High-flow Nasal Cannula Research Articles

Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula for Non-Invasive Primary Respiratory Support in Neonates: Experience of a Referral Neonatal Level III Facility in South-South Nigeria

Background: Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is an increasingly used tool for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in neonates and children needing advanced respiratory support.1 In neonates, common indications for HHHFNC therapy include: respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), post extubation from mechanical ventilation; and other causes of respiratory distress. Its use in Nigeria is not widespread. The aim of this study is to assess the indications, clinical characteristics, outcome and determinants of the successful use of HHHFNC for providing primary respiratory support for neonates referred and needing NIV in a Level III NICU in Nigeria. Methods: This was a retrospective study. All neonates in this study were referred to our facility, Med-Vical Medical Centre, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria and received HHHFNC for primary respiratory support. Results: The highest indication for primary use of HHHFNC for neonates was respiratory distress syndrome (50.0%). The success rate of HHHFNC in this study was high (70.0%). Although not statistically significant, a higher proportion of neonates in the failure group weighed less than 1kg, while in the successful group, a higher proportion was delivered after 28 weeks. All infants who stayed longer than 7days on admission belonged to the successful group, and none failed HHHFNC therapy. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.011). In conclusion, this study revealed that the success rate of HHHFNC therapy as primary respiratory support in neonates with respiratory distress is high (70.0%), thus it can be used confidently in neonates needing NIV. Length of hospital stay was the only significant factor associated with the successful use of HHHFNC as primary respiratory support.

Monitoring and modulation of respiratory drive in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in spontaneous breathing.

Non-invasive respiratory support, namely, non-invasive ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, and high-flow nasal cannula, has been increasingly used worldwide to treat acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, giving the benefits of keeping spontaneous breathing preserved. In this scenario, monitoring and controlling respiratory drive could be helpful to avoid patient self-inflicted lung injury and promptly identify those patients that require an upgrade to invasive mechanical ventilation. In this review, we first describe the physiological components affecting respiratory drive to outline the risks associated with its hyperactivation. Further, we analyze and compare the leading strategies implemented for respiratory drive monitoring and discuss the sedative drugs and the non-pharmacological approaches used to modulate respiratory drive during non-invasive respiratory support. Refining the available techniques and rethinking our therapeutic and monitoring targets can help critical care physicians develop a personalized and minimally invasive approach.

Effect of high-flow nasal and buccal oxygenation on safe apnea time in children with open mouth: A randomized controlled trial.

High-flow nasal oxygenation is reported to prolong duration of apnea while maintaining adequate oxygen saturation with the mouth closed. Also, buccal oxygenation is known to have similar effects in obese adults. We compared the effect of these two methods on prolongation of acceptable apnea time in pediatric patients with their mouth open. Thirty-eight patients, aged 0-10 years were randomly allocated to either the high-flow nasal oxygenation group (n = 17) or the buccal oxygenation group (n = 21). After induction of anesthesia including neuromuscular blockade, manual ventilation was initiated until the expiratory oxygen concentration reached 90%. Subsequently, ventilation was paused, and the patient's head was extended, and mouth was opened. The HFNO group received 2 L·min-1·kg-1 of oxygen, and the BO group received 0.5 L·min-1·kg-1 of oxygen. We set a target apnea time according to previous literature. When the apnea time reached the target, we defined the case as "success" in prolongation of safe apnea time and resumed ventilation. When the pulse oximetry decreased to 92% before the target apnea time, it was recorded as "failure" and rescue ventilation was given. The success rate of safe apnea prolongation was 100% in the high-flow nasal oxygenation group compared to 76% in the buccal oxygenation group (p = .04). Oxygen reserve index, end-tidal or transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure, and pulse oximetry did not differ between groups. High-flow nasal oxygenation is effective in maintaining appropriate arterial oxygen saturation during apnea even in children with their mouth open and is superior to buccal oxygenation. Buccal oxygenation may be a good alternative when high-flow nasal oxygenation is not available.

