BackgroundCystic Fibrosis has historically been described as a disease that affects people of European ancestry. Consequently, much of what we know about CF is based on evidence generated from data collected in white individuals. This may lead to systematic bias in how non-white people with CF are diagnosed and treated. In this study we compared clinical outcomes between the white and non-white people with CF in Canada. MethodsCanadian CF Registry data collected between 2000 and 2019 were used in this population-based cohort study. Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of people with CF identified as white and those identified as non-white were compared. Analyses were adjusted for cohort effects but not socioeconomic status. ResultsBetween 2000 and 2019, 5516 people with CF in the Registry were identified as white and 323 were identified as non-white. At diagnosis, the white and non-white groups were similar with respect to sex at birth, age at diagnosis, prevalence of pancreatic insufficiency, and meconium ileus. The non-white group had similar rates of CF-related complications and bacterial infections compared to the white, but worse lung function, worse nutritional status, lower treatment rates, and higher rate of hospitalizations. During the 20-year study period, the non-white group had a 1.85 higher risk of death compared to the white group (HR 95 %CI 1.39; 2.47). InterpretationThere is an urgent need understand why outcomes for Canadians with CF differ between white and non-white individuals, including the role of socioeconomic circumstances.
Read full abstract