Black patients require higher doses of tacrolimus to achieve target blood concentrations than do individuals from other ethnic groups (1, 2) leading to concern that they are under-immunosuppressed in the critical early posttransplant period (3). Our cohort of black patients, treated with an initial daily tacrolimus dose of 0.2 mg/kg, had twofold lower dose-normalized blood concentrations (median (IQR) 4.08 (3.6–7.7) ng/mL per 0.1 mg/kg) than white patients (8.51 (5.7–12) ng/mL per 0.1 mg/kg) on day 7 posttransplant (P<0.001). These data led to the adoption of a twofold higher initial tacrolimus dose for black patients than our standard regimen. All black renal transplant recipients transplanted in our center between 1995 and 2005 were studied (Table 1). Twenty-two were of African Caribbean origin, 16 from West Africa, and 1 from East Africa. One patient in the 0.4 mg/kg cohort was switched to sirolimus on day 8 posttransplant. We are reporting a change in standard clinical protocol that did not require ethical approval.TABLE 1: DemographicsBefore July 2002 an initial oral loading dose of 0.2 mg/kg was given preoperatively followed by a maintenance dose of 0.1 mg/kg twice daily (0.2 mg/kg daily). Subsequently, the loading dose was 0.4 mg/kg, followed by 0.2 mg/kg twice daily (0.4 mg/kg daily). Subsequent dosing was directed by thrice weekly measurement aiming for 12 hr postdose whole blood concentration of 15–20 ng/mL for days 0–7 and then 10–15 ng/mL. The dose was adjusted by 20% for results outside the target range except for high concentrations when fewer than 3 doses had been given. The Tacrolimus II immunoassay (Abbott diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL performed on an IMx clinical analyser) was used throughout the study. The laboratory was a member of the International Tacrolimus Proficiency Testing Scheme. Methyl prednisolone (500 mg) was given intravenously perioperatively, then 20 mg of oral prednisolone daily. On day 7, 21/26 patients (80.8%) in the 0.2 mg/kg group had concentrations below the target of 15 ng/mL compared to 3/13 (23.1%) in the 0.4 mg/kg group (P=0.03, Figure 1). All patients in the 0.4 mg/kg group achieved the lower target of 10 ng/mL, that would now be regarded as conventional, on day 7 compared with 16/26 (61.5%) in the 0.2 mg/kg group (P<0.03). On day 7, 3/26 (11.5%) of the 0.2 mg/kg group had values greater than 20 ng/mL compared with 7/13 (53.8%) in the 0.4 mg/kg group (P<0.02). The blood tacrolimus concentration exceeded 15 ng/mL on day 7 in 5/26 patients (19.2%) in the 0.2 mg/kg group and 10/13 (76.9%) with the higher dose (P<0.007).FIGURE 1.: Blood tacrolimus concentrations. The 12-hr postdose tacrolimus concentration on days 7 (±1 day) and day 14 (±1 day) after transplantation are shown for individual patients. The dashed lines represent the minimum target blood tacrolimus concentrations at which we were aiming: 15 ng/mL during week 1 and 10 ng/ml during week 2. The area between these lines represents what would now be regarded as an appropriate therapeutic range. Values for the 0.4 mg/kg group were significantly higher than for the 0.2 mg/kg group on day 7 (Mann–Whitney P=0.001), but not on day 14.An increase in the initial daily tacrolimus dose from 0.2 mg/kg to 0.4 mg/kg allowed most patients to achieve minimum target blood concentrations during the first week posttransplant, but at the expense of potentially toxic blood concentrations. The degree to which the patients in the 0.4 mg/kg group exceeded the target range was surprising. Tacrolimus exposure increases linearly with increasing doses up to 10 mg (4) but there are no published data for higher doses. A possible explanation would be a saturable barrier to drug absorption with greater oral bioavailability at higher tacrolimus doses. An initial daily dose of 0.4 mg/kg is probably excessive and provides the basis for testing an initial starting dose of tacrolimus at 0.3 mg/kg. Nidyanandh Vadivel Ashwani Garg Renal Medicine and Transplantation St. George’s Hospital London, United Kingdom David W. Holt Cardiac and Vascular Sciences: Analytical Unit St. George’s, University of London London, United Kingdom Rene W. S. Chang Renal Medicine and Transplantation St. George’s Hospital London, United Kingdom Iain A. M. MacPhee Cellular and Molecular Medicine: Renal Medicine St. George’s, University of London London, United Kingdom