for which routine TDM is not feasible.MethodsWe evaluated drug cohorts from the Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group – TDM study. Based on PK levels taken at pre-specified time points, PK-guided interventions were performed. Feasibility of TDM was evaluated, and based on the success and practicability of TDM, cohorts could be closed.ResultsFor 10 out of 24 cohorts TDM was not feasible and inclusion was closed. A high incidence of adverse events resulted in closing the cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib cohort. The enzalutamide and erlotinib cohorts were closed because almost all PK levels were above target. Other, non-pharmacological reasons led to closing the palbociclib, olaparib and tamoxifen cohort.ConclusionsAlthough TDM could help personalising treatment for many drugs, the above-mentioned reasons can influence its feasibility, usefulness and clinical applicability. Therefore, routine TDM is not advised for cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, enzalutamide, erlotinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib. Nonetheless, TDM remains valuable for individual clinical decisions.

Phase 2 pilot trial to optimise pharmacometric evaluations in Chagas disease (CHARM: CHAgas disease PharMacometrics)

Chagas disease is a neglected disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi that currently affects about 7 million people in the Americas and the American diaspora. Only two drugs are available to treat Chagas disease, both are associated with a high incidence of adverse events, particularly in adults, and they are also complex to administer. New treatments are needed urgently, but there is no established method of evaluating new drugs. We describe the study protocol for a pilot phase 2 descriptive observational study of parasite dynamics within the host, followed by a randomised evaluation of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties of subcurative doses of anti-chagasic drugs in patients with chronic Chagas disease. This study is divided into three stages. The general objective of the study is to characterise the dynamics of the parasite within the host at steady state and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for each of the three drugs studied. This is based on characterising the structure and parameters of a pharmacodynamic model of parasite turnover within the host. Each stage of the study targets specific key parameters in the pharmacodynamic model of parasite dynamics (both the blood stage and the tissue stage) for individual research participants. The primary outcome measure for all three stages is blood-stage parasite density, measured by quantitative PCR. Upon completion, research participants will receive definitive treatment for Chagas disease in accordance with national guidelines. Registration ISRCTN (ISRCTN26467068; 01/07/2021).

Comparative efficacy and safety of weekly tirzepatide versus weekly insulin in type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of recent innovations in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which include once-weekly formulations such as tirzepatide, a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, and once-weekly insulin options such as icodec and basal insulin Fc. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted. The network meta-analysis protocol was registered at OSF registries (https://osf.io/gd67x). The primary outcome of interest was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), with change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, incidence of hypoglycaemia, and treatment discontinuation as secondary outcomes. Tirzepatide exhibited superior efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels compared with insulin therapies, with the 15-mg dose showing the most significant reduction (mean difference [MD] -1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.49; -1.0). In terms of FPG reduction, tirzepatide 15 mg ranked highest (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.05; -0.34), followed by tirzepatide 10 mg and 5 mg. Additionally, tirzepatide led to substantial weight loss, with the 15-mg dose exhibiting the most pronounced effect (MD -12.13, 95% CI -13.98; -10.27). However, a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation were associated with tirzepatide, particularly at higher doses. Tirzepatide, particularly at higher doses, demonstrates superior efficacy in lowering HbA1c and reducing hypoglycaemia risk compared with weekly insulin. However, its use is also associated with a higher incidence of AEs and treatment discontinuation.

The optimal atropine concentration for myopia control in Chinese children: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis.

To figure out whether various atropine dosages may slow the progression of myopia in Chinese kids and teenagers and to determine the optimal atropine concentration for effectively slowing the progression of myopia. A systematic search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wanfang database, encompassing literature on slowing progression of myopia with varying atropine concentrations from database inception to January 17, 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a network Meta-analysis was executed using Stata version 14.0 Software. Results were visually represented through graphs. Fourteen papers comprising 2475 cases were included; five different concentrations of atropine solution were used. The network Meta-analysis, along with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), showed that 1% atropine (100%)>0.05% atropine (74.9%) >0.025% atropine (51.6%)>0.02% atropine (47.9%)>0.01% atropine (25.6%)>control in refraction change and 1% atropine (98.7%)>0.05% atropine (70.4%)>0.02% atropine (61.4%)>0.025% atropine (42%)>0.01% atropine (27.4%)>control in axial length (AL) change. In Chinese children and teenagers, the five various concentrations of atropine can reduce the progression of myopia. Although the network Meta-analysis showed that 1% atropine is the best one for controlling refraction and AL change, there is a high incidence of adverse effects with the use of 1% atropine. Therefore, we suggest that 0.05% atropine is optimal for Chinese children to slow myopia progression.

