High Risk For Invasive Fungal Infections Research Articles

2739. Evaluation of a Perioperative Fungal Prophylaxis Protocol Change in Orthotopic Liver Transplant

Abstract Background Orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) carries a high rate of fungal infections, including invasive fungal infections (IFI). A targeted antifungal prophylaxis protocol can identify OLT patients who warrant antifungal prophylaxis and optimize agent selection. In January 2021, a targeted antifungal prophylaxis post-liver transplant protocol was implemented at Cleveland Clinic. Since its introduction, rates of fungal infections and adherence to the protocol have not been assessed. The goal of this project is to describe the impact of a protocol change in OLT recipients. Methods This was a retrospective observational cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years old with an OLT +/- sequential kidney transplant at Cleveland Clinic. Review of perioperative fungal prophylaxis from June 1, 2019 – May 31, 2020 was performed and used as the baseline. The post-intervention period was June 1, 2021 – May 31, 2022. The primary objective was to determine adherence to the new OLT fungal prophylaxis protocol on post-operative day (POD) 0. Secondary objectives included the 90-day incidence of proven or probable IFI post-OLT before and after implementation. Study Population Results A total of 134 patients pre-protocol and 166 patients post-protocol were included. Prior to protocol implementation, 73% patients were prescribed clotrimazole, 13% fluconazole, 13% micafungin, and 1% nystatin. After protocol implementation, 63% were prescribed clotrimazole, 16% fluconazole, and 21% micafungin. In the post-protocol group, there was an adherence rate of 66% on POD0 which increased to 84% over the duration of prophylaxis. Prior to initiation of the antifungal protocol, 6.7% of patients developed an IFI while 3.6% of patients developed an IFI post-protocol (p=0.22). Median time to IFI was 8 days (IQR 2-19) pre-protocol and 15 days (IQR 6-17) post-protocol. Mortality and ICU length of stay were comparable between groups. Primary and Secondary Results OLT: orthotopic liver transplant; POD: post-operative day; ICU: intensive care unit; IFI: invasive fungal infection Characteristics of Patients with Invasive Fungal Infections IFI: invasive fungal infection; TPN: total parenteral nutrition; IAI: intra-abdominal infection; n/a: not applicable; pRBC: packed red blood cells; OR: operating room; RRT: renal replacement therapy; ICU: intensive care unit; Dose dep.: dose dependent; GI: gastrointestinal Conclusion The implementation of a targeted antifungal prophylaxis post-liver transplant protocol can be a powerful strategy for promoting consistency in antifungal prophylaxis within a population at high risk for IFIs. Our study showed an 84% adherence rate to the implemented protocol, with numerically lower rates of IFIs post-protocol compared to pre-protocol. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Invasive fungal infection incidence and risk factors in patients receiving ibrutinib in real-life settings: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

Data on the risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI) with ibrutinib treatment are scarce. This study aimed to determine IFI incidence and risk factors in ibrutinib-treated patients in real-life settings. We constituted a cohort of ibrutinib incident users in the French National Healthcare Database. All patients ≥18 years with a first dispensing of ibrutinib between 21 November 2014 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were followed from the cohort entry date until IFI, ibrutinib discontinuation, death, or 31 December 2020, whichever came first. The cumulative incidence function method was used to estimate the probability of IFI accounting for competing risk of death. A multivariate cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess independent IFI risk factors. Among 6937 ibrutinib-treated patients, 1-year IFI cumulative incidence was 1.3%, with invasive aspergillosis being the most frequent. Allogenic or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.59, 95% confidence interval [1.74; 7.41]), previous anticancer treatment (HR 2.12, CI 95% [1.34; 3.35]) and chronic respiratory disease (HR 1.66, [1.03; 2.67]) were associated with higher risk of IFI. Besides neutropenia and corticosteroids, use of anti-CD20 agents was significantly more frequent in patients having experienced IFI (HR 3.68, [1.82; 7.45]). In addition to patients with ASCT history, severe neutropenia or treated with corticosteroids, our findings support active surveillance of IFIs in those with chronic respiratory disease, previously treated, or treated with anti-CD20 agents in combination with ibrutinib. Further studies are needed to optimise IFI prophylaxis in these patient subgroups.

Antifungal Stewardship Programs in Children: Challenges and Opportunities.

Antifungal Stewardship Programs in Children: Challenges and Opportunities.

Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients under Targeted Echinocandin Prophylaxis

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are one of the most important infectious complications after liver transplantation, determining morbidity and mortality. Antimycotic prophylaxis may impede IFI, but a consensus on indication, agent, or duration is still missing. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of IFIs under targeted echinocandin antimycotic prophylaxis in adult high-risk liver transplant recipients. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing a deceased donor liver transplantation at the Medical University of Innsbruck in the period from 2017 to 2020. Of 299 patients, 224 met the inclusion criteria. We defined patients as being at high risk for IFI if they had two or more prespecified risk factors and these patients received prophylaxis. In total, 85% (190/224) of the patients were correctly classified according to the developed algorithm, being able to predict an IFI with a sensitivity of 89%. Although 83% (90/109) so defined high-risk recipients received echinocandin prophylaxis, 21% (23/109) still developed an IFI. The multivariate analysis identified the age of the recipient (hazard ratio-HR = 0.97, p = 0.027), split liver transplantation (HR = 5.18, p = 0.014), massive intraoperative blood transfusion (HR = 24.08, p = 0.004), donor-derived infection (HR = 9.70, p < 0.001), and relaparotomy (HR = 4.62, p = 0.003) as variables with increased hazard ratios for an IFI within 90 days. The fungal colonization at baseline, high-urgency transplantation, posttransplant dialysis, bile leak, and early transplantation showed significance only in a univariate model. Notably, 57% (12/21) of the invasive Candida infections were caused by a non-albicans species, entailing a markedly reduced one-year survival. The attributable 90-day mortality rate of an IFI after a liver transplant was 53% (9/17). None of the patients with invasive aspergillosis survived. Despite targeted echinocandin prophylaxis, there is still a notable risk for IFI. Consequently, the prophylactic use of echinocandins must be critically questioned regarding the high rate of breakthrough infections, the increased occurrence of fluconazole-resistant pathogens, and the higher mortality rate in non-albicans Candida species. Adherence to the internal prophylaxis algorithms is of immense importance, bearing in mind the high IFI rates in case algorithms are not followed.

Effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in the haematologic setting

ABSTRACT Objectives Patients with haematologic malignancies are at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Current guidelines recommend the use of azoles for IFI prophylaxis; however, in many clinical situations, antifungal prophylaxis is used off-label. We conducted a systematic literature review to provide haematologists with the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole in IFI prophylaxis in interventional and real-world, observational studies. Methods Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases, and relevant conference proceedings and clinical trial registries, were searched for studies on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole prophylaxis in adults at high risk of IFIs. Studies were assessed for inclusion and risk of bias. Results Nine studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, eight of which were in haematologic populations (patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes; n = 5) or included haematologic populations (n = 3). Evidence from these studies suggests isavuconazole is effective for IFI prophylaxis in the haematologic setting. However, the studies frequently lacked safety data, most were based on small patient populations from single centres and risk of bias could not be assessed for five studies. Discussion These findings provide evidence for isavuconazole as an alternative azole for prophylaxis in high-risk populations. Limitations include lack of applicability of risk of bias assessment tools, level of filtering applied in the search strategy and focus on English-language publications. Conclusion Isavuconazole may be an effective azole for IFI prophylaxis in high-risk haematologic populations, although further studies are needed.

Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China.

BackgroundPosaconazole is confirmed to be more effective for preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) than first-generation triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole), but its economic value has not been comprehensively evaluated in China. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in hematological-malignancy patients at high risk for IFIs from the Chinese healthcare perspective.MethodsA hybrid decision tree and Markov model were built using published data to estimate the total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension and first-generation triazoles. Regimens with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) lower than the threshold of willingness to pay (WTP) were considered cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. The regional imbalance of economic development and the tablet formulation of posaconazole were considered in the scenario analyses.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, posaconazole oral suspension provided an additional 0.109 QALYs at an incremental cost of $954.7, yielding an ICER of $8,784.4/QALY, below the national WTP threshold of $31,315/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust. Scenario analyses showed that the base-case ICER was consistently below the WTP thresholds of all 31 Chinese provinces, with the likelihood of posaconazole being cost-effectiveness ranging from 78.1 to 99.0%. When the posaconazole oral suspension was replaced by the tablet formulation, the ICER increased to $29,214.1/QALY, still below the national WTP threshold and WTP thresholds of 12 provinces.ConclusionsPosaconazole oral suspension is a highly cost-effective regimen for preventing IFI in high-risk hematological-malignancy patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Posaconazole tablets may also be considered in some high-income regions of China.

