Higher SOFA Score Research Articles

Temporal Evolution and Outcomes of Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Hospitalized Patients

ObjectiveTo investigate the radiographic features, temporal evolution, and outcome of patients who develop non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) while hospitalized for other causes. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive Emergency Department ICH (ED-ICH) and in-hospital ICH (IH-ICH) over an 8-year period. Variables including demographics, medical history, lab values, lead time to diagnosis, defined as time from last known well to first CT scan, and clinical characteristics, follow-up CT scan, as well as the frequency of withdrawal of life support were compared in the two groups. Mortality in correlation with ICH score was assessed. ResultsSixty-One IH-ICH and 216 ED-ICH patients were compared. History of cardiac disease, cancer, coagulopathy and higher SOFA score at time of diagnosis were significantly higher in the IH-ICH group (all P< 0.01). Time from symptom onset to diagnosis was shorter in the IH-ICH group (median 95 versus 117 minutes, P=0.011). Thirty six percent of IH-ICH fell into a worse ICH category when recalculated 6 hours from initial scan time, compared to only 10% of the ED-ICH. ICH score was well calibrated in ED-ICH when assessed both at diagnosis and 6 hours later, but underestimated actual mortality in the IH-ICH, particularly at ICH scores 0 to 3. End of life measures were pursued in 69% of IH-ICH group compared to 19% in the ED-ICH group. ConclusionsIH-ICH, is associated with higher overall mortality rates and often times heralds withdrawal of life sustaining therapies in patients. In addition, IH-ICH in comparison to ED-ICH, significantly changes in severity metrics within the first 6 hours. ICH score is not accurate and not calibrated to reflect reasonable stratification of mortality in IH-ICH. Prospective validation and investigation of variables accounting for higher IH-ICH mortality are needed.

Todos los caminos llevan a Roma: resultados de las terapias respiratorias no invasivas aplicadas en un centro terciario sin Unidad de Cuidados Intermedios durante la pandemia de COVID-19

IntroductionNon-invasive respiratory therapies (NRT) were widely used in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in different settings, depending on availability. The objective of our study was to present 90-day survival and associated factors in patients treated with NRT in a tertiary hospital without an Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit. The secondary objective was to compare the outcomes of the different therapies. MethodsObservational study of patients treated with NRT outside of an intensive care or intermediate respiratory care unit setting, diagnosed with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome by radiological criteria and SpO2/FiO2 ratio. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to determine independently associated variables, and the outcomes of high flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure were compared. ResultsIn total, 107 patients were treated and 85 (79.4%) survived at 90 days. Before starting NRT, the mean SpO2/FiO2 ratio was 119.8±59.4. A higher SOFA score was significantly associated with mortality (OR 2,09; 95% CI 1.34-3.27), while self-pronation was a protective factor (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06-0.91). High flow nasal cannula was used in 63 subjects (58.9%), and continuous positive airway pressure in 41 (38.3%), with no differences between them. ConclusionApproximately 4 out of 5 patients treated with NRT survived to 90 days, and no significant differences were found between high flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure.

Factors associated with enteral nutrition and the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders in a cohort of critically ill adults

Introduction: adults in intensive care commonly receive enteral nutrition (EN). Data describing the conditions associated with EN in critically ill patients are limited. Objective: to describe the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders and to identify conditions associated with the use of EN. Methods: a prospective cohort, single-center study of critically ill adults. The patients were followed daily for the first 10 days of hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) or until ICU discharge or death. Clinical, nutritional variables and gastrointestinal disorders were compared between patients who did and did not receive EN. Univariate and multivariate regression identified the conditions associated with EN with the proposed variables. Results: of the 157 included adults, 62 % received EN. The EN group had higher APACHE II (23.6 ± 7.6 vs. 15 ± 7.2, p < 0.001) and SOFA scores on the day of ICU admission [7 (5-10.5) vs. 4 (2-6); p < 0.001], and higher ICU mortality (32 % vs. 10 %, p = 0.002). Diarrhea and need for gastric decompression were more frequent in the EN group (39.7 % vs. 11.7 %, p < 0.001 and 34 % vs. 13.3 %, p = 0.004, respectively). The multivariate analysis showed that neurological deficit (OR: 16.7 [95 % CI: 5.9-46.9]; p < 0.001), previous enteral tube feeding (OR: 45.1 [95 % CI: 5.3-380]; p < 0.001), and SOFA score on the day of ICU admission (OR: 1.2 [95 % CI: 1.01-1.3]; p = 0.03) were associated with EN. Conclusions: conditions related to the severity of critically ill patients, such as higher SOFA scores, greater neurological deficit, and prior enteral tube feeding, were more commonly associated with EN. Diarrhea and need for gastric decompression were more frequent in patients who received EN.

