High-risk Pulmonary Embolism Research Articles

Reduced Dose Tenecteplase in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Reduced Dose Tenecteplase in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Ultrasound assisted, catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-high and high risk pulmonary embolism: focus on safety for oncological patients

Abstract Background Catheter-based revascularization procedures have been developed as an alternative to systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy for intermediate-high and high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with. Little is known about the outcomes of oncological patients, who are notably at higher bleeding risk, undergoing such procedure. Purpose The USAT IH-PE registry is a retrospective and prospective multicenter registry of patients treated with ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed thrombolysis. We sought to determine whether patients with active cancer experience more bleeding complications and need for transfusions. Methods: Between March 2018 and July 2023, 102 patients were included. The majority were at intermediate–high-risk PE (86%), mostly female (57%), with a mean age of 63.7 ± 14.5 years. Most patients (77.8%) had a bilateral involvement of the main pulmonary arteries on CT scan and 9 patients (8.8%) had at least one prior episode of PE. 28.4% had active cancer. We compared the oncological and non-oncological subpopulations. The primary endpoints were bleeding complications (defined as BARC > IIIa) and need for transfusion. Results Overall, 12% of patients experienced bleeding complications, of which 4.9% were BARC ≥ 3. When comparing bleeding complications, defined as BARC > IIIa or the need for transfusion, no significant difference was found between patients with active cancer and those without (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.01-6.62, p=1, and OR 2.43, 95% CI 0.61-9.48, p=0.18, respectively). Conclusions In the USAT IH-PE registry, where a significant proportion of patients have active cancer, no significant difference in bleeding complications was observed in these subjects. This finding confirms the safety of the procedure, even in a subpopulation traditionally considered at higher risk for bleeding.

Radiological indicators of chronicity in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism treated with ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis: a study of 180 consecutive cases

Abstract Background Radiological signs of chronic thrombi are present in up to 20% of patients that present acutely with pulmonary embolism (PE). Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (USAT) can swiftly reverse right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute PE. Purpose To investigate the frequency of radiological signs of chronic PE and pre-existing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients treated with USAT and their impact on early and long-term hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. Methods The index CT scans of patients receiving USAT for acute intermediate-high and high-risk PE at a tertiary academic institution (2017-2022) were adjudicated by three expert radiologists blinded for treatment scheme and outcomes. Changes in invasively-measured mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) at 24 hours post USAT, presence of post-PE impairment (PPEI), and CTEPH diagnoses after at least 3 months were studied. A total of 15 radiological signs of chronicity were assessed, including 6 major criteria that have been previously validated to raise the suspicion of pre-existing CTEPH. In this study, acute-on-chronic PE was defined when at least 3 of the 6 validated radiological criteria for chronicity were present together with acute findings. Pre-existing CTEPH was defined based on the results of follow-up (vs. index) CT scan and on the anatomical consistency of pathology specimens after pulmonary endarterectomy. PPEI was defined by the presence of residual respiratory symptoms and right ventricular dysfunction during follow-up. Results Of 180 consecutive patients (median age 65 years, 61% men, 17% high-risk PE), 31 had at least 3 of 6 radiological criteria at the time of acute presentation; Table 1. The median modified Miller Score was 24 points and baseline mPAP was 35 mmHg in both groups. The absolute mPAP reduction after USAT was 11 (Q1-Q3: 5-17) mmHg in patients with <3 and 10 (Q1-Q3: 5, 17) mmHg in those with ≥3 criteria; Table 2. Three (1.7%) patients were diagnosed with CTEPH after a median of 3 months and underwent pulmonary endarterectomy: in all 3 patients, CTEPH was pre-existing. At least 3 of the 6 previously validated criteria were present in all CTEPH patients at index CT. In the 3 patients with acute PE on pre-existing CTEPH, the median baseline mPAP was much higher (median 53 mmHg) than in the remaining patient group and the absolute reduction after USAT was 9 mmHg, corresponding to a relative reduction of 19%. During follow-up, PPEI was more frequent in patients with <3 signs (n=4, 2.7%) than in those with ≥3 signs (n=4, 12.9%). Conclusion(s) The evaluation of six radiological parameters in initial CT scans successfully identified all cases of pre-existing CTEPH in patients presenting with acute PE. However, these parameters did not prove effective in determining which patients would benefit from USAT in terms of mPAP reduction.Baseline characteristicsHemodynamic and clinical outcomes