Predictors of high-flow nasal cannula failure in COVID-19 patients in a northern Peruvian hospital

ObjectivesTo determine predictors of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in COVID-19 patients in a hospital in northern Peru.MethodologyA retrospective cohort study was conducted during the months of March and May 2021. Data collection was based on a follow-up of 156 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who were users of HFNC. Epidemiological factors and clinical outcomes of treatment were analyzed from medical records. Epidemiological, analytical, and HFNC use-related characteristics were described using measures of absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency, and dispersion. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis with robust variance and a 95% confidence interval was performed.ResultsWe found that age, SpO2/FiO2, work of breathing (WOB scale) at admission, degree of involvement, type of infiltrate on CT scan, lymphocytes, c-reactive protein, and D-dimer were significantly associated with failure of HFNC (p < 0.05). In addition, the WOB scale, PaO2/FiO2, SaO2/FiO2, and ROX index were variables that presented statistical significance (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis model, a risk of failure of HFNC was determined with age > = 60 years [RRa 1.39 (1.05–1.85)] and PaO2/FiO2 score less than 100 [Rra 1.65 (0.99–2.76)].ConclusionsPredictors to failure of HFNC are age older than 60 years and minimally significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 than 100.

Post-COVID Interstitial Lung Disease: How do We Deal with This New Entity?

In the postacute phase of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), survivors may have persistent symptoms, lung function abnormalities, and sequelae lesions on thoracic computed tomography (CT). This new entity has been defined as post-COVID interstitial lung disease (ILD) or residual disease. To evaluate the characteristics, risk factors and clinical significance of post-COVID ILD. Multicenter cross-sectional analysis of data from a randomized clinical study. In this study, patients with persistent respiratory symptoms 3 months after recovery from COVID-19 were evaluated by two pulmonologists and a radiologist. post-COVID ILD was defined as the presence of respiratory symptoms, hypoxemia, restrictive defect on lung function tests, and interstitial changes on follow-up high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). At the three-month follow-up, 375 patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome were evaluated, and 262 patients were found to have post-COVID ILD. The most prevalent complaints were dyspnea (n = 238, 90.8%), exercise intolerance (n = 166, 63.4%), fatigue (n = 142, 54.2%), and cough (n = 136, 52%). The mean Medical Research Council dyspnea score was 2.1 ± 0.9, oxygen saturation was 92.2 ± 5.9%, and 6-minute walking distance was 360 ± 140 meters. The mean diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 58 ± 21, and the forced vital capacity was 70% ± 19%. Ground glass opacities and fibrotic bands were the most common findings on thoracic HRCT. Fibrosis-like lesions such as interlobular septal thickening and traction bronchiectasis were observed in 38.3% and 27.9% of the patients, respectively. No honeycomb cysts were observed. Active smoking [odds ratio (OR), 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-2.67), intensive care unit admission during the acute phase (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.1-1.95), need for high-flow nasal oxygen (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.42-1.9) or non-invasive ventilation (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.8-2.07), and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels (OR, 1.23; 95% CI 1.18-1.28) were associated with the development of post-COVID ILD. At the 6-month follow-up, the respiratory symptoms and pulmonary functions had improved spontaneously without any specific treatment in 35 patients (13.4%). The radiological interstitial lesions had spontaneously regressed in 54 patients (20.6%). The co-existence of respiratory symptoms, radiological parenchymal lesions, and pulmonary functional abnormalities which suggest a restrictive ventilatory defect should be defined as post-COVID-19 ILD. However, the term “fibrosis” should be used carefully. Active smoking, severe COVID-19, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase level are the main risk factors of this condition. These post-COVID functional and radiological changes could disappear over time in 20% of the patients.

The effect of decoupling humidity control on aerosol drug delivery during HFNC for infants.

