High-risk Surgical Patients Research Articles

Transcatheter closure management of mitral paravalvular leakage: A single center experience.

Paravalvular leakage (PVL) is a common complication after artificial valve replacement. Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure (PVT), an efficient, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for PVL patients. The purpose of this study was to present our experience with transcatheter closure of mitral paravalvular leakage (PVL) after surgical valve replacement in our center. A cohort of 81 consecutive patients with mitral PVLs was treated with transcatheter closure between September 2014 and December 2022. We reviewed the demographics, clinical features, therapeutic modalities and follow-up results. The patients' charts were used for retrospective analysis. Eighty-one patients from one center were enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients was 63 ± 11 years. The median LVEF was 51% ± 7%, and the median regurgitation volume was 11.5 ± 10.1 mL. Sealing with occlusion was successful in 70 patients, and the technical success rate was 86.5%. The median regurgitation volume was reduced to 1.95 ± 2.6 mL. The major adverse event was hemolysis, which affected 19 patients, 17 of whom required blood transfusion. Three patients required secondary open surgery due to bleeding. Three patients died during the hospital stay, and all of their deaths were caused by hemolysis-related complications. The median hospital stay was 10.3 ± 6.3 days. During the follow-up period, 2 patients died, and none of their deaths were caused by surgery. The New York Heart Association classification increased in all patients during the 6-month follow-up. Transcatheter mitral PVL closure requires complex catheter techniques. However, this technique is minimally invasive and has a shorter hospital stay. Interventional mitral PVL closure is a safe and efficacious technique for high-risk surgical patients with symptomatic paravalvular regurgitation.

Comparative Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Wound Closure Techniques in Appendectomies for Gangrenous Appendicitis

Background: Post-operative medical complications are very common in patients with gangrenous nonperforated appendicitis, especially surgical site infections (SSIs). Currently no conclusive answers on the relative benefits of immediate vs delayed wound clear therefore a comparison is essential. Objectives: In order to compare the results of immediate versus delayed wound closure in patients with gangrenous appendicitis who underwent appendectomy, SSIs, wound healing, and general postoperative recovery will be assessed. Methodology: The present study is a retrospective cohort study, using data from 185 patients, operated for gangrenous appendicitis during the period between from January 2023 to February, 2024. Total patients were categorized into two groups based on the wound closure technique employed, immediate wound closure (IWC, n=105) and delayed wound closure (DWC, n=80). Specific dependent variables were the overall SSI rate, days to wound healing and days of hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included a return of symptoms and overall postoperative morbidity. Results: The study also revealed that the incidence of SSIs was relatively low in the DWC group at 8. 0% compared to the (22.0± 0.01) % in the IWC group, which was statistically significant (p<0. 001). The overall IWC time was significantly shorter in the IWC group (11 days) as compared to the DWC group (15 days) (P value = 0. 02). In our study, the DWC group was found to have a lower median LOS of 6 days as compared to IWC group that had a LOS of 8 days. When compared the two groups regarding readmission rates, the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0. 05). Conclusion: These delayed wound closure strategies in appendectomy for gangrenous appendicitis are a safe means of decreasing SSIs and hospital stay without a predisposing effect on wound healing and readmission. Based on these findings, it is recommended that DWC is the better approach in the management of such high-risk surgical patients.

A preliminary study about role of the endovascular profundoplasty in extremely high-risk surgical patients

A preliminary study about role of the endovascular profundoplasty in extremely high-risk surgical patients

Urgency adjusted outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are a complex cohort who are relatively poorly represented in published literature. This is partly due to the lack of consensus of the definition of the term emergency in IBD surgery. There is ongoing and recent work defining clinical urgency for unplanned surgical procedures and categorizing the high-risk surgical patient. This paper aims to report the difference in patient metrics and risks as recorded by the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA). Complete patient data, including histology, were available in the NELA database between 2013 and 2016. Urgency categories recorded by NELA are <2h, 2-6h, 6-18h, and >18h. Patient characteristics, physiology, biochemistry, and outcomes are reported according to these urgency categories with regression analysis used to compare differences between them. Mortality in Crohn's disease (CD) ranged from 1.4% in the >18h urgency to 14.6% in the most urgent. In ulcerative colitis (UC), this range was from 3.1% to 14.8%. In both CD and UC, there were significant trends in hemodynamic instability, serum white cell count, serum electrolytes and creatinine, and outcome measures length of stay and unplanned return to theater. Patients having emergency surgery for IBD are not a single cohort when considering physiology, blood biochemistry, or most importantly, outcomes. Risk counseling and management should reflect this. Hemodynamic changes are subtle and may be missed in this cohort.