Pulmonary artery pulsatility index evaluation in intermediate-to-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism patients underwent transcatheter intervention

Abstract Background The clinical impact of pulmonary embolism (PE) transcatheter intervention on the right ventricular function and its potential role as procedural outcomes has to be defined. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary transcatheter intervention between 2021 and 2023 were included in an observational fashion. Data about clinical characteristics, PE risk stratification, pre and post-interventional pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index (PAPi) were collected. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital death or repeated intervention. Results 49 patients were included, mostly female gender (61.2%), with a mean age of 67±12,9 years old, 79.6% with > 1 PE risk factor, and 55% of them stratified as high-risk (HR) PE. 34.6% of the patients were treated with transcatheter thrombolysis (all in the intermediate-to-high-risk cohort), 20% with FlowTriever device, 53.4% with Indigo Cath8 or Lightning 12 device, 8.1% of the procedure was performed under ECMO support. All patients classified in intermediate-to-high risk (IHR) survived, and the mean PAP was reduced (33.4±10.9 to 24.3±7.1 mmHg p<0.01), as well as PAPi (2,3±0.35 to 1.68±0.26 p<0.01). 22% of the patients In IHR experienced the primary endpoint, in these populations, the mean PAP (pre 33±4.1 vs post 30.5±4.6 p=0.58) and PAPi (pre 1.35±.0.6 vs post 1.4±0.6 p=0.39) did not change significantly. On the other side, those who survived without events had a slight significative reduction in mean PAP (pre 32±6.7 vs post 24.6±4.3 p<0.02) while the PAPi significantly increased (1.2±0.6 vs 1.8±0.2 p<0.01). In the HR population, a delta PAPi > 0.45 demonstrated a 65.7% sensitivity and 75% Specificity for the primary outcome AUC 0.83 at ROC curve analysis. Conclusion Pulmonary Thrombus aspiration significantly changes the PAP and PAPi in patients with acute PE. While in IHR patients the overperforming PAPi seems to normalize, in HR patients it increases and may be a marker of procedural success and right ventricle recovery.

Mitigating health disparities by improving access to catheter-based therapies for vulnerable patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Abstract Introduction This study explores the implementation and outcomes of catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) within a safety-net hospital (SNH), addressing a critical gap in the literature concerning CBT in underserved and vulnerable populations. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing CBT between October 2020 and January 2024 at a SNH. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Results A total of 107 patients (47.6% female, mean age 58.4 years) underwent CBT for acute PE, with 23 (21.5%) high-risk and 84 (78.9%) intermediate-risk PE. Demographically, 64% identified as Black, 10% White, 19% Hispanic or Latino, and 5% Asian. In terms of insurance coverage, 50% had private insurance or Medicare, 36% had Medicaid, and 14% were uninsured. Notably, 67% of the patients resided in high poverty rate zip codes and 11% were non-citizen non-residents. Markers of risk severity, such as biomarkers (troponin, BNP), PE risk classification (high versus intermediate-risk), rates of low CI, lactate level, CPES/sPESI score, and rates of RV dysfunction did not vary significantly across race/ethnic groups, insurance status, level of poverty and citizenship status. Over a median follow up period of 30 days, 6 (5.6%) patients expired (all high-risk PE), 3 of which presented with cardiac arrest. No patients who presented with intermediate-risk PE died at 30 days. There was no difference in 30-day mortality based on race, insurance type, poverty level or citizenship status. Conclusion The findings emphasize the feasibility and success of implementing PERT and CBT at a SNH, offering a potential model to address healthcare disparities in acute PE on a broader scale.