Aerosol therapy is commonly used during treatment with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Heated humidification inside the HFNC tubing circuit leads to unwanted condensation, which may greatly limit the efficiency of drug delivery. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether a novel humidification system, which decouples temperature and humidity control, can improve the delivered dose. In a bench study setup, fluorescein sodium solution was nebulized using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer in an infant HFNC circuit to measure the delivered dose, with a conventional versus a novel decoupled humidifier. The deposition of fluorescein inside each breathing circuit component and a final collection filter at the end of the nasal cannula was collected and quantified with a UV-vis spectrometer. Droplet sizes at different sections of the breathing circuit were measured by laser diffraction. Three air flow rates: 5, 10 and 15 L/min, and two nebulizer positions: (1) at the humidifier and (2) after the inspiratory tube, were tested. The delivered dose decreased with increasing flow rate for the conventional setup and was higher when the nebulizer was placed after the inspiratory tube. Turning off the conventional humidifier 10 minutes before and during nebulization did not improve the delivered dose. The decoupled humidifier achieved a significantly higher (p = .002) delivered dose than the conventional setup. The highest delivered dose obtained by the decoupled humidifier was 62.4% when the nebulizer was placed after the humidifier, while the highest dose obtained for the conventional humidifier was 36.3% by placing the nebulizer after the inspiratory tube. In this bench study, we found that the delivered dose for an infant HFNC nebulization setup could be improved significantly by decoupling temperature and humidity control inside the HFNC circuit, as it reduced drug deposition inside the breathing circuit.

2023 Year in Review: Home Oxygen Therapy.

Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is a treatment that involves the provision of supplemental oxygen to individuals with respiratory disease to correct hypoxemia in the post-acute care environment. Over 1.5 million adults in the United States use supplemental oxygen for various respiratory disorders. This paper explores literature published on LTOT from September 2022-September 2023. Upon the conclusion of this literature review, 4 distinct categories emerged. This paper highlights the significant findings associated with the 4 categories: supplemental oxygen and COVID-19, telemonitoring, LTOT equipment, and in-home high-flow nasal cannula.

Physiological effects of high-flow nasal cannula during sustained high-intensity exercise in healthy volunteers: a randomised crossover trial

IntroductionHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has increased exercise capacity in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. However, it remains unknown whether HFNC impacts respiratory physiological variables during exercise. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of HFNC on respiratory physiological variables during sustained high-intensity exercise in healthy volunteers.MethodsWe performed a single-center, open-label, and randomised crossover trial to compare HFNC (60 L·min−1) and Sham-HFNC (2 L·min−1) interventions during a constant work-rate exercise (CWRET) through randomised order. The primary outcome was ΔPes, and the secondary outcomes were other variables of inspiratory effort, ventilation distribution, ventilatory variables, and clinical assessment. We evaluated volunteers at seven-time points (Baseline= T0; CWRET= T1-T2-T3 (minutes: 1′, 4′ and 6′); Cooldown-period= T4-T5-T6 (minutes: 1′; 6′;10′)) in both interventions.ResultsFourteen healthy volunteers (50% women; age: 22 [21–27] years) were enrolled. Mean differences in ΔPes decreased to favor the HFNC intervention compared to Sham-HFNC at T2 (−2.8 cmH2O; 95%CI −5.3 to −0.3), as well as the sPTPmin at T2 (−86.1 cmH2O×s·min−1;95%CI −146.2 to −26.1), and T3 (−79.9 cmH2O×s·min−1;95%CI −142.3 to −17.6). The standard deviation of the regional ventilation delay index was also lower with HFNC compared to Sham-HFNC (T1: −1.38; 95%CI −1.93 to −0.83; T2: −0.71; 95%CI −1.27 to −0.16). There was decreased dyspnea to favor the HFNC, but sPTP-per-breath, spatial distribution ventilation indexes, ventilatory variables, and clinical assessments were nonsignificant between interventions.ConclusionHFNC intervention reduces respiratory effort, dyspnea and improves temporal ventilation distribution in healthy volunteers during CWRET.

