High-risk Surgical Patients Research Articles

RADT-08. THIRD RECURRENT WHO 1 SPINAL MENINGIOMAS. CASE SERIES AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SURGERY OR DEFINITIVE RADIOTHERAPY

Abstract INTRODUCTION Spinal meningiomas (SM) account for approximately 1.2–12.7% of all meningiomas and 25% of spinal cord tumors. Most are benign (WHO grade 1), but a small percentage are atypical (WHO grade 2) or anaplastic (WHO grade 3). These tumors are typically solitary and non-invasive with low recurrence rates post-surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy of definitive radiotherapy (RT) versus third surgery for recurrent SM WHO grade 1, focusing on local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. METHODS A retrospective review approved by the Institutional Review Board included patients diagnosed with recurrent SM WHO grade 1 who underwent second surgery between 2008-2020. Patients who received radiation after the first surgery or upgraded to WHO grade 2 or 3 were excluded. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical techniques, and radiation therapy details were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS The study included 48 cases of third progression SM WHO grade 1. The median age was 53 years, and 70.8% were female. Tumor locations were primarily thoracic (75%). There was no significant difference in PFS between the third surgery and RT groups, with 36-month PFS rates of 77.4% and 76.4%, respectively. RT-related toxicities were manageable, and neurological improvements were noted in both groups, with more pronounced improvements in the surgical group. RT showed better pain control outcomes. CONCLUSION Both definitive RT and third surgery are effective for managing recurrent SM WHO grade 1, with comparable PFS. RT is a viable alternative, especially for high-risk surgical patients, providing effective pain control and manageable toxicities. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups are recommended to validate these findings and refine treatment protocols for recurrent SM, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

An interrater reliability analysis of preoperative mortality risk calculators used for elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patients shows poor to moderate reliability

BackgroundMultiple preoperative calculators are available online to predict preoperative mortality risk for noncardiac surgical patients. However, it is currently unknown how these risk calculators perform across different raters. The current study investigated the interrater reliability of three preoperative mortality risk calculators in an elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patient population to evaluate if these calculators can be safely used for identification of high-risk noncardiac surgical patients for a preoperative multidisciplinary team discussion.MethodsFive anesthesiologists assessed the preoperative mortality risk of 34 high-risk patients using the preoperative score to calculate postoperative mortality risks (POSPOM), the American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator (SRC), and the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT). In total, 170 calculations per calculator were gathered.ResultsInterrater reliability was poor for SORT (ICC (C.I. 95%) = 0.46 (0.30–0.63)) and moderate for SRC (ICC = 0.65 (0.51–0.78)) and POSPOM (ICC = 0.63 (0.49–0.77). The absolute range of calculated mortality risk was 0.2–72% for POSPOM, 0–36% for SRC, and 0.4–17% for SORT. The coefficient of variation increased in higher risk classes for POSPOM and SORT. The extended Bland–Altman limits of agreement suggested that all raters contributed to the variation in calculated risks.ConclusionThe current results indicate that the preoperative risk calculators POSPOM, SRC, and SORT exhibit poor to moderate interrater reliability. These calculators are not sufficiently accurate for clinical identification and preoperative counseling of high-risk surgical patients. Clinicians should be trained in using mortality risk calculators. Also, clinicians should be cautious when using predicted mortality estimates from these calculators to identify high-risk noncardiac surgical patients for elective surgery.