Baseline characteristics, management patterns and outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism and malignancy: Insights from a single-centre study

Abstract Background and aim The presence of malignancy is an important factor that increases the risk of venous thromboembolism. On the other hand, acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the main causes of death in this setting. In this study, we evaluated the impact of active malignancy on the treatment choices, and short and long term clinical outcomes in patients with acute PE. Methods In this study conducted in a tertiary center, 872 acute PE patients (age 61.6±16.8 years, female 57.5 %) from different risk categories were treated with thrombolytic, anticoagulant and catheter-based therapies in accordance with currently available acute PE guidelines. The population was retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups according to the presence of active malignancy. Results Active malignancy was documented in 129 (14.8 %) patients. In the groups with and without malignancy, the proportions of low-, intermediate-low-, intermediate-high-, and high-risk PE patients were 3.1 % vs. 15.6 %, 17.8 % vs. 16.7 %, 60.5 % vs. 60 %, and 18.6 % vs. 7.7 %, respectively (p<0.001). While the two groups did not differ in terms of echocardiographic and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) characteristics, the presence of contraindications for thrombolytic were more frequent in the malignancy group (22.5% vs. 10.9%, p<0.001). Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), rheolytic thrombectomy (RT), systemic thrombolysis (ST) and anticoagulation-alone (AC) therapies were noted in 27.3 %, 6.4 %, 6.4 % and 49.7 % of overall PE patients. The RT and AC therapies were more frequent in PE patients with malignancy whereas ST and USAT were more frequently used in the absence of malignancy. Notably, lytic dosages and treatment durations in USAT and ST protocols were comparable between malignant and non-malignant PE cohorts. Regardless of the presence of malignancy and the treatment modality chosen, significant improvements were achieved in the clinical, echocardiographic and CTPA measures of the PE severity (p<0.001 for all). Major and minor bleeding rates were also similar in both groups, while in-hospital and, as expected, long-term mortality were higher in the malignancy cohort. Active malignancy and PESI score were found to be independent predictors for composite end-point of 60-day mortality and PE-related rehospitalization (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.32 - 4.47, p=0.04) and (OR: 1.02; 95 % CI: 1.01-1.01, p<0.001), respectively. Malignancy (OR: 3.5, 95 % CI: 2.15-5.75, p< 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.51, 95 % CI: 1.35-4.68, p< 0.003) were independent predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusion Concomitant malignancy adversely affects both short- and long-term outcomes in patients with acute PE. Although these patients are more vulnerable, it is possible to achieve satisfactory treatment success with acceptable bleeding rates with the inclusion of catheter-based methods as treatment option.Survival plot

Bringing PERT to Pediatrics: Initial Experience and Outcomes of a Pediatric Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT)

IntroductionMultidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) streamline care of adults with life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Given rarity of pediatric PE, developing a clinical, educational, and research PERT paradigm is a novel and underutilized concept in pediatrics. Research QuestionIs PERT feasible in pediatrics, and does it improve PE care? Study Design and MethodsA strategy-to-execution proposal to launch a pediatric PERT was developed for institutional buy-in. Key stakeholders collectively implemented PERT. Data were collected for the two-year pre- and post-PERT eras, and outcomes were compared. ResultsPERT implementation took 12 months. Our PERT, led by hematology, comprises of pediatric experts in emergency medicine, critical care, interventional cardiology, anesthesiology, and interventional radiology. Data on 30 patients pre-PERT and 31 post-PERT were analyzed. Pre-PERT, 10%(3/30), 13%(4/30), 20%(6/30), and 57%(17/30), and post-PERT, 3%(1/31), 10%(3/31), 16%(5/31), and 71%(22/31) were categorized as high-risk, intermediate-LOW risk, intermediate-HIGH risk, and low-risk PE, respectively. Post-PERT, there were 13 unique PERT activations. PERT was activated on all eligible PE patients and, additionally, on four low-risk PEs. Time-to-echocardiogram was shorter post-PERT (4.7 hrs vs 2 hrs, P=0.0147). Anticoagulation was ordered (90 min vs 54 min, P=0.003) and given sooner (154 min vs 113 min, P=0.049) post-PERT. There were no differences in time-to-reperfusion therapies (12 hrs pre-PERT vs 8.7 hrs post-PERT, P=0.1). Five (83.3%) of six eligible (intermediate-HIGH and high-risk) patients received reperfusion therapies in the post-PERT era compared to three (37.5%) of eight eligible patients in the pre-PERT era (P=0.0001). There were no differences in major bleeding, mortality, or length of stay in either era. InterpretationThe pediatric PERT paradigm was successfully created and adopted locally. Our PERT enhanced access to experts, facilitated timely advanced therapies, and held value for low-risk PE. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) and Children’s Health System of Texas pediatric PERT may serve as a best-practice model for streamlining care for pediatric PE.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Reperfusion Strategies in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Hospitalizations.

