South African higher education has undergone numerous social, political and cultural changes that call for transformation in the sector. This dates to decades of diplomatic conversations and active protests on old and progressively new antagonisms. Attention-grabbing student protests – popularly referred to as the #RhodesMustFall and #FeesMustFall campaigns – set a new tone and platform for reflection by leaders in the education sector, inclusive of higher- and basic education in South Africa. These have steered many conferences, seminars and research on “transformation” by national education departments, universities, colleges and organizations such as Universities South Africa (USAf). The same protests brought to light several other challenges, such as funding, accommodation, security and academic exclusions, among others. However, as obnoxious as the situation may seem, it still provides the necessary conditions for a deep reappraisal of current hegemonies within the sector, which provides opportunities for stakeholders to reimagine how to shape the goal of the sector. This chapter provides a discussion on how such reimagination has concentrated on the decolonization of the curriculum as a shot at achieving the transformation agenda. For example, the series of debates on decolonizing the curriculum as fundamental to informing and achieving transformed higher education as organized by the Council of Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). We argue that this approach is limiting in focus and scope and impacts less on transformational challenges in higher education. It is suggested that an all-inclusive curriculum suited for globalization is contextualized. Such an approach would not only address the need to decolonize the higher education curriculum and provide cognitive justice but also other higher education challenges such as graduate employment and curriculum relevance to national and international economic growth.
Read full abstract