As fabrication processes improve, and portable power sources are scaled down, the more feasible it becomes to produce untethered powered orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons for human assistance. The advent of more-energy-dense batteries, such as lithium ion, has spurred the research, development, and commercialization of a number of electrically driven active orthoses, including direct motor drives [1], electrohydraulics, and “smart-material” actuators [2]. Advances in manufacturing have also made pneumatically driven actuators more lightweight through component integration [3]. Figure 1, however, illustrates the challenge in developing effective mobile assistive orthoses and prostheses—to operate for more than a few minutes, the requisite power-source mass must increase. For an hour, or more, of operation, electroactive polymers are shown to have the best mass-to-power ratio, with solenoids being a distant second (roughly 1 order of magnitude difference, but closing).Reproducing the plantarflexion (step-off) function of a healthy ankle joint is particularly challenging as well. A significant power spike must be generated within, roughly, 100 ms, and it must dissipate just as quickly (Fig. 2). Precisely metered and timed fuel combustion within an actuator can provide the requisite torque and power peaks. Also, the specific energy of hydrocarbon fuels is more than 1 order of magnitude higher than the best batteries, affording much lighter-weight actuation systems and far greater operation times for a given mass of energy storage [6].Figure 3 shows a conceptual model of an ankle-foot orthosis that employs combustion to directly provide plantarflexion actuation from fuel combustion [6]. This particular design also employs energy-recovery to provide the dorsiflexion (toe-up) actuation as well. At a theoretical thermodynamic efficiency of >60%, very little thermal energy will be wasted (∼7 W), requiring minimal passive heat dissipation to maintain a surface-contact temperature of <41 °C. Carbon dioxide and water vapor are the predominant exhaust products, produced only when walking, at amounts that pose a minimal asphyxiation hazard if operated in a closed environment.Certainly, before building such a system, characterization of the combustion pressures over time, and extension rates of the piston under load, is critical. A test stand was constructed to experimentally determine the forces that can be generated through combustion of various fuel types (Fig. 4). To date, propane (C3H8) and hydrogen have been tested. Propane is a readily available fuel, used frequently in gas grills and fleet vehicles, with a specific energy (lower heating value) of 46 MJ/kg. Hydrogen can be produced inexpensively via electrolysis, but with a specific energy of 120 MJ/kg (∼3 x propane) and explosive limits between 4% and 75%, care must be taken.Due to the near-instantaneous release of chemical potential energy in the combustion process, accurately measuring the forces generated on a piston is a challenge. Maximal pressures and forces are required to calculate initial sizes for components of the actuation system. For expediency, to collect the requisite data without a high-speed data-acquisition system and sensors—until funds are available, it was decided that the crushing of small, high-tolerance (±1%) copper spheres would provide this measure of maximal force generated by the piston. The spheres were positioned inside a shaft coupling between the combustion-driven-piston shaft and the shaft of a loading piston. Static crushing of 1.98 mm-diameter copper spheres, using the loading piston and an attached, calibrated load cell, provided a reference curve (Fig. 5). The load cell’s gauge has only a 200 Hz sampling rate; so it cannot reliably capture the peak forces during combustion. Plastic deformation of the spheres accurately records the peak forces experienced, through interpolation from the reference curve. Extrapolation also provides an estimate of peak forces beyond the reference curve.Figure 5 shows the results of these preliminary tests. Each trial used 26 ml of a 50/50 mix of hydrogen and air. Three combustion trials used 2.07 bar compression pressure, and the other three used 2.76 bar. Variability in metering the air and hydrogen, as well as in setting the compression pressure, resulted in the spread of the data points. These will need to be better controlled for higher accuracy, and more static tests are required toward the limit of the load cell, so that extrapolation is not necessary.Peak forces greater than 1.8 kN (400 lbf) were achieved in these preliminary trials, enough to provide the requisite 75 N m peak torque with just a 4.2 cm-radius pulley. A pneumatic loading cylinder was used in these trials to limit the peak forces. The orthosis will also employ compliance, e.g., springs, to control these peaks, beyond that provided by fuel and air metering. A hydraulic loading cylinder, or shaft lock on the pneumatic one, will be used to approach a measurement of absolute peak forces attainable.
Read full abstract