High Resolution Perimetry Research Articles

Visual function in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: Effect of Vision Restoration Therapy—A pilot study

To evaluate the effects of Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) on the visual function of patients with anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Randomized controlled double-blind pilot trial. 10 patients with stable anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION). All patients were evaluated before VRT and after 3 and 6 months of treatment by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, 24-2 SITA-standard Humphrey visual field (HVF), High Resolution Perimetry (HRP) (perimetry obtained during VRT), and vision-based quality of life questionnaire. Patients were randomized between two VRT strategies (5 in each group): I) VRT in which stimulation was performed in the seeing VF of the affected eye ("seeing field-VRT"); II) VRT in which stimulation was performed along the area of central fixation and in the ARV (areas of residual vision) of the affected eye ("ARV-VRT"). The results of the HRP, HVF, and clinical assessment of visual function were compared for each patient and between the two groups at each evaluation. Visual acuity qualitatively improved in the ARV-VRT group, however the change was not statistically significant (p=0.28). Binocular reading speed significantly improved in the ARV-VRT group (p=0.03). HVF foveal sensitivity increased mildly in both groups (p=0.059). HRP analysis showed a similar increase in stimulus accuracy in both groups (mean improvement of about 15%). All patients reported functional improvement after VRT. Despite a small sample, the study showed a trend toward improvement of visual function in the ARV-VRT group. Improvement of HRP in both groups may reflect diffusely increased visual attention (neuronal activation), or improvement of an underlying sub-clinical abnormality in the "seeing" visual field of patients with optic neuropathies.

Vision restoration therapy does not benefit from costimulation: A pilot study

Visual field deficits in patients have long been considered to be nontreatable, but in previous studies we have found an enlargement of the intact visual field following vision restoration therapy (VRT). In the present pilot study, we wished to determine whether a double-stimulation approach would facilitate visual field enlargements beyond those achieved by the single-stimulus paradigm used in standard VRT. This was motivated by the findings that following visual cortex injury in animals, the size of receptive fields could be enlarged by systematic costimulation, where two stimuli were used to excite visual cortex neurons (Eysel, Eyding, & Schweigart, 1998). Patients (n = 23) with stable homonymous field deficits after trauma, cerebral ischemia, or hemorrhage (lesion age > 6 months) carried out either (a) standard VRT with a single stimulation (n = 9), or vision therapy with (b) a parallel costimulation (n = 7) or (c) a moving costimulation paradigm (n = 7). Training was carried out twice daily for 30 min over a 3-month period. Before and after therapy, visual fields were tested with 30° and 90° Tübinger automatic perimetry (TAP) and with high-resolution perimetry (HRP). Eye movements were recorded with an eye tracking system. When data of all three types of visual field training were pooled, we found significant improvements of stimulus detection in HRP (4.2%) and fewer misses within the central 30° perimetrically (−3.7% right eye, OD, or −4.4% left eye, OS). However, the type of training did not make any difference such that the three training groups profited equally. A more detailed analysis of trained versus untrained visual field areas in 16 patients revealed a superiority of the trained area of only 1.1% in HRP and between 3.5% (OS) and 4.4% (OD) in TAP. Spatial attention and alertness improved significantly in all three groups and correlated significantly with visual field enlargements. While vision training had no influence on the patient's testimonials concerning their visual abilities, the patients significantly improved in a practical paper-and-pencil number tracking task (Zahlen-Verbindungs Test; ZVT). Visual field enlargement does not benefit from a double-stimulation paradigm, but visual attention seems to play an important role in vision restoration. The improvements in trained as well as in untrained areas are explained by top-down attentional control mechanisms interacting with local visual cortex plasticity.

Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: An eye tracker study

Aim It has been argued that patients with visual field defects compensate for their deficit by making more frequent eye movements toward the hemianopic field and that visual field enlargements found after vision restoration therapy (VRT) may be an artefact of such eye movements. In order to determine if this was correct, we recorded eye movements in hemianopic subjects before and after VRT. Methods Visual fields were measured in subjects with homonymous visual field defects ( n = 15) caused by trauma, cerebral ischemia or haemorrhage (lesion age >6 months). Visual field charts were plotted using both high-resolution perimetry (HRP) and conventional perimetry before and after a 3-month period of VRT, with eye movements being recorded with a 2D-eye tracker. This permitted quantification of eye positions and measurements of deviation from fixation. Results VRT lead to significant visual field enlargements as indicated by an increase of stimulus detection of 3.8% when tested using HRP and about 2.2% (OD) and 3.5% (OS) fewer misses with conventional perimetry. Eye movements were expressed as the standard deviations (S.D.) of the eye position recordings from fixation. Before VRT, the S.D. was ±0.82° horizontally and ±1.16° vertically; after VRT, it was ±0.68° and ±1.39°, respectively. A cluster analysis of the horizontal eye movements before VRT showed three types of subjects with (i) small ( n = 7), (ii) medium ( n = 7) or (iii) large fixation instability ( n = 1). Saccades were directed equally to the right or the left side; i.e., with no preference toward the blind hemifield. After VRT, many subjects showed a smaller variability of horizontal eye movements. Before VRT, 81.6% of the recorded eye positions were found within a range of 1° horizontally from fixation, whereas after VRT, 88.3% were within that range. In the 2° range, we found 94.8% before and 98.9% after VRT. Subjects moved their eyes 5° or more 0.3% of the time before VRT versus 0.1% after VRT. Thus, in this study, subjects with homonymous visual field defects who were attempting to fixate a central target while their fields were being plotted, typically showed brief horizontal shifts with no preference toward or away from the blind hemifield. These eye movements were usually less than 1° from fixation. Large saccades toward the blind field after VRT were very rare. Conclusion VRT has no effect on either the direction or the amplitude of horizontal eye movements during visual field testing. These results argue against the theory that the visual field enlargements are artefacts induced by eye movements.