To investigate the contemporary use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in conjunction with reperfusion strategies in high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Observational epidemiological analysis. The U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (years 2016-2020). High-risk PE hospitalizations. Use of ECMO in conjunction with thrombolysis-based reperfusion (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis) or mechanical reperfusion (surgical embolectomy or catheter-based thrombectomy) with regards to in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. We identified high-risk PE hospitalizations in the NIS (years 2016-2020) and investigated the use of ECMO in conjunction with thrombolysis-based (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis) and mechanical (surgical embolectomy or catheter-based thrombectomy) reperfusion strategies with regards to in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. Among 122,735 hospitalizations for high-risk PE, ECMO was used in 2,805 (2.3%); stand-alone in 1.4%, thrombolysis-based reperfusion in 0.4%, and mechanical reperfusion in 0.5%. Compared with neither reperfusion nor ECMO, ECMO plus thrombolysis-based reperfusion was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98), whereas no difference was found with ECMO plus mechanical reperfusion (aOR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.67-1.60), and ECMO stand-alone was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.22-2.10). In the cardiac arrest subgroup, ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93). Among all patients on ECMO, thrombolysis-based reperfusion was significantly associated (aOR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91), and mechanical reperfusion showed a trend (aOR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47-1.19) toward reduced in-hospital mortality compared with no reperfusion, without increases in major bleeding. In patients with high-risk PE and refractory hemodynamic instability, ECMO may be a valuable supportive treatment in conjunction with reperfusion treatment but not as a stand-alone treatment especially for patients suffering from cardiac arrest.

Controversies in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department

Backgroundacute pulmonary embolism is frequently diagnosed in the Emergency Department, and the management approach can be nuanced. Objective: in this narrative review, we synthesize the literature in selected areas of ongoing controversy regarding the diagnostic and management approaches for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in the Emergency Department, and provide evidence-based recommendations to empower emergency physicians to provide optimal care in these situations. DiscussionD-dimer is used to clinically exclude the diagnosis of PE patients who are stratified as low risk. However by utilizing likelihood ratio and with certain scoring tools, patient historically considered moderate or high risk for PE may safely be able to have the diagnosis excluded with a negative D-dimer. Traditional risk stratification and management strategies can be cautiously applied to patients with concomitant Coronavirus-19 infection while awaiting more definitive studies. There is an increasing trend in the diagnosis of isolated subsegmental PE, and many patients receiving this diagnosis may be treated without anticoagulation provided that they have no evidence of associated DVT and can be closely followed as an outpatient. There is a persistent hesitancy to discharge patients with newly-diagnosed acute PE, and existing well-supported risk stratification tools and clinical decision frameworks can support the emergency physician's decision to safely discharge low-risk patients. Conclusion: this review of the literature empowers emergency clinicians to manage challenging PE cases in the ED.

TCT-727 The Role of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index to Assess the Outcomes Following Catheter Directed Therapy in Patients With Intermediate-to-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

TCT-727 The Role of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index to Assess the Outcomes Following Catheter Directed Therapy in Patients With Intermediate-to-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Revisiting Hemodynamic Definition: Incidence Of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Following Acute Intermediate-High And High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Revisiting Hemodynamic Definition: Incidence Of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Following Acute Intermediate-High And High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

174 Comparison of Large-Bore Mechanical Thrombectomy to Other Therapies for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Using Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of the FLAME Study

174 Comparison of Large-Bore Mechanical Thrombectomy to Other Therapies for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Using Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of the FLAME Study

JTH in Clinic: management of low-risk pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cardiovascular disease diagnosis in emergency departments that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. One of the first steps after diagnosing PE is to risk stratify for adverse outcomes using risk scores such as PE Severity Index and European Society of Cardiology risk scheme. While intermediate- and high-risk PE patients should be admitted to the hospital, there is increasing evidence to support early discharge and home-based anticoagulation therapy for low-risk patients. The Hestia criteria encompass many of the clinicians’ considerations for who may be suitable for early discharge, considering both medical and social factors. Additionally, professional guidelines have provided algorithms on determining which low-risk patients may be suitable. Despite this, low-risk acute PE patients are still often admitted for inpatient treatment. In this review, we present a case-based approach on how to risk stratify and evaluate patients who may be good candidates for early discharge and home therapy.

