High-dose Opioids Research Articles

Online education for safer opioid prescribing in hospitals-lessons learnt from the Opioid Use Change (OUCh) project.

Opioids are often required for acute inpatient pain relief but lack of knowledge about common and less common long-term side effects can lead to inappropriate discharge prescribing. There are few validated educational tools available for junior prescribers on hospital wards. Education around opioid prescribing and deprescribing remains limited in the undergraduate curriculum and yet almost all controlled drug prescribing in hospitals is done by junior doctors. A 5-minute video was developed with iterative feedback from medical students, junior prescribers, pain specialists, primary care educational leads, and a patient who had developed opioid addiction after hospital prescribing. It explained the need for clear stop dates on discharge summaries and the range of opioid side effects. It also highlighted the hospital admission as an opportunity to reduce inappropriate high-dose opioids. A short knowledge-based quiz before and after viewing the video was used to evaluate the impact on and change in knowledge and confidence around opioid prescribing. This tool was designed to be used entirely online to allow delivery within existing mandatory training. Feedback was positive and showed that knowledge of side effects significantly increased but also contacts with ward pharmacists and the acute pain team increased. Junior doctors highlighted that the undergraduate curriculum did little to prepare them for prescription addiction and that pharmacy and senior support was needed to support any changes in longer-term, high-dose opioids. This short educational video improved knowledge of safe opioid prescribing and could be incorporated within wider opioid education in UK healthcare.

Implementation of a Hybrid Care Model for Telemedicine-based Cancer Pain Management at the Cancer Center of Naples, Italy: A Cohort Study.

Telemedicine, the remote delivery of healthcare services, represents a great opportunity for cancer pain management. A care model of telemedicine that combines remote visits and hospital access could be an effective and safe strategy for pain management of cancer patients. A retrospective study was conducted using the dataset of the telemedicine program at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Naples, Italy for assessing the efficacy of a telehealth-based model of care. Demographic, clinical, and process variables were investigated. A total of 226 cases and 489 visits were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 63.4 years (SD=12.4 years), and no sex differences were observed. Approximately 55% of patients were ECOG-PS ≤2 and 87% suffered from metastatic disease. More than half of the patients were treated with high doses of opioids. Each patient had a mean of 2 remote visits and half of the patients had more than 1 telehealth consultation. The dropout ratio was 5.3%. Most visits (n=472) were conducted on patients in the Campania Region, Italy. The maximum covered distance from the Cancer Center and the patients' location was 555.22 Km. A significant difference in the overall number of visits (p=0.006) and the number of pro-capita remote visits (p=0.010) was found, in favor of the group of patients treated before the end of the Covid-19 emergency in Italy, compared to those treated after the pandemic. Despite various positive outcomes, the analysis highlights several weaknesses, such as the need to assist patients with advanced and non-advanced disease located outside the regional territory. Overall, the telehealth processes should be adapted to post-pandemic scenarios towards their implementation in routine clinical practice.

Changes in pontine and preBötzinger/Bötzinger complex neuronal activity during remifentanil-induced respiratory depression in decerebrate dogs.

Introduction: In vivo studies using selective, localized opioid antagonist injections or localized opioid receptor deletion have identified that systemic opioids dose-dependently depress respiratory output through effects in multiple respiratory-related brainstem areas. Methods: With approval of the subcommittee on animal studies of the Zablocki VA Medical Center, experiments were performed in 53 decerebrate, vagotomized, mechanically ventilated dogs of either sex during isocapnic hyperoxia. We performed single neuron recordings in the Pontine Respiratory Group (PRG, n = 432) and preBötzinger/Bötzinger complex region (preBötC/BötC, n = 213) before and during intravenous remifentanil infusion (0.1-1mcg/kg/min) and then until complete recovery of phrenic nerve activity. A generalized linear mixed model was used to determine changes in Fn with remifentanil and the statistical association between remifentanil-induced changes in Fn and changes in inspiratory and expiratory duration and peak phrenic activity. Analysis was controlled via random effects for animal, run, and neuron type. Results: Remifentanil decreased Fn in most neuron subtypes in the preBötC/BötC as well as in inspiratory (I), inspiratory-expiratory, expiratory (E) decrementing and non-respiratory modulated neurons in the PRG. The decrease in PRG inspiratory and non-respiratory modulated neuronal activity was associated with an increase in inspiratory duration. In the preBötC, the decrease in I-decrementing neuron activity was associated with an increase in expiratory and of E-decrementing activity with an increase in inspiratory duration. In contrast, decreased activity of I-augmenting neurons was associated with a decrease in inspiratory duration. Discussion: While statistical associations do not necessarily imply a causal relationship, our data suggest mechanisms for the opioid-induced increase in expiratory duration in the PRG and preBötC/BötC and how inspiratory failure at high opioid doses may result from a decrease in activity and decrease in slope of the pre-inspiratory ramp-like activity in preBötC/BötC pre-inspiratory neurons combined with a depression of preBötC/BötC I-augmenting neurons. Additional studies must clarify whether the observed changes in neuronal activity are due to direct neuronal inhibition or decreased excitatory inputs.

