High-resolution Esophageal Manometry Studies Research Articles

Nasopharyngeal airway assistance improves esophageal intubation rates of high-resolution esophageal manometry catheters.

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is the gold standard test for esophageal motility disorders. Nasopharyngeal airway-assisted insertion of the HREM catheter is a suggested salvage technique for failure from the inability to pass the catheter through the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). It has not been demonstrated that the nasopharyngeal airway improves procedural success rate. Patients undergoing HREM between March 2019 and March 2023 were evaluated. Chart review was conducted for patient factors and procedural success rates before and after use of nasopharyngeal airway. Patients from March 2019 to May 2021 did not have nasopharyngeal airway available and were compared to patients from May 2021 to March 2023 who had the nasopharyngeal airway available. In total, 523 HREM studies were conducted; 234 occurred prior to nasopharyngeal airway availability, and 289 occurred with nasopharyngeal airway availability. There was no difference in HREM catheter UES intubation rates between periods when a nasopharyngeal airway attempt was considered procedural failure (85% vs. 85%, p = 0.9). Nasopharyngeal airway use after UES intubation failure lead to improved UES intubation rates (94% vs. 85%, p < 0.01). Thirty-six patients that failed HREM catheter UES intubation had the procedure reattempted with a nasopharyngeal airway, 30 (83%) of which were successful. The nasopharyngeal airway assisted catheter UES intubation for failures attributed to nasal pain and hypersensitivity, gagging, coughing, and pharyngeal coiling. Utilization of the nasopharyngeal airway increased rates of UES intubation. When HREM catheter placement through the UES fails, placement of a nasopharyngeal airway can be trialed to overcome patient procedural intolerance.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction in Children with Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft after Failed Primary Cleft Repair.

Changes in pharyngeal and upper-esophageal-sphincter (UES) motor dynamics contribute to swallowing dysfunction. Children with type 1 laryngeal clefts can present with swallowing dysfunction and associated symptoms which may persist even after the initial endoscopic intervention. This study sought to characterize pharyngeal and esophageal motor function in children with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had persistent presenting symptoms after their initial therapeutic intervention. We retrospectively analyzed high-resolution esophageal manometry studies of children ≤ 18 years old with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had an esophageal manometry study performed for persistent symptoms after an initial repair. A total of 16 children were found to have significantly increased UES resting pressure, UES pre- and post-swallow maximum pressures, and duration of UES contraction during swallows in comparison to nine age-matched controls of children without pharyngeal anatomical abnormalities. There was no difference between UES residual pressures or pharyngeal dynamics between the two groups. UES resting and residual pressures did not correlate with VFFS in penetration and aspiration scores of children with type 1 laryngeal clefts status post repair. Our study is the first to identify specific changes in UES motor function in patients with type 1 laryngeal cleft post initial repair.

Compartmentalized pressurization is a novel prognostic factor for hypercontractile esophagus.

Hypercontractile esophagus (HE) is a disorder of increased esophageal body contractile strength on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Compartmentalized pressurization (CP) is a pattern with an isobaric contour of >30 mmHg extending from the contractile front to the lower esophageal sphincter on HREM. The relevance of CP to HE has yet to be explored. A retrospective review was performed on 830 HREM studies of patients to identify HE. HE patients' CP status and symptoms by Eckardt score (ES) were reviewed. Diagnoses were made using Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0. Forty-seven patients (5.6%) were identified as having HE by CCv3, 30 (3.6%) of which had HE by CCv4. 11/30 HE patients had CP, and 19/30 did not. CP was associated with chronic opioid use (36.4% vs. 5.3% p = 0.047). Presenting ES was greater for HE patients with CP (7 vs. 4). Seven HE patients with CP and 11 without CP were managed medically. ES after medical therapy was higher in HE patients with CP compared to those without CP (9 vs. 0). No HE patients with CP responded to medical therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significance of this association over time. 83% of all HE patients had all-cause symptom remission. HE patients with CP are associated with a higher presenting ES. HE patients with CP do not respond to medical therapy, while HE patients without CP frequently do respond. CP in HE may have prognostic value in determination of treatment strategy for patients with HE.

Evaluating the impact of position, volume, and consistency on high-resolution esophageal manometry outcomes.