Risk assessment and management strategies in older patients with acute pulmonary embolism

IntroductionManaging older patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging due to their underrepresentation in clinical trials, comorbidities and increased complication risk. This study evaluates risk assessment and management outcomes in older PE patients focussing on home and reperfusion treatment. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with acute PE at an academic medical centre (2015-2022). Results242 patients with a mean age of 77 years were included. All 59 patients with negative Hestia criteria were discharged ≤24h, and in total 81 patients (35%) received home treatment. Among these 14-day mortality and recurrent venous-thromboembolism were 0% and major bleeding occurred in 1.3% (one patient, 95%CI 0.11-6.1). European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk-classification showed 9 low-risk PE (3.9%), 199 intermediate-risk (87%), and 20 high-risk PE patients (8.8). In 5 of the 20 high-risk patients, hypotension was mainly caused by another condition, i.e. sepsis. Eight high-risk patients received reperfusion therapy. Fourteen-day mortality was 51% in high-risk patients (95%CI 27-71); 5 out of 8 patients receiving reperfusion treatment died within 5 days. Patients with an Acute Presenting Older Patient (APOP) score of ≥45% had higher 14-day mortality (28%; 95%CI 12-46) compared to <45% (3.2%; 95%CI 0.85-8.3; HR 10.2; 95%CI 2.6-39). ConclusionSelecting for home treatment using Hestia was safe for older PE patients in our cohort. Mortality in the high-risk group was high also when receiving reperfusion treatment. The ESC risk-classification and APOP score identified patients at higher mortality risk, suggesting their potential utility in clinical decision-making.

Pulmonary Embolism in the Post-partum Period: A Case Report

Background: One well-known hypercoagulable state that raises the risk of venous thromboembolism is pregnancy and it is more common in cesarean delivery. Pulmonary embolisms are difficult to identify based solely on postpartum symptoms. Most of the symptoms are non-specific, therefore they are typically underdiagnosed throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period. Objective: This work presented information on the treatment of high-risk pulmonary embolism in the postpartum phase. Case presentation: This paper reported the case of a 33-year-old female, admitted to the emergency room for shortness of breath. Her personal history showed that she had just given birth to her sixth child by caesarian section a month ago and had a history of hysterectomy due to severe infection. Result: She suffered a high-risk pulmonary embolism in the post-partum period. It takes a strong index of suspicion to diagnose and treat patients in a timely manner. Conclusion: Echocardiography and Multislice Computerized Tomography are the best diagnostic methods. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis should be taken into account, particularly in patients who have risk factors.

Risk Stratification and Management of Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of mortality. Not only is PE associated with short-term mortality, but up to ~20% of patients might suffer from long-term consequences such as post-PE syndrome and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Current risk stratification tools poorly predict those who are at risk for short-term deterioration and those who develop long-term consequences. Traditionally, systemic thrombolysis has been considered the first-line therapy for patients with high-risk PE without contraindications; however, it comes with the risk of major bleeding (notably intracranial hemorrhage). The use of catheter-directed interventions (embolectomy or thrombolysis) has been increasing owing to their low bleeding risk; however, randomized trial data supporting their efficacy in improving clinical outcomes are limited. In this review, we highlight the evidence supporting the available advanced therapies for high- and intermediate-risk PE and summarize the ongoing trials which are evaluating these therapies.

Imaging and Biomarkers: The Assesment of Pulmonary Embolism Risk and Early Mortality.