Survival analysis of COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care for acute respiratory distress syndrome: An observational retrospective study.

This study analyzed clinical factors impacting the survival of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress síndrome, or ARDS (CARDS) to ICU compared to non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. Clinical variables from 1,008 CARDS cases and 332 ARDS cases were computed using learning algorithms. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models with the enter method evaluated risk factors and ICU mortality relationships. The survival analysis was completed with Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank tests. A Random Forest model revealed that mechanical ventilation-related factors, oxygenation, blood pH, superinfection, shock, and ICU length of stay have the greatest effects on ICU survival. According to a multivariate Cox model, reintubation and a high-flow nasal cannula were essential for survival in CARDS patients during the ICU stay. The length of stay in the ICU diminishes in patients older than 45 years, regardless of the source of ARDS. This study gives recommendations for the respiratory care of ARDS in COVID-19 patients.

Nutrition intake, muscle thickness, and recovery outcomes for critically ill patients requiring non-invasive forms of respiratory support: A prospective observational study

BackgroundUse of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing, yet reporting of nutrition intake, muscle thickness, or recovery outcomes in this population is limited. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to quantify muscle thickness, nutrition intake, and functional recovery outcomes for patients receiving HFNC/NIV within the ICU. MethodsA single-centre, prospective, observational study in adult ICU patients recruited within 48 hrs of commencing HFNC/NIV. Change in quadriceps muscle layer thickness using ultrasound (primary outcome) and 24 hr nutrition intake from study inclusion to day 7 (D7), functional capacity (Barthel Index), and quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension five-level utility index) at D90 were assessed. Data are n (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range], are compared using paired sample t-test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. ResultsPrimary outcome data were available for n = 28/42: 64 ± 13 y, 61% male, body mass index: 29.1 ± 9.0 kg/m2, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score: 17 ± 5. Quadriceps muscle layer thickness reduced from 2.41 ± 0.87 to 2.12 ± 0.73 cm; mean difference: −0.29 cm (95% confidence interval: -0.44, −0.13). Nutrition intake increased from study inclusion to D7: 1735 ± 1283 to 5448 ± 2858 kJ and 17.4 ± 16.6 to 60.9 ± 36.8g protein. Barthel Index was 87 ± 20 at baseline and 91 ± 15 at D90 (out of 100). Quality of life was impaired at D90: 0.64 ± 0.23 (health = 1.0). ConclusionCritically ill patients receiving HFNC/NIV experienced muscle loss and impaired quality of life.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure related to suspected or confirmed acute heart failure: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

The objective of this review is to compare high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen (High flow oxygen) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the management of acute respiratory failure secondary to suspected or confirmed acute heart failure (AHF). A comprehensive and relevant literature search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted using Medical Subject Heading and Free text terms from January 2010 to March 2024. All randomized clinical trials and observational retrospective and prospective studies reporting adult patients with acute respiratory failure due to suspected or confirmed AHF and comparing HFNC to NIV were included. Primary outcome included treatment failure, as a composite outcome including early termination to the allocated treatment, need for in-hospital intubation or mortality, or the definition used in the study for treatment failure if adequate. Secondary outcomes included change in respiratory rate and dyspnea intensity after treatment initiation, patient comfort, invasive mechanical ventilation requirement, and day-30 mortality. Six of the 802 identified studies were selected for final analysis, including 572 patients (221 assigned to high flow and 351 to NIV). Treatment failure rate was 20% and 13% in the high flow oxygen and NIV groups, respectively [estimated odds ratio (OR): 1.7, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.9-3.1] in randomized studies and 34% and 16% in the high flow oxygen and NIV groups, respectively (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 0.7-13.5), in observational studies. Tracheal intubation requirement was 7% and 5% of patients in the HFNC and NIV groups, respectively (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.5-3.5) in randomized studies, and 20% and 9% in the high flow oxygen and NIV group, respectively (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 0.5-9.4) in observational studies. Mortality was 13% and 8% in the high flow oxygen and the NIV groups, respectively (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 0.8-1.1) in randomized studies and 14% and 9% in the high flow oxygen and the NIV groups, respectively (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.5-3.7) in observational studies. Compared with NIV, high flow oxygen was not associated with a higher risk of treatment failure during initial management of patients with acute respiratory failure related to suspected or confirmed AHF.