Feasibility study of a Behavioural Intervention for Opioid Reduction (BIOR) for patients with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a protocol

IntroductionAround 30%–50% of adults suffer moderate to severe chronic pain not caused by cancer. Significant numbers are treated with opioids which over time may cease to be effective and produce...

Acute pancreatitis associated with scoliosis surgery: Could opioids be a determinant factor in its development?

Various medical complications can occur after spinal surgery in the pediatric population. Current surgical techniques have allowed a greater degree of scoliosis correction, but at the same time, unusual complications have been described that seem to be associated and have a multifactorial etiology. We present a case series of three pediatric patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery with continuous use of full-dose opioids, and during hospitalization and post-operative surveillance developed acute pancreatitis. The association between prolonged exposure to high-dose opioids and the onset of pancreatitis in the context of major surgery suggests a potential relationship that warrants further study.

Does a High Postoperative Opioid Dose Predict Chronic Use After ACDF?

The purpose of this study is to determine if increased postoperative prescription opioid dosing is an isolated predictor of chronic opioid use after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative diseases from 2016-2019 at a single institution was performed. Preoperative and postoperative opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions, including morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and duration of use, were obtained from the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Univariate analysis compared patient demographics and surgical factors across groups on the basis of postoperative opioid dose (high: MME ≥90, low: MME <90) and chronicity of use (chronic: ≥120 days or >10 prescriptions). Logistic regressions identified predictors of high opioid dose and chronic use. A total of 385 patients were included. Preoperative opioid tolerance and tobacco use were associated with high postoperative opioid dose and chronic usage. Younger age correlated with high-dose prescriptions. Increased body mass index and preoperative benzodiazepine use were associated with chronic opioid use. Chronic postoperative opioid use correlated with high-dose prescriptions, change in opioid prescribed, private pay scripts, and more than 1 prescriber and pharmacy. Logistic regression identified high postoperative opioid dose, opioid tolerance, increased body mass index, and no prior cervical surgery as predictors of chronic opioid use. Regression analysis determined younger age, increased medical comorbidities, and opioid tolerance to be predictors for high MME prescriptions. High postoperative opioid dose independently predicted chronic opioid use after ACDF regardless of preoperative opioid tolerance.

Opioid-Induced Esophageal Dysmotility (OIED) - A Case Report.

Recent studies have shown that chronic opioid use is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic esophageal motility disorders. Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) is most often identified in patients taking high doses of opioids. This condition is associated with poorer treatment outcomes than primary motility disorders and management of these cases is further complicated by the presence of chronic pain, opioid addiction, and physical and psychological comorbidity.We present the case of a 68-year-old Caucasian woman with OIED, induced by the chronic intake of low-dose Fentanyl and Tramadol prescribed to treat severe back pain. The clinical course highlights the sometimes difficult diagnosis and management of this recently recognized condition.

Changing patterns of opioid initiation for pain management in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cross-sectional study.