Glucagon agonism in the treatment of metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with obesity and, therefore, it is important to target both overweight and hyperglycaemia. Glucagon plays important roles in glucose, amino acid and fat metabolism and may also regulate appetite and energy expenditure. These physiological properties are currently being exploited therapeutically in several compounds, most often in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonism in the form of dual agonists. With this combination, increases in hepatic glucose production and hyperglycaemia, which would be counterproductive, are largely avoided. In multiple randomized trials, the co-agonists have been demonstrated to lead to significant weight loss and, in participants with T2DM, even improved glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. In addition, significant reductions in hepatic fat content have been observed. Here, we review and discuss the studies so far available. Twenty-six randomized trials of seven different GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R)/glucagon receptor (GCGR) co-agonists were identified and reviewed. GLP-1R/GCGR co-agonists generally provided significant weight loss, reductions in hepatic fat content, improved lipid profiles, insulin secretion and sensitivity, and in some cases, improved HbA1c levels. A higher incidence of adverse effects was present with GLP-1R/GCGR co-agonist treatment than with GLP-1 agonist monotherapy or placebo. Possible additional risks associated with glucagon agonism are also discussed. A delicate balance between GLP-1 and glucagon agonism seems to be of particular importance. Further studies exploring the optimal ratio of GLP-1 and glucagon receptor activation and dosage and titration regimens are needed to ensure a sufficient safety profile while providing clinical benefits.

Technical review of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage/anastomosis and trans‐endosonographically created route procedures for the treatment of pancreatic diseases

AbstractEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided pancreatic duct drainage includes two procedures: EUS‐guided drainage/anastomosis (EUS‐D/A) and trans‐papillary drainage with EUS‐assisted pancreatic rendezvous. EUS‐guided pancreatogastrostomy is the most common EUS‐D/A procedure and is recommended as a salvage procedure in cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails or is difficult. However, initial EUS‐D/A is performed in patients with surgically altered anatomy at our institution. It is one of the most difficult interventional EUS procedures and has a high incidence of adverse events. The technical difficulties differ according to etiology, and the incidence of adverse events varies between initial EUS‐D/A and subsequent trans‐endosonographically/EUS‐guided created route procedures. Hence, it is important to meticulously prepare a procedure based on the patient's condition and the available devices. The technical difficulties in EUS‐D/A include: (1) determination of the puncture point, (2) selection of a puncture needle and guidewire, (3) guidewire manipulation, and (4) dilation of the puncture route and stenting. Proper technical procedures are important to increase the success rate and reduce the incidence and severity of adverse events. The complexity of EUS‐D/A is also contingent on the severity of pancreatic fibrosis and stricture. In post‐pancreatectomy cases, determination of the puncture site is important for success because of the remnant pancreas. Trans‐endosonographically/EUS‐guided created route procedures following initial EUS‐D/A are also important for achieving the treatment goal. This article focuses on effective strategies for initial EUS‐D/A, based on the etiology and condition of the pancreas. We mainly discuss EUS‐D/A, including its indications, techniques, and success‐enhancing strategies.

Safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e13106 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a first-in-class TROP-2-directed antibody conjugated to a topoisomerase inhibitor, has shown antitumor activity across various breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Following SG approval for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its broad use, understanding SG’ safety profile is crucial. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SG in patients with BC. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, and ASCO and ESMO websites for clinical trials assessing the safety of SG in BC patients. Outcomes of interest included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade, grade 3/4, adverse events (AEs) leading to death, and AEs leading to SG dose reduction or discontinuation. All analyses were performed in R software (v.4.2.2) using random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. Results: A total of 1,325 patients from six studies – three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs – were included. Median age of population ranged from 47 to 56 years. Most had metastatic disease (86%, n=1187), and triple-negative BC (48.6%, n=670). Regarding therapies, 798 patients received SG and 527 had treatment of physician's choice (TPC). In the pooled analysis of 748 patients on SG, the overall risk of AEs was 100% (95% CI 99-100%). The estimated risk of the most common all grade AEs were neutropenia (66%), anemia (44%), nausea (56%), vomiting (30%), fatigue (46%), constipation (17%), diarrhea (45%), and alopecia (46%), as described (Table). The risk of grade 3/4 AEs among 748 patients on SG was 55% (95% CI 36-74%). Neutropenia was the most important grade ≥3 AE, with a estimated frequency of 47%; followed by anemia and diarrhea, with an incidence of at 9% and 7%, respectively. The incidence of all other grade 3/4 AEs (e.g. anemia, vomiting, leukopenia, fatigue, constipation, and diarrhea) was below 10%. Dose reduction and discontinuation were observed in 14.4% and 2.9% of patients, respectively. Toxicity-related deaths occurred in six patients (0.4%). In a comparative sensitivity analysis of RCTs only, SG had significantly higher toxicity than TCPs, all grade AEs (OR 12.30 95%CI 1.68-89.87, p=0.01), and grade >3 AEs (OR 1.69 95%CI 1.25-2.28, p=0.0006). Conclusions: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, SG was associated with a high incidence of AEs. Neutropenia is a notable and potentially serious adverse event. Toxicity associated with SG may be addressed through close monitoring and early management. [Table: see text]

Consensus for antifungal stewardship in China (2024 edition).

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) has become a serious threat to human health in China and around the world, with high mortality and morbidity. Currently, the misdiagnosis rate of IFD is extremely high, compounded with the low quality of prescription antifungals and the high incidence of adverse events associated with IFD treatment, resulting in lengthy hospitalization, low clinical response, and high disease burden, which have become serious challenges in clinical practice. Antifungal stewardship (AFS) can not only significantly increase the early diagnosis rate of IFD, reduce inappropriate utilization of antifungal drugs, improve patient prognosis, but can also improve therapeutic safety and reduce healthcare expenses. Thus, it is urgent to identify key AFS metrics suitable for China's current situation. Based on metrics recommended by international AFS consensuses, combined with the current situation of China and the clinical experience of authoritative experts in various fields, several metrics were selected, and experts in the fields of respiratory diseases, hematology, intensive care units (ICUs), dermatology, infectious diseases, microbiology laboratory and pharmacy were invited to assess AFS metrics by the Delphi method. Consensus was considered to be reached with an agreement level of ≥80% for the metric. Consensus was reached for 24 metrics, including right patient metrics (n=4), right time metrics (n=3), and right use metrics (n=17). Right use metrics were further subdivided into drug choice (n=8), drug dosage (n=4), drug de-escalation (n=1), drug duration (n=2), and drug consumption (n=2) metrics. Forty-six authoritative experts assessed and reviewed the above metrics, and a consensus was reached with a final agreement level of ≥80% for 22 metrics. This consensus is the first to propose a set of AFS metrics suitable for China, which helps to establish AFS standards in China and is also the first AFS consensus in Asia, and may improve the standard of clinical diagnosis and treatment of IFD, and guide hospitals to implement AFS, ultimately promoting the rational use of antifungal drugs and improving patient prognosis.

