Abstract

BackgroundService-learning (SL) is a contested field of knowledge and issues of sustainability and scholarship have been raised about it. The South African Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC) has provided policy documents to guide higher education institutions (HEIs) in the facilitation of SL institutionalisation in their academic programmes. An implementation framework was therefore needed to institutionalise the necessary epistemological shifts advocated in the national SL policy guidelines.ObjectivesThis article is based on the findings of a doctoral thesis that aimed at developing an SL implementation framework for the School of Nursing (SoN) at the University of the Western Cape (UWC).MethodMixed methods were used during the first four phases of the design and development intervention research model developed by Rothman and Thomas.ResultsThe SL implementation framework that was developed during Phase 3 specified the intervention elements to address the gaps that had been identified by the core findings of Phases 1 and 2. Four intervention elements were specified for the SL implementation framework. The first intervention element focused on the assessment of readiness for SL institutionalisation. The development of SL capacity and SL scholarship was regarded as the pivotal intervention element for three of the elements: the development of a contextual SL definition, an SL pedagogical model, and a monitoring and evaluation system for SL institutionalisation.ConclusionThe SL implementation framework satisfies the goals of SL institutionalisation, namely to develop a common language and a set of principles to guide practice, and to ensure the allocation of resources in order to facilitate the SL teaching methodology. The contextualised SL definition that was formulated for the SoN contributes to the SL operationalisation discourse at the HEI.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSL scholars and practitioners, have raised concerns about SL issues related to sustainability (Brukardt et al 2004:4), transformative practice (Butin 2006b:478) and authentic institutional commitment (Brukardt et al 2004:17)

  • The institutionalisation of SL in the academic programmes of South African higher education institutions (HEIs) is guided by the policy documents of the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC 2004a:7–8, b:7, 19; 2006a:7–9, b:138–146)

  • The SL implementation framework satisfies the goals of SL institutionalisation, namely to (1) develop a common language, (2) compile a set of principles to guide practice and (3) ensure the allocation of resources to facilitate the SL teaching methodology (HEQC 2006a:138)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

SL scholars and practitioners, have raised concerns about SL issues related to sustainability (Brukardt et al 2004:4), transformative practice (Butin 2006b:478) and authentic institutional commitment (Brukardt et al 2004:17). Scholars such as Bringle and Hatcher (2000:288) and Butin (2006b:473) argue for the institutionalisation of SL within a scholarly framework. The institutionalisation of SL in the academic programmes of South African HEIs is guided by the policy documents of the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC 2004a:7–8, b:7, 19; 2006a:7–9, b:138–146). An implementation framework was needed to institutionalise the necessary epistemological shifts advocated in the national SL policy guidelines

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call