The Chicago classification primarily utilizes ten 5 mL liquid swallows in a supine position as the standard high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) protocol. HRM can be performed with varying volumes and consistencies and in an upright position. We aimed to determine the impact on HRM results by (1) position, (2) swallows of differing volume and consistency, and (3) perception of bolus passage. HRM was performed in healthy volunteers (HV) with the following protocol of swallows: liquids 10 × 5 mL, 5 × 10 mL, and 3 × 10 mL multiple rapid swallows; applesauce 5 × 5 mL and 5 × 10 mL; and bread 5 × 2 × 2 cm and 5 × 4 × 4cm. HV rated difficulty of each swallow on a 5-point Likert scale. All HVs performed the protocol in supine position first and then in "semi-upright" (sitting 70 degrees in a bed) and "upright" (sitting in a chair) in a randomized order. Thirty-seven HVs, median age 27 years, 64% female completed this study. Median distal contractile integral (DCI) and integrated relaxation pressure 4 s (IRP4) of 5 mL liquid swallows significantly differed (all p < 0.01) between position performed. Large volume swallows resulted in higher DCI and lower IRP4. IRP4 results were significantly increased for 2 × 2 cm pieces of bread compared to 5 mL water swallows. DCI results were higher for 2 × 2 cm pieces of bread compared to 5 mL water swallows. Distal latency was shorter in more upright positions. Among this cohort of HV, perceived difficulty of bolus passage was more likely to occur with solid boluses. The volume and consistency of a swallow and the position it is performed in, significantly alter HRM metrics. Interpretation of HRM studies should incorporate different normative values which are specific to the position and bolus type.

346. CUTOFF VALUE OF THORACOABDOMINAL PRESSURE GRADIENT FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE ON STARLET HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY

Abstract Derangement of thoracoabdominal pressure gradient (TAPG) associates with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard to assess pathophysiology of GERD. Starlet HRM is widely used in Japan; however, TAPG values on Starlet HRM system have been unstudied. The aim of this study is to propose the cutoff value of TAPG to discriminate GERD on Starlet HRM system. We included patients who underwent both Starlet HRM and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH study (MII-pH) at our hospital between July 2018 and February 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups; control group (both HRM and MII-pH were within normal limits), GERD group (acid exposure time [AET] ≥4.0% and/or DeMeester score ≥ 14.72), and non-pathological reflux group. Normal MII-pH values were defined according to our previous study using healthy Japanese volunteers (Yano, et al. Esophagus, 2017); AET &amp;lt;2.5%, DeMeester score &amp;lt; 11, and liquid reflux episodes &amp;lt;80.0. TAPG and adjusted TAPG were analyzed (shown in Figure). Total 102 patients met the study criteria (mean age 53.0 ± 16.0 years, 32 females). Thirty-four patients were categorized into the control group, 31 patients were into the GERD group, and 37 patients were into the non-pathological reflux group. In the control group, 5th and 95th percentiles of TAPG were − 3.4 and 24.3 mmHg, and those of adjusted TAPG were − 50.7 and 1.6 mmHg. TAPG poorly correlated with acid exposure time (AET) (rs = 0.287, p = 0.003); however, adjusted TAPG well-correlated with AET (rs = 0.505, p &amp;lt; 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the estimated cutoff of adjusted TAPG was −11.1 mmHg (sensitivity 71.0%, specificity 71.8%, AUC 0.742, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Adjusted TAPG is associated with antireflux competency across the esophagogastric junction. Estimated cutoff value of adjusted TAPG was −11.1 mmHg in the study cohort. Further study is warrantied.

A134 UES MANOMETRIC PARAMETERS IN ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS

BackgroundUpper esophageal sphincter (UES) function may be evaluated manometrically using a solid-state high-resolution manometry (HRM) system, which allows for the measurement of manometric parameters specific to the UES. While many of these parameters have yet to be validated for use in clinical practice, there is some suggestion that there may be an association between esophageal motility and UES function.AimsWe aimed to identify the relationship between UES manometric variables and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) diagnoses.MethodsA retrospective analysis of HREM studies was performed between 2019 and 2021. Extraction of esophageal and UES manometric variables were performed. UES manometric values of interest included: mean basal pressure (mmHg), mean residual pressure (mmHg), relaxation time-to-nadir (ms), relaxation duration (ms), and recovery time (ms). Relationships between manometric diagnosis (Chicago Classification version 3) and UES manometric variables were explored. All values are expressed a medians and group means were compared with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.Results2119 symptomatic patients underwent HREM over the study period. Manometric diagnoses were achalasia (72 patients), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (286), absent contractility (108), distal esophageal spasm (53), jackhammer esophagus (32), and ineffective esophageal motility (694). 886 patients had no specific motility disorder; 643 of whom had ≤ 20% ineffective swallows and were considered symptomatic controls.Patients with achalasia had significantly higher mean basal pressures (63.2 vs. 54.4, p = .001), mean residual pressure (3.8 vs. -1.9, p < .001), relaxation-time-to-nadir (182.0 vs. 142.0, p = .005), relaxation duration (820.5 vs. 708.0, p < .001) and recovery time (623.0 vs. 562, p < .001) compared to control patients. Among patients with achalasia, the presence of panesophageal pressurization correlated weakly with recovery time (R2 .3, p = .03). Patients with ineffective esophageal motility had significantly higher mean basal pressures (61.7 vs. 54.0, p < .001).Among all patients, patients with incomplete bolus clearance (≥ 30%) had significantly higher UES mean basal pressure (58.9 vs. 54.6, p = .004), mean residual pressure (-.62 vs. -2, p < .001), relaxation duration (724.0 vs. 707.0, p = .014) and recovery time (580 vs. 558.0, p < .001).ConclusionsPatients with achalasia may have higher basal and residual UES pressures, and slower relaxation compared to patients with normal esophageal motility. This may reflect dynamic changes of the UES in response to obstruction at the esophagogastric junction. Elevated UES pressures are also seen in patients with ineffective esophageal motility, potentially reflecting a response to poor bolus clearance. More work needs to be done to validate these parameters in clinical practice.Funding AgenciesNone

Hiatal hernias associated with acid reflux: size larger than 2cm matters.

Hiatal hernia (HH) is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); the effect of HH size on GERD is not well defined. To evaluate the relationship between HH size as measured by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and reflux parameters on esophageal pH-impedance testing (multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH [MII-pH]) to define HH sizes associated with GERD. HREM and MII-pH studies were reviewed. The relationship of HH size to other parameters was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Correlation coefficients were determined using Spearman and Pearson's tests. A total of 897 patients underwent both HREM and MII-pH. There were 529 (58.9%) patients with HH size <1cm, 203 (22.6%) with HH 1.0-1.9cm, and 165 (18.4%) with HH ≥2cm. Larger HH size was associated with lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal and residual pressures (r = -0.43 and r = -0.48, p < 0.01), higher acid exposure time (AET) (r = 0.17, p < 0.01), number of acidic refluxes (r = 0.16, p < 0.05), and number of reflux episodes detected by impedance (total r = 0.22, p < 0.01). HH ≥ 2cm compared with smaller size HH was associated with higher proximal AET%, acidic refluxes, and reflux episodes detected by impedance (p < 0.05). Increasing HH size was associated with older age, higher AET, and number of reflux episodes. HH ≥2cm was associated with multiple worsened GERD parameters. Low LES pressure was weakly associated with an increase in the number of reflux episodes. Larger HHs, particularly >2cm, are associated with more severe GERD parameters.

A Short History of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry.

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) utilizes sufficient pressure sensors such that intraluminal pressure is monitored as a continuum along luminal length, similar to time viewed as a continuum on polygraph tracings in 'conventional' manometry. When HRM is coupled with pressure topography plotting, and pressure amplitude is transformed into spectral colors with isobaric areas indicated by same-colored regions, "Clouse plots" are generated. HRM has several advantages compared to the technology that it replaced: (1) the contractility of the entire esophagus can be viewed simultaneously in a uniform standardized format, (2) standardized objective metrics of peristaltic and sphincter function can be systematically applied for interpretation, and (3) topographic patterns of contractility are more easily recognized with greater reproducibility. Leveraging these advantages led to the current standard for the interpretation of clinical esophageal HRM studies, the Chicago Classification (CC), now in its fourth iteration. Compared to conventional manometry, HRM has vastly improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia, largely due to the objectivity and accuracy of identification of impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. Additionally, it has led to the subcategorization of achalasia into three clinically relevant subtypes, differentiated by the contractile function of the esophageal body, and identified an additional disorder of EGJ outflow obstruction wherein esophageal peristalsis is preserved. Headway has also been made in understanding hypocontractile and hypercontractile conditions. In summary, HRM and the CC process have revolutionized our understanding of esophageal motility and motility disorders. Moving forward, there will always be remaining challenges, but we now have the tools to meet them.