Clinical impact of chronic substance abuse in a Norwegian ICU-population.

The clinical impact of chronic substance abuse of alcohol and drugs-referred to as substance use disorders (SUD)-is often overlooked in the intensive care (ICU) setting. The aims of the present study were to identify patients with SUD-regardless of cause of admission-in a mixed Norwegian ICU-population, and to compare patients with and without SUD with regard to clinical characteristics and mortality. Cross-sectional prospective study of a mixed medical and surgical ICU-population aged ≥18years in Oslo, Norway. Data were collected consecutively, using a questionnaire including the AUDIT-C test, medical records and toxicology results. Patients classified with SUD were divided into the subgroups alcohol use disorders (AUD) and drug use disorders (DUD). Overall, 222 (26%) of the 861 patients included were classified with SUD; 137 (16%) with AUD and 85 (10%) with DUD. 130/222 (59%) of the SUD-patients had substance abuse-related cause of ICU-admission. Compared to non-SUD patients, DUD-patients were younger (median age 42 vs 65years) and had lower SAPS II scores (41 vs 46), while AUD-patients had higher SOFA scores (8.0 vs 7.3). Overall, age-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed similar hospital mortality for SUD-patients and non-SUD patients, but AUD was associated with increased mortality among medical patients and in patients with sepsis (OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-2.8), and OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1-6.2)). One in four ICU-patients had SUD regardless of cause of admission. Alcohol use disorder was associated with increased mortality in medical patients and in patients with sepsis.

COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-A Multicenter Observational Study.

Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included.Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay.Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Treatment profile and long-term outcome of intensive care unit-admitted patients with liver cirrhosis or other liver disease in relation to alcohol consumption

Objective To examine the impact of alcohol consumption on the treatment profile, mortality and causes of death in intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients with liver cirrhosis and other liver disease. Methods Data on liver disease and ICU treatment of patients with previously diagnosed liver disease between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively collected from medical records at Oulu University Hospital, Finland. The median follow-up was 367 days. The causes of death were obtained from Statistics Finland. Results From 250 patients, high-risk alcohol consumption was present in 74.7% (71 of 95) cirrhotic patients and 43.2% (67 of 155) patients in the other liver disease group. Gastrointestinal causes were the most common admission causes. Despite the higher SOFA scores in the alcoholic liver cirrhosis patients compared with the non-alcoholic cirrhosis, there were no differences in the need for organ support, length of ICU stay or outcome between the groups or the subgroups. There were no differences in 1-year mortality between the cirrhosis groups (alcoholic cirrhosis 43.7% versus non-alcoholic cirrhosis 45.8%, p = 1.0) or between the other liver disease groups (patients with alcohol consumption 37.3% versus patients without alcohol consumption 36.4%, p = 1.0). The patients with high-risk alcohol consumption died more often due to liver disease, whereas the patients without high-risk alcohol consumption died often due to malignancies. Conclusions We report no significant impact of alcohol consumption on the ICU treatment profile or mortality of patients with cirrhosis or other liver disease. The high mortality underlines the importance of preventive measures after ICU admission.