Advances in prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections: perspectives on hematologic diseases.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common causes of mortality and morbidity in patients with hematologic diseases. Delayed initiation of antifungal treatment is related to mortality. Aspergillus sp. is the leading cause of IFI followed by Candida sp. Diagnosis is often challenging owing to variable conditions related to underlying diseases. Clinical suspect and prompt management is important. Imaging, biopsy, and non-culture-based tests must be considered together. New diagnostic procedures have been improved, including antigen-based assays and molecular detection of fungal DNA. Among hematologic diseases, patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at high risk for IFIs. Antifungal prophylaxis is recommended for these high-risk patients. There are continuous attempts to achieve ideal management of IFIs. Scoring system for quality control has been developed with important recommendations of current guidelines. Higher adherence to guidelines is related to decreased mortality in IFIs.

Epidemiology and risk of invasive fungal infections in systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Introduction:Infections are a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Among various infections, invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have a particularly high mortality rate; however, studies examining IFIs in patients with SLE are limited.Methods:Patients diagnosed as having SLE between 1997 and 2012 were enrolled from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database along with age- and sex-matched non-SLE controls at a ratio of 1:10. IFIs were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and validated by the prescriptions of systemic antifungal agents. The incidence rate (IR), incidence rate ratio (IRR), and all-cause mortality rate of IFIs and its subtypes were analyzed. A Cox multivariate regression model with time-dependent covariates was applied to analyze independent risk factors for IFIs.Results:A total of 24,541 patients with SLE and 245,410 non-SLE controls were included. We observed 445 IFI episodes in the SLE cohort, with an all-cause mortality rate of 26.7%. Candida spp. (52.8%) was the most common pathogen, followed by Cryptococcus spp. (18.2%) and Aspergillus spp. (18.2%). The IR of IFIs in the SLE cohort was 20.83 per 10,000 person-years, with an IRR of 11.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.8–12.6] relative to the non-SLE controls. Juvenile patients with SLE aged ⩽18 years had the highest IRR of 47.2 (95% CI: 26.9–86.8). Intravenous steroid therapy administered within 60 days (hazard ratio: 29.11, 95% CI: 23.30–36.37) was the most critical risk factor for overall IFIs and each of the three major fungal pathogens. Distinct risk factors were found among different IFI subtypes.Conclusion:Patients with SLE had a higher risk of IFIs, especially juvenile patients. Intravenous steroid therapy is the most critical risk factor for IFIs. This study provides crucial information for the risk stratification of IFIs in SLE.Plain Language SummariesPatients with systemic lupus erythematosus and physicians treating this patient group should be aware of the risk of invasive fungal infections.Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a severe complication with a high mortality rate among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, studies on this topic are scant. We performed a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan to estimate the incidence and mortality of and risk factors for IFIs. We found an incidence rate of 20.83 per 10,000 person-years for IFIs, with a mortality rate of 26.7%. Juvenile patients aged ⩽18 years had the highest relative risk of IFIs. Although candidiasis was the most common IFI, cryptococcosis and aspergillosis should be concerned in juvenile patients as well. Intravenous steroid therapy was the most critical risk factor for all IFIs, and different immunosuppressive agents posed different risks in patients for acquiring certain fungal pathogens.Our findings provide pivotal epidemiological information and indicate risk factors for IFIs in patients with SLE. Age and exposure to specific immunosuppressants and steroids might help predict the risk of IFIs. Because the manifestation of these infections is sometimes indistinguishable from a lupus flare, physicians should be aware of this fatal complication, especially when patients are not responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. Early recognition, implication of diagnostic tools, and empirical antimicrobial agents can be the key to treating patients with IFIs. Additional studies are required to develop a risk management program for patients with SLE.

Invasive fungal infections amongst patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure at high risk for fungal infections.