Ancillary Techniques and Maneuvers in High Resolution Esophageal Manometry

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is a technique to determine the function of esophageal musculature and integrity of esophagogastric junction. Conventionally, the HREM study is done in the supine position using ten swallows of 5 ml water each. Apart from this mandatory testing, ancillary testing and maneuvers are undertaken to elicit detailed physiological information. These include multiple rapid swallows, rapid drink tests, testing in the upright position with solid swallows, and pharmacological testing. The present review highlights these techniques and their clinical utility.

Evaluation of esophageal motor function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux using multiple rapid swallows.

Multiple rapid swallow (MRS) is a complementary test performed during high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). The present study was done to assess the MRS findings in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have normal peristalsis and minor motility disorders. This is a retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained database of patients referred for HREM study to our center. The recordeddetails included age, sex, symptoms with duration, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy reports. HREM data included basal inspiratory and expiratory pressures, median integrated relaxation pressure, and peristaltic pattern. Three MRS sequences were recorded per patient. The inhibition and contraction phases were interpreted for each MRS sequence. A total of 68 patients (38 normal motility, 30 minor motility disorders) formed the study cohort. Hiatus hernia was common in GERD patients with minor motility disorders (p 0.02). Patients with minor motility disorders were more likely to have poor peristaltic reserve than patients with normal peristalsis (p < 0.05). MRS patterns in inhibition and contraction phases were similar in the three MRS sequences for patients with normal peristalsis, while in patients with minor peristaltic disorders, the inhibition phase was significantly discordant on repetitive MRS (p 0.049). Thus, in GERD patients, those with normal peristalsis were more likely to have normal MRS pattern. On the contrary, those with minor peristaltic disorders had a higher frequencyof poor peristaltic reserve and show significant discordance in the inhibition phase of MRS.

Obesity Does Not Impact Outcomes or Rates of Gastroesophageal Reflux After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia.

Outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy in obese patients with achalasia are suboptimal along with the increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The impact of obesity on treatment success and GERD after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are not well known. Hence, our study aims were to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of GERD after POEM in nonobese versus obese patients with achalasia. Chart review of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and June 2018. Patients with timed barium esophagram (TBE) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) before POEM along with post-POEM TBE, HREM, and esophageal pH study were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups, nonobese (body mass index <30 kg/m) and obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m). Patient demographics, TBE, HREM, pH study findings, and Eckardt scores were compared between the 2 groups. A total of 89 patients (46 nonobese; 43 obese) met the study criteria. There were no significant differences in age, gender, achalasia subtype, operative time, length of stay and complication rates between the 2 groups. Treatment success (Eckardt score ≤3) was similar in both groups (97.7% nonobese vs. 92.7% obese, P=0.35). Abnormal DeMeester scores on pH study (>14.72) were similar in nonobese and obese patients (58.7% vs. 46.5%, P=0.25). Symptomatic GERD was also similar in both groups (17.8% in nonobese vs. 20% in obese, P=0.79). POEM is an equally safe and effective treatment option for both nonobese and obese patients with achalasia in the short-term. Interestingly, POEM does not lead to higher rates of GERD in obese compared with nonobese patients.

