High-flow Nasal Cannula Group Research Articles

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Following Sun's Procedure in Acute Aortic Dissection Type a Patients.

Background: Patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) often have hypoxemia (partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2]/fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] <300 mmHg) before weaning in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study compared the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with that of conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with AADA following Sun's procedure.Methods: The medical records of 87 adult patients with AADA who underwent Sun's procedure and met the inclusion criteria (PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg before weaning) were retrospectively analyzed. After surgery, 41 patients were treated with HFNC and 46 were treated with COT. The oxygenation level, FiO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, heart rate, respiratory rate, subjective discomfort, and reintubation rate were recorded. The difference in lung volume loss between the HFNC and COT groups was assessed using the radiological atelectasis score (chest radiograph) or calculated from three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images.Results: From day 1 to day 5 after weaning, there was no significant difference in PaO2/FiO2 between the HFNC and COT groups, although the FiO2 was significantly lower in the HFNC group than in the COT group (P < 0.05). Further studies indicated that the percentage of lung volume loss (pleural effusion and/or pulmonary atelectasis) by 3D reconstruction of CT images at 4–8 days post-operation was significantly lower in the HFNC group (P < 0.05). The subjective experience of breathing discomfort, reintubation rate, and length of stay in the ICU were significantly reduced in the HFNC group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in readmission to the ICU and in-hospital mortality between the two groups.Conclusions: HFNC can be used as an effective oxygen therapy for AADA patients with hypoxemia after Sun's procedure.

Prognostic impact of high flow nasal cannula compared to noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute pulmonary edema

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The high flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) may offer an alternative to invasive and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in patients with acute pulmonary edema (APE) with theoretical advantages related with patient adaptation, comfort and lower need of staff training to achieve optimal therapy. However, clinical efficacy and safety of HFNC is not well established. We aimed to compare the in-hospital clinical outcomes between NIPPV and HFNC in patients without hypercapnia as initial treatment of acute pulmonary edema (APE). Methods In a prospective, observational study, 47 patients treated with HFNC or NIPPV as initial treatment of no-hypercapnic APE were included. Primary endpoint was the composite of death or need for orotracheal intubation within 30 days after admission. Results 47 patients (mean [±SD] age 68.8± 13.1 years, 83% man) were included. 28 (59.6%) patients received HFNC and 19 (40.4%) NIPPV- CPAP as initial treatment to APE. De novo acute heart failure was the initial presentation in 76,6% and 61,7% was secondary to acute coronary syndrome. There was no significant difference in 30-days mortality rates or composite objective of death/intubation in HFNC vs NIPPV (21.5 vs 15.8 p = 0.72) and (37.0 vs 21.1% p= 0.24). However the failure of therapy defined as the combined objective of intubation or change of therapy due to respiratory worsening was more frequent (40.7 vs 15.8 p = 0.07) in HFNC group. Conclusion The HFNC was not associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients with no-hypercapnic EAP, but was associated with no-significant increase of treatment failure secondary to respiratory worsening, despite comparable disease severity and initial treatment. Randomized studies are needed Ends points comparing NIPPV and HFNCVariableOverall (n = 47)CPAP/NIPPVN = 19HFNCn = 28P valueDeath at 30 days (%)19.115.821.50.72Respiratory infection after 48 hours of admission (%)15.226.37.40.107Intubation at 30 days (%)23.915.829.60.32Death or intubation 30 days (%)30.421.137.00.24Intubation or change therapy for worsening RD (%)30.440.715.80.07Length hospital stay (days)11.8 ± 10.912.06 ± 9.611.7 ± 11.80.65Length critical care unit stay(days)5.87 ± 6.86.9 ± 7.25.1 ± 6.50.24RD Respiratory distress

Randomised controlled trial of high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants after extubation.

