High-risk Primary Breast Cancer Research Articles

Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (UK TACT2; CRUK/05/19): quality of life results from a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early breast cancer improves outcomes but its toxicity affects patients' quality of life (QOL). The UK TACT2 trial investigated whether accelerated epirubicin improves time to recurrence and if oral capecitabine is non-inferior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for efficacy with less toxicity. Results showed no benefit for accelerated epirubicin and capecitabine was non-inferior. As part of the QOL substudy, we aimed to assess the effect of chemotherapies on psychological distress, physical symptoms, and functional domains. TACT2 was a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial done in 129 UK centres. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed node-positive or high-risk node-negative invasive primary breast cancer, who had undergone complete excision, and due to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to four cycles of 100 mg/m2 epirubicin either every 3 weeks (standard epirubicin) or every 2 weeks with 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 2 of each cycle (accelerated epirubicin), followed by four 4-week cycles of either CMF (600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide intravenously on days 1 and 8 or 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14; 40 mg/m2 methotrexate intravenously on days 1 and 8; and 600 mg/m2 fluorouracil intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle) or four 3-week cycles of 2500 mg/m2 capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 given twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle). The randomisation schedule was computer generated in random permuted blocks, stratified by centre, number of nodes involved (none vs 1-3 vs ≥4), age (≤50 years vs >50 years), and planned endocrine treatment (yes vs no). QOL was one of the secondary outcomes and is reported here. All patients from a subset of 44 centres were invited to complete QOL questionnaires (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module [QLQ-C30] and Quality of Life Questionnaire breast module [QLQ-BR23]) at baseline, end of standard or accelerated epirubicin, end of CMF or capecitabine, and at 12 and 24 months after randomisation. The QOL substudy prespecified two coprimary QOL outcomes assessed in the intention-to-treat population: overall QOL (reported elsewhere) and HADS total score. Prespecified secondary QOL outcomes were EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales of physical function, role function, and fatigue and EORTC QLQ-BR23 subscales of sexual function and systemic therapy side-effects. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN68068041, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00301925. From Dec 16, 2005, to Dec 5, 2008, 4391 patients (20 [0·5%] of whom were male) were enrolled in TACT2; 1281 (85·8%) of 1493 eligible patients were included in the QOL substudy. Eight (0·6%) participants in the QOL substudy were male and 1273 (99·4%) were female. Median follow-up was 85·6 months (IQR 80·6-95·9). Analysis was performed on the complete QOL dataset (as of Sept 15, 2011) when all participants had passed the 24-month timepoint. Prerandomisation questionnaires were completed by 1172 (91·5%) patients and 1179 (92·0%) completed at least one postrandomisation questionnaire. End-of-treatment HADS depression score (p=0·0048) and HADS total change score (p=0·0093) were worse for CMF versus capecitabine. Accelerated epirubicin led to worse physical function (p=0·0065), role function (p<0·0001), fatigue (p=0·0002), and systemic side-effects (p=0·0001), but not sexual function (p=0·36), compared with standard epirubicin during treatment, but the effect did not persist. Worse physical function (p=0·0048), sexual function (p=0·0053), fatigue (p<0·0001), and systemic side-effects (p<0·0001), but not role functioning (p=0·013), were seen for CMF versus capecitabine at end of treatment; these differences persisted at 12 months and 24 months. Accelerated epirubicin was associated with worse QOL than was standard epirubicin but only during treatment. These findings will help patients and clinicians make an informed choice about accelerated chemotherapy. CMF had worse QOL effects than did capecitabine, which were persistent for 24 months. The favourable capecitabine QOL compared with CMF supports its use as an adjuvant option after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Research UK, Amgen, Pfizer, and Roche.

Subgroup of post-neoadjuvant luminal-B tumors assessed by HTG in PENELOPE-B investigating palbociclib in high risk HER2-/HR+ breast cancer with residual disease.

519 Background: About one third of patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2‐ primary breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy will relapse despite adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therapeutic inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) by palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated highly relevant efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. The phase III PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) study did not show a significant benefit from palbociclib in women with centrally confirmed HR+, HER2- primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at high-risk of relapse (CPS‐EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) for the primary endpoint (Loibl et al. JCO 2021). Methods: After completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional therapy, PENELOPE-B patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 13 cycles (1 year) of palbociclib 125mg daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28d cycle in addition to standard endocrine therapy. Analysis of the primary endpoint of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was planned after 290 events. Secondary objective included iDFS in luminal-B group by treatment. Gene expression in post-neoadjuvant surgical residual tumor tissue samples was profiled using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel targeting 2559 genes (HTG Molecular Diagnostics Inc.). Based on 91 genes of this panel the AIMS subtype (Paquet &amp; Hallett, JNCI 2014) was calculated. Results: Gene expressions were measured in tumors from 906 of 1250 (72%) PENELOPE-B patients; 663 had LumA subtype, 64 LumB, 135 NormL, 16 BasalL, and 28 HER2E. Compared to LumA the LumB patients were older, had higher post-neoadjuvant Ki-67, higher risk status (CPS-EG), and higher grade; no significant correlation was found for the region of participating sites, cT, ypT, and ypN. Patients with LumB tumors had an estimated 3-year iDFS of 71.9% with palbociclib vs 44.8% with placebo HR = 0.50 (0.24-1.05); outcome was similar in patients with LumA tumors (3-year iDFS 83.9% vs 79.5%, HR = 0.93 (0.68-1.28), interaction p = 0.132); this was confirmed in multivariable analyses. Ki-67 by IHC and proliferation biomarkers from the HTG panel also showed no significant interaction with treatment. Conclusions: PENELOPE-B did not show a benefit from the addition of 1 year palbociclib to endocrine therapy compared to placebo in the total enrolled high-risk primary breast cancer population. However, the small group of luminal-B tumors (n = 64) derived benefit from palbociclib, although without a statistically significant interaction. Further investigation is required in a larger cohort to validate a palbociclib benefit that might be confined to this group.