Evaluating Pressure Variability and Influencing Factors during High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Premature Infants.

Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulas (HHHFNCs) are increasingly used as an alternative strategy for weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in premature infants. However, the optimal pressure provided by HHHFNCs is unknown. This retrospective study investigated the pressure changes and associated factors during HHHFNC therapy in preterm infants. Clinically stable preterm neonates born with a birth weight of 2500 g or less and receiving HHHFNC therapy for weaning from NCPAP were enrolled. The flow of the HHHNFCs was adjusted to achieve an initial pressure equivalent to the positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) of NCPAP. Subsequent pressure changes in the HHHFNCs were measured by a GiO digital pressure gauge. Nine premature infants were enrolled. Their gestational age (mean ± SD) was 28.33 ± 2.61 weeks, and the birth weight was 1102.00 ± 327.53 g. Overall, 437 pressure measurements were conducted. The median pressure of the HHHFNCs was 5 cmH2O. The generated pressure had a significant association with the body weight, postmenstrual age (PMA) and flow rate. A multiple regression model revealed that the measured pressure (cmH2O) = -5.769 + 1.021 × flow rate (L/min) - 0.797 × body weight (kg) + 0.035 × PMA (days) (r2 = 0.37, p < 0.001). The pressure provided by HHHFNCs is influenced by body weight, PMA, and flow rate. It is feasible to set the delivered pressure of HHHFNCs to match the applied PEEP of NCPAP initially, facilitating the weaning of preterm infants from NCPAP to HHHFNCs.

High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy (HFNC) With Different Temperatures in COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: The effect of using high flow oxygen delivery through the nasal cannula (HFNC) in COVID-19 patients has been associated with different results. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different HFNC temperatures in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into three groups under high current oxygenation with temperatures of 31, 34, and 37. Except for the temperature, other device settings were set equally. After 24 hours, clinical conditions were on the agenda and compared with the conditions before the intervention. Results: Fever, sore throat, malaise, diarrhea in patients of 31 degree group and indicators of nausea, cough, body pain, headache have changed the most in 37 degree group. Abdominal pain has shown the greatest change in the 34 degree group. PR, DBP, and SpO2 indices changed the most at 31 degrees and RR and SBP at 37 degrees. PR, RR, SBP and SPO2 indices showed significant values in intra-group comparison, and in inter-group comparison, only PR, RR indices had significant differences. In intra-group analysis, PaCO2, WBC, CRP, ESR and ferritin had significant changes, and in inter-group comparison, none of the indicators had significant differences. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, reducing the temperature in the use of HFNC can improve the clinical conditions of patients with COVID-19.

A Pediatric Bench Model of Continuous Albuterol Delivery Using Heliox.