Comparison of pulse pressure and stroke volume variations measured by three monitors in high-risk surgical patients

IntroductionDynamic indices of fluid responsiveness (FR) such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) differ among hemodynamic monitors, which use proprietary algorithms, and vary even over a short period of time. We aimed to compare the baseline values, fluctuation and predictive value for FR of PPV and SVV measured by three minimally invasive monitors. Patients and methodsTwenty patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery were included and 45 fluid challenges were analysed. The patients were simultaneously monitored using Carescape B650, LiDCO Rapid and FloTrac/Vigileo system. Cardiac output (CO), PPV and SVV were recorded before and after the fluid challenge of 500ml of balanced crystalloid solution. An increase in CO ≥ 15 % defined fluid responders. Concurrently recorded arterial waveform was used for offline calculation of PPV. ResultsMean baseline values of the indices ranged between 8.6% and 13.4%. LiDCO showed higher fluctuation of indices compared to the other monitors. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) ranged from 0.71 to 0.76 with optimal cut-off value between 7.5% and 13.9%. AUROC increased for all indices when FR was defined as an increase in stroke volume. Furthermore, a decrease in PPV or SVV after fluid challenge (ΔPPV, ΔSVV) proved a better marker of FR (AUROC 0.82 – 0.93) than baseline values with a uniform threshold of approximately -3%. ConclusionsAlthough a significant range of baselines variations and optimal cut-off values was observed, the predictive value of PPV and SVV from all the monitors was only moderate and comparable. Nevertheless, ΔPPV and ΔSVV appear to be a reliable and device-independent markers of FR.

Septal Myectomy for Isolated Midventricular Obstruction After Alcohol Septal Ablation for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BackgroundAlcohol septal ablation is an alternative to surgical myectomy for septal reduction in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, particularly in high-risk surgical patients. However, alcohol septal ablation can sometimes result in residual left ventricular obstruction, typically in the subaortic area and, much more rarely, in the midventricular region. MethodsThis report presents 3 unique cases of isolated midventricular obstruction without systolic anterior motion that required surgical myectomy after alcohol septal ablation. ResultsThree patients presented with persistent or recurrent symptoms of left ventricular outflow obstruction after alcohol septal ablation. Surgical myectomy, performed through a transapical approach alone or in combination with a transaortic approach, successfully reduced intracavitary gradients and septal thickness in all 3 patients. One patient underwent cardiac transplantation 2 years after septal myectomy due to diastolic heart failure without obstruction. ConclusionsThis case series highlights concerns about the use of alcohol septal ablation for patients with long-segment subaortic obstruction and midventricular involvement, suggesting that surgical myectomy may be a more suitable treatment option for this anatomic subtype.

Effectiveness and Safety of Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis in Older and High-Risk Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a prevalent surgical emergency, particularly among elderly individuals who present with high perioperative risks. While early cholecystectomy (CCY) is the standard treatment, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) isproposedas an alternative for high-risk patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of CCY versus PC in managing AC among elderly and high-risk surgical patients. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ScienceDirect, Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EBSCO Open Dissertations, from July 1to 15, 2024. Studies published from January 2019 to July 15, 2024, were included if they focused on patients aged 65 and older or those classified as high-risk surgical candidates. The review encompassed 72,366 participants across 22 studies, predominantly observational. Key outcomes assessed included postoperative complications, readmission rates, recurrence of cholecystitis, and mortality rates. This study highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies for managing AC in elderly populations. While CCY remains the preferred approach when feasible, PC offers a critical alternative for high-risk patients. Future research is necessary to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.

A Needle's Misdirection: Unravelling Vascular Injuries in Malpositioned Central Venous Catheters and Safe Removal Approaches

Central venous catheters (CVC) are commonly inserted to obtain vascular access. Complications such as vascular injuries arising from malpositioned CVC may occur, and safe surgical removal is required to prevent further complications. We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated in the cardiothoracic surgery department at our institution in the past 10 years for intrathoracic vascular injuries in malpositioned CVC without the need for concurrent cardiac or thoracic surgical procedures. Among the 21 patients in our series, 2 patients (10%) had a single arterial injury, 16 patients (76%) had venous injuries only, and 3 patients (14%) had both arterial and venous injuries. 16 patients (76%) underwent surgery to remove the malpositioned CVC; majority of them underwent sternotomy (n=12, 57%) and 7 of them had repair of blood vessels, and 4 patients (19%) underwent video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). 2 out of the 5 patients who had their CVC directly removed followed by external compression required emergency sternotomy due to pericardial effusion. In patients with artery or mediastinal vessel injuries, a sternotomy approach was preferred, whereas VATS was chosen when subclavian vessels or brachiocephalic vein injuries were noted. Endovascular procedures are alternatives for high surgical risk patients, but these advanced procedures are currency limited due to high expertise and facilities requirements.