A129 THE VALUE OF REPEAT MANOMETRIC TESTING

Abstract Background While motility disorders may evolve over time, there is scant guidance around the role of repeat high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). Given the invasive nature of HRM and the implications on financial cost and patient discomfort, it is obvious that the emphasis should be on minimizing unnecessary repeat examinations. However, there are no recommendations around indications or timing of repeat HRM. Aims We aimed to determine the outcomes in patients who underwent repeat manometry and look for predictors of progression to achalasia or major motility disorder. Methods Consecutive reports from HRM studies performed between Aug 2013 – May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with ≥ 2 HRM studies were included. Studies without a Chicago classification diagnosis were excluded. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine if initial HRM diagnosis was associated with change in diagnosis on follow-up HRM. Initial and follow-up manometric parameters were compared with paired T-tests. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to look for predictors of progression to achalasia or major motility disorder. Results 134 patients underwent ≥ 2 HRM studies. Initial diagnoses were IEM (45 patients [33.6%], EGJOO (34 [25.4%], absent peristalsis (18 [13.4%], achalasia (11 [8.2%], DES (4 [3.0%]), and JH (3 [2.2%]; 29 (14.2%) of patients had a normal HRM. 109 (81.3%) patients underwent 2 HRM, 18 (13.4%) 3 HRM, 4 (3%) 4 HRM, and 3 (2.2%) 5 HRM. The final follow-up HRM occurred after a median 496 [80 – 1823] days. 72 (53.7%) of patients had no change from their initial diagnosis. Patients with an initial diagnosis of DES were significantly more likely to have a change in diagnosis on the final follow-up (3 normal:1 IEM) (p = .043). No other classes reached significance. Patients with IEM had a significantly higher mean DCI (395.1 [0 - 3248] vs 790.8 [0 – 10715.0], p = .006) and IRP (4.5 [-10.4 – 14.2] vs [6.6 [-6.2 – 21.0], p = .017) on their follow-up HRM. 4 patients without achalasia (3 EGJOO:1 IEM) on their index HRM had a diagnosis of achalasia on their final HRM. The median IRP in non-achalasia patients with a diagnosis of achalasia on final HRM (22.3 [8.4 – 30.7] was significantly higher than those without a diagnosis of achalasia on final HRM (6.6 [-10.4 – 39.8]) (p = .013); however no manometric criteria or initial HRM diagnoses predicted progression to achalasia or major motility disorder on binary logistic regression analysis. Conclusions In most patients, repeat manometry did not change the manometric diagnosis. Patients with DES were significantly likely to have their diagnosis change with repeat HRM, and most of these patients had normalization of their HRM. Manometric parameters in IEM appear to improve over time. This finding could reflect interval therapy, or shed some light on the natural history of this disease. Funding Agencies None

A133 DEVELOPMENT OF TYPE 3 ACHALASIA WITH DISTANT PANCREATIC MALIGNANCY

Abstract Background Pseudoachalasia is often caused by malignant involvement at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) leading to dysphagia. Aims We describe a case of type 3 achalasia presenting in a woman with metastatic pancreatic cancer with no direct involvement at the GEJ, fundus or cardia. Methods A case report and literature review were performed. Results A 53-year-old woman presented with a 2-month-history of progressive abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting with a 30-pound weight loss. She had a remote history of breast cancer in remission after surgery and chemoradiation. On presentation, she denied chest pain, reflux, dysphagia or odynophagia. Abdominal exam revealed focal epigastric tenderness and jaundice. Abdominal CT showed a 6.7 x 5.8 cm conglomerate mass involving the hepatic hilum, pancreatic head, duodenum, common bile duct, and portal vein with gastric outlet and biliary obstruction. This mass was confirmed to be a pancreatic adenocarcinoma on pathology. She then underwent nasogastric tube decompression. Initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) confirmed a stenotic area at the distal duodenal cap. A duodenal stent and common bile duct stent were placed during a second EGD. The esophagus and GEJ were unremarkable on both endoscopic exams. She was started on chemotherapy with gemcitabine and abraxane. Two weeks after her stent placement, she rapidly developed severe retrosternal squeezing discomfort and choking occurring with swallowing. CT chest and abdomen were negative for any intrathoracic and diaphragmatic involvement with stability of the mass. A barium swallow study demonstrated tertiary contractions in the thoracic esophagus with marshmallow hold-up in the distal esophagus. She then underwent a high-resolution esophageal manometry study that demonstrated an elevation of integrated residual pressure (IRP) of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and absence of peristalsis, with the distal 2/3rds of the esophagus showing a simultaneous and prolonged pressure front consistent with type 3 achalasia, Chicago classification v3.0 [Figure 1]. All contractions had a distal contractile integral (DCI) of &amp;gt;8000 mmHg-cm-s. She experienced significant symptom improvement with pinaverium bromide, a gut-specific calcium channel antagonist. A review of the literature revealed that there have been 4 English-language cases published on pseudoachalasia associated with pancreatic cancer, with all cases describing direct infiltration of pancreatic cancer in the GEJ, cardia or fundus with manometric features of type I achalasia. Conclusions We report the first case of type 3 achalasia with no evidence of direct malignant infiltration at the GEJ on radiographic and endoscopic evaluations. Possible mechanisms to explain this phenomenon include paraneoplastic antibody-mediated impairment of enteric neurons that decrease nitric oxide availability, or microscopic disease involvement at the GEJ. Funding Agencies None