Abstract 15010: Myocardial Injury in Sepsis With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Introduction: Sepsis is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality; novel prognostic biomarkers are needed. The association of myocardial injury with mortality in sepsis has not been fully characterized. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that elevated plasma high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) would be associated with 60-day mortality in patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of subjects from the MI-ARDS study with ARDS and sepsis. The exposure variable was plasma hs-TnI on intubation (Day 0) and Day 3. Hs-TnI was measured using Abbott Laboratories’ ARCHITECT STAT assay. Patients were divided into four hs-TnI (ng/L) groups (Grp): GrpA: &lt;2 (undetectable), GrpB: ≥2-&lt;26 (&lt;99 th percentile of population), GrpC: ≥26-&lt;130 (&lt;5 times upper limit of normal [ULN]), GrpD: ≥130 (&gt;5 times ULN). The primary outcome was 60-day mortality. We determined the association between hs-TnI and mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of 320 subjects, there were 15 (4%) in GrpA, 97 (30%) in GrpB, 88 (28%) in GrpC, and 120 (38%) in GrpD. Mean age was 50 years and 172 subjects (54%) required vasopressors. Higher plasma levels of hs-TnI were associated with higher SOFA score and creatinine, and more vasopressor use. Overall mortality was 33%. There was no significant difference in 60-day survival between clinical categories of Day 0 hs-TnI (Fig 1-A). Rising troponin between Day 0 and Day 3 was associated with a higher risk of mortality after adjusting for age, sex, trial assignment, and SOFA score (HR: 1.75, CI: 1.11-2.77, p=0.02) (Fig 1-B), and additionally adjusting for Day 0 hs-TnI (HR: 1.72, CI: 1.03-2.85, p=0.04). Conclusions: Initial hs-TnI in patients with sepsis and ARDS was not associated with mortality. Increase in hs-TnI of at least 20% by Day 3 was associated with 60-day mortality. Future studies should assess mechanism and treatment of myocardial injury in sepsis.

Evaluation of the clinical profile, laboratory parameters and outcome of two hundred COVID-19 patients from a tertiary centre in India.

COVID-19 is a pandemic with over 5 million cases worldwide. The disease has imposed a huge burden on health resources. Evaluation of clinical and epidemiological profiles of such patients can help in understanding and managing the outbreak more efficiently. This study was a prospective observational analysis of 200 diagnosed COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary care center from 20th march to 8th May 2020. All these patients were positive for COVID-19 by an oro-nasopharyngeal swab-rtPCR based testing. Analyses of demographic factors, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and the outcomes were performed. The mean age of the population was 40 years with a slight male predominance (116 patients out of 200, 58%). A majority of the patients (147, 73.5 %) were symptomatic, with fever being the most common symptom (109, 54.5%), followed by cough (91, 45.5%). An older age, presence of symptoms and their duration, leukocytosis, a high quick SOFA score, a high modified SOFA score, need for ventilator support, an AST level more than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), and a serum creatinine level of 2 mg/dl or greater were at a significantly higher risk of ICU admission and mortality. Presence of diabetes mellitus, AST > three times ULN, serum creatinine 2 mg/dl or higher, and a qSOFA score of 1 or higher were all associated with significantly greater odds of critical care requirement. Triage and severity assessment helps in deciding the requirement for a hospital stay and ICU admission for COVID-19 which can easily be done using clinical and laboratory parameters. A mild, moderate and severe category approach with defined criteria and treatment guidelines will help in judicious utilization of health-care resources, especially for developing countries like India. *Other members of the Safdarjung Hospital COVID-19 working group: Balvinder Singh (Microbiology), MK Sen(Pulmonary Medicine), Shibdas Chakrabarti (Pulmonary Medicine), NK Gupta (Pulmonary medicine), AJ Mahendran (Pulmonary Medicine), Ramesh Meena (Medicine), G Usha (Anaesthesiology), Santvana Kohli (Anaesthesiology), SahilDiwan (Anaesthesiology), Rushika Saksena (Microbiology), Vikramjeet Dutta (Microbiology), Anupam Kr Anveshi (Microbiology).

Damage Control Surgery may be a Safe Option for Severe Non-Trauma Peritonitis Management: Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm.