Cerebral oximetry in high-risk surgical patients: where are we?

This review aims to summarize the latest evidence on the role of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in monitoring cerebral oxygenation in high-risk surgical patients, including both cardiac and noncardiac surgeries, and to present a new algorithm for its application. NIRS effectively measures brain oxygen saturation noninvasively, proving valuable in cardiac surgeries to reduce neurological complications, though its impact on nonneurological outcomes is less clear. In noncardiac surgeries, NIRS can help prevent complications like postoperative cognitive dysfunction, particularly in high-risk and major surgeries. Studies highlight the variability of cerebral oxygenation impacts based on surgical positions, with mixed results in positions like the beach chair and sitting positions. A structured algorithm for managing cerebral desaturation has been proposed to optimize outcomes by addressing multiple factors contributing to blood oxygen content and delivery. Despite its limitations, including spatial resolution and interindividual variability, NIRS is a useful tool for intraoperative cerebral monitoring. Further studies are needed to confirm its broader applicability in noncardiac surgeries, but current evidence supports its role in reducing postoperative complications especially in cardiac surgeries.

The use of perioperative Impella 5.5 support in high-risk cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Although the Impella device has an established role in high-risk percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock, its role in open cardiac surgery remains unclear. We undertook this study to better understand the role of Impella support in cardiac surgical intervention. This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery with surgically placed Impella 5.5 device support from October 2020 through June 2023. Patient charts were identified and systematically reviewed for relevant information. The primary outcome for this study was patient survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative survival, 30-day survival and 1-year survival. From 2020-2023, ten patients underwent open cardiac surgery with Impella 5.5 support. Five patients were male and the median age was 56.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 52-63.8 years]. Three patients (30%) presented for isolated revascularization, 3 patients (30%) presented for single valve surgical intervention, 3 patients (30%) presented for revascularization and valve intervention, and 1 patient (10%) presented for multivalve intervention. The median ejection fraction (EF) of patients was 25% (IQR, 21.25-32.5%), the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 4.32% (IQR, 1.73-11.06%). Of the patients, 40% underwent axillary cannulation while 60% had central cannulation. Intraoperative survival was 100%, survival to discharge was 90% and 30-day survival was 80%. Our study suggests the use of surgical Impella in high-risk cardiac surgical patients is associated with acceptable survival regardless of site or timing of cannulation. However, Impella usage is associated with significant morbidity. Further investigation is warranted to better understand which patients benefit perioperative Impella support.

The Role of Structured Goals of Care Discussions in Critically Ill Thoracic Surgery Patients.

Objective: The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. Results: In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, P = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, P = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, P = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, P = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, P = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. Discussion: Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.

High Flow Oxygen Therapy and Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Case Report

Treatment of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in high-risk surgical patients with chronic pulmonary disease is a challenge in standard and emergency care. The observation that supplementary oxygen may lead to better reabsorption of pneumothorax has been known for over 50 years. It can help to avoid potential high-risk interventions or surgery in multimorbid patients.

An extraperitoneal single-port robotic approach to low anterior resection-Cadaveric experience.