HFNC therapy is increasingly used as ‘non-invasive’ respiratory support for preterm infants. A 2016 Cochrane Review found that HFNC had similar efficacy to NCPAP for preterm infants following extubation,1 but that further studies were needed, particularly in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation, who are at highest risk of extubation failure. The trial by Uchiyama et al is the largest randomised trial of HFNC as post-extubation support in preterm infants, and one of only a few to enrol extremely preterm infants (168 infants enrolled; 76 HFNC, 92 NCPAP/NIPPV). This multicentre non-inferiority trial found NCPAP/NIPPV was superior to HFNC (and HFNC did not satisfy non-inferiority criteria) for the primary outcome of treatment failure within 7 days. Reintubation rates were similar; more than 80% of infants who met HFNC treatment failure criteria avoided reintubation due to crossover to NCPAP/NIPPV. Like previous similar trials2-4 the intervention was not blinded, although objective treatment failure criteria were used. In the NCPAP/NIPPV group, 149 infants received NCPAP and 47 received NIPPV at extubation. In both groups, the escalation of respiratory support was at clinician discretion. As the control group could receive either NCPAP or NIPPV, the definition of ‘treatment failure’ is blurred: some infants received NIPPV before ‘treatment failure’ and others did not. It is not reported whether NIPPV inflations were synchronised with the infant's breathing or not, which may be important.5 A non-inferiority trial design is reasonable given the existing evidence, although the sample size calculation assumed a HFNC treatment failure rate 9% higher than that of NCPAP/NIPPV, and the chosen non-inferiority margin was rather large. There is an imbalance in the allocation of infants to HFNC (47%) and NCPAP/NIPPV (53%). A total of 378 infants were ultimately recruited to the study (38 more than required, even with inflation for anticipated dropouts); however this represents only 33% of eligible infants, which has implications for generalisability of the results. The use of respiratory stimulants prior to extubation is not reported. The trial was prospectively registered; however, there are inconsistencies between the registration and the published trial in the stated sample size, comparator and primary outcome. The starting HFNC gas flow was >2 L/min, lower than some previous studies,3, 4 and it is unclear whether infants received the maximal permitted gas flow of 8 L/min prior to treatment failure being determined. As increasing gas flow is associated with increased delivered pressure,6 this may have contributed to decreased efficacy in the HFNC group. Extubation failure in preterm infants is an important concern for neonatal clinicians, and the optimal mode of post-extubation respiratory support remains uncertain. The results of the trial by Uchiyama et al may tip the balance in favour of NCPAP/NIPPV as initial post-extubation support; however, consistent with previous evidence, reintubation rates are similar when HFNC is used with the ‘backup’ of NCPAP/NIPPV. For the most immature infants at highest risk of extubation failure, it seems prudent to avoid using HFNC as initial post-extubation support. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. https://ebneo.org/HFNC-after-extubation

Characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving high flow nasal cannula therapy prior to mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 respiratory failure: A prospective observational study.

Background:Treatment strategies for acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) had significant variation early in the pandemic. We sought to determine if patients treated with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) prior to mechanical ventilation had differing outcomes compared to those treated only with conventional oxygen.Methods:This was a prospective, observational study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary care medical center with a diagnosis of acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Adult patients with a positive polymerase chain reaction test for COVID-19 who required mechanical ventilation were included.Results:A total of 91 patients met the inclusion criteria for our study. The mean age was 68.4 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 12) and 58% were male. The mean initial partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio was 152 (SD ± 65) and was not significantly different between the HFNC group and the conventional oxygen strategy group (P = 0.95). The observed mortality rate was 30% in the HFNC group versus 52% in the conventional oxygen strategy group (P = 0.05). The multivariate odds ratio of mortality for patients on HFNC was 0.375 compared to a conventional oxygen strategy (95% confidence interval 0.122–1.151, P = 0.09).Conclusions:While HFNC appears to be safe as the initial treatment strategy for COVID-19 associated respiratory failure, HFNC did not result in a statistically significant difference in mortality compared to a conventional oxygen strategy. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease in Procedural Sedation: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