To study the prevalence, risk factors, role of serum biomarkers for diagnosis and impact of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). An analysis of IFI in patients with ACLF (EASL criteria) was conducted retrospectively. The diagnosis of IFI in clinically suspected patients was based on EORTC/MSG criteria. The demographical, clinical, laboratory details and outcomes were analysed. Out of 264 patients with ACLF, 54 (20.4%) patients with suspicion of IFI were evaluated and IFI was diagnosed in 39 (14.7%). Invasive candidiasis was documented in 25 (64.1%) and invasive aspergillosis in 14 (35.8%). The most common source of infection was respiratory (n=13) followed by renal (n=7) and spontaneous fungal peritonitis (n=6). On univariate analysis, diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis, prior antibiotic use, cerebral and respiratory organ failures, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-OF and CLIF-C ACLF) scores were predictors for development of IFI (P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, hemodialysis and prior antibiotics use predicted the development of IFI (P<0.05). Non-survivors were more likely to have IFI (P=0.029), high CLIF-OF and CLIF-C ACLF scores (P<0.001; for both) and higher 1,3-β D Glucan (BDG) levels (P=0.009). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of BDG (80pg/mL) and Galactomannan index (GMI [0.5]) for diagnosing IFI were 97.4%, 60%, 0.770% and 43.6%, 100%, 0.745 respectively. Invasive fungal infections constitutes an important cause of mortality in ACLF patients. BDG and GMI can be useful markers to guide antifungal therapy in patients at high risk for IFI.

Prophylaxis for aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies: pros and cons

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Along with new diagnostic options, comes the recent development of novel antifungal agents that expanded the spectrum of activity over traditional treatments contributing to the successful management of fungal diseases. Nevertheless, invasive fungal infections (IFI) represent a major hindrance to the favorable outcome of patients with hematologic malignancies. According to these observations, an appropriate prevention of IFI occurring in hematologic patients should be considered of paramount importance. However, the wide use of antifungal agents may facilitate the emergence of resistance and may be associated to the occurrence of severe adverse events and eventually may significantly increase the cost of therapeutic procedures.Areas covered: The aim of present review is to analyze advantages and disadvantages of primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in hematologic patients.Expert commentary: Patients with AML/MDS undergoing intensive chemotherapy and patients receiving stem cell transplantation are at high risk of IFI, and therefore may benefit form PAP, although several additional factors should be carefully evaluated in our decision-making approach, including the local epidemiology and the prompt availability of diagnostic facilities. The advent of new treatment options for hematologic patients such as target therapies might facilitate the rise of new risk categories so far underestimated.

Health-care utilization and outcomes of patients at high risk of invasive fungal infection.

PurposeThe objectives of this study were to present trends in posaconazole use over time and describe selected outcomes among patients at high risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) by use and type of antifungal medicine.MethodsA retrospective observational study using data from the Premier Healthcare Database between January 2007 and March 2016 was conducted. Inpatient use of posaconazole by formulation and year is described. Separately, four cohorts of patients at high risk of IFI – those with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) – but without a diagnosis code for IFI during the index encounter were identified as potential candidates for antifungal prophylaxis. Use of antifungal medication(s) in these patients was categorized. Index length of stay (LOS), index hospital costs, and subsequent inpatient and outpatient encounters with IFI at 30, 60, and 90 days post-index encounter are presented by antifungal group for each cohort. The percentage of patients with inpatient and outpatient encounters with IFI at 90 days post-index encounter was determined for each cohort by year.ResultsUse of posaconazole oral suspension increased through 2012, then declined as the tablet formulation became available in 2013. A total of 19,872 AML patients, 12,125 MDS patients, 14,220 HSCT patients, and 5,431 GVHD patients were considered potential candidates for antifungal prophylaxis; however, a large proportion of patients within each cohort (33%–94%) did not receive any antifungal drug during the index hospitalization. Index LOS, hospital costs, and subsequent encounters for IFI varied among cohorts and by antifungal group. Within each cohort, subsequent encounters for IFI at 90 days post-index encounter fluctuated but remained rare across different years.ConclusionOver time and as new posaconazole formulations became available, the frequency of use of each formulation changed. In addition, this study suggested a low rate of potential antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk patients. This is one of the first reports attempting to describe antifungal prophylaxis in a contemporary, large, all-payer, geographically representative hospital database.