413 Assessment of Procedural Performance and Compliance With Standardized Interpretation of High Resolution Esophageal Manometry Studies Post-Quality Improvement Initiative at a Large Community Hospital

INTRODUCTION: Accurate performance of esophageal manometry (EM) is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal motility disorders. The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS) proposed minimal quality measures (QMs) for performance and interpretation of EM in 2017. Many community practices are not adhering to standardized guidelines. We previously assessed the compliance to ANMS QMs in terms of procedural performance guidelines and adherence to the Chicago Classification Guidelines for interpretation of studies (Seminara et al (1)). Our aim now is to present our post-quality improvement (QI) initiative results with respect to performance and interpretation of the EMs. METHODS: Motility Nurses were sent to the ANMS Clinical training course with additional weekly training by a GI motility physician with review of standard protocols. A procedural checklist was established and implemented for all subsequent EMs. GI physicians were provided detailed data with articles and books regarding utilizing the Chicago Classification for interpretation of EM results but did not receive 1:1 formal training. Twenty-seven EM studies conducted between January to March 2019 were reviewed since the training. Three main procedural QMs were assessed for compliance: 30 second swallows, 10 attempted wet swallows, and at least 7 evaluable swallows with solids swallows. All 27 studies previously interpreted by community GIs were reread by a motility expert and assessed for: correct diagnosis, missing items based on the Chicago Classification, treatment / referral plan, and the appropriateness of surgery referral. RESULTS: In all three procedural QMs, nursing compliance improved to 100% post QI initiative (n = 27) (see Table 1). For the interpretation segment: 78% (n = 21/27) made an incorrect diagnosis, 92% (25/27) had at least one missing item, 26% (7/27) had no treatment plan, 26% (7/27) were referred to surgery 3 of which was for an incorrect diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This QI initiative effectively increased compliance by nursing staff performing EM up to 100% as assessed by the ANMS validated procedural QMs. However, our study revealed poor data interpretation by physicians despite adequate performance of EMs resulting in a high degree of incorrect diagnoses and possibly treatments. Future QI initiatives should focus on formally improving physician education on the interpretation to increase diagnostic accuracy.

378 Resting Upper Esophageal Sphincter Pressure Is Elevated in Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Chronic Cough Patients and May Be a Marker for Laryngeal Hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION: Chronic cough is difficult to treat when unresponsive to proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and sinus therapy. In this setting it is presumed to be neurogenic in etiology. Despite the role of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) as a barrier to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease, it has not been well characterized in chronic cough patients. We aim to assess UES tonicity in patients with PPI-refractory chronic cough and otherwise intact esophageal motor function. METHODS: Patients with a Chicago Classification diagnosis of normal esophageal motility on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) on studies performed for the indication of chronic cough were retrospectively studied. All studies were performed at a GI motility lab at a tertiary care center from January 2013 to August 2018. Patients with prior cervical spinal surgery, foregut surgery, gastroparesis, severe pulmonary disease or manometric hiatal hernia were excluded. All HRM were performed with a solid-state assembly with a 4.2 mm outer diameter catheter. Upper esophageal resting pressure and residual pressure (mmHg) were recorded from HRM studies and compared to a control group of patients with normal esophageal motility on studies performed for an indication of non-cardiac chest pain. Available pH-metry tests in chronic cough patients were also reviewed for acid exposure time. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with chronic cough (mean age 63 ± 25, 71% female) and twenty patients with non-cardiac chest pain (mean age 55 ± 14, 60% female) were included. Median resting UES pressure (mmHg) was higher in the chronic cough group (80) vs the chest pain group (50.8) with a p value of 0.004 (Figure 1). There was no difference in residual UES pressure (3.5 in chronic cough vs 3.15 in chest pain). A total of 12 pH studies were performed in chronic cough patients; 9 of these were on PPI. Median distal acid exposure time % was 1.35 [IQR 0.5-6]. CONCLUSION: UES hypertonicity found in PPI-refractory chronic cough patients may be a marker of laryngeal hypersensitivity. A second possibility is that primary UES dysfunction is the cause of cough in this subgroup.

Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Study of the Esophagogastric Junction in Patients with Achalasia.

A novel three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry provides a dynamic 360° representation of the pressure at the esophagogastric junction. To describe the three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry patterns of achalasia. We retrospectively included all consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry before and after treatment (pneumatic dilatation or per-oral endoscopic myotomy) for achalasia between November 2016 and July 2017. The distribution of the pressures at the esophagogastric junction on three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry was determined. Eighteen patients were included. Mean integrated relaxation pressure was 20.7mmHg, and median (range) Eckardt score was 7 (4-10). Nine patients were treated by pneumatic dilatation and seven by myotomy. Nine patients underwent three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry after treatment. Before treatment, the esophagogastric junction pressure distribution was best observed at end expiration and during the 4s of the integrated relaxation pressure measurement. During the integrated relaxation pressure, the lower esophageal sphincter was asymmetric in 12 patients with a high-pressure zone between the left and the posterior side of the esophagogastric junction. After treatment, five patients had a residual high-pressure point on the left or the posterior side of the esophagogastric junction. Three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry allows a simple assessment of the pressure topography at the EGJ. In patients with achalasia, we found the esophagogastric junction pressure to be asymmetric with a peak pressure on the greater curvature side. Three-dimensional high-resolution esophageal manometry has the potential to guide initial and redo treatments.

High-resolution Esophageal Manometry Patterns in Children and Adolescents With Rumination Syndrome

Rumination is defined by effortless regurgitation within seconds or minutes of ingested food. The aim of this study was to determine the high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) pattern in children with rumination syndrome. HREM was evaluated in 15 pediatric patients with rumination syndrome according to the Rome criteria and compared with 15 controls. Primary rumination was defined as a clinical rumination episode associated with a rise of gastric pressure above 30 mmHg. Secondary rumination was defined as a clinical rumination episode associated with a rise of gastric pressure above 30 mmHg during a transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR). Ninety-two episodes of rumination were demonstrated during HREM study in 12 of the 15 patients (80%; 1-29 episodes per patient; median intragastric pressure 49.6 mmHg). Primary rumination occurred in 3 patients and secondary rumination in 5 patients. One patient had primary and secondary rumination episodes. In 3 patients, classification of rumination episodes was not possible due to repetitive swallowing leading to lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. In the control group, no episodes of rumination occurred. The sensitivity and the specificity of the HREM study (association of a clinical rumination episode with a rise in gastric pressure >30 mmHg) to confirm the diagnosis of rumination were 80% and 100%, respectively. HREM allows confirming diagnosis of rumination syndrome and to differentiate between primary and secondary rumination in the presence of objective rumination episodes. Further research is needed to study whether HREM results may influence treatment and outcome of children with rumination syndrome.

Spectrum of esophageal dysmotility in systemic sclerosis on high-resolution esophageal manometry as defined by Chicago classification.

The classic manometric findings in systemic sclerosis are aperistalsis of the esophageal body with hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter. These changes contribute to gastroesophageal reflux disease in these patients. With widespread use of high-resolution esophageal manometry, diverse abnormalities are seen. The aim of this study is to characterize esophageal dysmotility in patients with systemic sclerosis undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry and compare demographic features and diagnostic test results among patients with varying degrees of esophageal dysmotility. Patients with systemic sclerosis who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry between January 2008 and October 2014 at our institution were identified. High-resolution esophageal manometry studies were reinterpreted using the Chicago Classification, v3.0 criteria. We also reviewed the patient charts for demographic data, indications for manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, pH studies, medication use, and autoantibody panel. The cohort consisted of 122 patients with a mean age of 53.3±15.3 years. High-resolution esophageal manometry was normal in 23, showed ineffective esophageal motility in 22, absent contractility in 73, and one case each of type II achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, hypercontractile esophagus, and distal esophageal spasm. Patients with absent contractility were younger and more likely to have erosive esophagitis, hiatal hernia, and esophageal strictures than patients with ineffective esophageal motility or normal manometry. There were no statistically significant differences in the groups based on autoantibodies or indications for manometry. Diverse esophageal motility abnormalities were noted in systemic sclerosis with ineffective esophageal motility or absent contractility observed in over three-fourth of the patients. Patients with absent contractility were younger and had more severe reflux. The severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease related endoscopic findings correlated with the degree of esophageal dysmotility on high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Difference of achalasia subtypes based on clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and stasis scores