ObjectivesThe study was conducted to compare the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy with conventional oxygen therapy through a simple oxygen mask for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease during percutaneous intervention while under procedural sedation. DesignProspective, randomized and controlled trial. SettingA Cantonese cardiac center in China. ParticipantsTwo hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists classification II pediatric patients were enrolled from April 25, 2018 to November 28, 2018. InterventionsPatients scheduled for percutaneous closure of a heart defect under deep sedation with propofol, midazolam and fentanyl by an anesthesiologist were randomized (1:1) to receive oxygen therapy through a simple oxygen mask or through the HFNC system. Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome was the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), requirement for noninvasive respiratory support, change in the gastric antrum area and other adverse events. Blood gas analysis results also were compared. Oxygen therapy through the HFNC system improved the lowest SpO2 (99% [94%-100%]), as compared with the mask group (99% [72%-100%]), p < 0.001. Seven patients out of 99 (7.1%) in the mask group had hypoxia or required bag-mask ventilation, whereas no such patient was reported in the HFNC group, p < 0.001. There were no differences between the groups in terms of gastric distention, procedure length, total propofol dose, atropine use or other complications. ConclusionWhen compared with simple mask oxygenation, HFNC could reduce the incidence of desaturation, the need for airway assisted ventilation and risk of carbon dioxide retention without causing hemodynamic instability or gastric distention. It is effective for pediatric patients with non-cyanotic congenital heart disease who require procedural sedation.

A postoperative comparison of high-flow nasal cannula therapy and conventional oxygen therapy for esophageal cancer patients.

Hypoxaemia in post-surgical patients of esophageal cancer (EC) is common in thoracic departments. However, few studies have investigated the role of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). A retrospective study was implemented to enroll hypoxemic patients after esophagectomy who were treated by HFNC or COT immediately after extubation between January 2019 and December 2019. We compared the effect of HFNC or COT in patients regarding the vital signs and arterial blood gases, the incidence of anastomotic leakage, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), sore throat/nose, and reintubation, length of stay, and sputum production. We also 3D reconstructed the postoperative chest CT, and compared the amount of lung volume loss caused by PPCs (pneumothorax, atelectasis, pulmonary consolidation and pleural effusion) between the two groups. Compared to patients in COT group, sore throat/nose in HFNC group was lower, the sputum production was higher, and the total hospital stay was shorter. Compared to COT, HFNC treatment decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) at day 1, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at day 1-4, and heart rate (HR) at day 2-4, increased arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) at day 1-4, and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2%) at day 1-2. In addition, the rate of PPCs and anastomotic leakage in HFNC group were lower than those in COT group. Compared to COT, HFNC treatment significantly decreased the amount of lung volume loss caused by PPCs. HFNC can improve the hypoxemia of patients after esophagectomy, increase the flow of sputum, reduce the incidence of PPC and anastomotic leakage.

A simple nomogram for predicting failure of non-invasive respiratory strategies in adults with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study

BackgroundNon-invasive respiratory strategies (NIRS) including high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) have become widely used in patients with COVID-19 who develop acute respiratory failure. However, use of these therapies, if ineffective, might delay initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in some patients. We aimed to determine early predictors of NIRS failure and develop a simple nomogram and online calculator that can identify patients at risk of NIRS failure.MethodsWe did a retrospective, multicentre observational study in 23 hospitals designated for patients with COVID-19 in China. Adult patients (≥18 years) with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and acute respiratory failure receiving NIRS were enrolled. A training cohort of 652 patients (21 hospitals) was used to identify early predictors of NIRS failure, defined as subsequent need for IMV or death within 28 days after intensive care unit admission. A nomogram was developed by multivariable logistic regression and concordance statistics (C-statistics) computed. C-statistics were validated internally by cross-validation in the training cohort, and externally in a validation cohort of 107 patients (two hospitals).FindingsPatients were enrolled between Jan 1 and Feb 29, 2020. NIV failed in 211 (74%) of 286 patients and HFNC in 204 (56%) of 366 patients in the training cohort. NIV failed in 48 (81%) of 59 patients and HFNC in 26 (54%) of 48 patients in the external validation cohort. Age, number of comorbidities, respiratory rate–oxygenation index (ratio of pulse oximetry oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen to respiratory rate), Glasgow coma scale score, and use of vasopressors on the first day of NIRS in the training cohort were independent risk factors for NIRS failure. Based on the training dataset, the nomogram had a C-statistic of 0·80 (95% CI 0·74–0·85) for predicting NIV failure, and a C-statistic of 0·85 (0·82–0·89) for predicting HFNC failure. C-statistic values were stable in both internal validation (NIV group mean 0·79 [SD 0·10], HFNC group mean 0·85 [0·07]) and external validation (NIV group value 0·88 [95% CI 0·72–0·96], HFNC group value 0·86 [0·72–0·93]).InterpretationWe have developed a nomogram and online calculator that can be used to identify patients with COVID-19 who are at risk of NIRS failure. These patients might benefit from early triage and more intensive monitoring.FundingMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Key Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on patients with aspiration pneumonia accompanied by respiratory failure in the post-stroke sequelae stage

