S – Scientific Session 2 Outcomes following freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis implantation: The Australian experience up to 10 years Andrew Sherrah , Paul Bannon , Richmond Jeremy , Rajesh Puranik , Peter Brady , David Marshman , Manu Mathur , John Brereton , James Edwards , Robert Stuklis , Paul Hendel , Matthew Bayfield , Michael Wilson , Michael Vallely 1,2,3,7 Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia The Baird Institute, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia Darcy Sutherland Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia Corresponding author. Introduction: The choice of valvular prosthesis in aortic valve replacement surgery must be tailored to the needs of the individual patient. We report our clinical and echocardiographic outcomes up to 10 years post-operatively following use of the Freestyle bioprosthesis for aortic valve and root surgery utilising several different surgical approaches. Methods: The retrospective collection of this data was approved by the local ethics committees. From January, 2004 until July, 2014, 237 patients underwent Freestyle bioprosthesis implantation at the aortic position at five Australian hospitals. Preand post-operative clinical data were collected, as well as post-operative echocardiographic data. Total clinical follow-up consisted of 560 patient-years and was 100% complete within 18 months of the date of study completion. Results: Mean age was 63 13 years and 81.4% of patients were male. The most commonly used prosthesis size was 27 mm (32.5%) and 41.4% of patients required concurrent replacement of their ascending aorta. 31.7% of patients required a concurrent cardiac procedure. Pre-operatively, 30.3% of patients were in NYHA Class III or IV; at last post-operative follow-up this was 2.9%. 30 day mortality from all causes was 4.3%. All cause survival at 5 and 10 years of follow-up was 82.6 3.9% and 56.4 10.5%, respectively. Freedom from valvular or coronary artery re-intervention at 5 and 10 years was 92.9 3.4% and 73.3 10.6%, respectively. The mean maximum aortic systolic gradient at 1, 5 and 10 years was 12.3 9.0 mmHg, 10.2 5.3 mmHg and 8.4 0.0 mmHg, respectively. At the completion of follow-up, 91.7% of patients had trivial or nil aortic regurgitation. Discussion: We demonstrate comparable long term outcomes to the large international series’ for implantation of the Freestyle porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position. This is inclusive of multiple implantation techniques. The Freestyle is a suitable prosthesis choice in patients where there is associated aortic dilatation and long term anticoagulation is not desirable. Longer follow up data are required to assess the suitability of the prosthesis in younger patients. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2014.12.014 Trics-III prospective randomised controlled trial of a restrictive or liberal blood transfusion protocol Alistair Royse , Colin Royse , David Scott , Nadine Shehata , David Mazer , TRICS-III investigators University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia St Vincents Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Mt Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada St Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Canada Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Canada Introduction: Hypothesis: That a “restrictive” transfusion protocol is not inferior to a “liberal” transfusion protocol in high risk cardiac surgery patients as measured by a composite outcome of mortality and serious morbidity in high risk cardiac surgery patients. Methods: The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of in-hospital mortality and major morbidity (myocardial infarction, new renal failure, new focal neurological deficit). The restrictive group will have a transfusion threshold of < 75 g/L throughout their hospital admission whereas the liberal group will have a transfusion threshold of < 95 g/L in the operating room (OR) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) followed by a threshold of < 85 g/L in the ward. Secondary endpoints are to assess the impact of transfusion threshold on the incidence of adverse clinical events, blood utilisation and 6-month mortality. Adverse event outcomes include length of stay in the ICU and hospital, prolonged low cardiac output state, use of intra-aortic balloon pump ventricular assist device postoperatively, duration of mechanical ventilation, infection, acute kidney injury, and gut infarction. Results: This study is awaiting final ethics and governance clearance in Australia and will commence in 2014. Heart, Lung and Circulation (2015) 24S1, e5–e6 1443-9506/04/$36.00 ABSTRACTS
Read full abstract