High-sensitivity Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Research Articles

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer.

BackgroundThere is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is scarce.Materials and MethodsWe evaluated the impact of the mGPS and HS-mGPS on the overall survival (OS) in 129 patients with HNC treated at Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital from 2012-2013. The mGPS was calculated as follows: mGPS of 0, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤1.0 mg/dl; 1, CRP >1.0 mg/dl; 2, CRP>1.0 mg/dl and albumin <3.5 mg/dl. Regarding the HS-mGPS, the CRP threshold level was set as 0.3 mg/dl. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models after adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsThe prognosis of HNC worsened significantly as both the mGPS and HS-mGPS increased in a univariate analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the HS-mGPS was significantly associated with the OS (adjusted HR for HS-mGPS of 2 compared to an HS-mGPS of 0 [HRscore2-0] 3.14 [95% CI: 1.23-8.07], Ptrend < 0.001), while the mGPS was suggested to be associated with the survival (HRscore2-0 2.37 [95% CI:0.89-6.33], Ptrend = 0.145). Even after stratification by clinical covariates, these associations persisted.ConclusionWe conclude that the HS-mGPS is useful as an independent prognostic factor in HNC.

High-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) Is superior to the mGPS in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

The present study compared the prognostic value of the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcimona (LAESCC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The baseline data of 163 eligible patients were retrospectively collected. Patients with a C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ 10 mg/l and albumin ≥ 35 g/l were allocated to mGPS-0 group. Patients with only elevated CRP (> 10 mg/l) were assigned to mGPS-1 group. Patients who had both elevated CRP (> 10 mg/l) and hypoalbuminurea (< 35 g/l) were assigned to mGPS-2 group. The HS-mGPS was calculated based on cutoff values of 3mg/l for CRP and the same value (35 g/l) for albumin. Prognostic significance for both tumor response and overall survival (OS) was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The mGPS was 0 in 95 patients, 1 in 28 patient and 2 in 40 patients. In contrast, the HS-mGPS was 0 in 66 patients, 1 in 47 patients and 2 in 50 patients. In multivariate analysis, the HS-mGPS was the only positive factor for tumor response (P = 0.015). Both the mGPS (P < 0.001) and HS-mGPS (P < 0.001) were good prognostic predictors for OS. However, the HS-mGPS was found to be a superior prognostic predictor compared to the mGPS in a multivariate analysis (P = 0.006). In conclusion, the pretreatment HS-mGPS is a strong prognosticator superior to the mGPS for both tumor response and OS in LAESCC patients who received CCRT.

Prognostic value of the C-reactive protein/Albumin Ratio (CAR) in patients with operable soft tissue sarcoma.

BackgroundThe preoperative C-reactive protein/Albumin ratio (CAR) is valuable for predicting the prognosis of patients with various types of cancers. The aim of the present study is to investigate the prognostic value of the preoperative CAR and compare it with other systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS).MethodsThis retrospective study included 206 patients with STS. The optimal cutoff value of the CAR was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The impact of the CAR and other clinicopathological features on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare groups classified by the CAR. Additionally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the predictive ability of the CAR, high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (Hs-mGPS), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).ResultsThe optimal cut-off value of the CAR was 0.1035 according to the ROC analysis. An increased CAR (≥0.1035) was significantly associated with older age, larger tumor size, deep tumor location, higher tumor grade and more advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (all P<0.05). Patients with an elevated CAR (≥0.1035) exhibited a shorter median survival time and lower 5-year OS rate than those with a CAR<0.1035 (68.2 vs 115.8 months, P = 0.000; 44.6% vs 80.9%, P = 0.000, respectively). The results of a multivariate analysis indicated that the CAR (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-4.14, P = 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for OS along with tumor grade (P<0.05). Additionally, the CAR exhibited a greater AUC value (0.662) than the NLR and PLR, but the value was equal to the Hs-mGPS.ConclusionsThe preoperative CAR is an independent prognostic factor predicting prognosis in STS and exhibits superior prognostic ability compared to the established inflammation-based prognostic indices.