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy on patients with aspiration pneumonia accompanied by respiratory failure in the post-stroke sequelae stage, with the goal of providing more effective oxygen therapy and improving patient prognosis.MethodsRetrospective analysis was conducted on 103 elderly patients with post-stroke aspiration pneumonia and moderate respiratory failure (oxygenation index: 100–200 mmHg) that had been admitted. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mode of oxygen therapy that was used: the Venturi mask group and the HFNC treatment group. The two groups were analyzed and compared in terms of the changes in the blood gas indices measured at different points in time (4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h), the proportion of patients that required transition to invasive auxiliary ventilation, and the 28-day mortality rate.ResultsA total of 103 patients were retrospectively analyzed; 16 cases were excluded, and 87 patients were included in the final patient group (42 in the HFNC group and 45 in the Venturi group). There was a statistically significant difference in the oxygenation indices of the HFNC group and the Venturi group (F = 546.811, P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant interaction between the monitored oxygenation indices and the mode of oxygen therapy (F = 70.961, P < 0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference in the oxygenation indices for the two modes of oxygen therapy (F = 256.977, P < 0.05). HFNC therapy contributed to the improvement of the oxygenation indices at a rate of 75.1%. The Venturi and HFNC groups also differed significantly in terms of the proportion of patients that required transition to invasive auxiliary ventilation within 72 h (P < 0.05). The HFNC group’s risk for invasive ventilation was 0.406 times that of the Venturi group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the 28-day mortality rate of the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionHFNC could significantly improve the oxygenation state of patients with post-stroke aspiration pneumonia and respiratory failure, and it may reduce the incidence of invasive ventilation.

A Comparative Study between Postextubation of Preterm Neonates into High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Background: For respiratory support in premature newborns, there has been a trend toward less trachealintubation, less mechanical ventilation, and more nasal respiratory support which can result in the improvement ofsuccessful extubation rate. The two commonly known types of nasal respiratory support after extubation are thenasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). The current study aimed toinvestigate and compare successful extubation using HFNC and conventional nasal CPAP after a period ofendotracheal positive pressure ventilation and detect which of these two methods is better for successfulextubation with fewer side effects.Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted on 210 preterm newborns in the neonatal intensive careunit (NICU) of Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Qasr El Eyni Hospital. Post extubation failure rates werecompared between the two groups, namely (HFNC) and (nasal CPAP). The collected data were analyzed in SPSSsoftware (version 20).Results: Neonates who needed re-intubation within 72 h after initial extubation were higher in the HFNC group(72.7%) versus (27.3%) in the CPAP group (P-value=0.063). Moreover, 45.8% of neonates in the HFNC group neededre-intubation within 1 week of initial extubation versus 54.2% in CPAP (P-value=0.970). The mean duration ofrespiratory support using HFNC was 3.7 days, compared to 6.5 days using CPAP (P-value= 0.001). Among neonateswho suffered from nasal trauma, 90.6% of neonates belonged to the CPAP group, while 9.4% of cases belonged to theHFNC group (P-value= 0.001). Conclusion: The use of CPAP and HFNC after the extubation of preterm mechanically ventilated neonates wasstatistically equal regarding extubation failure.

High flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure and nasal positive pressure ventilation in infants with severe bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Introductionnon-invasive ventilation is widely used in the respiratory management of severe bronchiolitis.Methodsa randomized controlled trial was carried out in a tertiary pediatric university hospital´s PICU over 3 years to compare between continuous positive airway pressure/nasal positive pressure ventilation (CPAP/NPPV) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) devices for severe bronchiolitis. The trial was recorded in the national library of medicine registry (NCT04650230). Patients aged from 7 days to 6 months, admitted for severe bronchiolitis were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly chosen to receive either HFNC or CPAP/NPPV. If HFNC failed, the switch to CPAP/NPPV was allowed. Mechanical ventilation was the last resort in case of CPAP/NPPV device failure. The primary outcome was the success of the treatment defined by no need of care escalation. The secondary outcomes were failure predictors, intubation rate, stay length, serious adverse events, and mortality.Resultsa total of 268 patients were enrolled. The data of 255 participants were analyzed. The mean age was 51.13 ± 34.43 days. Participants were randomized into two groups; HFNC group (n=130) and CPAP/NPPV group (n=125). The success of the treatment was significantly higher in the CPAP/NPPV group (70.4% [61.6%- 78.2%) comparing to HFNC group (50.7% [41.9%- 59.6%])- (p=0.001). For secondary outcomes, lower baseline pH was the only significant failure predictor in the CPAP/NPPV group (p=0.035). There were no differences in intubation rate or serious adverse events between the groups.Conclusionhigh flow nasal cannula was safe and efficient, but CPAP/ NPPV was better in preventing treatment failure. The switch to CPAP/NPPV if HFNC failed, avoided intubation in 54% of the cases.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen for hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Low-concentration oxygen is an established way for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with Type II respiratory failure. Hypercapnia can complicate both COPD exacerbations and stable COPD. Treating with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can reduce carbon dioxide tension in arterial (PaCO2 ) in hypercapnic COPD. As an open system, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) is easy to tolerate and use. More researches are needed to focus on how HFNC is used to treat COPD patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL database were retrieved from inception to October 2019. Eligible trials were clinical randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of HFNC and conventional oxygen on hypercapnic COPD patients. Two researchers assessed the quality of each study and extracted the data into RevMan 5.3 independently. The primary outcome was PaCO2 and the secondary outcome was PaO2 . Four RCTs with 329 patients were included. The research results indicated that PaCO2 in the HFNC group was similar to the conventional oxygen group. No significant difference were observed in PaCO2 (MD -0.98, CI: -2.67 to 0.71, Z=1.14, p=0.25) and PaO2 (MD -0.72, CI: -6.99 to 5.55, Z=0.23, p=0.82) between the HFNC group and conventional oxygen group. Our meta-analysis showed no difference in PO2 and PCO2 between the HFNC and conventional oxygen. But we should treat this conclusion with caution because the number of studies and participants is small and, there is heterogeneity in the PaO2 and PCO2 measurements between stable and AECOPD.

Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Preterm Infants After Extubation.

Our aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) against those of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) after extubation in preterm infants. This prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted in 6 tertiary NICUs. Infants born at <34 weeks who needed noninvasive ventilation after extubation were enrolled. We randomly assigned infants to an HFNC group when HFNC was used or to an NCPAP/NIPPV group when NCPAP or NIPPV was used. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 7 days after extubation. We then examined clinical aspects of treatment failure with HFNC use. In total, 176 and 196 infants were assigned to the HFNC and NCPAP/NIPPV groups, respectively. The HFNC group showed a significantly higher rate of treatment failure than that of the NCPAP/NIPPV group, with treatment failure occurring in 54 infants (31%) compared with 31 infants (16%) in the NCPAP/NIPPV group (risk difference, 14.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-23.2). Histologic chorioamnionitis (P = .02), treated patent ductus arteriosus (P = .001), and corrected gestational age at the start of treatment (P = .007) were factors independently related to treatment failure with HFNC use. We found HFNC revealed a significantly higher rate of treatment failure than NCPAP or NIPPV after extubation in preterm infants. The independent factors associated with treatment failure with HFNC use were histologic chorioamnionitis, treated patent ductus arteriosus, and a younger corrected gestational age at the start of treatment.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for the Treatment of Children