Abstract GS1-02: Phase III study of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative primary breast cancerand with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): First results from PENELOPE-B

Abstract Background: About one third of patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2- primary breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy will relapse despite adjuvant endocrine therapy. The risk of relapse can be assessed more accurately using the CPS-EG scoring system (Mittendorf et al. JCO 2011). Therapeutic inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) by palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated highly relevant efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. Thus, we hypothesize that palbociclib may also be active in these high-risk patients with primary breast cancer. Methods: PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in women with centrally confirmed HR+, HER2- primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at high-risk of relapse (CPS-EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+). After completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional therapy, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125mg daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28d cycle in addition to standard endocrine therapy. Randomization was stratified by lymph node status (at surgery), age, Ki-67, global region, and CPS-EG score. Primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Final analysis was planned after 290 iDFS events with efficacy boundary p&amp;lt;0.0463 due to 2 interim analyses. Main secondary endpoints include iDFS excluding second primary invasive non-breast cancers, overall survival, and safety. Results: A total of 1250 patients were randomized between 2/2014 and 12/2017. Median age was 49.7 years [range 19-79]; 96.8% had residual disease in the breast, 94.6% were ypN+; G3 was reported in 47.4%, Ki-67 &amp;gt;15% in 27.7 %; 54.7% of patients had risk status CPS-EG score ≥3. 1118 patients (89%) completed at least 7 cycles of therapy. 50.1% of patients received aromatase inhibitor (AI), 49.8% tamoxifen, 6.6% AI + gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and 9.7% tamoxifen + GnRH. Most common related serious adverse events (SAEs) were infections and vascular disorders. 8 fatal SAEs were reported. Conclusions: PENELOPE-B evaluates the effect of palbociclib for 1 year compared to placebo in addition to endocrine therapy in high-risk primary breast cancer patients. The database was locked with 308 events on September 25th 2020. After breaking the blind for analysis, top line results will be available as of mid October 2020. Results of the final iDFS analysis will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Frederik Marmé, Miguel Martin, Michael Untch, Hervé Bonnefoi, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry Bear, Nicole Mc Carthy, Mireia Melé Olivé, Karen Gelmon, José García Sáenz, Catherine M Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Masakazu Toi, Hope S Rugo, Sabine Seiler, Valentina Nekljudova, Carsten Denkert, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Nicole Burchardi, Gunter von Minckwitz. Phase III study of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative primary breast cancerand with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): First results from PENELOPE-B [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-02.

FDG-PET/CT in high-risk primary breast cancer-a prospective study of stage migration and clinical impact.

To investigate the clinical impact of FDG-PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in high-risk primary breast cancer. Women with high-risk primary breast cancer were enrolled between September 2017 and August 2019 at Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Conventional mammography with/without MRI was performed before staging by FDG-PET/CT. We studied the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases, the effect on the change of treatment, and the prevalence of incidental findings. Biopsy and follow-up were used as a reference standard for the accuracy analysis. Of 103 women, 24 (23%) were diagnosed with distant metastases by FDG-PET/CT. Among these, breast surgery was omitted in 18 and could have been spared in six. Another sixteen (16%) patients were upstaged to more advanced loco-regional disease, leading to more extensive radiotherapy. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing distant metastases were 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.00) and 0.95 (0.88-0.99), respectively. Twenty-nine incidental findings were detected in 24 women (23%), leading to further examinations in 22 and diagnosis of eight (8/22, 36%) synchronous diseases: cancer (n = 4), thyroiditis (n = 2), aorta aneurysm (n = 1), and meningioma (n = 1). FDG-PET/CT had a substantial impact on staging and change of treatment in women with high-risk primary breast cancer, and further examination of incidental findings was considered clinically relevant. Our findings suggest that FDG-PET/CT should be considered for primary staging in high-risk primary breast cancer to improve treatment planning.

250P FDG-PET/CT in high-risk primary breast cancer: A prospective study of stage migration and clinical impact

250P FDG-PET/CT in high-risk primary breast cancer: A prospective study of stage migration and clinical impact

Influence of denosumab on disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow of breast cancer (BC) patients with neoadjuvant treatment: A GeparX translational substudy.