IntroductionThree subtypes of achalasia have been defined through high-resolution esophageal manometry: subtype i shows no pressurization with swallows, subtype ii has increased isobaric panesophageal pressure, and subtype iii has distal esophageal spastic non-isobaric contractions. Studies describing the subtypes based on radiographic findings, clinical symptoms, and stasis scores are limited. AimTo determine the differences in clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and stasis scores for the 3 achalasia subtypes. MethodsPatients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry received a questionnaire about current symptoms and previous treatments. The questions included the presence of symptoms and their severity. Barium swallow tests were performed before the high-resolution esophageal manometry study to evaluate the maximum esophageal diameter. Stasis scores were calculated using the transit patterns on high-resolution esophageal manometry. ResultsOne hundred and eight patients with high-resolution esophageal manometry diagnosis of achalasia (n=8, subtype i; n=84, subtype ii; n=16, subtype iii) within the time frame of 1/2012-6/2015 were included in the study. Sex distribution was similar between the subtypes. Patient age was younger for subtype i (38±16 years), compared with subtypes ii (55±17 years) and iii (63±17 years) (P=.03). Esophageal symptoms did not differ between subtypes regarding the severity of nausea, chest pain, coughing, and heartburn, except for increased vomiting severity in subtype i (2.8±1.4 vs. 1.4±1.4 vs. 1.2±1.2, P<.01). A significant radiographic difference in esophageal dilation was seen between subtypes ii and iii (35.1±14.4 vs. 24.0±7.2mm, P=.023). Stasis scores did not significantly differ between the subtypes. ConclusionsAchalasia subtypes had similar clinical symptoms, except for increased vomiting severity in subtype i. The maximum esophageal diameter in subtype ii was significantly greater than in subtype iii. Esophageal stasis scores were similar. Thus, high-resolution esophageal manometry remains essential in assessing achalasia subtypes.

Trends in Diagnoses After Implementation of the Chicago Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders (V3.0) for High-Resolution Manometry Studies at a Large Academic Medical Center

Introduction: High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is considered the gold standard diagnostic test for esophageal motility disorders. The Chicago Classification (CC V3.0) is a hierarchical approach to interpret HRM studies and defines metrics for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The real world clinical practice impact of using CC V3.0 is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic distribution of esophageal motility disorders before and after implementation of CC V3.0 for HRM interpretation.Table 2: Rate Ratios for Diagnoses associated with Implementation of Chicago Classification V3.0 (09/01/2014)Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with a HRM study conducted at a single center from January 1, 2013 through September 30, 2015. The implementation of CC V3.0 occurred in September 2014 and was fully adopted by December 2014. Patient charts were reviewed to extract demographics (age, sex), clinical variables (symptoms, indications), and HRM variables (esophageal pressure topography metrics, diagnoses and interpretation). If a diagnosis was not clearly stated, it was categorized as indeterminate. Rate ratios (RR) for CC V3.0 diagnostic categories (normal, indeterminate, achalasia and EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and major and minor motility disorders) were calculated by Poisson regression associated with the period after CC V 3.0 implementation. All models were adjusted for age and sex, and the reference time period was quarter 1 (Jan-Mar 2013). Results: There were 796 HRM studies included in the study. The mean ± standard deviation patient age was 53.4 ±15.5 years, with 59% being female (Table 1). The graphical trends in diagnoses over time are shown in Figure 1. The percentage of indeterminate and major motility disorder diagnoses was significantly lower in the time period after CC V 3.0 implementation. The percentage of normal, EGJOO, and minor motility disorder diagnoses were significantly higher post implementation. There was no change in the % of achalasia diagnoses.Figure 1Table 1: Characteristics of the study population overall, and by time periods before and after Chicago Classification V3.0 policy implementation on 09/01/2014Conclusion: This is one of the first studies showing the impact of CC V3.0 on HRM interpretation in clinical practice. The increase in the number of normal studies and decrease in the number of indeterminate studies suggests that CC V3.0 clarifies the criteria for a normal study. The increase in studies with a diagnosis of EGJ outflow obstruction may reflect the heterogeneity of disorders with clinically relevant outflow obstruction. Further study is needed to determine if these results translate to changes in therapeutic decision making and treatment outcomes.