The optimal setup for continuously administering albuterol with heliox remains unclear, especially for pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of continuous albuterol delivery with heliox using different nebulizer setups in a pediatric model. A pediatric manikin with simulated spontaneous breathing was used to receive continuous albuterol (20 mg/h) with heliox (80/20) in 3 setups: (1) The MiniHEART nebulizer, driven by oxygen at 3 L/min, was attached to a Y-piece, linking to a non-rebreather mask and a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox; (2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) placed at the humidifier inlet of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with 11 L/min heliox and the manikin's mouth sealed; and (3) a VMN placed between a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox and a non-rebreather mask. Both tight-fitting and loose-fitting mask configurations were tested in the setup with vibrating mesh nebulizer and mask. Heliox of 70/30 was tested with a VMN and a loose-fitting mask. Albuterol was delivered continuously to the nebulizer via an infusion pump at 8 mL (20 mg)/h for each 20-min run and each experiment was repeated five times. A collecting filter placed between the manikin's trachea and lung model was removed after each run, and the drug was eluted and assayed via ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm). During continuous albuterol nebulization using heliox, the VMN either in line with HFNC or with a tight-fitting mask achieved the highest and similar inhaled dose (8.5 ± 0.4 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, P = .35), while the MiniHEART nebulizer yielded the lowest aerosol deposition (1.5 ± 0.2%). The inhaled dose was lower with the loose-fitting mask than with the tight-fitting mask (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, P=.009), and heliox of 80/20 delivered a higher inhaled dose than heliox of 70/30 (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 0.4%, P=.009). When administering continuous albuterol with heliox in a pediatric model, utilizing a VMN in line with HFNC during closed-mouth breathing yielded a higher inhaled dose compared to both the MiniHEART nebulizer and VMN with a loose-fitting mask.

Clinical and physiological consequences of preoxygenation using high-flow nasal oxygen in emergency anaesthesia.

Clinical and physiological consequences of preoxygenation using high-flow nasal oxygen in emergency anaesthesia.

Factors Influencing Feeding Decisions in Children With Bronchiolitis on High-Flow Nasal Cannula.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is used in up to 50% of children admitted with bronchiolitis. Consensus recommendations for feeding these children have not been established, and there is variability in practice. We sought to identify factors influencing feeding decisions for general care patients admitted with bronchiolitis on HFNC from a national sample of interdisciplinary care team members. In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with care team members involved in making feeding decisions at 10 US hospitals from June 2022 to March 2023. Eligible participants included 1 nurse, respiratory therapist, speech language pathologist, and physician from each site. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and conducted until reaching sufficiency. Three researchers analyzed transcript data using content analysis guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model. We interviewed 29 participants, including 19 nurses, respiratory therapists, and speech language pathologists and 10 physicians. Participants identified 11 factors influencing feeding decisions related to hospital work systems and processes outlined in the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, including people (child and parent characteristics, care team experience), tools and technology (guideline, protocol, ordersets), organization (institutional culture, education), environment (time of day, care location), task (interventions to optimize feeding), and process (clinical assessment, feeding trial, communication). Our findings suggest that feeding decisions are driven by factors related to the child, care team experience, institutional tools, and culture. These key factors may inform local improvement efforts to decrease variation in feeding children with bronchiolitis requiring HFNC.

A Comprehensive Review on High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Critical Care: Evidence-Based Insights and Future Directions.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has emerged as a significant advancement in respiratory support, offering a non-invasive alternative to traditional oxygen delivery methods in critical care settings. This review comprehensively evaluates HFNC therapy, focusing on its definition, historical evolution, and current clinical applications. HFNC therapy delivers humidified and heated oxygen at high flow rates through a nasal cannula, enhancing oxygenation and patient comfort. The review highlights the physiological mechanisms underlying HFNC and its efficacy in managing acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, and postoperative respiratory support. Key findings from clinical trials and meta-analyses are discussed, emphasizing HFNC's advantages over conventional methods, such as reduced intubation rates and shorter ICU stays. The review also addresses safety considerations, including potential risks and complications associated with HFNC therapy. Furthermore, it explores future directions for research and technological advancements aimed at optimizing HFNC use in diverse patient populations. This review aims to provide evidence-based insights to inform clinical practice and guide future investigations in respiratory therapy.

