Like all people, we perceive the version of reality that our culture communicates. Like others having or living in more than one culture, we get multiple, often opposing messages. The coming together of two self-consistent but habitually incomparable frames of reference causes un choque, a cultural collision. --(Anzaldua, 1987, p.51) For the past two decades, historically marginalized youth have been underachieving in educational settings. More specifically, Latino/a (1) secondary youth have not attained academic success in comparison to other youth (Ek, 2009; Gandara & Contreras, 2009; Contreras, 2011). Much of the blame from schools and other institutions is placed on students, families, and historically marginalized communities of color (Irizarry & Raible, 2011). According to the Pew Hispanic Center (Fry, 2014), Latino/a youth have one of the highest high school dropout rates in the educational system. Numerous research studies on secondary Latino/a youth have demonstrated that culturally irrelevant curricula, pedagogy, unqualified teachers, and other educational factors have influenced the academic path of secondary youth (see Madrid, 2011). Irizarry and Raible (2011) argued that the lives of Latino/a youth continue to be excluded from secondary schools. Further, this causes student disengagement in high schools. Over the past ten years, the student population in the educational system has seen an increase in cultural, linguistic, and ethnic diversity. Further, with the rise and influx of immigrant populations in the United States, communities are becoming highly diverse and consequently, interaction between immigrant populations and mainstream institutions is increasing (Rios, 2013). The U.S Census projects that 50% of the population will consist of culturally, linguistically, racially, ethnic, and religiously diverse groups by 2050 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). Despite the increasing growth of diversity within our national borders, issues concerning educational equity and equality have not always been well attended to in educational contexts. Schools and other institutions impacting youth must begin to recognize the daily experiences of students who live in two separate and disconnected worlds, that of home and school. Often, these worlds are in conflict. Although Latino/a youth come to high school with multiple identities, various languages, rich cultural experiences, and powerful lived experiences, they are often pushed into the shadows. High schools, especially urban high school, can be alienating, dehumanizing, and culturally denigrating spaces for youth who are pushed to the margins (Valenzuela, 1999). Border pedagogy (Giroux, 1992) has emerged as a way to disrupt the manner in which marginalized youth are educated in secondary school settings. This special theme issue examines how border pedagogy influences the lives of Latino/a youth in secondary schools. Major Concepts, Research Issues, and Ideas Examined Border pedagogy (Garza, 2007) has been enacted to interrupt the way in which marginalized youth learn within the educational system. Border pedagogy draws from the guiding principles of critical theory (Giroux, 1992) and critical pedagogy (Freire, 1974). Furthermore, border pedagogy is an understanding that there are ideological, epistemological, social and cultural margins that make up the language of power, history and difference (Giroux, 1992). Moreover, conceptual boundaries limit the potential of individuals who are different from those in power. Latino youth and other students of color are disengaged because they don't see themselves reflected in books, schools, and school curriculum (Bartolome, 2008; hooks; 2003; Prieto & Villenas, 2012). Border pedagogy engages learners in multiple references that constitute different cultural codes, experiences and languages to help them construct their own narratives and histories and revise democracy through sociocultural negotiation (Wilson, Ek, Ty, & Douglas, 2014). …