The recent publication of a national guideline and quality standards in Canada have provided clinicians with new, evidence-based recommendations on safe, appropriate opioid use. We sought to characterize how well opioid initiation practices aligned with these recommendations before and following their release. We conducted a population-based study among people initiating opioids prior to the release of national guidelines (April 2015-March 2016; fiscal year [FY] 2015) and in the most recent year available (January-December 2019) in Ontario, Canada. We used linked administrative claims data to ascertain the apparent indication for opioid therapy, and characterized the initial daily dose (milligrams morphine or equivalent; MME) and prescription duration for each indication. In FY2015, 653,885 individuals commenced opioids, compared to 571,652 in 2019. Over time, there were small overall reductions in the prevalence of initial daily doses exceeding 50MME (23.9% vs. 20.1%) and durations exceeding 7 days (17.4% vs. 14.8%); but the magnitude of the reductions varied widely by indication. The prevalence of high dose (>50MME) initial prescriptions reduced significantly across all indications, with the exception of dentist-prescribed opioids (13.6% vs. 12.1% above 50MME). In contrast, there was little change in initial durations exceeding 7 days across most indications, with the exception of some surgical indications (e.g. common excision; 9.3% vs. 6.2%) and among those in palliative care (35.2% vs. 29.2%). Despite some modest reductions in initiation of high dose and long duration prescription opioids between 2015 and 2019, clinical practice is highly variable, with opioid prescribing practices influenced by clinical indication. These findings may help identify medical specialties well-suited to targeted interventions to promote safer opioid prescribing.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia of ventilated critically ill patients with multiple trauma: a prospective randomized study

BackgroundSedation of ventilated critically ill trauma patients requires high doses of opioids and hypnotics. We aimed to compare the consumption of opioids and hypnotics, and patient outcomes using sedation with or without continuous regional analgesia (CRA). MethodsMultiple trauma-ventilated patients were included. The patients were randomized to receive an intravenous analgesia (control group) or an addition of CRA within 24h of admission. A traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients group was analyzed. The primary endpoint was the cumulative consumption of sufentanil at 2 days of admission. Secondary endpoints were cumulative and daily consumption of sufentanil and midazolam, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and safety of CRA management. ResultsSeventy six patients were analyzed: 40 (67.5% males) in the control group and 36 (72% males) in the CRA group, respectively. The median [IQR] Injury Severity Score was 30.5 [23.5–38.5] and 26.0 [22.0–41.0]. The consumption of sufentanil at 48h was 725 [465–960] μg/48h versus 670 [510–940] μg/48h (p = 0.16). Daily consumption did not differ between the groups except on day 1 when consumption of sufentanil was 360 [270–480] μg vs. 480 [352–535] μg (p = 0.03). Consumptions of midazolam did not differ between the groups. No difference was noted between the groups according to the secondary endpoints. ConclusionsCRA does not decrease significantly sufentanil and midazolam consumption within the first 5 days after ICU admission in multiple trauma-ventilated patients. The use of peripheral nerve blocks in heavily sedated and ventilated trauma patients in the ICU seems safe.

Prescription Opioid Use among Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak in Taiwan: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

The COVID-19 outbreak disrupted medical access for patients receiving chronic opioid therapy. This study investigated their prescription opioid dosages before and after the 2020 outbreak in Taiwan. A prospective questionnaire survey was conducted among registered outpatients receiving long-term opioids before July 2019 in Taiwan. The questionnaire included items from the Taiwanese Brief Pain Inventory and quality of life assessment. Follow-up surveys in outpatient departments through October 2020 were conducted to collect opioid prescription data. After a mean of 531 days, the questionnaire responses of 103 of the initial 117 respondents were reviewed. Daily opioid doses decreased for 31 respondents (30.1%), remained roughly equivalent (defined as ±2.5%) for 27 (26.2%), and increased for 45 (43.7%) after the first wave of the pandemic. The use of strong opioids and nonopioid medications did not significantly differ among the three groups, but less fentanyl patch use was noted in the decreased-dose group after the outbreak. More than 70% of the patients received daily high-dose opioids (≥90 morphine milligram equivalents); moreover, 60% reported constipation. No deaths due to opioid overdose occurred during the study period. The COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 did not interrupt access to long-term opioid prescriptions for most registered patients with chronic pain in Taiwan. Less fentanyl patch use was observed in participants whose opioid dose was tapering.