Background: The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to further compare the clinical benefits and adverse reactions of HFNC with CPAP in the treatment of mild to moderate respiratory failure due to pneumonia in children below 2 years old.Methods: Using a prospective randomized controlled study method, 84 patients with pneumonia and mild to moderate respiratory failure admitted to the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019 were randomly divided into the HFNC group and the CPAP group. It was registered as a clinical trial at clinical trials.gov, registration number: ChiCTR2000030463.Results: The analyses included 84 patients. No differences were observed between the two groups in baseline demographic or physiological characteristics. Treatment failure necessitating intubation and transfer to the PICU was noted in six of 43 infants (14%) in the HFNC group, as compared with four of 41 infants (10%) in the CPAP group (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the duration of hospital stay, the duration of non-invasive respiratory support, and mortality. The 10 infants who experienced treatment failure had more severe hypoxemia with lower PaO2/FiO2 (HFNC 182 ± 11.5 and CPAP 172 ± 8.6). We found that both the HFNC group and the CPAP group showed significantly improved oxygenation and relief of respiratory distress after treatment. No differences were observed between the two groups in the development improvement of RR, PaO2, PaCO2, SpO2, and PH. Assessment of the occurrence of adverse events showed that the HFNC group had a lower level of nasal injury, a lower risk of abdominal distension, a lower intensity and frequency of sedation, and better tolerance.Conclusion: HFNC is an effective and safe initial respiratory support treatment in children <2 years with mild to moderate respiratory failure due to pneumonia, and the incidence of intubation and death is very low; concurrently, the comfort and tolerance of HFNC are better. To some extent, HFNC is a well-tolerated alternative to CPAP.

Application of a High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Prevention of Postextubation Atelectasis in Children Undergoing Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

General anesthesia-induced atelectasis is common, and persistent postoperative atelectasis is associated with pulmonary complications. We aimed to evaluate the preventive effects of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on postoperative atelectasis and respiratory complications in infants and small children. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, children (≤2 years) receiving general anesthesia (>2 hours) were randomized into the control and HFNC groups. At the end of the surgery, the first lung ultrasound evaluation was performed in both groups. In the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), the control group received conventional oxygen therapy, while the HFNC group received oxygen via HFNC, with a flow rate of 2 L kg-1 min-1. Before discharge to the ward, a second lung ultrasound examination was performed. The primary outcome was the lung ultrasound score at PACU discharge. The secondary outcomes included the lung ultrasound score at the end of surgery, the incidence of significant atelectasis at PACU discharge, and other postoperative outcomes. Lung ultrasound score and the incidence of atelectasis at the end of surgery did not differ significantly between the control (n = 38) and HFNC (n = 40) groups. After staying in the PACU, both groups showed a reduced lung ultrasound score and atelectasis incidence. However, the HFNC group had a significantly lower consolidation score than the control group (0; interquartile range [IQR] = 0-1 vs 3; IQR = 2-4; P< .001). Additionally, none of the patients had significant atelectasis in the HFNC group, compared to 6 patients in the control group (0% vs 15.8%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.444; 95% confidence interval for OR, 0.343-0.575; P = .011). Incidence of desaturation (oxygen saturation [Spo2] ≤ 95%), postoperative complications, and the length of hospital stay did not differ between the groups. Preventive use of HFNC after surgery improves the lung ultrasound score and reduces postoperative atelectasis compared to conventional oxygen therapy in infants and small children.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Compensated Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