Anticipating the side effects of benznidazole: HLA-B*35 and patch test

IntroductionTreatment of Chagas disease frequently causes distress to patients due to a high incidence of adverse effects. Different preemptive tests have been researched to prevent these effects and to allow focus to be given to certain predisposed patients. Benznidazole is the most prescribed Chagas disease treatment in Spain.In this work, we analyzed the genetic markers HLA-B*35 allele group and HLA-B*35:05 allele specifically, as well as an allergy patch test, as benznidazole's most frequent adverse effects are cutaneous. MethodsHLA-B intermediate-resolution genotyping was performed followed by a high-resolution level analysis. Cutaneous allergies were tested using strips impregnated with a mixture of benznidazole and placed on the upper back of patients before starting treatment. ResultsIn our sample of more than 400 patients, there was almost no relationship between any kind of side effect and either of the HLA-B alleles studied. The patch testing was quickly discarded as a preemptive test due to its low sensitivity (16.7%). ConclusionIn conclusion, we were unable to replicate and corroborate genetic markers identified by other groups and there is currently no test that can anticipate the adverse effects of benznidazole, therefore, more investigation should be carried out in this field.

P2X3 Receptor Antagonist Eliapixant in Phase I Clinical Trials: Safety and Inter-ethnic Comparison of Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese and Japanese Participants.

Afferent neuronal hypersensitization via P2X3 receptor signaling has been implicated as a driver of several disorders, including refractory chronic cough, endometriosis, diabetic neuropathic pain, and overactive bladder. Eliapixant, a selective P2X3 receptor antagonist, has been in clinical development for all four disorders. This paper describes pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety data from two phase I studies of eliapixant in healthy Japanese and Chinese participants and compares those data within the two populations and with previous multiple dose data from Caucasian participants. Two separate phase I, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled studies were conducted with healthy male participants. The Japanese study was single-blind and the Chinese study was double-blind. Eliapixant was administered as an oral amorphous solid dispersion immediate-release tablet in strengths of 25 mg, 75 mg, and 150 mg. PK characteristics after a single dose (SD) and at steady state (multiple dose [MD], twice daily), adverse events (AEs), and tolerability were evaluated. A post hoc comparison of PK characteristics after SD of eliapixant in Japanese and Chinese participants, and after MD of eliapixant in Japanese, Chinese, and Caucasian participants, was performed. Overall, 36/39 participants enrolled in the Japanese/Chinese studies, respectively (mean [standard deviation] age 25.4 [6.5] and 26.7 [5.0] years, respectively). After SD administration, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was higher among Japanese than Chinese participants in the 25 mg and 75 mg dose groups, but comparable in the 150 mg dose group. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was comparable between Japanese and Chinese participants in the 25 mg and 75 mg dose groups, but lower among Japanese participants in the 150 mg group. Half-lives after SD and MD administration were also comparable in Japanese and Chinese participants. The post hoc analysis included 26 Japanese, 30 Chinese, and 50 Caucasian participants. Comparable exposure (Cmax,md and AUC[0-12]md) was observed after MD administration of eliapixant in Chinese and/or Japanese compared with Caucasian participants (geometric mean inter-ethnic ratios close to 1). The trough plasma concentration after eliapixant 150 mg MD, which was assumed to be relevant to eliapixant efficacy, was comparable across all ethnicity groups. Most AEs reported in the Japanese (eliapixant 75 mg SD, n = 2; eliapixant 150 mg MD, n = 2) and Chinese participants (eliapixant 25 mg SD, n = 7; eliapixant 75 mg SD, n = 6; eliapixant 150 mg SD, n = 7; eliapixant 150 mg MD, n = 9; placebo SD, n = 5; placebo MD, n = 1) were of mild intensity. Higher incidences of AEs in the Chinese population were likely due to differing standards of AE reporting between investigators. Eliapixant was well tolerated by Japanese and Chinese participants. The inter-ethnic evaluation demonstrated similar PK characteristics across Japanese, Chinese, and Caucasian participants. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers: NCT04265781 and NCT04802343.