580 Background: DTCs in the bone marrow are observed in up to 30% at primary diagnosis of BC and their presence is an independent prognostic factor for reduced survival. It was shown that antiresorptive therapy eradicates DTCs and improves prognosis in DTC-positive BC patients (pts). In the GeparX phase III prospective randomized trial, denosumab (a monoclonal IgG2-anti-RANKL-antibody) was investigated as add-on treatment to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with two different nab-paclitaxel schedules in early high-risk primary BC. In a translational substudy, we analyzed for the first time the influence of short-term denosumab treatment (24 weeks) on the presence of DTCs. Methods: A total of 167 pts from the GeparX trial were analyzed for DTCs at baseline by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Initially DTC-positive pts were re-analyzed for DTCs after NACT±Denosumab. Results: Overall, 60/167 pts (35.9%) treated with NACT±Denosumab had a pathological complete response (pCR; 55.4% in TNBC, 43.3% in HER2+, 15.3% in HR+/HER2-). At baseline, 43/167 pts (25.7%) were DTC-positive and 41 of those were available for re-analysis of DTCs after NACT±Denosumab. DTC eradication was observed in 77.8% after NACT+Denosumab and in 69.6% after NACT alone (p = 0.726). Due to the limited number of pts eligible for DTC-re-analysis after NACT, a subtype specific analysis for the effect of denosumab was not possible. There was no significant association between pCR and i) the presence of DTCs at baseline (37.1% DTC-negative vs 32.6% positive, p = 0.71) or ii) the eradication of DTCs after NACT±Denosumab (36.7% vs 27.3%, p = 0.72). Notably, in TNBC, we observed a tendency that DTC-positivity at baseline or DTC-persistence after NACT could be associated with reduced pCR rate (40.0% in DTC-positive vs. 66.7% in DTC-negative pts, p = 0.16; 25% in DTC-persistent pts vs. 50% in DTC-eradicated pts, p = 0.59). Conclusions: Denosumab in addition to NACT does not improve pCR, but the suspected effect of denosumab on DTC eradication should be further analyzed in TNBC. Key words: GeparX trial, denosumab, disseminated tumor cells, bone marrow, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Funding: GeparX and DTC substudy were financially supported by Amgen and Celgene. Clinical trial information: NCT02682693 .

Impact of 18F-FDG PET/MR on therapeutic management in high risk primary breast cancer patients – A prospective evaluation of staging algorithms

PurposeTo investigate whether potential differences in staging between a traditional staging imaging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR lead to a change in patient management in breast carcinoma and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the traditional staging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification. MethodIn this prospective cohort study from two university hospitals 56 women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer and increased pre-test probability for distant metastases were included. All patients were examined by a traditional staging imaging algorithm (X-ray mammography, breast ultrasonography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and ultrasonography of the liver and axillary fossa) and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MR including dedicated 18F-FDG PET/MR breast examinations. Each patient was discussed two times in a separate tumor board session to determine a total of three therapy recommendations based on histopathological data of the primary tumor and (1) traditional algorithm only, (2) traditional algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR, and (3) 18F-FDG PET/MR only. Major changes in therapy recommendations and differences between the traditional staging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification were evaluated. ResultsStaging by 18F-FDG PET/MR led to a difference in treatment compared the traditional staging algorithm in 8/56 cases (14%). Therapy changes included therapy of the breast, locoregional nodes and systemic therapy. A trend to staging superiority was found for 18F-FDG PET/MRI without statistical significance (p = 0.3827). ConclusionIn conclusion, for breast cancer patients with elevated pre-test probability for distant metastases a change of the therapy regiment occurs in 14 % of patients when staged by 18F-FDG PET/MR and confirmed by histopathology compared to a traditional staging algorithm. In particular with regard to the amendment of the guideline further assessment of 18F-FDG-PET/MR in this setting is necessary to assess the true value of this modality.

Abstract P2-20-02: Site of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy: Clues to biology and impact on endpoints