Damage control surgery (DCS) has emerged as a new option in the management of non-traumatic peritonitis patients to increase survival in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to compare DCS with conventional strategy (anastomosis/ostomies in the index laparotomy) for severe non-traumatic peritonitis regarding postoperative complications, ostomy rate, and mortality and to propose a useful algorithm in the clinical practice. Patients who underwent an urgent laparotomy for non-trauma peritonitis at a single level I trauma center in Colombia between January 2003 and December 2018, were retrospectively included. We compared patients who had DCS management versus definitive initial surgical management (DISM) group. We evaluated clinical outcomes and morbidities among groups. 290 patients were included; 81 patients were treated with DCS and 209 patients underwent DISM. Patients treated with DCS had a worse critical status before surgery with higher SOFA score [median, DCS group: 5 (IQR: 3-8) vs. DISM group: 3 (IQR: 1-6), p < 0.001]. The length of hospital stay and overall mortality rate of DCS group were not significant statistical differences with DISM group. Complications rate related to primary anastomosis or primary ostomy was similar. There is not difference in ostomy rate among groups. At multivariate analysis, SOFA > 6 points and APACHE-II > 20 points correlated with a higher probability of DCS. DCS in severe non-trauma peritonitis patients is feasible and safe as surgical strategy management without increasing mortality, length hospital of stay, or complications. DCS principles might be applied in the non-trauma scenarios without increase the stoma rate.

The comparison of GNRI and other nutritional indexes on short-term survival in geriatric patients treated for respiratory failure

There are several screening tools used in the detection of malnutrition to facilitate nutritional support and predict prognosis in the elderly. We aimed to compare the prognostic predictive value of geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) with other nutritional indices on 1month survival in geriatric patients hospitalized for respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 191 geriatric patients (> 65years) admitted to a specialized chest hospital with respiratory failure between January 2018 and January 2019 were analyzed. Patients were classified into two category according to 30-day survival: Survivors and Non-survivors. Nutritional assesment was done via GNRI, OPNI, NRS 2002, Nutric Scores in ICU. Using GNRI, 146 (76.3%) geriatric patients found to be at risk of malnutrition (GNRI score: ≤ 92). GNRI < 86.9 showed significantly higher 30-day mortality rate and patients with malnutrition risk were older, had significantly lower BMI, OPNI, and higher SOFA score. The Age, NRS 2002, Nutric and SOFA score had negative correlation with GNRI. Nutric score, prealbumin and GNRI were detected as significant independent risk factors of 30-day mortality. GNRI had higher sensitivity (76.7%) but lower specificity (57.1%) compared to Nutric score and OPNI for the prediction of 30-day hospital mortality. Compared to others, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) seems to be a good predictor of 30-day mortality and having a score of less than 86.9 increase the malnutrition risk in geriatric patients hospitalized for respiratory failure in ICU.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure in Wales: The PANDORA-WALES Study.

Background: We aimed to identify the prevalence of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and its associated mortality. The secondary aim was to describe ventilatory management as well as the use of rescue therapies. Methods: Multi-centre prospective study in nine hospitals in Wales, UK, over 2-month periods. All patients admitted to an ICU were screened for AHRF and followed-up until discharge from the ICU. Data were collected from patient charts on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, management and outcomes. Results: Out of 2215 critical care admissions, 886 patients received mechanical ventilation. A total of 197 patients met inclusion criteria and were recruited. Seventy (35.5%) were non-survivors. Non-survivors were significantly older, had higher SOFA scores and received more vasopressor support than survivors. Twenty-five (12.7%) patients who fulfilled the Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during the ICU stay without impact on overall survival. Rescue therapies were rarely used. Analysis of ventilation showed that median Vt was 7.1 mL/kg PBW (IQR 5.9–9.1) and 21.3% of patients had optimal ventilation during their ICU stay. Conclusions: One in four mechanically ventilated patients have AHRF. Despite advances of care and better, but not optimal, utilisation of low tidal volume ventilation, mortality remains high.