Analgesic use and favourable patient-reported outcome measures after paediatric surgery: an analysis of registry data

BackgroundPain after paediatric appendectomy and tonsillectomy is often undertreated. Benchmarking of hospitals could reveal which measures are associated with improved patient- or parent-reported pain-related outcomes. MethodsA total of 898 anonymised cases from 11 European hospitals participating in PAIN OUT infant were analysed. The children completed a questionnaire on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 24 h after surgery. According to a composite PRO measure, including pain intensity and pain-related interference, hospitals were allocated to Group I (favourable results), II (average results), and III (unfavourable results). Benchmarking of hospital groups was performed investigating process variables (dosing of non-opioid analgesics, opioids, and dexamethasone) associated with PROs, side-effects, and children's perception of care. Variables associated with PROs were analysed using multinomial regression analysis with the PRO score-related hospital group as a dependent variable (estimated odds ratios [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]). ResultsDuring the first 24 h after surgery, 1.2 (1.1–1.3) full daily doses of non-opioid analgesics (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID], paracetamol, metamizole) were administered in group I and 0.7 (0.6–0.8) in group III (P<0.001). Intraoperative dexamethasone was administered to 70.1 and 52.6% of the children in Group I and Group III, respectively (P<0.001). A lower number of full daily doses of non-opioid analgesics: 0.22 [0.15–0.31]), less dexamethasone (0.49 [0.33–0.71]), fewer non-opioid analgesics before the end of surgery (0.37 [0.22–0.62]) and higher opioid doses were associated with hospital allocation to group III vs group I (Nagelkerke's R2=0.433). ConclusionsThe results indicated substantial deficits in the concept, application, and dosing of analgesics in paediatric patients after surgery. Timely administration of adequate analgesic doses can easily be introduced into daily clinical practice. Clinical trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT 02083835.

Usefulness of Inhaled Sedation in Patients With Severe ARDS Due to COVID-19.

Sedation in intensive care is fundamental for optimizing clinical outcomes. For many years the world has been facing high rates of opioid use, and to combat the increasing opioid addiction plans at both national and international level have been implemented.1 The COVID-19 pandemic posed a major challenge for health systems and also increased the use of sedatives and opioid analgesia for prolonged periods of time, and at high doses, in a significant proportion of patients. In our institutions, the shortage of many drugs for intravenous (IV) analgosedation forces us to alternatives to replace out-of-stock drugs or to seek sedation goals, which are difficult to obtain with traditional drugs at high doses.2 METHODS: This was an analytical retrospective cohort study evaluating the follow-up of subjects with inclusion criteria from ICU admission to discharge (alive or dead). Five end points were measured: need for high-dose opioids (≥ 200 µg/h), comparison of inhaled versus IV sedation of opioid analgesic doses, midazolam dose, need for muscle relaxant, and risk of delirium. A total of 283 subjects were included in the study, of whom 230 were administered IV sedation and 53 inhaled sedation. In the inhaled sedation group, the relative risks (RRs) were 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.8, P = .045) for need of high-dose fentanyl, 0.3 (95% CI 0.20-0.45, P < .001) for need of muscle relaxant, and 0.8 (95% CI 0.61-1.15, P = .25) for risk of delirium. The median difference of fentanyl dose between the inhaled sedation and IV sedation groups was 61 µg/h or 1,200 µg/d (2.2 ampules/d, P < .001), and that of midazolam dose was 5.7 mg/h. Inhaled sedation was associated with lower doses of opioids, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants compared to IV sedation. This therapy should be considered as an alternative in critically ill patients requiring prolonged ventilatory support and where IV sedation is not possible, always under adequate supervision of ICU staff.

New Areas of Consensus for the Management of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) in Pregnancy: An International Delphi Panel