Abstract Background: Achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) has been shown on the patient level to predict excellent long-term event-free survival outcomes. Residual cancer burden (RCB) quantifies the extent of residual disease for patients who did not achieve pCR. A high proportion of metastatic events to the central nervous system (CNS), a known chemotherapy sanctuary site, was previously observed among the small number of relapses in patients achieving a pCR (Symmans et al 2017), raising the possibility that these CNS events may be independent of response in the breast. I-SPY2 is an adaptively randomized, phase II, platform trial that evaluates new drugs and combinations in the neoadjuvant setting for women with high-risk primary breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated the type and sites of recurrences by RCB classes in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Methods: I-SPY 2 patients enrolled prior to 11/2016 across 9 experimental and control arms, with available RCB and event-free survival (EFS) data were included in this analysis. The median follow-up is 3.8 years. We summarized the EFS event type, further sub-dividing the distant recurrence events by their site of relapse (CNS-only, CNS and other sites, Non-CNS). We estimated the overall and site-specific distant recurrence incidence in each RCB class at 3 years using a competing risk (Fine-Gray) model. In addition, we assessed the association between RCB and distant recurrence free survival including all distant recurrences (DRFS), as well as excluding the CNS-only recurrences (non-CNS DRFS) using a Cox model. Our statistics do not adjust for multiplicities beyond variables evaluated in this study. Results: Among 938 subjects, there were 180 EFS events, including 28 (16%) local recurrences (without distant recurrence and/or death) and 152 DRFS events. Among the DRFS events, 25 patients died without a distant recurrence. 127 experienced distant recurrences, including 22 (17.3%) with CNS-only, 16 (12.6%) with CNS and other sites, 87 (68.5%) with non-CNS distant recurrence; 2 (1.6%) patients had missing recurrence site information. Incidence of CNS-only recurrences are low and are similar across RCB classes (pCR/RCB-0 (n=338): 1%, RCB-I (n=129): 3%, RCB-II (n=328): 2%, RCB-III (n=143): 2% at 3 years). In contrast, the incidence of non-CNS recurrences increase with increasing RCB (RCB-0: 2%, RCB-I: 4%, RCB-II: 11%, RCB-III: 19% at 3 years). DRFS of RCB-I patients do not significantly differ from those achieving a pCR/RCB-0 (DRFS at 3 years: 92% vs. 95%, hazard ratio: 1.77 (0.87-3.63)); the small numerical difference is further reduced when the CNS-only recurrences are excluded (non-CNS DRFS at 3 years: 95% vs. 96%, hazard ratio: 1.48 (0.61-3.58)). CNS recurrences among DRFS events are proportionally higher within the pCR (5/16 (31%)) and RCB-I (5/12 (42%)) than in the RCB-II (8/57 (14%)) and RCB-III (4/42 (9%)) groups largely because of the relative low frequency of non-CNS recurrence events. Conclusions: In our high-risk I-SPY 2 cohort, CNS-only recurrences are uncommon but appear similar across RCB groups, independent of response, suggesting that the CNS is a treatment sanctuary site. In contrast, non-CNS recurrence rates increase as RCB increases. These findings, if confirmed, support the use of RCB to identify patients with excellent outcomes beyond those achieving a pCR; and suggest that inclusion of CNS only recurrences as an outcome event may impact the association between neoadjuvant therapy response and long-term outcome. Citation Format: Christina Yau, Angela DeMichele, W. Fraser Symmans, Lajos Pusztai, Douglas Yee, Amy S. Clark, Christos Hatzis, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Jodi Carter, Yunn-Yi Chen, Kimberly Cole, Laila Khazai, Molly Klein, Dina Kokh, Gregor Krings, Sunati Sahoo, Kathy S. Albain, A. Jo Chien, Kirsten K. Edmiston, Anthony D. Elias, Erin D. Ellis, David M. Euhus, Heather S. Han, Claudine Isaacs, Qamar J. Khan, Julie E. Lang, Janice Lu, Jane L. Meisel, Zaha Mitri, Rita Nanda, Donald W. Northfelt, Tara Sanft, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca K. Viscusi, Anne M. Wallace, Rachel Yung, Nola M. Hylton, Judy C. Boughey, Michelle E. Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S. Rugo, Richard Schwab, Laura J. van' t Veer, Donald A. Berry, Laura J. Esserman. Site of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy: Clues to biology and impact on endpoints [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-20-02.

Spontaneous murine tumors in the development of patient-derived xenografts: a potential pitfall

Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are generated in immune deficient mice and demonstrate histologic and molecular features similar to their corresponding human tumors. However, murine tumors (non-human) spontaneously occur in these models. 120 consecutive patients with high-risk primary breast cancer enrolled in the prospective neoadjuvant BEAUTY study had tumor tissue obtained at the time of diagnosis. These tumor cells, including initial tissue and subsequent generations, were injected into either NSG (n = 365) or NOD-SCID (n = 396) female mice. Mice with initial tumor growth sufficient for transfer to the 2nd generation underwent histologic review by pathologists, including Ki67 staining. After passaging the tumors for up to 4 generations, at least one primary mouse tumor was detected from 24 of the 54 PDX-lines, for a frequency of 3.2% (24 mice out of 761 mice), including murine lymphomas (n = 13), mammary tumors (n = 7), osteosarcomas (n = 2), and hemangiosarcomas (n = 2). While true PDX showed scattered strong staining with Ki67, murine tumors were Ki67 negative. No significant differences (p = 0.062) were observed comparing development of murine tumors in NOD-SCID (n = 8) vs NSG mice (n = 16). While PDX are a useful tool in cancer research, there is a potential for spontaneous murine tumors to arise, which could alter results of studies utilizing PDX. Morphologic review by a pathologist, potentially along with Ki67 staining, is necessary to ensure that tumor growth represents the desired PDX prior to use in downstream studies. This study is the first prospective study evaluating the frequency, type, and time frame for development of non-human tumors.

Ten-year results of intense dose-dense chemotherapy show superior survival compared with a conventional schedule in high-risk primary breast cancer: final results of AGO phase III iddEPC trial

Primary breast cancer (BC) patients with extensive axillary lymph-node involvement have a limited prognosis. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) trial compared intense dose-dense (idd) adjuvant chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk BC patients. Here we report the final, 10-year follow-up analysis. Enrolment took place between December 1998 and April 2003. A total of 1284 patients with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive 3 courses each of idd sequential epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) q2w or standard epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC→P) q3w. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary end point. A total of 658 patients were assigned to receive iddEPC and 626 patients were assigned to receive EC→P. The median duration of follow-up was 122 months. EFS was 47% (95% CI 43% to 52%) in the standard group and 56% (95% CI 52% to 60%) in the iddEPC group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87; log-rank P = 0.00014, one-sided]. This benefit was independent of menopausal, hormone receptor or HER2 status. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI 55% to 63%) for patients in the standard group and 69% (95% CI 65% to 73%) for patients in the iddEPC group (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87; log-rank P = 0.0007, two-sided). Nine versus two cases of secondary myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome were observed in the iddEPC and the EC→P arm, respectively. The previously reported OS benefit of iddEPC in comparison to conventionally dosed EC→P has been further increased and achieved an absolute difference of 10% after 10 years of follow-up.