Clinical characteristics and survival analysis in critical and non-critical patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a single-center retrospective case control study

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in China at the end of 2019, the world has experienced a large-scale epidemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2. The epidemiological and clinical course of COVID-19 patients has been reported, but there have been few analyses about the characteristics, predictive risk factors, and outcomes of critical patients. In this single-center retrospective case–control study, 90 adult inpatients hospitalized at Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory tests, and treatment data were obtained and compared between critical and non-critical patients. We found that compared with non-critical patients, the critical patients had higher SOFA score and qSOFA scores. Critical patients had lower lymphocyte and platelet count, elevated D-dimer, decreased fibrinogen, and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and interleukin-6(IL-6). More critical patients received treatment including antibiotics, anticoagulation, corticosteroid, and oxygen therapy than non-critical ones. Multivariable regression showed higher qSOFA score and elevation of IL-6 were related to critical patients. Antibiotic usage and anticoagulation were associated with decreased in-hospital mortality. And critical grouping contributed greatly to in-hospital death. Critical COVID-19 patients have a more severe clinical course. qSOFA score and elevation of IL-6 are risk factors for critical condition. Non-critical grouping, positive antibiotic application, and anticoagulation may be beneficial for patient survival.

Factors associated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation failure in patients with hematological neoplasia and their association with outcomes

BackgroundThe usefulness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in oncohematological patients is still a matter of debate.AimTo analyze the rate of noninvasive ventilation failure and the main characteristics associated with this endpoint in oncohematological patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).MethodsA ventilatory support protocol was developed and implemented before the onset of the study. According to the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio and clinical judgment, patients received supplementary oxygen therapy, NIMV, or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).ResultsEighty-two patients were included, average age between 52.1 ± 16 years old; 44 (53.6%) were male. The tested protocol was followed in 95.1% of cases. Six patients (7.3%) received IMV, 59 (89.7%) received NIMV, and 17 (20.7%) received oxygen therapy. ICU mortality rates were significantly higher in the IMV (83.3%) than in the NIMV (49.2%) and oxygen therapy (5.9%) groups (P < 0.001). Among the 59 patients who initially received NIMV, 30 (50.8%) had to eventually be intubated. Higher SOFA score at baseline (1.35 [95% CI = 1.12–2.10], P = 0.007), higher respiratory rate (RR) (1.10 [95% CI = 1.00–1.22], P = 0.048), and sepsis on admission (16.9 [95% CI = 1.93–149.26], P = 0.011) were independently associated with the need of orotracheal intubation among patients initially treated with NIMV. Moreover, NIMV failure was independently associated with ICU (P < 0.001) and hospital mortality (P = 0.049), and mortality between 6 months and 1 year (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe implementation of a NIMV protocol is feasible in patients with hematological neoplasia admitted to the ICU, even though its benefits still remain to be demonstrated. NIMV failure was associated with higher SOFA and RR and more frequent sepsis, and it was also related to poor prognosis.

Prognostic performance of endothelial biomarkers to early predict clinical deterioration of patients with suspected bacterial infection and sepsis admitted to the emergency department

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of endothelial biomarkers to early predict clinical deterioration of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected sepsis. This was a prospective, multicentre, international study conducted in EDs. Adult patients with suspected acute bacterial infection and sepsis were enrolled but only those with confirmed infection were analysed. The kinetics of biomarkers and organ dysfunction were collected at T0, T6 and T24 hours after ED admission to assess prognostic performances of sVEGFR2, suPAR and procalcitonin (PCT). The primary outcome was the deterioration within 72 h and was defined as a composite of relevant outcomes such as death, intensive care unit admission and/or SOFA score increase validated by an independent adjudication committee.ResultsAfter adjudication of 602 patients, 462 were analysed including 124 who deteriorated (27%). On admission, those who deteriorated were significantly older (73 [60–82] vs 63 [45–78] y-o, p < 0.001) and presented significantly higher SOFA scores (2.15 ± 1.61 vs 1.56 ± 1.40, p = 0.003). At T0, sVEGFR2 (5794 [5026–6788] vs 6681 [5516–8059], p < 0.0001), suPAR (6.04 [4.42–8.85] vs 4.68 [3.50–6.43], p < 0.0001) and PCT (7.8 ± 25.0 vs 5.4 ± 17.9 ng/mL, p = 0.001) were associated with clinical deterioration. In multivariate analysis, low sVEGFR2 expression and high suPAR and PCT levels were significantly associated with early deterioration, independently of confounding parameters (sVEGFR2, OR = 1.53 [1.07–2.23], p < 0.001; suPAR, OR = 1.57 [1.21–2.07], p = 0.003; PCT, OR = 1.10 [1.04–1.17], p = 0.0019). Combination of sVEGFR2 and suPAR had the best prognostic performance (AUC = 0.7 [0.65–0.75]) compared to clinical or biological variables.ConclusionssVEGFR2, either alone or combined with suPAR, seems of interest to predict deterioration of patients with suspected bacterial acute infection upon ED admission and could help front-line physicians in the triage process.

