PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of a high load and intensity experimental physical training regimen to improve recruit performance within the Australian Army. METHODS: Military recruits were assigned to either a 12-week Experimental (EXP n = 68, 21.7 ± 4.2 y), Military (MIL n = 60, 21.1 ± 4.1 y) or civilians act as a control group (CON n = 11, 25.5 ± 4.5 y) and were assessed at Weeks 1, 6 and 12, in military tests for 3.2 km 22 kg load carriage, 1RM 1.5m box lift, 20 m multistage fitness test and 2 min push-up test. A random sub-sample of recruits (EXP n = 33; MIL n = 38) also performed physiological tests (DEXA, V [Combining Dot Above]O2peak, 1RM squat and bench press, vertical jump and 30 s Wingate). Total training time (41 hours) and frequency (41) was match between EXP and MIL. However, compared to MIL the EXP had 50% lower physical activity count (triaxial accelerometer), but higher heart rate reserve (heart rate monitor, EXP >70%, MIL 15RM). Significant interactions (P<0.05) are reported as the mean change between Weeks 1 and 12, ± SD. RESULTS: No changes were observed for CON. EXP significantly reduced total body fat (EXP -2.7 ± 2.2 kg, MIL -1.7 ± 2.2 kg) whilst total lean mass was observed to increase in both groups (EXP 2.1 ± 1.9 kg, MIL 2.4 ± 2.2 kg). EXP showed superior improvement in load carriage time (EXP -155.1 ± 122.4 s, MIL -104.1 ± 123.6 s), 1RM box lift (EXP 4.8 ± 6.0 kg, MIL 1.0 ± 5.5 kg), 20 m multistage fitness test (EXP 5.3 ± 4.1 mL.kg-1.min-1, MIL 3.4 ± 4.0 mL.kg-1.min-1), 2-min push-up (EXP 10.8 ± 7.1 reps, MIL 8.0 ± 7.4 reps), 1RM bench press (EXP 18.0 ± 6.7 kg, MIL 9.2 ± 18.6 kg), 1RM squat (EXP 27.8 ± 10.5 kg, MIL -6.1 ± 27.6 kg) and V [Combining Dot Above]O2peak (EXP 2.7 ± 4.1 mL.kg-1.min-1, MIL -1.2 ± 6.3 mL.kg-1.min-1). MIL had a significantly greater decline in vertical jump power (EXP -36.8 ± 128.7 W, MIL -72.1 ± 139.4 W). In contrast, 30 s mean power declined in both groups after training (EXP -24.5 ± 53.7 W, MIL -25.0 ± 107.7 W). CONCLUSION: Despite a significant reduction in training volume, recruit performance in basic military, occupational and physiological tests of physical fitness were superior. Our results suggest that high resistance training loads and exercise endurance intensity can be successfully implemented within a mass military recruit training environment. Supported by a UOW/DST Group doctoral scholarship
Read full abstract