Detection of Promoter Hypermethylation of GSTP1 and CDH1 Genes and the Relationship of Histopathological Parameters of the Breast

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Histopathology plays an important part in determining the treatment strategy for women with breast cancer. GSTP1 plays an important role in protecting cells from cytotoxic and carcinogenic agents and it is expressed in normal tissues at variable levels in different cell types. CDH1 plays a critical role for establishment and maintenance of polarity and differentiation of epithelium during the development period. Also, it plays an important role in signal transduction, differentiation, gene expression, cellmotility and inflammations. Methods: In this study the promoter methylation levels of GSTP1 and CDH1 gene which are associated with breast cancer were investigated by technique of Methylation Sensitive High Resolution Melting Analysis (MS-HRM). We analysed primary tumor core biopsies from 80 high-risk primary breast cancer patients (tumors ≥ 2 cm and/or lymphatic metastase and/or distant metastases and/or under 40 years). Also the patients’ histopathologic types were associated with the methylation levels. Results: In our study the promoter hypermethylation status was observed at different rates; GSTP1 and CDH1 hypermethylation frequencies were 82% and 95% respectively. The promoter hypermethylation levels of the genes were found to be significant with lymph node positivity, ER positivity and HER2/neu negativity. Conclusion: Our study is important as being the first study that analyzes association between histopathologic type and GSTP1 and CDH1 gene promotor methylation status in Turkish population.

Dual HER2-blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a subanalysis of data from the randomized phase III GeparSepto trial

The neoadjuvant phase III GeparSepto study showed that substituting nab-paclitaxel for standard solvent-based paclitaxel significantly improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate achieved with a sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide for high-risk primary breast cancer. Recent trials demonstrated that in HER2+ breast cancer pCR can be increased by using pertuzumab in addition to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. The present analysis focuses on efficacy and safety data from the subset of patients with HER2+ tumors from the GeparSepto trial (n = 396) in comparison to the HER2- cohort. Patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer (n = 1206) received four cycles of weekly paclitaxel [either solvent-based (Pac) or nab-paclitaxel (nab-Pac), according to randomization] followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 q3w, with concurrent trastuzumab and pertuzumab q3w for those with HER2+ tumors. The primary endpoint was pCR defined as ypT0 ypN0. Higher rates of pCR were achieved in HER2+ than in HER2- tumors (57.8% versus 22.0%, P < 0.0001), with the highest rate in the HER2+/HR- cohort (71.0%; 66.7% Pac, 74.6% nab-Pac). In HER2+/HR+ tumors, the pCR rate was 52.9% (49.7% Pac, 56.4% nab-Pac). Grade ≥3 toxic effects were significantly more common in HER2+ than in HER2- patients, with grade 3-4 diarrhea in 7.6% versus 0.9% (P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia in 6.3% versus 3.3% (P = 0.023) of patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreases from baseline were uncommon, with 2.0% versus 0.4% of patients showing decreases to <50% along with a ≥10% decrease from baseline. In HER2+ early breast cancer, a dual HER2-targeted combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, together with taxane-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieved high rates of pCR.

Abstract P4-21-06: Dual HER2-blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: A subanalysis of data from the randomized phase III GeparSepto trial

Abstract Background Our recent randomized, multicenter phase III GeparSepto study (Untch M et al. Lancet Oncol 2016) found that substituting nab-paclitaxel for standard solvent-based paclitaxel significantly improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients receiving a sequential regimen of taxane, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment for high-risk primary breast cancer. Patients with HER2-positive tumors (32.8%; n=396) also received a combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab: the present analysis focuses on efficacy and safety data from these HER2+ patients treated with the dual-blockade. Methods Patients with histologically confirmed early breast cancer (n = 1206) received either weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 or weekly nab-paclitaxel 150/125mg/m2, according to randomization), followed by four cycles of epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 q3w, with concurrent trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (loading (LD) dose 8 mg/kg) and pertuzumab 420 mg (LD 840 mg) q3w for those with HER2-positive tumors. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as ypT0 ypN0. Results The GeparSEPTO trial included 396/1206 (32.8%) HER2+ primary breast cancer patients. 27.0% in the HER2-positive and 34.1% in the HER2-negative group had HR-negative disease. Baseline characteristics were otherwise comparable between HER2+ and HER2- patients. Higher rates of pCR were seen in HER2+, compared to HER2- tumors (57.8% vs 22.0%). The highest overall pCR rate was observed in the HER2+/HR- cohort with 71.0%; 66.7% with Pac and 74.6% with nab-Pac. In HER2+/HR+ pCR rate was 52.9% ; 49.4% with Pac and 56.4% with nab-Pac. Using the definition ypT0/is ypN0 for pCR; pCR rates were generally higher especially in the HER2+ cohort (66.2% (ypT0/is ypN0) vs 57.8% (ypT0 ypN0)) compared to 25.2% (ypT0/is ypN0) vs 22% (ypT0 ypN0)) in patients with HER2-negative tumors. The HER2+ patients experienced a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events 85.4% vs 78.0% in the HER2-cohort, p=0.003); grade 3-4 hematologic AEs 74.0% (HER2+) vs 69.5% (HER2-); p=0.120 with grade 3-4 anaemia 2.5% vs 0.9%; p=0.034); any grade thrombopenia 28.5% vs 21.8%; p=0.012) and febrile neutropenia 6.3 vs 3.3%; p=0.023. Any grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities occurred in 38.4% vs 30.1%; p=0.005), with grade 3-4 diarrhea occurring in 7.6% vs 0.9%; p&amp;lt;0.001 of the patients. This had no impact on compliance. LVEF decreases from baseline were uncommon (7.6%) with 2.0% (HER2+) versus 0.4% (HER2-) of patients showing decreases to &amp;lt;50% along with a ≥10% decrease from baseline. Conclusion This is the largest cohort of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer receiving a dual HER2-targeted neoadjuvant therapy of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, together with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel followed by epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. HER2+ patients experienced more noteworthy toxicity. The pCR rate were higher in the HER2+ cohort receiving the dual blockade and was highest in patients with in HER+/HR- particularly if nab-paclitaxel was substituted for paclitaxel. The trial is financially supported by Celgene and Roche. Citation Format: Loibl S, Jackisch J, Schneeweiss A, Schmatloch S, Aktas B, Denkert C, Schem C, Wiebringhaus H, Kuemmel S, Luebbe K, Warm M, Just M, Hanusch C, Hackmann J, Blohmer J-U, Clemens M, Engels K, Nekljudova V, von Minckwitz G, Untch M. Dual HER2-blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: A subanalysis of data from the randomized phase III GeparSepto trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-21-06.