Introduction and aim Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a single nucleotide substitution in the beta-globin gene, resulting in the production of hemoglobin (Hb) S, and is the most common hematologic genetic disorder worldwide. As a result of Hb polymerization, oxidative stress and chronic hemolysis, complications occur during pregnancy for women with SCD, impacting both maternal and fetal health. We aimed to identify areas of consensus for the management of pregnancy-related complications in SCD, with a focus on prophylactic transfusion therapy (PTT). Methods A Delphi panel consisting of 13 experts from 4 countries replied to 2 rounds of questions (1 panelist dropped out between the 1st and 2nd survey). The 1st survey (October-November 2021) consisted of open-ended questions, while the 2nd one (April-May 2022, used to identify the degree of consensus or changes in opinion among panelists) was comprised of multiple-choice or closed questions based on the answers from the 1st survey. The thresholds were: <9/12 panelists (<75%) for no consensus, 9-10/12 panelists (75-90%) for consensus, and ≥11/12 panelists (>90%) for strong consensus. The Delphi panel covered topics where no global standardization or little evidence exists to guide management and prevention of maternal complications during pregnancy in SCD. These included antenatal care, hydroxyurea (HU) therapy, transfusion, prevention and treatment of complications, delivery and follow-up, bottlenecks and knowledge gaps. Results The panelists achieved strong consensus in the following areas of management: antenatal care (specifically, that pregnant women with SCD should be followed at least every 4 weeks by a multi-disciplinary team of specialists who would decide on the required tests and treatments), HU (discontinuation ≥3 months before conception; experts would not recommend discontinuation of pregnancy in case of exposure to HU during pregnancy), delivery and follow-up (that a multidisciplinary team should decide on labor induction or elective cesarean section). For the following areas of management, no consensus was achieved: continuation of HU therapy (could be considered during pregnancy/lactation if the risks of stopping HU therapy outweigh the benefits and if the patient understands the risks and agrees with continuing therapy), Hb level targeted prior to delivery, or preferred transfusion modality (simple transfusions versus automated red cell exchange [aRCX]) for a pregnant woman with SCD who was not on PTT during pregnancy but needed to be transfused prior to delivery. The input collected for transfusion (including details on when to recommend PTT) is summarized in the Table. The experts felt that target Hb and hematocrit should be set by clinical experience and would be impacted by the time interval between transfusions and the clinical indication for transfusion. There was no consensus on the most suitable transfusion modality. The experts identified a strong interest to prioritize the use of routine PTT in pregnant women with SCD as an area of research. Conclusion The experts did not achieve uniform consensus to support the standardized use of PTT in pregnant women with SCD. They achieved consensus that PTT should be routinely used in pregnant women with ≥2 acute vaso-occlusive pain episodes in a 4-week period regardless of genotype, with a preference for peripheral venous over central venous access, and the use of aRCX over simple transfusion (target HbS <30%) for the prevention of transfusional iron overload. The experts also achieved a strong consensus that prophylactic red cell exchanges should be used to reduce frequency of acute pain episodes in women taking high-dose opioids daily, and recommended consideration of on-demand transfusions for acute fetal complications. Consensus was not achieved on frequency of prophylactic transfusions, timing of PTT initiation during pregnancy in relation to HU discontinuation, target hematocrit levels, methods for the prevention of alloimmunization (extended red cell phenotyping versus genotyping) and the use of PTT for secondary prevention of fetal complications and pregnancy loss. In general, the areas of non-consensus seemed to correspond to areas with the widest knowledge gaps and lack of evidence, highlighting the need for further research in the use of PTT in pregnant women with SCD. Funding: Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

The association between chiropractic integration in an Ontario community health centre and continued prescription opioid use for chronic non-cancer spinal pain: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study

Background:Emerging evidence suggests that access to chiropractic care may reduce the likelihood of initiating an opioid prescription for spinal pain; however, the impact of chiropractic care for patients already prescribed opioids is uncertain. We undertook a sequential explanatory mixed methods study to evaluate the association between initiating chiropractic care and continued opioid use among adult patients attending an Ontario community health centre (CHC) and receiving opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer spinal pain.Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 210 patient records between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2020. We used generalized estimating equations, adjusted for patient demographics, co-morbidities, visit frequency, and calendar year, to evaluate the association between receipt versus non-receipt of chiropractic services and continued opioid use (e.g., unique opioid fills, number of refills, and dosages) up to one year following the index chiropractic visit. We also completed follow-up interviews with 14 patients and nine general practitioners from the CHC and integrated these data with our quantitative findings.Results:Over 12-month follow-up, there were lower rates of opioid fills (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.83) and refills (IRR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.17–0.42) among chiropractic recipients (n = 49) versus non-recipients (n = 161). Although patients who did and did not receive chiropractic care began the study with the same dose of opioids, recipients were less likely to be prescribed higher-dose opioids (i.e., ≥ 50 mg morphine equivalents daily) compared to non-recipients at three months (odds ratio [OR] = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04–0.47), six months (OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05–0.40), nine months (OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07–0.57), and 12 months (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08–0.62). Interviews suggested that patient self-efficacy, limited effectiveness of opioids for chronic pain, stigma regarding use of opioids, and access to chiropractic treatment were important influencing factors.Conclusion:We found that continued prescription opioid use among patients with chronic non-cancer spinal pain who received chiropractic care was lower than in patients who did not receive chiropractic care. Four themes emerged in our qualitative interviews to help provide a richer understanding of this association. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the effect of chiropractic care on opioid use for chronic spinal pain.

