The assessment of wind energy resources is critical for the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy sources. Using the outputs from high-resolution global climate models (GCMs), such as the High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), has become one of the most important tools in wind energy research. This study evaluated the reliability of the 22 GCMs available in the HighResMIP-PRIMAVERA project by simulating the wind energy climatology and variability over the Tibetan Plateau (TP) with reference to observations and investigated the differences in performance of the GCMs between high-resolution (HR) and low-resolution (LR) simulations. The results show that most models performed relatively well in simulating the probability distribution of the observed wind speed over the TP, but nearly half of the models generally underestimated the wind speed, whereas the others tended to overestimated the wind speed. Compared with the wind speed, the GCMs showed larger biases in reproducing the wind power density (WPD) and other wind energy resources, whereas the biases in multi-model ensembles were relatively smaller than those in most individual models. With respect to interannual variability, both the HR and LR models failed to capture interannual variations in WPD over the TP. Furthermore, more than half of the HR GCMs had a reduced bias relative to the corresponding LR GCMs, indicating the good performance of most HR models in simulating wind energy resources over the TP in terms of spatial pattern and temporal variability. However, the overall performance of HR GCMs varied among models, which suggests that solely improving the horizontal resolution is not sufficient to completely solve the uncertainties and deficiencies in the simulation of wind energy over complex terrain.
Read full abstract