Concurrent Capecitabine and Radiation Therapy for High-risk Primary Breast Cancer

Concurrent Capecitabine and Radiation Therapy for High-risk Primary Breast Cancer

Short term quality of life with epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamid (FEC) and sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamid-docetaxel (EC-DOC) chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer – Results from the prospective multi-center randomized ADEBAR trial

BackgroundThe recommendation for adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in high risk primary breast cancer is heterogeneous among guidelines. Understanding the impact on QoL is thereby a crucial factor, especially if the benefit is potentially low. This study aims to assess QoL as a secondary outcome in the prospective randomized multi-center ADEBAR trial. MethodsQoL was assessed at baseline (t1), before cycle 4 FEC and cycle 5 EC-DOC (t2), 4 weeks after chemotherapy (t3) and 6 weeks after radiation (t4) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Breast Cancer-Specific Module (QLQ-BR23). Results1306 patients were enrolled into the ADEBAR trial. 675 were assigned to the FEC and 688 to the EC-DOC arm. After the beginning of treatment, global QoL dropped in both arm by 3–4 points. In the EC-DOC arm, QoL dropped further at t3 by 7 points and stayed stable in the FEC arm. 6 weeks after radiation, QoL exceeded baseline in both arms by 6–8 points. The differences between treatment arms were strongest at t3 (53.0 vs. 49.5) but did not reach clinical relevance at any point in time. Physical functioning, nausea and vomiting, fatigue and systemic therapy side effects followed with some minor exceptions similar patterns but showed higher amplitudes. ConclusionIn conclusion, we could not detect a clinically relevant difference between the two treatment arms in global QoL, although the results consistently show that patients on EC-DOC report worse scores during the treatment.

Abstract P1-12-03: Short term quality of life with epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamid (FEC) and sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamid-docetaxel (EC-DOC) chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer – Results from the prospective multi-center randomized Adebar trial

Abstract Background: The grade of recommendation for adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with high risk primary breast cancer is heterogeneous among international guidelines. Understanding the impact on quality of life (QOL) by adjuvant dose dense chemotherapy in comparison to standard adjuvant chemotherapy is thereby a crucial factor, especially if the benefit is potentially low. This study aims to assess the impact on QOL by adjuvant dose dense chemotherapy in the prospective randomized multi-center ADEBAR trial. Methods: QOL was assessed at baseline (t1), before cycle 4 FEC (Epirubicin 60mg/m2 i.v. d 1 + 8, 5-Fluoruracil 500mg/m2 i.v. d 1 + 8, Cyclophosphamide 75mg/m2 p.o. d 1–14, q4w x 6) and cycle 5 EC-DOC (Epirubicin 90mg/m2 plus Cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 q3w x 4, sequentially followed by Docetaxel 100mg/m2 q3w x 4) (t2), 4 weeks after chemotherapy (t3), 6 weeks after radiation (t4) and 1 year after baseline (t5) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Breast Cancer-Specific Module (QLQ-BR23). A multivariate mixed model was fitted to test for differences between the two treatment arms. Primary endpoint was global QOL, secondary endpoints physical functioning, nausea&amp;vomiting, fatigue and systemic therapy side effects. A minimum clinically meaningful difference was considered to be 10 points. Results: 1306 patients were recruited between 3/2002 and 5/2005 675 were assigned to the FEC and 688 to the EC-DOC arm. Compliance to QOL assessment was 74% at baseline and 58% four weeks after therapy, but dropped to 11% after one year follow up. After the beginning of treatment global QOL dropped in both arm by 3 to 4 points. In the EC-DOC arm QOL dropped further at t3 by 7 points and stayed stable in the FEC arm. 6 weeks after radiation QOL exceeded baseline in both arms by 6 to 8 points. The differences between treatment arms were strongest at t3 (54.1 vs. 49.7) but did not reach clinical relevance at any point in time. Physical functioning, nausea vomiting, fatigue and systemic therapy side effects followed with some minor exceptions similar patterns, but showed higher amplitudes. Conclusion: In conclusion we could not detect a statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms in QOL parameters, indicating that dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact QOL at a clinically relevant level compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Schwentner L, Harbeck N, Singer S, Eichler M, Rack B, Forstbauer H, Wischnik A, Scholz C, Fink V, Huober J, Friedl T, Weissenbacher T, Härtl K, Kiechle M, Janni W. Short term quality of life with epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamid (FEC) and sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamid-docetaxel (EC-DOC) chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer – Results from the prospective multi-center randomized Adebar trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-03.