Early Feasibility Study with the SATURN Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement Device

PurposeTo report the outcomes of the early feasibility study of transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the SATURN System (InnovHeart, Milano, Italy) to treat patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation. DescriptionFive high surgical risk patients underwent transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement with the SATURN System at a single center. One-year follow-up is complete for all patients. EvaluationThe valve was implanted successfully in all patients without any major adverse events. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire improved from a median of 63.5 (interquartile range, 19.6) at baseline to 99.0 (interquartile range, 21.6) at 1 year. Echocardiographic follow-up demonstrates stable valve function, no transvalvular or paravalvular mitral regurgitation, and absence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. ConclusionsAt 1 year after transapical SATURN transcatheter mitral valve replacement, all patients are alive with quality of life improvement and favorable device hemodynamics. These initial results are promising and larger scale studies with continued follow-up are required to further elucidate the efficacy and safety of this novel technology.

Perioperative transfusion study (PETS): Does a liberal transfusion protocol improve outcome in high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery? A randomised controlled pilot study.

Small studies have shown that patients with advanced coronary artery disease might benefit from a more liberal blood transfusion strategy. The goal of this pilot study was to test the feasibility of a blood transfusion intervention in a group of vascular surgery patients who have elevated cardiac troponins in rest. We conducted a single-centre, randomised controlled pilot study. Patients with a preoperative elevated high-sensitive troponin T undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery were randomised between a liberal transfusion regime (haemoglobin >10.4 g/dL) and a restrictive transfusion regime (haemoglobin 8.0-9.6 g/dL) during the first 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome was defined as a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or unscheduled coronary revascularization. In total 499 patients were screened; 92 were included and 50 patients were randomised. Postoperative haemoglobin was different between the intervention and control group; 10.6 versus 9.8, 10.4 versus 9.4, 10.9 versus 9.4 g/dL on day one, two and three respectively (p < 0.05). The primary outcome occurred in four patients (16%) in the liberal transfusion group and in two patients (8%) in control group. This pilot study shows that the studied transfusion protocol was able to create a clinically significant difference in perioperative haemoglobin levels. Randomisation was possible in 10% of the screened patients. A large definitive trial should be possible to provide evidence whether a liberal transfusion strategy could decrease the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction in high risk surgical patients.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount. Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized. (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques. Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.

Understanding early deaths after major emergency abdominal surgery: An observational study of 754 patients.

Major emergency abdominal surgery is associated with severe postoperative complications and high short- and long-term mortality. Despite recent advancements in standardizing multidisciplinary care bundles, a subgroup of patients continues to face a heightened risk of short-term mortality. This study aimed to identify and describe the high-risk surgical patients and risk factors for short-term postoperative mortality. In this study, we included all patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery over 2years and collected data on demographics, intraoperative variables, and short-term outcomes. The primary outcome measure was short-term mortality and secondary outcome measures were pre, intra, and postoperative risk factors for premature death. Multivariable binary regression analysis was performed to determine possible risk factors for short-term mortality. Short-term mortality within 14days of surgery in this cohort of 754 consecutive patients was 8%. Multivariable analysis identified various independent risk factors for short-term mortality throughout different phases of patient care. These factors included advanced age, preoperative history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and vascular bowel ischemia or perforation of the stomach or duodenum during the primary surgery. Patients at high risk of early mortality following major emergency abdominal surgery exhibited distinct perioperative risk factors. This study underscores the importance of clinicians identifying and managing these factors in high-risk patients to ensure optimal care.

Combined Endovascular and Endoscopic Management of a Secondary Aortoesophageal Fistula after Open Surgical Aortic Repair in a Giant Descending Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Secondary aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is defined as a communication between the aorta and the esophagus, occurring after aortic disease treatment or esophageal procedures, associating very high mortality rates with treatment and being fatal without it. Several treatment strategies have been described in the literature, combining open surgery or endovascular aortic repair with surgical or endoscopic management of the esophageal lesion. We present the case of a 53-year-old patient with a history of open aortic surgery for a giant descending thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm complicated with secondary AEF, successfully managed using emergency transiliac TEVAR (thoracic endovascular aortic repair), extensive antibiotic therapy associated with nutritional replenishment, and rehabilitation therapy. Novel endovascular and endoscopic devices have been developed, offering less invasive treatment strategies with improved outcomes, especially for high risk surgical patients. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to personalized medicine to manage such complex situations.