Background and Objectives: Pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence has been increasing in the last 10 years. Computed thoracic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) had a major role in PE diagnosis and prognosis. The main purpose of this study was as follows: the prognostic value of a CTPA parameter, pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI), in PE risk assessment and the predictive accuracy of biomarkers, D-dimer and cardiac Troponin T (c-TnT), in 7-day mortality. A second objective of the research was to investigate the relationship between imaging by PAOI and these biomarkers in different etiologies of PE. Materials and Methods: This study comprised 109 patients with PE, hospitalized and treated between February 2021 and August 2022. They had different etiologies of PE: deep vein thrombosis (DVT); persistent atrial fibrillation (AF); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation; COVID-19; and cancers. The investigations were as follows: clinical examination; D-dimer testing, as a mandatory method for PE suspicion (values ≥500 µg/L were highly suggestive for PE); c-TnT, as a marker of myocardial injury (values ≥14 ng/L were abnormal); CTPA, with right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) signs and PAOI. Treatments were according to PE risk: systemic thrombolysis in high-risk PE; low weight molecular heparins (LWMH) in high-risk PE, after systemic thrombolysis or from the beginning, when systemic thrombolysis was contraindicated; and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in low- and intermediate-risk PE. Results: PAOI had a high predictive accuracy for high-risk PE (area under curve, AUC = 0.993). D-dimer and cTnT had a statistically significant relationship with 7-day mortality for the entire sample, p < 0.001, and for AF, p = 0.0036; COVID-19, p = 0.003; and cancer patients, p = 0.005. PAOI had statistical significance for 7-day mortality only in COVID-19, p = 0.045, and cancer patients, p = 0.038. The relationship PAOI-D-dimer and PAOI-c-TnT had very strong statistical correlation for the entire sample and for DVT, AF, COPD, and COVID-19 subgroups (Rho = 0.815-0.982). Conclusions: PAOI was an important tool for PE risk assessment. D-dimer and c-TnT were valuable predictors for 7-day mortality in PE. PAOI (imaging parameter for PE extent) and D-dimer (biomarker for PE severity) as well as PAOI and c-TnT (biomarker for myocardial injury) were strongly correlated for the entire PE sample and for DVT, AF, COPD, and COVID-19 patients.

Percutaneous Thrombectomy With Flowtriever System in Pregnant Women With High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism and Contraindications to Systemic Thrombolysis.

Through these clinical cases, we present a new protocol of action, updated with the latest evidence on percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy using dedicated catheters, for high-risk PE in pregnant women or during the early postpartum period.

Increased risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with COVID-19 pneumonia in comparison to influenza pneumonia: insights from the National Inpatient Sample database.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily a respiratory virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, induces a hypercoagulable state. Previous studies comparing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with influenza pneumonia revealed a higher risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, these studies have not adequately accounted for the severity and acuity of the presenting viral pneumonia. In this retrospective study, we rigorously adjusted for critical illness using a nationally representative dataset to investigate whether COVID-19 pneumonia is independently linked to a higher risk of PE and DVT. After comprehensive multivariate adjustment, our findings demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia maintained significantly higher odds of developing acute inpatient PE [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16-2.86; P<0.01] and DVT (aOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.41-1.96; P<0.01) during the early pandemic compared to patients with influenza pneumonia. Furthermore, we identified congenital heart disease and malnutrition as novel risk factors for acute PE in COVID-19 patients. Our study suggests that the higher prevalence of acute inpatient PE over DVT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may support a "thrombus in situ" mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-mediated pulmonary thrombosis. Consequently, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for PE, even in the absence of DVT, among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and should follow evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management.

Intervención dirigida por catéter en la embolia aguda de pulmón. Posicionamiento SEC-Asociación de Cardiología Intervencionista/SEC-Asociación de Cardiopatía Isquémica y Cuidados Agudos Cardiovasculares/SEC-GT Hipertensión Pulmonar

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the leading cause of hospital death and the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular mortality. Traditionally, treatment options have included anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery; however, catheter-directed interventions (CDI), including catheter-directed thrombolysis and aspiration thrombectomy, have been developed for patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. These techniques can rapidly improve right ventricular function, hemodynamic status, and mortality in some patients, although there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. This document, prepared by the Interventional Cardiology Association, the Association of Ischemic Heart Disease and Acute Cardiovascular Care, and the Working Group on Pulmonary Hypertension of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), reviews the current recommendations and available evidence on the management of PE. It emphasizes the importance of rapid response teams, risk stratification, and early patient monitoring in identifying candidates for reperfusion. Based on existing clinical evidence on CDI, the document discusses various clinical scenarios and provides guidance on patient selection, particularly in situations of uncertainty due to insufficient evidence. Lastly, it describes periprocedural support, highlighting the necessary multidisciplinary approach to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with PE.