A minimally invasive surgery (MIS) extraperitoneal (XP) approach to left-sided colorectal resection utilizing the laparoscopic approach has recently been shown to be safe and feasible and to have potential advantages over the transperitoneal approach, especially in high-risk surgical patients. The aim of this article is to provide a first cadaveric demonstration of the use of a single-port robotic platform in performing XP low anterior resection by MIS. A single-port robotic platform (DaVinci®SP™) was used to perform XP single-port low anterior resection in two cadavers with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 19 and 40 kg/m2. The single-port robotic platform with versatile arms was successfully used to perform a complete low anterior resection with splenic flexure mobilization and total mesorectal excision through a single port. A single-port robotic platform enhances complete XP dissection in the supine patient in extreme BMI ranges. Clinical studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Transitions from Aerobic to Anaerobic Metabolism and Oxygen Debt during Elective Major and Emergency Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Intraoperative hemodynamic and metabolic optimization of both the high-risk surgical patients and critically ill patients remains challenging. Reductions in oxygen delivery or increases in oxygen consumption can initiate complex cellular processes precipitating oxygen debt (OXD). This study tested the hypothesis that intraoperative changes in sublingual microcirculatory flow reflect clinically relevant transitions from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism (TRANAM). We included patients undergoing elective major and emergency non-cardiac surgery. Macro- and microcirculatory variables, oxygen extraction, and transitions of metabolism were assessed in both cohorts. In the elective group, OXD was progressively increased over time, with an estimated 2.24 unit increase every 30 min (adjusted p < 0.001). Also, OXD was negatively correlated with central venous pressure (ρ = -0.247, adjusted p = 0.006) and positively correlated with stroke volume variation (ρ = 0.185, adjusted p = 0.041). However, it was not significantly correlated with sublingual microcirculation variables. In the emergency surgery group, OXD increased during the first two intraoperative hours and then gradually decreased until the end of surgery. In that cohort, OXD was positively correlated with diastolic arterial pressure (ρ = 0.338, adjpatients and the critically ill patients remains challengingsted p = 0.015). Also, OXD was negatively correlated with cardiac index (ρ = -0.352, adjusted p = 0.003), Consensus Proportion of Perfused Vessels (PPV) (ρ = -0.438, adjusted p < 0.001), and Consensus PPV (small) (ρ = -0.434, adjusted p < 0.001). TRANAM were evident in both the elective major and emergency non-cardiac surgery cohorts independent of underlying alterations in the sublingual microcirculation.

Performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter bioprostheses in inoperable patients with pure aortic regurgitation of a native valve: The BE-PANTHEON international project

BackgroundThe off-label utilization of transcatheter heart valve (THV) devices for the treatment of inoperable or high-surgical risk patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has demonstrated suboptimal outcomes, both with self- and balloon-expandable (BE) devices. The aim of this study is to compare the use of different BE scaffolds in treating pure NAVR. MethodsConsecutive patients with pure severe NAVR who were deemed to be at high-risk and were treated with last-generation BE-THVs among seventeen Centers in Europe and US. Technical and device success rates were the primary objectives. ResultsBetween February 2018 and July 2023, among 144 patients, 41 (28 %) received a MyVal device and 103 (72 %) were treated with a Sapien THV. Patients treated with a MyVal THV had an extra-large annulus more frequently compared to the Sapien group (49%vs.20 %, p < 0.001).Technical and device success rates were 90 % and 81 %, respectively, p > 0.1. The rate of THV migration/embolization (MyVal 4.9%vs. Sapien 11 %, p = 0.4) and second valve needed (4.9%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.7) were numerically lower in the MyVal group, whereas the rate of at least moderate paravalvular leak (15%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.2) and permanent pacemaker implantation (25%vs.18 %, p = 0.16) were numerically higher in the Myval group. ConclusionsOff-label use of BE devices for pure NAVR represents a potential alternative in high-risk patients in the absence of dedicated devices. However, BE in NAVR is associated with suboptimal outcomes. The availability of larger THV sizes may introduce transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an effective treatment for patients traditionally deemed unsuitable. Non-standard abbreviations and acronymsAR = aortic regurgitation, BE = balloon-expandable, NAVR = native aortic valve regurgitation, PM = pacemaker, TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement, THV = transcatheter heart valve, TVEM = transcatheter valve embolization and migration, VARC-3 = Valve Academic Research Consortium 3.