Predictive and Prognostic significance of high-sensitivity modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HS-mGPS) in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Objective: To study the predictive and prognostic significance of high-sensitivity modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HS-mGPS) on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 117 patients with advanced gastric cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with SOX (oxaliplatin+ S1) or mFOLFOX 6(oxaliplatin+ CF+ 5-FU) regimen. HS-mGPS was calculated according to blood C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration and serum albumin (ALB) level. The correlation between HS-mGPS and clinicopathological characteristics was determined and the predictors of survival were analyzed. Results: 117 patients with stage ⅡB (43 cases), stage Ⅲ (60), and stage Ⅳ (14) received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The overall response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 61.5%(72/117), and the tumor control rate was 88.0% (103/117), with a pathological response rate of 91.5% (107/117). The R0 resection rate was 81.2% (95/117). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 21.0 (95% CI 6.4-35.6) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 39.0 (95% CI 21.4-56.6) months. Higher HS-mGPS was associated with higher T stage, local lymph-node metastasis, distant metastasis, lower chemotherapy overall response rate and lower pathological response rate (all P<0.05). The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that higher HS-mGPS, presence of local lymph-node metastasis and non R0 resection were associated with poorer DFS and OS (P<0.05). Conclusion: HS-mGPS can be used to predict the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and as an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A contrastive analysis of high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score and modified Glasgow prognostic score on the prognostic predict of patients with gastric cancer

Objective To investigate the value difference of high-sensitivity modified glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) and modified glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) on the prognostic predict of patients with gastric cancer. Methods The clinical data of 552 patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and accepted surgery treatment in our department were respectively collected. And all the patients were scored according to the score criterion of HS-mGPS and mGPS. Compare the difference of clinicopathological characteristics of tumors and prognostic between patients with different scores. Results The score results for 552 patients are mGPS 0 score 494 cases, mGPS 1 score 34 cases, mGPS 2 score 24 cases; HS-mGPS 0 score 411 cases, HS-mGPS 1 score 75 cases, HS-mGPS 2 score 66 cases, the 2 score systems are all correlate with patients’ age, tumor TNM stage, local lymphatic metastasis and vascular invasion [mGPS(Age: t=10.292, P=0.000; Sex: χ2=0.140, P=0.942; Tumor differentiation grade: χ2=0.260, P=0.883; TNM stage: χ2=8.326, P=0.000; Lymph node metastasis: χ2=13.574, P=0.000; Venous invasion: χ2=13.501, P=0.000) vs. HS-mGPS(Age: t=10.095, P=0.002; Sex: χ2=1.195, P=0.329; Tumor differentiation grade: χ2=0.512, P=0.778; Lymph node metastasis: χ2=7.060, P=0.000; Lymph node metastasis: χ2=13.468, P=0.000; Venous invasion: χ2=13.974, P=0.000)]. The results of univariate and multivariate analysis of risk fators of death after surgery manifest that, age, tumor differentiation, tumor TNM stage, lymphatic metastasis, vascular invasion, mGPS and HS-mGPS are all independent risk factors of death after surgery [Single factor analysis: Sex: P=0.187, odds ratio (OR)=0.869; Age: P=0.000, OR=1.474; Tumor differentiation grade: P=0.000, OR=3.121; Lymph node metastasis: P=0.000, OR=4.059; Venous invasion: P=0.000, OR=3.535; Tumor differentiation grade: P=0.000, OR=2.974; HS-mGPS: P=0.000, OR=4.578; mGPS: P=0.000, OR=2.331 and Multiple factors analysis: Age: P=0.000, OR=1.319; Tumor differentiation grade: P=0.010, OR=1.235; Lymph node metastasis: P=0.017, OR=1.213; vascular invasion: P=0.020, OR=1.306; tumor TNM stage: P=0.000, OR=2.909; HS-mGPS: P=0.007, OR=3.845; mGPS: P=0.000, OR=1.883]. Conclusion Compared with mGPS, the HS-mGPS download the score level, expanded the potential risk of poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer, and may have a certain reference value in improve the prognosis of these patients. Key words: High-sensitivity modified glasgow prognostic score; Modified glasgow prognostic score; Gastric cancer; Prognostic