High opioid doses, naloxone, and central nervous system active medications received by Medicare-enrolled adults.

A limited number of studies have analyzed prescribing among Medicare-enrolled adults at risk for opioid overdoses. The objectives of this study were to evaluate prescribing for naloxone and central nervous system (CNS) active medications and to determine the relationships of patient characteristics with exposure to these medications. This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a Medicare-enrolled medication therapy management eligible cohort. Patients were stratified into two cohorts, individuals with a mean daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose <50 and individuals with MME ≥50. Medications assessed included benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR), hypnotics, gabapentanoids, selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), antipsychotics, barbiturates, other antiepileptics, hydroxyzine, and naloxone. Chi-square with odds ratios and logistic regressions determined the relationships of medications and patient characteristics with mean daily MME ≥50. Relationship between medications and opioid dose was adjusted for age and sex. There were 3452 patients with a daily MME <50 and 1116 with a daily MME ≥50. After adjusting for age and sex, patients with a daily MME ≥50 were more likely to be prescribed hypnotics (OR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.70), SNRIs (OR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.17-1.64), and naloxone (OR: 3.21, 95% CI 2.49-4.12) (p < 0.001). Nine percent of eligible patients received naloxone. Age groups of persons <85 years of age had 1.58-4.04 (p ≤ 0.004) times the odds of being prescribed a mean daily MME ≥50. Nearly one-fourth of patients were prescribed a mean daily opioid therapy of MME ≥50. These patients were more likely to be prescribed hypnotics, SNRIs, and naloxone. Patients receiving chronic high-dose opioid therapy were more likely to be in age groups of persons <85 years. Naloxone may be underprescribed among eligible adults. Targeted medication services may ensure optimal prescribing among Medicare patients with chronic opioid therapies.

Patterns of prescribing in primary care leading to high-dose opioid regimens: a mixed-method study.

There are concerns about continuing increases in the number of patients prescribed long-term opioids and the prescribing of 'strong' opioids for chronic pain. Little is known about patients who are prescribed these long-term, high-dose drugs. To understand patterns of opioid prescribing that lead to long-term, high-dose use. A mixed-method study of the opioid prescription histories of patients using high doses in a North Wales GP practice. All patients on high-dose opioids during the census week were identified. Summary graphs of the prescription histories were prepared. Qualitative analysis was conducted individually by four researchers. A workshop was held to arrive at a consensus about common features and to inform further quantitative analysis. A quarter of high-dose regimens were initiated outside the practice, either in a different primary care practice or in secondary care. The majority of the remaining patients showed a pattern of dose increases to high levels over a short period (median 3.5 months). None showed a pattern of gradual increases over a longer timescale. Most of the patients remained on high doses continuously once a daily dose of ≥120 mg oral morphine equivalent (OME) was reached. These findings suggest that high-dose opioid regimens develop quickly in response to unknown clinical factors. An expected insidious upward drift in dose was not seen. The findings have implications for the prevention of potentially dangerous long-term, high-dose opioid prescribing. A dose of 60 mg OME or more is suggested as a useful 'red flag'.

The Philippine General Hospital’s First Fluoroscopy-guided Retrocrural Celiac Plexus Block as an Alternative to Surgical Management in a Patient with Intractable Pain from Chronic Pancreatitis: A Case Report

Intractable pain from chronic pancreatitis is commonly challenging to manage medically. Due to debilitating abdominal pain, quality of life of patients is usually poor. These patients require high doses of strong opioids and even surgical intervention. This paper reports the safe performance of fluoroscopy-guided retrocrural celiac plexus block in a 26-year-old male with chronic pancreatitis. This treatment modality spared him from undergoing total pancreatectomy and the subsequent need for postoperative lifetime insulin and enzyme replacement therapy.