β-d-Glucan Testing Is Overused in Patients Without Solid Organ/Stem Cell Transplant or Hematologic Malignancies

Background The β-d-glucan (BDG) assay aids in diagnosis of some invasive fungal infections (IFI) in at-risk patients. Due to an increase in the number of BDG tests ordered at Johns Hopkins Hospital in patients not at high risk for IFI, we evaluated the appropriateness of testing and conducted a survey to understand providers’ knowledge about the test.Methods From December 2015 to July 2016, we identified inpatients >17 years with at least one BDG test. We did not evaluate patients with solid organ/stem cell transplant or hematologic malignancies as they generally have indications for BDG testing. Using a standard data collection form, one infectious disease (ID) physician reviewed all test for appropriateness; 20% of cases were reviewed by an additional ID physician. Students, housestaff and allied staff from departments of medicine and surgery were surveyed regarding their knowledge of BDG test characteristics including indications and causes of false-positive results.Results355 patients with at least one BDG were included. 33% (n = 116) had a risk factor for IFI (e.g., AIDS, immunosuppressing medication, malignancy, total parenteral nutrition, and prolonged ICU stay) although only 13% (n = 48) of these had proved or possible IFI. 49% (n = 173) had no indication for testing. Of these, 4% (n = 8) had inappropriate antifungals started based on BDG results. Being at an intensive care unit or having cirrhosis was associated with inappropriate BDG use (P = 0.03). Most of the 47 clinicians surveyed recognized the utility of BDG in the diagnosis of candidiasis (63%) and Aspergillosis (78%) but only 49% recognized its utility in diagnosis of Pneumocystis. Fifty-two percent identified its lack of utility for diagnosis of Cryptococcus infection but only 44% recognized lack of utility for diagnosing Zygomycetes. The majority of those surveyed were unable to identify causes of false-positive results of the assay.Conclusion In patients without solid organ/stem cell transplant or hematologic malignancies, clinicians ordered the BDG assay in the absence of clinical risk or evidence of IFI in almost 50% of patients. Survey results suggest an incomplete understanding of organisms associated with positive BDG tests. Clinicians must be educated about the correct patient population in which a new test should be used.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients: one size does not fit all

Targeted antifungal prophylaxis against Candida species or against Candida species and Aspergillus species, according to individual patient risk factors (RFs), is recommended by experts. However, recent studies have reported fluconazole is as effective as broader spectrum antifungals for preventing invasive fungal infection (IFI) after liver transplantation (LT). We performed a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent LT at our 1420-bed tertiary teaching hospital, from June 2010 to December 2014, to assess the rate and etiology of IFI within 100days after LT, to investigate the compliance with targeted prophylaxis, and to analyze risk factors for developing IFI. In total, 303 patients underwent LT. Patients were classified as having low (no RFs), intermediate (1 RF for invasive candidiasis [IC]), and high risk (1 RF for invasive aspergillosis [IA] or ≥2 RFs for IC) for IFI in 20%, 30%, and 50% of cases, respectively. A total of 139 patients received antifungal prophylaxis: 98 with a mold-active drug and 41 with fluconazole. Overall adherence to targeted prophylaxis was 53%. Nineteen patients (6.3%) developed IFI: 7 IC and 12 IA. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for median model for end-stage liver disease score at LT, stratification risk group, and adherence to targeted prophylaxis, showed that graft dysfunction, renal replacement therapy, and prophylaxis with fluconazole were independent risk factors for IFI. Seven of the 9 patients who received fluconazole prophylaxis and developed IFI were classified as having high risk for IFI, and 6 developed IA. Recommended stratification is accurate for predicting patients at very high risk for IFI, who should receive prophylaxis with a mold-active drug.

Role of fungal infection in the modern clinic.

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) - a significant problem in the particular group of immunocompromised patients. Understanding of the epidemiology of IFI in hospitals helps to set a step by step set of actions needed to prevent the development of invasive fungal infections. The first step is to identify groups of patients with a high risk of IFI, the establishment of risk factors, analysis of the epidemiological profile of the genera and species of fungal pathogens, as well as their level of resistance to anti- fungal drugs. Secondly, it is necessary to establish mechanisms to prevent the permanent impact of potential fungal pathogens, to work out recommendations, including control over the quality of air and water in medical facilities. In addition to the timely implementation of these measures, it is important to pay special attention to the use of antifungal drugs for the prevention of IFI, which should be conducted in patients with very high risk of invasive fungal infections.

Randomized trial of micafungin for the prevention of invasive fungal infection in high-risk liver transplant recipients.