Weaning off heated humidified high flow nasal cannula successfully in a 24-week extreme low birth weight infant in South-South Nigeria: a case report

The use of heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) has become increasingly popular for providing noninvasive respiratory support for neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, there are several challenges to its use as primary respiratory support in extreme low birth weight (ELBW) preterm infants delivered before 28 weeks gestational age (GA), these include: lack of established guideline; and conflicting reports from studies on the risk of respiratory failure (apnea), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and death. In Nigeria, HHHFNC is not widely known nor used in most neonatal care facilities, including level III Neonatal care facilities. Despite adequate literature search, there is little or no known report or guideline for the successful use of and weaning from HHHFNC in ELBW neonates, delivered before 28 weeks GA in the Country. We present the successful weaning from HHHFNC as primary respiratory support at 30 weeks post conception age (PCA) in an ELBW preterm infant (weighing 700 gm) with severe RDS, delivered at 24 weeks GA in a neonatal care facility in Nigeria. HHHFNC was commenced at 6l/min following surfactant administration and successfully weaned off at 2l/min at 30 weeks PCA, with no incidence of apnea, BPD, NEC, air leaks, nasal septum damage and death. HHHFNC used as noninvasive primary respiratory support for ELBW preterm neonates with severe RDS delivered before 28 weeks GA is effective and safe; in addition, weaning off HHHFNC in this group of infants at 30 weeks PCA should be explored and recommended as a guideline in Nigeria and globally.

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Incidence of Post-Extubation Airway Obstruction in PICU: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial (HiFloCOT-PICU Trial).

To study the impact of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs. conventional oxygen therapy (COT) (by simple nasal cannula) as respiratory support after extubation on the rates of post-extubation airway obstruction (PEAO) among mechanically ventilated critically ill children. This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India over a period of 7 mo (11 August 2021 to 10 March 2022). Children aged 3 mo to 12 y who required invasive mechanical ventilation for > 72h and had passed spontaneous breathing trial (ready for extubation) were enrolled and randomized by computer generated block randomization to receive HFNC or COT after extubation. Primary outcome was rate of PEAO (assessed by modified Westley croup score, mWCS) within 48h of extubation; and secondary outcomes were rate and number of adrenaline nebulization, treatment failure (requiring escalation of respiratory support), extubation failure, adverse events, and length of PICU stay in two groups. During the study period, 116 children were enrolled (58 each in HFNC and COT groups). There was no difference in rate of PEAO (55% vs. 51.7%, respectively), need of adrenaline nebulization, extubation failure, adverse events, and duration of PICU stay in two groups. However, the HFNC group had significantly lower rates of treatment failure (27.6% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.02). The rate of PEAO was similar in HFNC and COT groups. However, HFNC group had significantly lower rate of treatment failure requiring escalation of respiratory support.

Nasal high flow or noninvasive ventilation? navigating hypercapnic COPD exacerbation treatment: A randomized noninferiority clinical trial

BackgroundNoninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been the cornerstone for managing acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) with hypercapnic respiratory failure. Nasal high flow (NHF) oxygen therapy has emerged as a potential alternative, offering a more tolerable modality with promising outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether NHF respiratory support is noninferior to NIV with respect to treatment failure, in patients with mild-to-moderate hypercapnic AECOPD. MethodsIn this multi-center, randomized, noninferiority trial, 105 patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure type II were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either NHF therapy or NIV. The primary endpoint was the frequency of treatment failure, defined as the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation or a switch to the alternative treatment group. Secondary endpoints included changes in respiratory parameters, patient comfort indicators, and the occurrence of complications. ResultsThe findings revealed no significant difference in the primary outcome between the groups, with a treatment failure rate of 19.6 % (10 out of 51) in the NHF group and 14.8 % (8 out of 54) in the NIV group. Interestingly, NHF users reported significantly lower levels of dyspnea and discomfort at multiple follow-up points. Despite the differences in patient comfort, respiratory parameters such as respiratory rate, arterial blood gases, and use of accessory muscles of respiration showed no significant disparities between the groups throughout the study period. ConclusionsNHF therapy was similar to NIV in preventing treatment failure among patients with hypercapnic AECOPD, offering a viable alternative with enhanced comfort. Trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03466385) on March 15, 2018.