Feasibility and safety of a novel plastic stent designed specifically for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) is emerging as an effective alternative treatment for obstructive pancreatitis after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). However, the high incidence of adverse events associated with EUS-PD (approximately 20%) remains an issue. Recently, we developed a novel plastic stent for EUS-PD, with a radiopaque marker positioned at approximately one-third of the length from the distal end of the stent and side holes positioned exclusively distal to the marker. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using this stent in EUS-PD. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 patients who underwent EUS-PD with the novel plastic stent at the National Cancer Center Hospital between March 2021 and October 2023. Technical and clinical success, procedure times, adverse events (AEs), recurrent pancreatic duct obstruction (RPO), and time to RPO were assessed. Results Of the 10 patients, five had postoperative benign pancreaticojejunal anastomotic strictures and five had malignant pancreatic duct obstruction. The technical and clinical success rates were both 100% (10/10). An AE (self-limited abdominal pain) occurred in one patient (10.0%). Two patients (20.0%) died of their primary disease during the follow-up period (median, 44 days; range, 25-272 days). The incidence of RPO was 10.0% (1/10), and the 3-month non-RPO rate was 83.3%. Conclusions The novel plastic stent shows potential as a useful and safe tool in EUS-PD.

Efficacy and Safety of 0.03% Atropine Eye Drops in Controlling Myopia Progression: A One-Year Prospective Clinical Study.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of one-year treatment with 0.03% atropine eye drops for slowing myopia progression among children aged 6-12 years. Methods: Healthy Caucasian children aged 6-12 years with cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) from -1.0 D to -5.0 D and astigmatism and anisometropia ≤1.5 D were included. Changes in mean axial length (AL) and objective SE as well as changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT) were assessed in the 0.03% atropine eye drops group and the control group from baseline through the 1-year follow-up. The proportion of participants showing myopia progression of <0.5 D from baseline in each group and any potential side effects in 0.03% atropine group were evaluated. Results: The study involved 31 patients in the 0.03% atropine eye drops group and 41 in the control group. Administration of 0.03% atropine for 1 year resulted in a mean change in SE of -0.34 (0.44) D/year, significantly lower than the -0.60 (0.50) D/year observed in the control group (p = 0.024). The change in AL was 0.19 (0.17) mm in the 0.03% atropine group, compared to 0.31 (0.20) mm in the control group (p = 0.015). There were no significant differences in changes of IOP, CCT and LT between the groups (all p ≥ 0.05). The 0.03% atropine group had a significantly greater increase in ACD compared to the control group (p = 0.015). In total, 64.5% of patients in the 0.03% atropine group showed progression <0.5 D/year, in contrast to 39.0% in the control group (p = 0.032). Adverse events were reported in 13 (35.0%) out of 37 patients in the treatment group, leading to discontinuation of the eye drops in six (16.0%) cases. None of the adverse events were severe. Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of adverse events, 0.03% atropine eye drops effectively slowed the progression of myopia over 1-year.

#1672 High level of HDL-C is associated with a higher risk of ESRD and all-cause mortality in patients with DM and CKD

Abstract Background and Aims Previous studies have regarded high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as ‘good cholesterol’; however, recent research has unveiled a higher incidence of adverse events among individuals with extremely elevated HDL-C levels. Method Two cohorts of subjects were analyzed in this study. In the first cohort, a total of 375 participants with DKD who underwent renal-biopsy between January 2008 and September 2020, from West China Hospital T2DM-DKD cohort, were enrolled for the longitudinal observational study. Additionally, 3,262 participants with DM and chronic kidney disease (CKD) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018 were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the association between HDL-C concentration and the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as well as all-cause mortality. Results Patients were divided into three groups based on HDL-C levels. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 44% of the patients developed ESRD in T2DM-DKD cohort. Patients in Group 3 (HDL-C ≥1.55 mmol/L) exhibited a higher risk of ESRD compared to Group 1 (HDL-C &amp;lt;1.03 mmol/L). After adjusting for confounders, Group 3 patients still had a significantly higher risk of ESRD (adjusted HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.03, 2.71). Analysis of HDL subfractions revealed that a higher HDL3/HDL2 ratio was associated with a lower risk of ESRD. Furthermore, in the NHANES cohort, higher HDL-C levels were linked to a higher risk of all-cause mortality during a median follow-up of 75 months as the result of the weighted Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.02). Notably, in patients with CKD stages 1-2, Group 3 participants had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.19) after adjusting for confounders. Conclusion This study challenges the notion of HDL-C as ‘good cholesterol’ in patients with DKD, as higher HDL-C levels were associated with increased risks of ESRD and all-cause mortality. Additionally, the study highlights the potential protective effect of a higher HDL3/HDL2 ratio against ESRD. These findings contribute to reevaluating the role of HDL-C and its subfractions in DKD patients.