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) following liver transplant is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Antifungal prophylaxis is rational for liver transplant patients at high IFI risk. In this open-label, noninferiority study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous micafungin 100 mg or center-specific standard care (fluconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, or caspofungin) posttransplant. The primary endpoint was clinical success (absence of a proven/probable IFI and no need for additional antifungals) at end of prophylaxis (EOP). Noninferiority (10% margin) of micafungin vs standard care was assessed in the per protocol and full analysis sets. Safety assessments included adverse events and liver and kidney function tests. The full analysis set comprised 344 patients (172 micafungin; 172 standard care). Mean age was 51.2 years; 48.0% had a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥20. At EOP (mean treatment duration, 17 days), clinical success was 98.6% for micafungin and 99.3% for standard care (Δ standard care - micafungin [95% confidence interval], 0.7% [-2.7% to 4.4%]) in the per protocol set and 96.5% and 93.6%, respectively (-2.9% [-8.0% to 1.9%]), in the full analysis set. Incidences of drug-related adverse events for micafungin and standard care were 11.6% and 16.3%, leading to discontinuation in 6.4% and 11.6% of cases, respectively. At EOP, liver function tests were similar but creatinine clearance was higher in micafungin- vs standard care-treated patients. Micafungin was noninferior to standard care as antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients at high risk for IFI. Adverse event profiles and liver function at EOP were similar, although kidney function was better with micafungin. NCT01058174.

Impact of Targeted Antifungal Prophylaxis in Heart Transplant Recipients at High Risk for Early Invasive Fungal Infection

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is associated with high mortality after heart transplantation (HTx). After two undiagnosed fatal cases of early disseminated fungal infections in our heart transplant program, a retrospective analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for the development of IFI and implement a new antifungal prophylaxis policy. Clinical characteristics of HTx recipients hospitalized in our center (2004-2010) were recorded (Period 1), and risk factors associated with IFI were investigated using Cox regression analysis. From October 2010 to October 2012 (Period 2), targeted caspofungin prophylaxis was administered to all recipients at high risk for IFI, based on the results of the Period 1 analysis. During Period 1, 10% (6/59) of the patients developed IFI at a median onset of 9 days after transplantation. By multivariate analysis, the use of posttransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was the strongest predictor for fungal infection (OR, 29.93; 95% CI, 1.51-592.57, P=0.03), whereas renal replacement therapy (RRT) and Aspergillus colonization were significant predictors only by univariate analysis. During Period 2, only 4% (1/26) of the patients developed IFI. In patients at high risk for IFI, antifungal prophylaxis was administered to 17% (4/23) in Period 1 versus 100% (13/13) in Period 2 (P<0.01). By survival analysis, antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a reduction in 90-day IFI incidence (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.84, P=0.03) and 30-day mortality (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.8, P=0.02). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was identified an important risk factor for IFI after HTx, and its use may require targeted administration of antifungal prophylaxis in the immediate posttransplant period.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Neutropenia and invasive fungal infection in patients with hematological malignancies treated with chemotherapy: a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study in China

In this study, we explored the relationship between neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,500/mm(3)) and invasive fungal infection (IFI) in Chinese patients who had hematological malignancies treated with chemotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study of consecutive patients with hematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy in China and determined clinical characteristics of patients who developed neutropenia and IFI. The results indicated that for the 2,177 neutropenic patients, 88 (4.0 %) were diagnosed with IFI. We found that a high risk of IFI (P<0.05) is associated with male gender, non-remission of the primary disease, use of two or more broad-spectrum antibiotics, treatment with parenteral nutrition, presence of cardiovascular disease, history of IFI, and neutropenia. When the ANC was less than 1,000, 1,000∼500, 500∼100, and <100/mm(3), the incidence of IFI was 0.5, 5.2, 3.9, and 4.7 %, respectively (ANC>1,000/mm(3) versus other groups, P<0.001). When the ANC was less than 1,000, 500, or 100/mm(3) for 10 days or more, the incidence of IFI was 3.2 versus 6.1 % (P=0.0052), 3.5 versus 7.1 % (P=0.0021), and 3.1 versus 10.0 % (P<0.001). When the ANC was less than 100/mm(3), taking antifungal prophylaxis reduced the incidence of IFI (P<0.05). The IFI-attributable mortality rate was 11.7 %. In conclusion, Chinese patients with IFI, severe and prolonged neutropenia increases the incidence of IFI. The incidence of IFI associated with neutropenia was reduced when antifungal prophylaxis was given. IFI was associated with a significantly increased high mortality rate in hematological malignancy patients with neutropenia.