Abstract P1-13-05: GAIN-2: Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense (idd) treatment with EnPC to tailored dose-dense (dt) therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: Results of the second safety interim analyses

Abstract Background: GAIN-2 compares the effectiveness and safety of a predefined intense dose-dense regimen (EnPC) vs. a dose-dense regimen with modification of single doses depending on individual hematological and non-hematological toxicities (dtEC-dtD) (NCT01690702). Moreover, the Trastuzumab substudy compares the subcutaneous administration of the drug to the abdominal wall vs. thigh. Methods: The primary objective of the GAIN-2 trial is to compare the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer (luminal A ≥4 N+; luminal B N+; HER2+ and TNBC N0/N+). Patients are randomized between EnPC (epirubicin 150 mg/m2 q2w x 3, nab-Paclitaxel 330 mg/m2 q2w x 3, cyclophosphamide 2000 mg/m2 q2w x 3) or dtEC-dtD (dd/tailored epirubicin/cyclophosphamide q2w x 4 followed by dd/tailored docetaxel q2w x 4) Two safety interim analyses after 200 (Noeding et al. Ann Oncol 2014) and 900 patients who have completed chemotherapy were planned. We present the results of the second safety analysis. In addition to the standard analyses for hematological and non-hematological toxicities, any affections of the cranial nerves as well as the rate of macula degenerations and anaphylactic reactions are of special interest. Results: Between 09/2012 and 05/2015 a total of 1473 patients have been randomized (EnPC n=734; dtEC-dtD n=739). Among those, 84 patients have been included in the trastuzumab substudy. No safety data are currently available for the substudy. Median age was 52 years and median body-mass-index 26. In terms of hematological adverse events, the rate of febrile neutropenia grade 3-4 (12% vs. 8%) and thrombopenia grade 3-4 (12% vs. 5%) was significantly increased in the EnPC arm. As for non-hematological side effects, there were significantly more patients developing an increase in alkaline phosphatase (59% vs. 40%), ALAT (69% vs. 59%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (83% vs. 68%), arthralgia (63% vs. 49%), myalgia (48% vs. 41%) and bone pain (25% vs. 17%) in the EnPC arm, whereas nosebleed (10% vs. 25%), edema (13% vs. 26%) and hand-foot syndrome (12% vs. 28%) were more common in the dtEC-dtD arm. We observed two treatment related deaths, both in the dtEC-dtD arm (cause of death: acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia). There were no differences between the treatment arms for the toxicities of special interest. In the EnPC arm, overall 30% of the patients required dose-reductions due to hematological toxicities compared with only 10% in the dtEC-dtD arm (p&amp;lt;0.001). The dose could be escalated to the maximum (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide 120/1200 mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2) in more than one third of the patients receiving dtEC-dtD. In 9% of women a reduction was required in the 4th cycle of docetaxel. Conclusion: This interim safety analysis from a prospectively randomized trial investigating iddEnPC with predefined doses and a toxicity adapted idd/tailored strategy (dtEC-dtD) showed no additional or unexpected safety signals in the iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD arm. Therefore, no modifications in the conduction of the study are necessary and the study continues as expected. Citation Format: Möbus V, Lück H-J, Forstbauer H, Wachsmann G, Ober A, Schneeweiss A, Christensen B, von Abel E, Grischke E-M, Höffkes H-G, Klare P, Yon-Dschun K, Schmatloch S, Furlanetto J, Burchardi N, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S. GAIN-2: Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense (idd) treatment with EnPC to tailored dose-dense (dt) therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: Results of the second safety interim analyses. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-05.

Abstract P6-03-06: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for detection of molecular residual disease (MoRD) in breast cancer