Chinese expert consensus on transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation (2023)

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was initially used to treat aortic stenosis (AS), and gradually expanded into aortic regurgitation (AR) treatment. Scholars worldwide have explored the use of marketed transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) valves for AR patients, offering another option for high-risk surgical patients. However, AR presents distinct challenges compared to AS, including anatomical differences, valve selection, procedural nuances, and complication profiles. Overall, TF-TAVR for AR is more complex with lower success rate than for AS. In order to promote the safe and standardized TF-TAVR for AR in China, the Structural Heart Disease Group of Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physician drafted this consensus. The writing expert team focused on key clinical challenges in TF-TAVR for AR patients, combining evidence from literature up to September 1, 2023, to formulate nine core viewpoints. These encompass indications, valve selection, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative techniques, complication prevention and management, postoperative care, and other aspects.

Transcatheter closure management of mitral paravalvular leakage: A single center experience.

Paravalvular leakage (PVL) is a common complication after artificial valve replacement. Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure (PVT), an efficient, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for PVL patients. The purpose of this study was to present our experience with transcatheter closure of mitral paravalvular leakage (PVL) after surgical valve replacement in our center. A cohort of 81 consecutive patients with mitral PVLs was treated with transcatheter closure between September 2014 and December 2022. We reviewed the demographics, clinical features, therapeutic modalities and follow-up results. The patients' charts were used for retrospective analysis. Eighty-one patients from one center were enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients was 63 ± 11 years. The median LVEF was 51% ± 7%, and the median regurgitation volume was 11.5 ± 10.1 mL. Sealing with occlusion was successful in 70 patients, and the technical success rate was 86.5%. The median regurgitation volume was reduced to 1.95 ± 2.6 mL. The major adverse event was hemolysis, which affected 19 patients, 17 of whom required blood transfusion. Three patients required secondary open surgery due to bleeding. Three patients died during the hospital stay, and all of their deaths were caused by hemolysis-related complications. The median hospital stay was 10.3 ± 6.3 days. During the follow-up period, 2 patients died, and none of their deaths were caused by surgery. The New York Heart Association classification increased in all patients during the 6-month follow-up. Transcatheter mitral PVL closure requires complex catheter techniques. However, this technique is minimally invasive and has a shorter hospital stay. Interventional mitral PVL closure is a safe and efficacious technique for high-risk surgical patients with symptomatic paravalvular regurgitation.

Comparative Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Wound Closure Techniques in Appendectomies for Gangrenous Appendicitis

Background: Post-operative medical complications are very common in patients with gangrenous nonperforated appendicitis, especially surgical site infections (SSIs). Currently no conclusive answers on the relative benefits of immediate vs delayed wound clear therefore a comparison is essential. Objectives: In order to compare the results of immediate versus delayed wound closure in patients with gangrenous appendicitis who underwent appendectomy, SSIs, wound healing, and general postoperative recovery will be assessed. Methodology: The present study is a retrospective cohort study, using data from 185 patients, operated for gangrenous appendicitis during the period between from January 2023 to February, 2024. Total patients were categorized into two groups based on the wound closure technique employed, immediate wound closure (IWC, n=105) and delayed wound closure (DWC, n=80). Specific dependent variables were the overall SSI rate, days to wound healing and days of hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included a return of symptoms and overall postoperative morbidity. Results: The study also revealed that the incidence of SSIs was relatively low in the DWC group at 8. 0% compared to the (22.0± 0.01) % in the IWC group, which was statistically significant (p&lt;0. 001). The overall IWC time was significantly shorter in the IWC group (11 days) as compared to the DWC group (15 days) (P value = 0. 02). In our study, the DWC group was found to have a lower median LOS of 6 days as compared to IWC group that had a LOS of 8 days. When compared the two groups regarding readmission rates, the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0. 05). Conclusion: These delayed wound closure strategies in appendectomy for gangrenous appendicitis are a safe means of decreasing SSIs and hospital stay without a predisposing effect on wound healing and readmission. Based on these findings, it is recommended that DWC is the better approach in the management of such high-risk surgical patients.