Revolutionizing outcomes: endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using innovative electrocautery enhanced-lumen apposing metal stents for high-risk surgical patients

This study retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). Between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022, 58 high-risk surgical patients with AC underwent EUS-GBD with the novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS. The technical success rate was 94.8% (55/58), with one case of duodenal perforation requiring surgery with complete stent migration and two of partial stent migration into the gallbladder. However, the clinical success rate was 100% (55/55). Recurrent AC occurred in 3.6% of the cases (2/55), managed with double pigtail plastic stents through the LAMS. Early AEs observed in 1.8% (1/55) due to stent obstruction. Late AEs occurred in 5.4% (3/55), including two cases of cholangitis and one of stent obstruction. For 33 patients followed over 6 months, LAMS maintenance was sustained in 30 cases. Two patients underwent double-pigtail plastic stent replacement after LAMS removal, and one underwent LAMS removal during surgery following tumor stage regression after chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma. The novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS demonstrated high technical and clinical success rates in high-risk surgical patients with AC, maintaining effective gallbladder drainage with minimal AEs during long-term follow-up, thus highlighting its efficacy and safety in challenging patients.

A Comparative Analysis of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conscious Sedation in Managing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Pain.

This study investigates the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for managing perioperative and postoperative pain in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis, particularly in high-risk elderly patients with extensive comorbidities and limited functional status. In a retrospective single-center study, 58 high-risk patients scheduled for PC were assessed. ESPB was administered to 23 patients, while 22 received conscious sedation. Pain intensity was measured using the numeric rating scale before any analgesic or ESPB administration, during the procedure and at 1 and 12h post-procedure and secondary outcomes included adverse effects and additional analgesic requirements. The ESPB group experienced significant pain reduction during and post-procedure compared to the conscious sedation group (p = 0.002). Procedure times were shorter (p = 0.015), and postoperative tramadol was less frequently needed in the ESPB group (p = 0.007). The incidence of nausea was also lower in the ESPB group (p = 0.001). No ESPB-related complications were reported. ESPB significantly alleviates perioperative and postoperative pain in PC patients, reducing additional analgesic use and side effects. It holds promise as a key component of pain management for high-risk surgical patients. Level 3, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Predicting and Preventing Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in High-Risk Surgical Patients

Predicting and Preventing Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in High-Risk Surgical Patients

Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block: A Novel Technique for Analgesia in Patients with Sternal Dehiscence.

Sternal wound complications following sternotomy need a multidisciplinary approach in high-risk postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Poorly controlled pain during surgical management of such wounds increases cardiovascular stress and respiratory complications. Multimodal analgesia including intravenous opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and regional anesthesia techniques, like central neuraxial blocks and fascial plane blocks, have been described. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB), a novel technique, has been effectively used in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Under ultrasound (US) guidance PIFB is performed with the aim of depositing local anesthetic between two superficial muscles, namely the pectoralis major muscle and the external intercostal muscle. The authors report a series of five cases where US-guided bilateral PIFB was used in patients undergoing sternal wound debridement. Patients had excellent analgesia intraoperatively as well as postoperatively for 24 hours with minimal requirement of supplemental analgesia. None of the patients experienced complications due to PIFB administration. The authors concluded that bilateral PIFB can be effectively used as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia with general anesthesia and as a sole anesthesia technique in selected cases of sternal wound debridement.

“Cup-in-Cup” for revision cup in total hip arthroplasty – An innovative technique

In a revision hip surgery with isolated poly-ethylene liner wear along with a stable acetabular shell involves difficult decision of revising the entire acetabular component or just the liner. However, unavailability of the similar poly liner in a high risk patient can be dealt with a novel technique of cup in cup by retaining the stable shell and cementing a polyethylene liner over it. A 77-year-old male came with complains of pain in the right hip and limp of 4 months duration after 17 years of a revision hip surgery. Poly-ethylene liner was found worn out intraoperative with both the metal shell and the stem very stable. Same company poly liner was not available. In order to prevent the extensive revision in a high surgical risk patient and to prevent the blood and the bone loss, a new Elite poly-ethylene cement cup was cemented over the old stable cementless metal shell. At 3 years short term follow up patient is able to walk pain free independently. The “cup-in-cup” technique with cemented PE cup into a retained well-fixed and well-positioned metal shell is a good technique in high surgical risk patients and gives promising result at short term follow up.

Influence of different intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcome after abdominal tumours resection.