IntroductionCurrently, there is a lack of evidence on the utilization of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) accompanied by hypercapnic respiratory failure. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of HFNC compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in such patients.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with AECOPD with a baseline arterial blood gas pH ≥7.35, PaO2 <60 mmHg, and PaCO2 >45 mmHg were enrolled. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, which needs mechanical ventilation.ResultsA total of 320 patients were randomized to either the HFNC group (n = 160) or the COT group (n = 160). Sixteen (10.0%) patients in the HFNC group had treatment failure during hospitalization, which was significantly lower than the COT group figure of 31 (19.4%) patients (p = 0.026). Twenty-four hours after recruitment, the PaCO2 of the HFNC group was lower than that of the COT group (54.1 ± 9.79 mmHg vs 56.9 ± 10.1 mmHg, p = 0.030). PaCO2 higher than 59 mmHg after HFNC for 24 h was identified as an independent risk factor for treatment failure [OR 1.078, 95% CI 1.006–1.154, p = 0.032].ConclusionIn AECOPD patients with acute compensated hypercapnic respiratory failure, HFNC improved the prognosis compared with COT. Therefore, HFNC might be considered for first-line oxygen therapy in select patients.Trial Registration NumberClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT02439333.

Efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates: a Meta analysis

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in neonates. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc, Wanfang Database, CNKI, and Weipu Database were searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HFNC versus nCPAP in the treatment of neonatal RDS published up to April 1, 2020. RevMan5.3 software was used to perform a Meta analysis of the eligible RCTs. Results A total of 12 RCTs were included, with 2 861 neonates in total, among whom 2 698 neonates (94.30%) had a gestational age of ≥28 weeks and 163 (5.70%) had a gestational age of 0.05). For primary respiratory support and post-extubation respiratory support, the HFNC group had a significantly lower incidence rate of nasal injury than the nCPAP group (P 0.05). Conclusions Based on the current clinical evidence, HFNC has a higher failure rate than nCPAP when used as primary respiratory support for neonates with RDS, and therefore it is not recommended to use HFNC as the primary respiratory support for neonates with RDS. In RDS neonates with a gestational age of ≥28 weeks, HFNC can be used as post-extubation respiratory support in the weaning phase.

Atelectasis prevention during anaesthesia using high-flow nasal cannula therapy: A paediatric randomised trial using MRI images

BackgroundAtelectasis frequently occurs early on during anaesthesia in children. We hypothesised that positive expiratory pressure (PEP) generated via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) could prevent atelectasis in non-intubated children under general anaesthesia. The objective was to compare the volume of atelectasis present in patients treated via HFNC to that of patients treated via a face bag-mask without PEP. The outcome used for this comparison was the ratio of the atelectasis volume to the total pulmonary volume. MethodsA prospective single-centre, single-blind, randomised trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital from November 2018 through May 2019. The trial subjects were infants and children between six months and six years of age who required anaesthesia for an MRI. The children were randomised to receive sevoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia either via a classic face bag-mask or by HFNC. The atelectasis volume was measured from thoracic MRI images. The judgement criterion was the ratio of the atelectasis volume to the lung volume. ResultsOf a trial group of 42 patients, 21 received anaesthesia via a face bag-mask and 21 via HFNC. After three patients were excluded for technical issues, the data for 39 patients were analysed. The atelectasis volume to the lung volume ratio in the HFNC group was significantly smaller than the ratio for the face bag-mask group (1.6% vs 6.8%, respectively; p=0.002). ConclusionHFNC was associated with a lower atelectasis lung ratio compared to using a face bag-mask during anaesthesia for children maintained with spontaneous ventilation. Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT 03592589

