Subgroup of post-neoadjuvant luminal-B tumors assessed by HTG in PENELOPE-B investigating palbociclib in high risk HER2-/HR+ breast cancer with residual disease.

Abstract

519 Background: About one third of patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2‐ primary breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy will relapse despite adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therapeutic inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) by palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated highly relevant efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. The phase III PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) study did not show a significant benefit from palbociclib in women with centrally confirmed HR+, HER2- primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at high-risk of relapse (CPS‐EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) for the primary endpoint (Loibl et al. JCO 2021). Methods: After completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional therapy, PENELOPE-B patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 13 cycles (1 year) of palbociclib 125mg daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28d cycle in addition to standard endocrine therapy. Analysis of the primary endpoint of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was planned after 290 events. Secondary objective included iDFS in luminal-B group by treatment. Gene expression in post-neoadjuvant surgical residual tumor tissue samples was profiled using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel targeting 2559 genes (HTG Molecular Diagnostics Inc.). Based on 91 genes of this panel the AIMS subtype (Paquet & Hallett, JNCI 2014) was calculated. Results: Gene expressions were measured in tumors from 906 of 1250 (72%) PENELOPE-B patients; 663 had LumA subtype, 64 LumB, 135 NormL, 16 BasalL, and 28 HER2E. Compared to LumA the LumB patients were older, had higher post-neoadjuvant Ki-67, higher risk status (CPS-EG), and higher grade; no significant correlation was found for the region of participating sites, cT, ypT, and ypN. Patients with LumB tumors had an estimated 3-year iDFS of 71.9% with palbociclib vs 44.8% with placebo HR = 0.50 (0.24-1.05); outcome was similar in patients with LumA tumors (3-year iDFS 83.9% vs 79.5%, HR = 0.93 (0.68-1.28), interaction p = 0.132); this was confirmed in multivariable analyses. Ki-67 by IHC and proliferation biomarkers from the HTG panel also showed no significant interaction with treatment. Conclusions: PENELOPE-B did not show a benefit from the addition of 1 year palbociclib to endocrine therapy compared to placebo in the total enrolled high-risk primary breast cancer population. However, the small group of luminal-B tumors (n = 64) derived benefit from palbociclib, although without a statistically significant interaction. Further investigation is required in a larger cohort to validate a palbociclib benefit that might be confined to this group.