Prognostic impact of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

The present study compared the prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS), high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic index (PI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study included 327 consecutive patients with resectable NSCLC with a follow.-up period. >5. years. Initially, the HS-mGPS was directly compared with the GPS and mGPS in terms of their ability to predict survival in patients with resectable NSCLC. Second, inflammation.-based scores, including the HS-mGPS, NLR, PLR, PI, and PNI, were analyzed preoperatively using multivariate Cox analysis. Clinical characteristics reflecting cancer progression were also analyzed. Elevated GPS (P < 0.001), mGPS (P < 0.001), and HS-mGPS (P < 0.001) levels were associated with reduced overall survival. The HS-mGPS (P < 0.001) was superior to the GPS and mGPS (P = 0.884) as a prognostic marker of postoperative outcomes. On multivariate Cox analysis, age (P = 0.026), p-T status (P < 0.001), p-N status (P < 0.001), lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.008), and the HS-mGPS (P = 0.016) were independent prognostic factors for survival. These results suggest that the HS-mGPS might have a greater prognostic impact than the GPS, mGPS, NLR, PLR, PI, or PNI in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Preoperative C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Predicts Prognosis of Patients after Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND: An elevated preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and compare it with other systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 455 patients with GC undergoing curative resection. We investigated the correlations between the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to assess independent prognostic factors. The area under the curve was used to compare the prognostic value of different markers. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, the CRP/Alb ratio were independently associated with OS in patients with GC (hazard ratio: 1.626; 95% confidence interval: 1.191-2.219; P = .002), along with age (P = .003), preoperative body weight loss (P = .001), tumor location (P = .008), metastatic lymph node ratio (P < .001), and seventh tumor-nodes-metastasis stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer) (P = .007). However, several other systemic inflammation–based prognostic scores (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, platelet lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index, Glasgow Prognostic Score, modified Glasgow prognostic score, and high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score) were not. In addition, the CRP/Alb ratio had a higher area under the curve value (0.625) compared with several other systemic inflammation–based prognostic scores (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative CRP/Alb ratio, a system inflammation-based prognostic score, is a superior predictor of OS in patients undergoing curative resection for GC and may help to identify the high-risk patients for treatment decisions.

The value of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score in predicting the survival of patients with a soft-tissue sarcoma.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (Hs-mGPS) could predict the disease-specific survival and oncological outcome in adult patients with non-metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma before treatment. A total of 139 patients treated between 2001 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The Hs-mGPS varied between 0 and 2. Patients with a score of 2 had a poorer disease-specific survival than patients with a score of 0 (p < 0.001). The estimated five-year rate of disease-specific survival for those with a score of 2 was 0%, compared with 85.4% (95% CI 77.3 to 93.5) for those with a score of 0. Those with a score of 2 also had a poorer disease-specific survival than those with a score of 1 (75.3%, 95% CI 55.8 to 94.8; p < 0.001). Patients with a score of 2 also had a poorer event-free rate than those with a score of 0 (p < 0.001). Those with a score of 2 also had a poorer event-free survival than did those with a score of 1 (p = 0.03). A multivariate analysis showed that the Hs-mGPS remained an independent predictor of survival and recurrence. The Hs-mGPS could be a useful prognostic marker in patients with a soft-tissue sarcoma.

The High-Sensitivity Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Is Superior to the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancer

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the superiority of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) before surgery in patients with gastric cancer. Patients and Methods: The participants of this retrospective study comprised 552 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at the Fukuoka University Hospital. The HS-mGPS was calculated before surgery based on cutoff values of 0.3 mg/dl for C-reactive protein and 3.5 g/dl for albumin, and correlations between the HS-mGPS and the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis were evaluated. In addition, the superiority of the HS-mGPS to the mGPS as a prognostic indicator was examined in detail. Results: The mGPS was 0 in 494 patients, 1 in 24 patients and 2 in 34 patients. In contrast, the HS-mGPS was 0 in 411 patients, 1 in 75 patients and 2 in 66 patients. Both the mGPS (p < 0.0001) and HS-mGPS (p < 0.0001) were good prognostic predictors in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy. Of the 494 patients with an mGPS of 0 before surgery, 51 and 32 exhibited an HS-mGPS of 1 and 2, respectively. The patients who exhibited migration in the HS-mGPS demonstrated a significantly more unfavorable prognosis than the patients with an HS-mGPS of 0 (p < 0.0001). The prognostic impact of the HS-mGPS was especially clear in stage I and IV patients (p = 0.0027, p = 0.017). The HS-mGPS was found to be a superior prognostic predictor compared to the mGPS in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: The HS-mGPS before surgery is a superior prognostic predictor in patients with gastric cancer.