Increased mortality in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted within seven days of disease onset.

PurposeCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is creating an unprecedented healthcare crisis. Understanding the determinants of mortality is crucial to optimise intensive care unit (ICU) resource use and to identify targets for improving survival.MethodsIn a multicentre retrospective study, we included 379 COVID-19 patients admitted to four ICUs between 20 February and 24 April 2020 and categorised according to time from disease onset to ICU admission. A Cox proportional-hazards model identified factors associated with 28-day mortality.ResultsMedian age was 66 years (53–68) and 292 (77%) were men. The main comorbidities included obesity and overweight (67%), hypertension (49.6%) and diabetes (30.1%). Median time from disease onset (i.e., viral symptoms) to ICU admission was 8 (6–11) days (missing for three); 161 (42.5%) patients were admitted within a week of disease onset, 173 (45.6%) between 8 and 14 days, and 42 (11.1%) > 14 days after disease onset; day 28 mortality was 26.4% (22–31) and decreased as time from disease onset to ICU admission increased, from 37 to 21% and 12%, respectively. Patients admitted within the first week had higher SOFA scores, more often had thrombocytopenia or acute kidney injury, had more limited radiographic involvement, and had significantly higher blood IL-6 levels. Age, COPD, immunocompromised status, time from disease onset, troponin concentration, and acute kidney injury were independently associated with mortality.ConclusionThe excess mortality in patients admitted within a week of disease onset reflected greater non-respiratory severity. Therapeutic interventions against SARS-CoV-2 might impact different clinical endpoints according to time since disease onset.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06202-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a large cohort study

BackgroundSince December 2019, an outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) initially emerged in Wuhan, China, and has spread worldwide now. Clinical features of patients with COVID-19 have been described. However, risk factors leading to in-hospital deterioration and poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients with severe disease have not been well identified.MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 1190 adult inpatients (≥ 18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and determined outcomes (discharged or died) were included from Wuhan Infectious Disease Hospital from December 29, 2019 to February 28, 2020. The final follow-up date was March 2, 2020. Clinical data including characteristics, laboratory and imaging information as well as treatments were extracted from electronic medical records and compared. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to explore the potential predictors associated with in-hospital deterioration and death.Results1190 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. Their median age was 57 years (interquartile range 47–67 years). Two hundred and sixty-one patients (22%) developed a severe illness after admission. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that higher SOFA score (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.22–1.43, per score increase, p < 0.001 for deterioration and OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11–1.53, per score increase, p = 0.001 for death), lymphocytopenia (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.13–2.89 p = 0.013 for deterioration; OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.26–15.87, p = 0.021 for death) on admission were independent risk factors for in-hospital deterioration from not severe to severe disease and for death in severe patients. On admission D-dimer greater than 1 μg/L (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.19–9.04, p = 0.021), leukocytopenia (OR 5.10, 95% CI 1.25–20.78), thrombocytopenia (OR 8.37, 95% CI 2.04–34.44) and history of diabetes (OR 11.16, 95% CI 1.87–66.57, p = 0.008) were also associated with higher risks of in-hospital death in severe COVID-19 patients. Shorter time interval from illness onset to non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the survivors with severe disease was observed compared with non-survivors (10.5 days, IQR 9.25–11.0 vs. 16.0 days, IQR 11.0–19.0 days, p = 0.030). Treatment with glucocorticoids increased the risk of progression from not severe to severe disease (OR 3.79, 95% CI 2.39–6.01, p < 0.001). Administration of antiviral drugs especially oseltamivir or ganciclovir is associated with a decreased risk of death in severe patients (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.64, p < 0.001).ConclusionsHigh SOFA score and lymphocytopenia on admission could predict that not severe patients would develop severe disease in-hospital. On admission elevated D-dimer, leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia and diabetes were independent risk factors of in-hospital death in severe patients with COVID-19. Administration of oseltamivir or ganciclovir might be beneficial for reducing mortality in severe patients.