Efficiency of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Introduction The clinical benefit of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on factors related to pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at synthesizing the available evidence on the efficacy of HFNC on exercise capacity, lung function, and other factors related to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients. Methods Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science) were searched for randomized trials comparing with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Primary outcomes were respiratory rate, FEV1, tidal volume, oxygen partial pressure, total score of St. George's respiratory questionnaire, 6-minute walk test, and exercise endurance time. Results Ten trials met the criteria for inclusion. Combined data from six studies showed that HFNC showed a lower respiratory rate in COPD patients [mean difference -1.27 (95% CI: -1.65–(-0.89)]. Combined data from three studies showed a lower forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in the group of HFNC. No difference in tidal volume was showed between the HFNC and control groups in COPD patients. No significant oxygen improvement between the HFNC groups and control groups. The total score of St. George's respiratory questionnaire was improved by the subgroup analysis of HFNC versus COT but no NIV. Two multicenter RCTs showed the six-minute walk test, and statistical results showed that the length of the six-minute walk capacity was increased after usage of HFNC compared to the control group [mean difference -8.65 (95% CI: -9.12–(-8.19)]. No increase of exercise capacity after usage of HFNC (mean difference -12.65). Conclusion In the first meta-analysis of the area, the current evidence did not show so much positive effect on tidal volume or oxygen improvement in COPD patients. Length of the six-minute walk capacity was increased after using HFNC, while other pulmonary rehabilitation parameters, namely, the score of St. George's respiratory questionnaire and exercise capacity show no increase in the group of HFNC. The variance in the quality of the evidence included in this meta-analysis highlights the need for this evidence to be followed up with further high-quality and more randomized trials.

The efficacy of the WhisperFlow CPAP system versus high flow nasal cannula in patients at risk for postextubation failure: A Randomized controlled trial.

Compare the efficacy(reintubation rate) between a high-flow nasal cannula(HFNC) and the WhisperFlow CPAP system in patients at risk for postextubation failure. RCT was conducted in patients who had at least one high-risk criterion for postextubation failure. All patients were randomly assigned to CPAP or HFNC for 48h. Of 140 patients, sixty-nine were assigned to the CPAP group and 71 to the HFNC group. The reintubation rate was similar between the HFNC and WhisperFlowCPAP [5 cases(7.0%) vs. 6 cases(8.7%); P=0.76]. The postextubation respiratory failure rate was not significantly different between the HFNC and WhisperFlow CPAP groups [10 cases(14.1%)vs.7cases(10.1%); P=0.48]. The respiratory rate was lower in the HFNC than CPAP group(P=0.04). The pain rating scale score was lower in the HFNC group than in the WhisperFlow CPAP group at 24h (2.8±2.0 vs. 3.7±1.9, P=0.02) and 48h (2.8±1.8 vs. 3.8±1.9, P=0.002). We are unable to demonstrate a reduction in postextubation respiratory failure in at risk patients with the use of HFNC compared with the WhisperFlow CPAP system probably because small sample size, but HFNC was better tolerated.

Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask

Objective In this study, the aim was to compare the rate of decrease in carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) values at consecutive time points and calculate the half-life of COHb (COHb t½) in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning and treated with either high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) or non-rebreather face mask (NRFM). Methods This retrospective, cohort study with historical controls was performed over a 2-year period and included adult patients with CO poisoning, whose COHb values were checked. The HFNC group consisted of patients admitted to the ED with CO poisoning when HFNC was available in the hospital, while the NRFM group consisted of patients who presented to the ED with CO poisoning before the availability of HFNC. The primary outcome of the study was to detect the COHb t½. Results A total of 71 patients were enrolled in the study. While 35 patients received oxygen with NRFM, 36 patients received HFNC. The mean COHb t½ in the HFNC group was 41.1 min (95% CI: 31.0–58.4) and 64.0 min (95% CI: 43.5–114.4) in the NRFM group. We did not find a significant difference in the COHb t½ between the HFNC group and NRFM group (p = 0.099). COHb levels between treatment arms at serial time points showed a statistically significant difference at 60 min (p = 0.048). We compared the decay constant and half-life of COHb between groups according to gender. In both genders, COHb t½ was significantly different between groups, and COHb t½ was lower in the patients treated with HFNC. Conclusion HFNC was effective in reducing the half-life of COHb values in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. Prospective studies to be conducted in larger groups are needed to fully understand the effect of HFNC on carbon monoxide poisoning.