A preliminary study about role of the endovascular profundoplasty in extremely high-risk surgical patients

A preliminary study about role of the endovascular profundoplasty in extremely high-risk surgical patients

Urgency adjusted outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are a complex cohort who are relatively poorly represented in published literature. This is partly due to the lack of consensus of the definition of the term emergency in IBD surgery. There is ongoing and recent work defining clinical urgency for unplanned surgical procedures and categorizing the high-risk surgical patient. This paper aims to report the difference in patient metrics and risks as recorded by the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA). Complete patient data, including histology, were available in the NELA database between 2013 and 2016. Urgency categories recorded by NELA are <2h, 2-6h, 6-18h, and >18h. Patient characteristics, physiology, biochemistry, and outcomes are reported according to these urgency categories with regression analysis used to compare differences between them. Mortality in Crohn's disease (CD) ranged from 1.4% in the >18h urgency to 14.6% in the most urgent. In ulcerative colitis (UC), this range was from 3.1% to 14.8%. In both CD and UC, there were significant trends in hemodynamic instability, serum white cell count, serum electrolytes and creatinine, and outcome measures length of stay and unplanned return to theater. Patients having emergency surgery for IBD are not a single cohort when considering physiology, blood biochemistry, or most importantly, outcomes. Risk counseling and management should reflect this. Hemodynamic changes are subtle and may be missed in this cohort.

Early Feasibility Study with the SATURN Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement Device

PurposeTo report the outcomes of the early feasibility study of transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the SATURN System (InnovHeart, Milano, Italy) to treat patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation. DescriptionFive high surgical risk patients underwent transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement with the SATURN System at a single center. One-year follow-up is complete for all patients. EvaluationThe valve was implanted successfully in all patients without any major adverse events. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire improved from a median of 63.5 (interquartile range, 19.6) at baseline to 99.0 (interquartile range, 21.6) at 1 year. Echocardiographic follow-up demonstrates stable valve function, no transvalvular or paravalvular mitral regurgitation, and absence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. ConclusionsAt 1 year after transapical SATURN transcatheter mitral valve replacement, all patients are alive with quality of life improvement and favorable device hemodynamics. These initial results are promising and larger scale studies with continued follow-up are required to further elucidate the efficacy and safety of this novel technology.

Perioperative transfusion study (PETS): Does a liberal transfusion protocol improve outcome in high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery? A randomised controlled pilot study.

Small studies have shown that patients with advanced coronary artery disease might benefit from a more liberal blood transfusion strategy. The goal of this pilot study was to test the feasibility of a blood transfusion intervention in a group of vascular surgery patients who have elevated cardiac troponins in rest. We conducted a single-centre, randomised controlled pilot study. Patients with a preoperative elevated high-sensitive troponin T undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery were randomised between a liberal transfusion regime (haemoglobin >10.4 g/dL) and a restrictive transfusion regime (haemoglobin 8.0-9.6 g/dL) during the first 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome was defined as a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or unscheduled coronary revascularization. In total 499 patients were screened; 92 were included and 50 patients were randomised. Postoperative haemoglobin was different between the intervention and control group; 10.6 versus 9.8, 10.4 versus 9.4, 10.9 versus 9.4 g/dL on day one, two and three respectively (p < 0.05). The primary outcome occurred in four patients (16%) in the liberal transfusion group and in two patients (8%) in control group. This pilot study shows that the studied transfusion protocol was able to create a clinically significant difference in perioperative haemoglobin levels. Randomisation was possible in 10% of the screened patients. A large definitive trial should be possible to provide evidence whether a liberal transfusion strategy could decrease the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction in high risk surgical patients.