The Effect of L-Carnitine on Mortality Rate in Septic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Randomized Clinical Trials.

Recent clinical trial studies have reported that L-carnitine supplementation can reduce the mortality rate in patients with sepsis, but there are no definitive results in this context. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on 28-day and one-year mortality in septic patients. A systematic search conducted on Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2019 without any language restriction. The publications were reviewed based on the Cochrane handbook and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). To compare the effects of L-carnitine with placebo, Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled according to the random effects model. Across five enrolled clinical trials, we found that L-carnitine supplementation reduce one-year mortality in septic patients with SOFA> 12 (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.96; P= 0.03) but had no significant effect on reducing 28-day mortality ((RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.28; P= 0.65) compared to placebo. Finally, we observed that based on current trials, L-carnitine supplementation may not have clinically a significant effect on mortality rate. L-carnitine patients with higher SOFA score can reduce the mortality rate. However, the number of trials, study duration and using a dosage of L-carnitine are limited in this context and further large prospective trials are required to clarify the effect of L-carnitine on mortality rate in septic patients.

Phosphate Disturbance in Critically Ill Children in Zagazig University Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background: Phosphorus is very important for normal cellular structure (cell membrane and nucleic acids). Phosphorus has an important role in the cell metabolism, ATP production, and homeostasis. Objectives: The aim of the work was to determine the prevalence and some of risk factors of hypophosphatemia in sick children, and to evaluate the prognostic effect of serum phosphorous level on the outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children during their stay in the pediatric intensive care unit. Patients and methods: This prospective cohort study included a total of 50 critically ill children, attending at Department of Biochemistry and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Department of Pediatrics, Zagazig University Hospitals. This study was conducted between April 2017 to August 2018. Patients age ranged from 2 months to 129 months and according to serum phosphorus level cases were classified into those with hypophosphatemia and others with normal phosphate level. The severity of illness was determined by using SOFA score. Results: Revealed that there was statistically significant decrease in phosphorus level at day 1 and day 3 between hypophosphatemia and normal phosphate level groups. The prevalence of hypophosphatemia was 46% at first day of admission and 70% at third day of admission. Significant increase of PTH and total bilirubin in hypophosphatemia group, and significant decrease of calcium in hypophosphatemia group compared to normophosphatemia group. The cases were followed and compared regarding; morbidity (need for mechanical ventilation, and length of PICU stay), degree of organ failure (SOFA score) and their outcome (discharge from PICU or death). Conclusion: It could be concluded that hypophosphatemia is considered a common co-morbidity in critically ill children in PICU. Hypophosphatemia more prevalent in those with respiratory problems, and higher SOFA score.

DVT incidence and risk factors in critically ill patients with COVID-19

Few data are available on the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill COVID-19 with thrombosis prophylaxis. This study retrospectively included 88 patients in the ICU with critically ill COVID-19 at Jinyintan Hospital in Wuhan, China. All patients underwent compression ultrasonography for identifying DVT. Firth logistic regression was used to examine the association of DVT with sex, age, hypoalbuminemia, D-dimer, and SOFA score. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age and SOFA score of 88 patients were 63 (55–71) years old and 5 (4–6), respectively. Despite all patients receiving guideline-recommended low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of DVT was 46% (95% CI 35–56%). Proximal DVT was recognized in 9% (95% CI 3–15%) of the patients, while 46% (95% CI 35–56%) of patients had distal DVT. All of the proximal DVT combined with distal DVT. Risk factors of DVT extension occurred in all distal DVT patients. As Padua score ≥ 4 or IMPROVE score ≥ 2, 53% and 46% of patients had DVT, respectively. Mortality was higher in patients with acute DVT (30%) compared with non-DVT (17%), but did not reach statistical significance. Hypoalbuminemia (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.05, P = 0.001), higher SOFA score (OR per IQR, 2.07; 95% CI 1.38–3.39, P = 0.001), and elevated D-dimer (OR per IQR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.03–1.84, P = 0.029) were significant DVT risk factors in multivariable analyses. High incidence of DVT was identified in patients with critically ill COVID-19, despite the use of guideline-recommended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. The presence of hypoalbuminemia, higher SOFA score, and elevated D-dimer were significantly independent risk factors of DVT. More effective VTE prevention and management strategies may need to be addressed.

