66,000 cholecystectomies are performed annually in the UK. Nationwide, all gallbladders are routinely sent for histological analysis to exclude incidental malignancy. This comes at significant cost to an overstretched National Health Service. This study set out to assess the utility of routine histopathological analysis following cholecystectomy. We performed a large, single-centre, retrospective analysis of all gallbladder specimens examined between February 2013 and December 2016 at our district general hospital. Specimens obtained in elective and emergency cases, through laparoscopic or open surgery, were included. A total of 752 gallbladder specimens were analysed. The mean age at the time of resection was 51 years, and the female:male ratio was 2.8:1. Seven (0.93%) specimens were reported to show suspicious histopathological features; epithelial atypia (1), low-grade epithelial dysplasia (2), high-grade epithelial dysplasia (1), papillary adenoma (1), MALT lymphoma (1) and invasive adenocarcinoma (1). In all seven cases, there was no clinical suspicion of gallbladder malignancy prior to surgery or suspicious pre-operative ultrasound scan findings. Gross macroscopic changes were noted at the time of resection in three cases. Four patients required further investigation and subsequent follow-up. All specimens deemed to be suspicious derived from patients over 50 years of age at the time of resection. Pre-operative investigations and macroscopic appearance at cholecystectomy may be inadequate in identifying patients with clinically important pathology. Routine histological analysis allows early identification. However, further work will assess whether more selective requests may help achieve the balance between cost-saving and safety in the context of a resource-limited healthcare service.