Earlier work (Paul, T., et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 4129-4135) has demonstrated that the water soluble positively charged peroxyl radical, (H(2)N)(2)(+)CC(CH(3))(2)OO(*) ((+)AOO(*)), caused direct strand scission of the Escherichia coli plasmid supercoiled DNA, pBR 322, with ca. 50% scission occurring at a (+)AOO(*)/base pair (bp) ratio of 0.2. There was no measurable direct scission with a negatively charged peroxyl ((-)BOO(*)) at (-)BOO(*)/bp = 24, nor with a neutral peroxyl (COO(*)) at COO(*)/bp = 5. Base modification (BM) of the same DNA by the same peroxyls has now been investigated using four base excision repair (BER) glycosylases. At (+)AOO(*)/bp = 0.04, there is 10% direct strand scission, and the Fpg protein recognized an additional 25% BM, while endonuclease (Endo) IV recognized an additional 20% BM and the other two BER enzymes did not give statistically significant BMs. None of the BER enzymes showed BMs in the DNA treated with -BOO(*). However, Fpg and Endo IV showed that at COO(*)/bp = 3.4 there was a BM comparable to that observed at (+)AOO(*)/bp = 0.04. Thus, COO(*) radicals are only ca. 1.2% as reactive toward the DNA's bases as (+)AOO(*). These results underline the importance of Coulombic forces in DNA reactions. It is also proposed that (+)AOO(*) has a higher intrinsic reactivity in H-atom abstractions and electron transfer processes than (-)BOO(*) or COO(*) radicals.