Abstract Background Metastatic breast cancer (BC) is an incurable condition and treated with palliative intent. Standard diagnostic imaging and serum markers have limited sensitivity and are not recommended in clinical practice. Micrometastatic disease in the bone marrow (DTC) and peripheral blood (CTCs) is a recognized prognostic marker but with limited clinical utility. The detection of asymptomatic disease using a sensitive, reproducible and robust blood-based molecular test, or molecular residual disease (MoRD) could potentially represents a tool with the capability to design early therapeutic interventions and improve outcome. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to reflect residual tumor burden with higher diagnostic accuracy. We performed a pilot study in patients with high-risk primary BC. Methods This is a prospective study of 30 patients with either locally advanced BC who had completed primary therapy (21 patients) and had no evidence of disease (NED), or were metastatic but treated with curative intent and currently NED or stable (9 patients). Plasma was analyzed for ctDNA either after completing neo-adjuvant therapy (NAT), for recurrence monitoring after surgery, or when there was a clinical suspicion of recurrence. Guardant360™(Guardant Health) is a ctDNA next generation sequencing panel which produces a quantitative measurement of the mutant allele fraction for single nucleotide variants in 54 genes and copy number variants in 3 genes (panel was expanded to 68 genes in Feb '15) using digital sequencing technology. Results Baseline ctDNA analysis was done for 30 patients and 25 (83%) had serial draws for a total of 76 samples. All patients were stage 3-4 except for two stage 2 patients. ctDNA or MoRD was detected in 17 (57%) of patients and in 39 (51%) of the samples. Of the 18 patients treated with NAT, 11 achieved pCR or had minimal residual disease. Of these 11, six had no ctDNA detected after surgery, 3 had mixed results of no ctDNA and low volume ctDNA alterations on different draws, and 2 had persistent mutations on 2 draws. Ten of these 11 patients remain NED with median follow up of 24 months, while the one patient who recurred had persistent low volume missense ctDNA alterations on serial draws, first detected 6 months before clinically evident recurrence. Of the 7 patients with significant residual disease (less than PR) after NAT, 6 had post-surgical ctDNA detected and 5 have recurred at a median of 13 months after surgery. Four of those patients had ctDNA tested prior to recurrence and all had alterations detected in the blood prior to clinical recurrence. Lastly, one HER2+ metastatic patient treated with curative intent with a subsequent negative PET scan and no ctDNA detected after HER2-targeted therapy progressed on CT 2 months later and repeat ctDNA revealed EGFR mutant allele fraction of 51% and ERBB2 amplification. Conclusions The evaluation of ctDNA in high-risk BC patients can identify MoRD and predict for clinical recurrence. Patients with no or low volume ctDNA after primary treatment remained NED longer than those with multiple or high volume alterations. Future studies will validate these early observations and aid in selecting patients for additional systemic therapy with the hope of improving outcome. Citation Format: Austin L, Jaslow R, Fortina P, Nagy R, Zill O, Talasaz A, Cristofanilli M. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for detection of molecular residual disease (MoRD) in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-06.

High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer.

The efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer (BC) has been an area of intense controversy among the medical oncology community. Over the last decade, due to the presentation of negative results from early randomized studies, this approach has not longer been considered an option by the vast majority of medical oncologists. This article is aimed to clarify what happened and where we are now in this not exhausted field. We critically revised the published literature regarding HDC in the setting of high-risk BC, including a recent meta-analysis using individual patient data from 15 randomized studies. A significant benefit by HDC in recurrence-free survival has been clearly documented in unselected patient populations. In HER2-negative population, particularly in the triple-negative disease, a positive effect of intensified therapy in overall survival is biologically plausible and supported by clinical evidence. Over the years HDC with support of adequate number of stem cells has become a safe treatment modality. The administration of higher doses of chemotherapy with stem cell support may still represent a therapeutic option (and not a recommendation) in selected BC patients. This approach should be investigated further.

Abstract S3-04: The phase III ICE study: Adjuvant Ibandronate with or without capecitabine in elderly patients with moderate or high risk early breast cancer

Abstract Background: Although approximately 50% of newly diagnosed breast cancers arise in women above 65 years old they are underrepresented in clinical trials. The ICE study was designed to investigate if a mono-chemotherapy with capecitabine in addition to the third generation bisphosphonate ibandronate will improve the outcome compared to ibandronate alone in elderly breast cancer patients with medium and high risk primary breast cancer not suitable for standard chemotherapy. Methods: This is a prospective, multi-center, controlled, open-label, randomized phase III trial. Female patients ≥ 65 years with unilateral or bilateral breast cancer who are either node-positive or high-risk node-negative (tumor size ≥2 cm, grade &amp;gt;I, and/or ER-and PR-negative); and a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CMI) ≤2 received either ibandronate alone for 2 years, 50 mg p.o. daily alternatively 6 mg i.v. every 4 weeks or the same ibandronate regimen together with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 on day 1 – 14 q day 22 for 6 cycles to be started within 6 months after axillary dissection. Patients with hormone-sensitive disease received an endocrine therapy according to guidelines. The primary objective is disease-free survival. A total of 1,394 patients were needed (5-year DFS improvement from 65% with ibandronate to 71.5% with ibandronate/capecitabine; α=0.05, ß=80%) and we expected 497 events during a median 5 year follow up. Results: Between 06/2004 and 08/2008, 1409 patients were randomized to ibandronate (N=702) or ibandronate/capecitabine (N=668) in 172 German centers, of whom 1380 patients started treatment (689 and 691 respectively). Median age was 71 (range 74-80) years; 58.6% of patients had a CMI≥1, 48.2% had N+, 35.2% grade 3, and 19.2% had ER/PgR negative disease. 83.8% of patients received all 6 capecitabine cycles. Capecitabine grade 3/4 toxicities were &amp;lt;2% except hand-foot-syndrome (6.8%). 3 patients died in relation with capecitabine treatment. Final DFS analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: CALGB 49907 showed that AC or CMF was superior to capecitabine in patients aged ≥65 years but was associated with twice as many moderate to severe toxic effects (64% vs 33%) (Muss H et al, NEJM 2012). The ICE study will provide evidence if capecitabine monotherapy is as active as adjuvant treatment and if it might be an option for frail and/or elderly patients where standard chemotherapy is considered to be too toxic. Citation Format: Gunter von Minckwitz, Toralf Reimer, Jochen Potenberg, Bettina Conrad, Ulrike Schürer, Holger Eidtmann, Marianne Just, Stefan Paepke, Elmar Stickeler, Georg Heinrich, Michael Untch, Volker Moebus, Christoph Thomssen, Christian Jackisch, Jens Huober, Sibylle Loibl, Valentina Nekljudova, Ulrike Nitz. The phase III ICE study: Adjuvant Ibandronate with or without capecitabine in elderly patients with moderate or high risk early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-04.