Comparison of fluconazole and posaconazole for fungal prophylaxis in high- risk patients with hematological malignity

Objective: To compare the frequency of fungal infection and mortality rates in patients with hematological malignity and receiving either flucanazole (FLU) or posaconazole (POS) prophylaxis. Methods: This retrospective, observational study investigated fungal prophylaxis in patients with a high risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and diagnosed with hematological malignity at our hospital hematology clinic between 01.01.2011 and 01.01.2013. FLU (n=70) was the prophylactic regimen between 2011 and 2012 which was replaced by POS (n=35) in the following period. The incidence and mortality rates of IFIs developing in the two periods were compared. Results: The incidence of IFI in patients administered FLU prophylaxis was 22/70 (31%), compared to 13/35 (37%) in the patients receiving POS. Incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in the FLU group was 21/70 (31%), compared to 9/35 (26%) in the POS group. The mortality rate in the group receiving FLU prophylaxis was 17 (24%), compared to 4 (11%) in the POS group. The difference was attributed to causes other than fungal infection. Results of subgroup analysis performed for AML were similar to the general findings in terms of both incidences of fungal infection and of mortality levels. In multivariate analysis, mean duration of neutropenia was correlated with prophylaxis failure. Conclusion: We conclude that both agents can be successfully used in fungal infection prophylaxis for patients at high risk for IFI.

Invasive fungal breakthrough infections, fungal colonization and emergence of resistant strains in high-risk patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole: real-life data from a single-centre institutional retrospective observational study

The broad-spectrum triazole posaconazole showed promising results in preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in high-risk patients. Concerns rise over the relevance of breakthrough IFIs (bIFIs) and the emergence of azole-resistant strains. The current retrospective analysis was undertaken to evaluate the incidence of bIFIs and to study fungal colonization and resistance following posaconazole exposure. Ninety-five patients who underwent 202 courses of primary antifungal prophylaxis with 200 mg of posaconazole three times daily during neutropenia after chemotherapy/haematopoietic stem cell transplantation between September 2008 and September 2010 were evaluated. An IFI was considered to be a bIFI if its occurrence was detected ≥4 days after initiation of preventative posaconazole prophylaxis. The incidence of bIFIs was 13% (27/202), with 11/27 (41%) proven and 16/27 (59%) probable bIFIs. Proven infections were mainly localized in the lungs (85%). Species diagnosis exclusively revealed non-Aspergillus species, i.e. mucormycetes in 55% and yeasts in 45%. The median overall survival for patients with bIFIs was 5.2 months. Sixteen of 27 patients with bIFIs (proven and probable) succumbed. Regarding only proven cases, 8/11 patients died, whereas only 1/16 deaths was caused by fungal disease. Prospective screening confirmed colonization with yeasts in 42/202 (21%) courses; moulds were not identified. The spectrum of colonizing yeasts changed slightly over time, shifting to more rare yeasts. There were no deaths due to invasive yeast infections. A significant proportion of bIFIs, compared with historical data, with a shift to non-Aspergillus spp. and in particular to mucormycetes was observed in patients at high risk for IFI during posaconazole prophylaxis.

Trends in the prevalence of invasive fungal infections from an analysis of annual records of autopsy cases of Toho University

Clinical diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is sometimes difficult, and obtaining an accurate assessment of trends concerning the prevalence of IFIs is a challenge. The aim of this study was to determine trends in the prevalence of IFIs from an autopsy survey. The retrospective review of autopsy records stored in Toho University was performed on all documented cases with fungal infection from 1955 to 2006. A total of 411 cases of IFIs were detected among 10 297 autopsies. The prevalence of candidiasis decreased from 3.6% (1981-93) to 2.0% (1994-2006), and that of aspergillosis increased throughout the 52-year period and reached 2.0% (1994-2006). The prevalence of IFIs in the patient group comprising haematological disorders was significantly higher (19.9%) than in other patient groups (2.9%), of which the odds ratio was 18.4 for mucormycosis and 10.0 for aspergillosis. The lung was the most common organ involved irrespective of major fungal species, and most cases with candidiasis showed multiple-organ infection. Results confirmed the increasing prevalence of aspergillosis and high risk of IFIs in the patient group with haematological disorders. IFIs were also detected in an immunocompromised state caused not only by primary disease but also by treatment with anti-tumour drugs and corticosteroids.