#2564 Terlipressin given by continuous infusion versus boluses in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is one of the complications among patients with cirrhosis. Available guidelines recommended terlipressin with albumin as part of HRS management. To date there is no consensus on whether terlipressin should be given via bolus or continuous intravenous infusion. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses of terlipressin in the treatment of patients with HRS and cirrhosis. Method A comprehensive search for databases of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses of terlipressin among adult patients with hepatorenal syndrome was done. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using relevant terms including hepatorenal syndrome, acute kidney injury, cirrhosis, terlipressin, bolus, and continuous infusion until December 2023. Response to therapy defined as decrease in serum creatinine or regression of acute kidney injury was the primary outcome of interest, while safety in terms of drug-related events, mortality, and transplant-free survival were the secondary outcomes. Data extraction was performed using a standardized data form. The reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus among the authors. Random-effects meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.4. Results A total of three studies, one high quality and two moderate quality RCTs, were included in the review, involving a total of 240 patients. Pooled analysis showed that continuous infusion was as effective or better than bolus infusion in achieving the primary outcome (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95-1.32, I2 = 0%). In one study, 28- and 90-day mortality were not significantly different, while 90-day transplant-free survival was not significantly different between continuous and bolus groups from another trial (53% vs 69% p = 0.26). Higher incidence of adverse events were also reported in the bolus group, RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13-1.04 (p = 0.06). Conclusion There is limited evidence to suggest that continuous infusion of terlipressin may demonstrate resolution of acute kidney injury more frequently than bolus infusion, and that continuous infusion is associated with decreased adverse events. Larger randomized controlled trials with higher quality are needed to ascertain the effects on mortality, need for renal replacement therapy, and transplant-free survival.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of parmacotherapy for hand osteoarthritis.

Hand osteoarthritis poses a significant health challenge globally due to its increasing prevalence and the substantial burden on individuals and the society. In current clinical practice, treatment options for hand osteoarthritis encompass a range of approaches, including biological agents, antimetabolic drugs, neuromuscular blockers, anti-inflammatory drugs, hormone medications, pain relievers, new synergistic drugs, and other medications. Despite the diverse array of treatments, determining the optimal regimen remains elusive. This study seeks to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of various drug intervention measures in the treatment of hand osteoarthritis. The findings aim to provide evidence-based support for the clinical management of hand osteoarthritis. We performed a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted until September 15th, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. After meticulous screening and data extraction, the Cochrane Handbook's risk of bias assessment tool was applied to evaluate study quality. Data synthesis was carried out using Stata 15.1 software. 21 studies with data for 3965 patients were meta-analyzed, involving 20 distinct Western medicine agents. GCSB-5, a specific herbal complex that mainly regulate pain in hand osteoarthritis, showed the greatest reduction in pain [WMD = -13.00, 95% CI (-26.69, 0.69)]. CRx-102, s specific medication characterized by its significant effect for relieving joint stiffness symptoms, remarkably mitigated stiffness [WMD = -7.50, 95% CI (-8.90, -6.10)]. Chondroitin sulfate displayed the highest incidence of adverse events [RR = 0.26, 95% CI (0.06, 1.22)]. No substantial variation in functional index for hand osteoarthritis score improvement was identified between distinct agents and placebo. In summary, GCSB-5 and CRx-102 exhibit efficacy in alleviating pain and stiffness in HOA, respectively. However, cautious interpretation of the results is advised. Tailored treatment decisions based on individual contexts are imperative.

Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Complications in Smokers and Non-smokers Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Prospective Study

Background Studies indicated that smoking alters the response to anesthetics and alters the outcome of perioperative care. A full understanding of the impact of smoking cessation to enhance surgical outcomes is pertinent. Purpose This research aimed to compare perioperative cardiopulmonary complications in smokers and non-smokers during elective surgery under general anesthesia. We aimed to determine the incidence of complications in patients with a history of smoking, identify those at an increased risk, and assess the relationship between smoking duration and complications Materials and Methods A total of 100 patients, comprising 50 smokers and 50 non-smokers, were enrolled in the study. Various parameters, including heart rate increase during intubation, severe coughing, bronchospasm, oral secretions, oxygen desaturation, reintubation, opioid antagonist use, pulmonary edema, and other cardiopulmonary events, were assessed perioperatively. Statistical analysis involved both continuous and categorical variables. For continuous variables, the Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. For categorical variables, chi-squared tests were employed. Sub-group analysis assessed the influence of smoking duration on the measured parameters. Results Smokers exhibited significantly higher incidences of severe coughing, heart rate elevation during intubation, and bronchospasm compared to non-smokers. Additionally, smokers experienced more pronounced oxygen desaturation throughout the perioperative period. Furthermore, a longer history of smoking was associated with an increased risk of complications, with individuals smoking for 10 or more years displaying a higher incidence of adverse events. Conclusion Smokers, particularly those with extended smoking histories, are at an increased risk of cardiopulmonary complications during elective surgery under general anesthesia. Emphasizing preoperative optimization, meticulous airway management, and smoking cessation support is essential to mitigate these risks. The study underscores the significance of these measures for enhancing perioperative safety and calls for further research to explore the long-term impacts and patient satisfaction associated with these interventions. These steps are essential not only for perioperative care but also for long-term health benefits among this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge with limited treatment success. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a potential treatment avenue, necessitating a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, culminating in the inclusion of studies focusing on the treatment of recurrent OC with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and analyzed using fixed or random effects models depending on heterogeneity levels. Our search yielded 1215 articles, with 6 meeting the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Studies varied in size and reported median age, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. The meta-analysis showed improved Objective Response Rates (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and PFS in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The overall adverse event rate was 17.9%, indicating a need for careful patient selection and monitoring. No significant publication bias was detected, enhancing the reliability of our findings. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors offer a promising treatment option for recurrent OC, improving ORR, DCR, and PFS. However, the higher incidence of adverse events necessitates a cautious approach to their use. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, biomarker identification, and optimal combination therapies.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of high-voltage and standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: A pooled analysis from randomized controlled trials

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common and serious complications of herpes zoster infection. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) therapy has emerged to be a neuromodulation technique for the treatment of PHN. Two therapeutic options are available for PRF, including high-voltage and standard-voltage PRF. Some studies suggested that the former one had better clinical efficacy than the latter one. For the first time, this pooled analysis compared the efficacy and safety of these two surgeries for the treatment of PHN. Five commonly used databases were applied to identify the eligible studies. This study was registered on the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023460236), which provided more relevant information. Finally, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 285 participants were included. The combined odds ratios (OR) showed that high-voltage PRF exhibited a significantly higher treatment efficiency than the standard PRF (OR = 1.4, 95%CI: 1.16 to 1.69, P < 0.001). Additionally, the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the high-voltage PRF group was significantly lower than that of the standard PRF group at one week (SMD = −0.776, 95%CI: −1.408 to −0.145, P = 0.016), one month (SMD = −0.544, 95%CI: −0.907 to −0.180, P = 0.003), and three months (SMD = −1.096, 95%CI: −1.504 to −0.687, P < 0.001) after treatment, particularly at the three months after surgery. However, the VAS was comparable between the two groups (SMD = −0.94, 95%CI: −1.985 to 0.104, P = 0.077). Patients who underwent high-voltage PRF did not have a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than those with standard PRF (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 0.78 to 3.13, P = 0.208). In summary, the current study revealed that high-voltage PRF is superior to standard-voltage PRF in improving analgesic efficacy in patients with PHN. Additionally, it does not increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects. Further studies are still warranted to determine the optimal voltage and duration of PRF treatment for patients with PHN.