P0637SAFETY, EFFICACY AND OUTCOMES OF SLOW LOW EFFICIENCY DIALYSIS (SLED) IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY (AKI) IN MEDICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS (ICU)- A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN INDIA

Abstract Background and Aims Slow low efficiency dialysis (SLED) is increasingly being used as a renal replacement therapy in hemodynamically unstable, critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). SLED may reduce intradialytic hemodynamic instability as compared with conventional intermittent haemodialysis, while reducing resource demands of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). There are very few studies which have evaluated its safety, efficacy and outcome despite its increasing use, especially in Indian subcontinent. Method We conducted a single centre, prospective study to demonstrate safety, efficacy and outcome of SLED.. Net fluid removal and duration of SLED were based on need and hemodynamic status of the individual patient as decided by treating nephrologist. SOFA score was used as severity illness score. Efficacy of SLED was studied in terms of ability to achieve ultrafiltration goal, correction of acidosis and urea reduction ratio. Safety was studied in terms of hemodynamic and cardiovascular stability and complications during and after SLED. Outcomes were noted at time of discharge and six months later in terms of dialysis dependence, renal parameters (if dialysis independent) and mortality (In hospital and 6 months following discharge). We included hemodynamically unstable patients with AKI from medical ICUs with age &amp;gt;18 years of either gender. We excluded patients with AKI who could tolerate conventional haemodialysis or ESRD on maintenance haemodialysis. Results We analysed 228 patients with AKI in medical ICUs who underwent 576 SLED sessions over period of six months. Mean age was 57.48 ± 15.67 years and 74% (n=169) were male. Comorbidities were hypertension (56%), diabetes mellitus (43%), CKD (33%) and cardiovascular diseases (28%). Sepsis (93%) and hypoperfusion (68%) were most common causes for AKI. Refractory fluid overload (91%) and refractory metabolic acidosis (79%) were most common indications for SLED. Mean SOFA score was 12.2 ± 7.75 with 61 % patients had SOFA score more than 11. 66% were on mechanical ventilator. Out of 576 sessions, 555 sessions (96%) completed the planned duration without any adverse event. Planned ultrafiltration goal was achieved in 94%. SLED was able to correct metabolic acidosis in majority (86.1%). 68% SLED sessions required a vasopressor support and 34.8 % of SLED sessions were associated with hemodynamic instability. Total 14(6.2 %) patients died during SLED session. No documented arrhythmias developed after starting SLED. In-hospital mortality occurred in 61% patients. At 6 months follow up, another 13% patients died. In subgroup analysis, mortality was significantly higher in patients with SOFA score more than 11 (P&amp;lt;0.0001). Ventilatory requirement was also significantly high in non-survivors(P&amp;lt;0.0001). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that inotropic requirement, higher SOFA severity score, acidosis with pH &amp;lt;7.25 and presence of underlying CKD were associated with significant mortality. Conclusion Our study demonstrated efficacy and safety of SLED in critically ill AKI patients in medical ICU. SLED was able to achieve planned ultrafiltration goal and correct metabolic acidosis in majority of patients. SLED had good hemodynamic tolerability. Mortality was noted in 61 % of patients (not attributable to SLED per se). High SOFA score, underlying co morbidities, vasopressor requirement and severe acidosis (pH &amp;lt;7.25) were associated with high mortality. SLED is a reasonable cost-effective option of RRT in hemodynamically unstable patients with AKI especially in developing countries.