IN his recent book Relativity Reexamined the late Leon Brillouin presents an interesting discussion of the problem of the interpretation of potential energy in special relativity theory1. He considers the radiation characteristics of an atom in a region of high electrostatic potential (for example, in the dome of an electrostatic accelerator) as compared with one at zero potential and points out the reasons why one should expect the spectral characteristics to be the same. Brillouin then cryptically mentions that these arguments are empirically verified. Presumably, he refers to the experiments of Kennedy and Thorndike2 and Drill3 in which an electrostatic analogue of the gravitational redshift was sought. Neither Kennedy and Thorndike nor Drill attempted to deduce theoretically the quantitative prediction of general relativity theory for the electrostatic redshift; rather, they appear to have proceeded in a purely experimental/intuitional fashion. In order to show that their null result was to be expected and that the electrostatic redshift is inaccessible even with present techniques, we now give a brief derivation of the general relativistic prediction for this effect.
Read full abstract