Manning et al. [1] investigated the effect of differences in age between human parents and the sex ratio of their offspring. They found that when men were older than their partners by 5 years or more, predominantly more male children were born. It has been suggested that older males and dominant males possess more re-sources and can pass these onto their sons and thereby enhance the transference of their genes into future generations [2]. Recently, Faust and Powell [3] demonstrated that, in primates, birth sex ratios in zoos are biased towards the dispersing sex (i.e., the sex with the greatest variation in reproductive success). Factors also known to have an effect on sex ratio in mam-mals are: (1) animals on a high plane of nutrition are predicted to produce more male than female offspring; (2) animals in good physical condition are predicted to pro-duce more male than female offspring; (3) animals of high social status are predicted to produce more male offspring; (4) higher population density results in more male offspring, and (5) a low level of stress results in more male offspring [4]. Manning et al.’s [1] study has been criticised by a number of authors [5–7] – principally concerning the small sample size and large number of uncontrolled vari-ables (e.g., social class and physical condition). Principally, we were interested in whether the parental age gap had an influence on birth sex ratio in a non-human primate species, the golden lion tamarin
Read full abstract