The 58th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology San Diego, California April 1-8, 2006

The 58th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology San Diego, California April 1-8, 2006

Poster 24: Vision Restoration Therapy After Stroke and Brain Trauma: Retrospective Analysis of 300 Patients

Objectives: To analyze retrospectively the effects of vision restoration therapy (VRT) and to determine the role of eye movements in visual field restoration. Design: We replicated our earlier findings by using a larger patient population, and in a separate patient sample we checked the role of eye movements in this process. Setting: Retrospective data analysis and prospective small sample experiment. Participants: Sample of 302 patients. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Visual field charts generated by computer-based high-resolution perimetry (HRP) were obtained from 302 patients.

Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field defects

Background: In patients with postgenicular lesions of the visual system, areas of residual vision (ARVs) are the main predictor of recovery induced by vision restoration therapy (VRT). In these partially defective regions, the elevated perceptual thresholds can be acutely reduced by attentional cueing. Objective: To examine whether directing attention to ARVs using a visuospatial cue also increases long-term neural plasticity and thus enhances permanent training outcome. Methods: In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, treatment outcome was compared in patients with postgenicular visual system lesions who received either standard VRT (control group [CG]; n = 10) or VRT with attentional cueing (experimental group [EG]; n = 9). Visual field size was determined before and after a 6-month treatment period using Tubingen Automated Perimetry and computer-based high-resolution perimetry (HRP) and in regular intervals throughout this period by HRP and detection performance in VRT. Results: In the area of the cue, restoration of vision was significantly greater than during VRT without cueing: cued patients showed a much more pronounced shift of the visual field border toward the blind area than that observed in the CG or in uncued regions of the EG. Focusing attention at ARVs during treatment changed topographic and temporal patterns of recovery as compared with uncued regions of the visual field. Conclusions: Use of a visuospatial cue to focus attention at areas of residual vision amplifies long-term neuronal plasticity. The authors propose that top-down signals preactivate partially damaged areas of V1, thus linking visual and attentional neuronal networks, with the effect of permanently increasing conscious visual perception.

Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field defects

In patients with postgenicular lesions of the visual system, areas of residual vision (ARVs) are the main predictor of recovery induced by vision restoration therapy (VRT). In these partially defective regions, the elevated perceptual thresholds can be acutely reduced by attentional cueing. To examine whether directing attention to ARVs using a visuospatial cue also increases long-term neural plasticity and thus enhances permanent training outcome. In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, treatment outcome was compared in patients with postgenicular visual system lesions who received either standard VRT (control group [CG]; n = 10) or VRT with attentional cueing (experimental group [EG]; n = 9). Visual field size was determined before and after a 6-month treatment period using Tubingen Automated Perimetry and computer-based high-resolution perimetry (HRP) and in regular intervals throughout this period by HRP and detection performance in VRT. In the area of the cue, restoration of vision was significantly greater than during VRT without cueing: cued patients showed a much more pronounced shift of the visual field border toward the blind area than that observed in the CG or in uncued regions of the EG. Focusing attention at ARVs during treatment changed topographic and temporal patterns of recovery as compared with uncued regions of the visual field. Use of a visuospatial cue to focus attention at areas of residual vision amplifies long-term neuronal plasticity. The authors propose that top-down signals preactivate partially damaged areas of V1, thus linking visual and attentional neuronal networks, with the effect of permanently increasing conscious visual perception.

Residual Vision in Transition Zones in Patients with Cerebral Blindness

Using high resolution perimetry in repeated sessions, we investigated 27 patients with homonymous visual field defects in order to detect islands of vision within the damaged area, and to determine color- and form-recognition abilities within these zones of residual vision. In most patients we found circumscribed areas within the “blind” field in which the stimulus was detected in about 50% of presentations. Only one patient had an island of vision greater than 5° within the defective area. We also found an area of variable performance between the blind and the intact field. Borders of field defects were classified as being: (a) sharp (small transition zone), (b) medium, or (c) fuzzy (scattered deficits). We propose that transition zones are functional representations of partially spared neuronal structures in areas of the brain which are only partially injured.

Abnormal motion displacement thresholds are associated with fine scale luminance sensitivity loss in glaucoma.

This study tests the hypothesis that abnormal motion displacement thresholds coexist with scotomas on a finer spatial scale than is measurable by conventional Humphrey perimetry. Eighteen patients with primary open angle glaucoma in one eye, and 18 age matched normal controls underwent motion displacement threshold testing and high spatial resolution perimetry. The motion displacement thresholds were significantly elevated in the glaucoma eyes, in 73% this exceeded normal limits. Ten glaucoma eyes had normal Humphrey 24-2 field nearest the motion test site: of these seven had abnormally elevated motion displacement thresholds and six had fine scale threshold depressions detected with high spatial resolution perimetry. This result suggests that glaucomatous elevations of motion displacement threshold may be present in areas of normal Humphrey 24-2 field, and this may coexist with measurable scotomas beyond the resolution of conventional Humphrey perimetry in some, but not all patients.

High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma

BACKGROUNDAutomated perimetry is of fundamental importance in assessing visual function in glaucoma. A technique was evaluated to perform high spatial resolution automated perimetry to allow a more detailed assessment of...