Intraoperative fluid management is a crucial aspect of cancer surgery, including colorectal surgery and pancreatoduodenectomy. The study tests if intraoperative multimodal monitoring reduces postoperative morbidity and duration of hospitalisation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery treated by the same anaesthetic protocols with epidural analgesia. A prospective study was conducted in 2 parallel groups. High-risk surgical patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly selected in the control group (CG), where standard monitoring was applied (44 patients), and the protocol group (PG), where cerebral oxygenation and extended hemodynamic monitoring were used with the protocol for intraoperative interventions (44 patients). There were no differences in the median length of hospital stay, CG 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 8 days), PG 9 (5.5), p = 0.851. There was no difference in postoperative renal of cardiac impairment. Procalcitonin was significantly higher (highest postoperative value in the first 3 days) in CG, 0.75 mcg/L (IQR 3.19 mcg/L), than in PG, 0.3 mcg/L (0.88 mcg/L), p = 0.001. PG patients received a larger volume of intraoperative fluid; median intraoperative fluid balance +1300 ml (IQR 1063 ml) than CG; +375 ml (IQR 438 ml), p < 0.001. There were significant differences in intraoperative fluid management and vasopressor use. The median postoperative value of procalcitonin was significantly higher in CG, suggesting differences in immune response to tissue trauma in different intraoperative fluid status, but there was no difference in postoperative morbidity or hospital stay.

Physician-modified inner-branched endovascular repair with re-intervention.

Treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in high surgical risk patients can be challenging. Reports of physician-modified inner-branched endovascular repair (PMiBEVAR) are increasing. Despite low morbidity and mortality rates, re-interventions for endoleaks with these grafts are serious. There are no reports of additional treatment for PMiBEVAR failure. A 75-year-old man presented to our hospital with a Crawford's type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. A PMiBEVAR was performed. Postoperative computed tomographic angiography revealed an endoleak from the inner branch of the right renal artery. A re-intervention was performed with coil embolization of the endoleak. Imaging after re-intervention showed successful obliteration of the endoleak. We thereby report a successful case of re-intervention for PMiBEVAR failure.

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SURGICAL PREHABILITATION IN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY PATIENTS

https://youtu.be/rQFd3dU-8AM BACKGROUND There are many complications that patients experience after cardiothoracic surgery, including prolonged intubation, increased length of ICU stay, infection, cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning and decreased quality of life. To reduce post-surgical complication risk, pre-surgical rehabilitation (Prehab) has developed as a potential countermeasure. Prehab may include exercise training, nutrition counseling, social support, patient and family education, smoking cessation and weight management. METHODS Thirty-nine, high risk surgical patients scheduled for major cardiovascular surgery were referred to the Prehab program by their cardiovascular surgeon to prepare them for upcoming intervention. Each patient underwent pre- and post-assessments, to include a six-minute walk test (6MWT), hand grip dynamometry (GRIP), and 30-second chair stands (30SCS). Patients attended supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for at least 2 weeks leading up to their surgical procedure. The 60-minute session included symptom-limited aerobic and resistance training, along with education on nutrition and post-surgical expectations. Dependent samples t-tests were used to determine statistical significance for all pre-post comparison measures. RESULTS Average program duration was 6.3 ± 3.3 wk, average number of sessions attended was 9.9 ± 5.7 sessions and the average number of sessions per week was 1.7 ± 0.3 sessions per week. Patients exercised for 27.1 ± 5.0 min with a mean exercise heart rate at 20.7 ± 12.4 bpm above rest. There were significant increases in 30SCS (pre = 9.5 ± 4.2 reps vs. post = 11.3 ± 4.5 reps), 6MWT (pre = 343.2 ± 117.9 m vs. post = 386.1 ± 96.9 m) and MET-min -1 (pre = 64.8 ± 27.5 MET-min -1 vs. post = 87.6 ± 7.3 MET-min -1). There were no changes in weight (pre = 87.5 ± 19.7 kg vs. post = 87.7 ± 19.3 kg), BMI (pre = 29.0 ± 6.2 kg·m 2 vs. post = 29.0 ± 6.0 kg·m 2), or GRIP (15.5 ± 6.7 kg vs. post = 17.8 ± 9.6 kg). Regarding safety, 385 exercise sessions were completed by all patients and 7 sessions were deferred by the staff for clinical reasons. In addition, of the 422.5 patient-hours of exercise, no untoward events occurred. CONCLUSION Patients awaiting cardiovascular surgery can exercise safely at a low to moderate intensity and see improvements in functional capacity and muscular strength.

The effectiveness of preoperative delirium prevention in intermediate to high-risk older surgical patients: A systematic review.

