Abstract Introduction/Objective TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma accounts for 1.6-4% of adult renal cell carcinomas (RCC). The histological characteristics of this entity can mimic many other renal cell neoplasms and definite diagnosis is based on immunohistochemical (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Nonspecific IHC findings can lead to diagnostic challenges delaying confirmatory studies and underdiagnosis. Methods/Case Report A 28-year-old male with sickle cell disease and a right kidney multilocular cystic mass incidentally found during evaluation of splenomegaly underwent partial nephrectomy. The tumor showed papillary, alveolar and sheet-like growth patterns composed of eosinophilic to clear cells with pleomorphic nuclei, including multinucleate forms. Initial ancillary studies showed minimal neoplastic expression (less than 5%) of PAX-8. Repeat PAX-8 yielded similar results and laboratory controls were evaluated successfully. A full work-up showed positivity of AMACR (diffuse), CD10 (diffuse), Cathepsin K (patchy), CK7 (focal), CAIX (focal), and no significant expression of pancytokeratin, HMB-45, Melan-A and SMA. Fumarate hydratase was retained, and the tumor showed a non-specific staining pattern of S (2-succinyl)-cysteine. Controls were appropriate. A high suspicion for a TFE-rearranged RCC was maintained, and a final diagnosis was confirmed with FISH analysis demonstrating a TFE3 (Xp11.23) rearrangement. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion Reports in the literature detail diffuse PAX-8 expression in TFE3-rearranged RCC. A high index of suspicion based on morphology in our case prompted FISH analysis leading to correct diagnosis. This case highlights the inconsistencies in the reported IHC profile of this entity. More studies are required to elaborate the presentations of this RCC subtype with numerous histologic mimics including the spectrum of immunostaining patterns to better assist patient care for this uncommon variant.
Read full abstract