Few reviews have addressed delirium prevention among intermediate to high-risk older surgical patients. To map preoperative delirium prevention interventions for older surgical patients at intermediate to high risk of developing delirium, assess outcomes and identify gaps in knowledge. Systematic narrative review of randomised controlled trials reported following the PRISMA checklist. A systematic search was conducted of the literature published from 1990 to October 2022 in Medline, CINAHL and Ageline and of the grey literature in Google Scholar. Randomised controlled trials were retrieved that assessed the effectiveness of preoperative delirium prevention interventions for older surgical patients at intermediate to high risk of delirium. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool, and results were tabulated. Studies were assessed for bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-one studies met the selection criteria including N = 5096 participants. Two studies tested cognitive training, two studies tested fascia iliaca compartment block and one study assessed femoral nerve block. Ten studies tested prophylactic medications including methylprednisolone. Five studies investigated geriatric assessment and management. One study assessed transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation. In the two studies testing fascia iliaca compartment block, there was a reduction in postoperative delirium for orthopaedic patients. Methylprednisolone reduced postoperative delirium in orthopaedic patients and in those undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Results of all other interventions on the occurrence of postoperative delirium and additional outcomes including the severity and duration of delirium were inconclusive. Despite the promising results for fascia iliaca compartment block and methylprednisolone, there is limited knowledge regarding evidence-based delirium prevention interventions. Most studies had small sample sizes indicating that the current evidence is exploratory. There is an urgent need for the funding and conduct of trials to test preventative interventions for older surgical patients at intermediate to high risk of developing delirium.

Multidisciplinary prehabilitation to improve frailty and functional capacity in high-risk elective surgical patients: a retrospective pilot study

BackgroundFrailty is associated with worse outcomes and higher healthcare costs. The long waiting time for surgery is a potential ‘teachable’ moment. We examined the feasibility and safety of a pilot prehabilitation programme on high-risk frail patients undergoing major elective surgery.MethodsA single-centre, retrospective pilot study (Dec 2020–Nov 2021) on a one-stop prehabilitation programme (structured exercise training, nutritional counselling/therapy, and psychological support) in collaboration with geriatricians and allied health professionals. At least 4 weeks before surgery, patients at high risk of frailty or malnutrition, or undergoing major hepatectomy, esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or radical cystectomy, were referred for prehabilitation (2–3 sessions/week). The primary outcomes were the feasibility and safety of prehabilitation. The secondary outcomes were changes in functional, emotional, and nutritional status and days alive and at home within 30 days after surgery (DAH30) associated with prehabilitation.ResultsOver a 12-month period, 72 out of 111 patients (64.9%) from the Perioperative Medicine Clinic were eligible for prehabilitation, of which 54 (75%) were recruited. The mean (standard deviation) age was 71.9 (6.9) years. The adherence rate to 3 weeks of prehabilitation was high in 52 (96.3%) participants. Prehabilitation improved exercise capacity (P = 0.08), enhanced some functional mobility measures (P = 0.02), and increased nutritional energy (P = 0.04) and protein intakes (P < 0.01). However, prehabilitation-related changes in muscle strength, cognitive function, and emotional resilience were minimal. The median (interquatile range) DAH30 was 19 (14–23) days. No adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThis outpatient-based, one-stop multidisciplinary prehabilitation programme was feasible, safe, and improved several measures of patient’s physiological reserve and functional capacity.Clinical trial registrationNCT05668221.

Provider Perceptions Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Surgical Patients with Frailty.

To characterize the perceptions of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and geriatricians regarding perioperative CPR in surgical patients with frailty. The population of patients undergoing surgery is growing older and more frail. Despite a growing focus on goal-concordant care, frailty assessment, and debate regarding the appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with frailty, providers' views regarding frailty and perioperative CPR are unknown. We performed qualitative thematic analysis of transcripts from semi-structured interviews of anesthesiologists (8), surgeons (10), and geriatricians (9) who care for high-risk surgical patients at two academic medical centers in Boston, MA. The interview guide elicited clinicians' understanding of frailty, approach to decision-making regarding perioperative CPR, and perceptions of perioperative CPR in frail surgical patients. We identified 5 themes: perceptions of perioperative CPR in patients with frailty vary by provider specialty; judgments regarding appropriateness of CPR in surgical patients with frailty are typically multifactorial and include patient goals, age, comorbidities, and arrest etiology; resuscitation in patients with frailty is sometimes associated with moral distress; biases such as ableism and ageism may skew clinicians' perceptions of appropriateness of perioperative CPR in patients with frailty; and evidence to guide risk stratification for patients with frailty undergoing perioperative CPR is inadequate. Anesthesiologists, surgeons, and geriatricians offer different accounts of frailty's relevance to judgments regarding CPR in surgical patients. Divergent views regarding frailty and perioperative CPR may impede efforts to deliver goal-concordant care and suggest a need for research to inform risk stratification, predict patient-centered outcomes, and understand the role of potential biases such as ageism and ableism.