Medication Use Evaluation of High-Dose Long-Term Opioid De-prescribing in Multiple Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

The Opioid Safety Initiative (OSI) was implemented in 2013 to enhance the safe and appropriate use of opioids in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Opioid use decreased nationally in subsequent years, but characterization of opioid de-prescribing practices has not been well established. To describe changes in patient characteristics and patterns of de-prescribing since OSI implementation for opioid users at > 90 morphine equivalent daily dose for at least 90 days for those that discontinued opioids within the VA. Retrospective observational pre-post intervention medication use evaluation using VA data and electronic health records to identify differences in opioid de-prescribing between fiscal year 2013 (FY13; early OSI) and FY17 (late OSI). Reviewers' insights for local opioid management and de-prescribing practices collected through web-based post-data collection survey. Veterans prescribed high-dose long-term opioid therapy in FY13 and FY17 who subsequently discontinued opioids at 27 VA medical centers. Chart review data from local facility reviewers identified socioeconomic characteristics, opioid de-prescribing rationale (e.g., risk-benefit, diversion) and practices (e.g., rate of opioid discontinuation, taper monitoring activities, withdrawal monitoring), and outcomes following discontinuation. Among 315 patients in FY13 and 322 patients in FY17 with opioid discontinuation, discontinuation rationale focused on diversion in FY13 and risk-benefit in FY17. Clinical pharmacists and pain management specialists had increased involvement in FY17 opioid discontinuations (36% versus 16%). Of all discontinuations, 56% of patients were tapered in FY13 versus 70% of patients in FY17. Tapering plans were longer in FY17 than in FY13 (163 days versus 65 days). Transitions to non-opioid pain therapy following opioid discontinuation were higher in FY17 compared to FY13 (70% versus 60%). Veterans discontinued from high-dose long-term opioids in FY17 were more optimally managed compared to those in FY13. Findings suggest improvements in opioid de-prescribing following OSI implementation, but interpretation is limited by study design.

Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner-Driven High Opioid Dose Reevaluation in Veterans with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

Veterans Health Administration implemented the Opioid Safety Initiative (OSI) in 2013 to promote safe/rational opioid prescribing. West Palm Beach VA Healthcare System (WPBVAHCS) has been an outlier for the percentage of Veterans with chronic non-cancer pain receiving ≥90 mg Morphine Equivalent Daily Dosing (MEDD) in Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISN) 8 since the 2016 fiscal year. The purpose was to determine the utility of a Pain Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner (CPP) identifying, reviewing, and approaching Veterans utilizing high-dose opioids for dose reevaluation and the impact on OSI metric post-opioid reevaluation. Pain CPP opioid education resulted in 28% (11/39) of Veterans undergoing an average 17.7 mg MEDD opioid dose reduction. For Veterans evaluated by Pain CPP, 83% (15/18) reported no change or improvement in average pain and PEG score. Pain CPP’s implemented 48 interventions outside of opioid dose reduction, the most common related to naloxone. No documented opioid overdose events, hospitalizations for uncontrolled pain or mental health, suicide attempts or pain-related crisis interventions were reported. Pain CPP’s are equipped to provide opioid education, address risk mitigation strategies, reassess pain regimens, and refer for non-pharmacologic modalities. Utilization of Pain CPP resources helps improve OSI metrics while providing safe comprehensive medication management (CMM) for chronic pain.

A retrospective study comparing postoperative opioid prescribing practices in an academic medical centre.

In the midst of the North American opioid crisis, identifying and intervening on drivers of high-risk opioid prescriptions is an important step towards reducing iatrogenic harm. We aimed to identify factors associated with variations in high-risk opioid discharge prescriptions, following select surgical procedures, to guide future quality improvement initiatives. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1322 patients who underwent select open pelvic and open abdominal surgeries between January 1 and December 31, 2017, in a tertiary health care centre in Montreal. Patients who underwent open abdominal surgeries were prescribed significantly higher daily doses of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (45 mg; interquartile range, 30-60), than patients who underwent either a caesarean delivery (20 mg, 20-20) or a hysterectomy (30 mg, 22-30). After adjustment for multiple potential confounders, abdominal surgery was associated with 4 times the odds of receiving more than 50 MME at hospital discharge compared with pelvic surgeries (odds ratio, 3.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-11.97). The availability of postoperative preprinted order sets with fixed high doses of opioids was also highly associated with the outcome. In our institution, some surgeries were more likely to receive high-risk opioid prescriptions at discharge. Efforts to optimize safer prescribing practices should address the creation and/or updating of preprinted order sets to reflect current best practice guidelines. This initiative could be overseen by hospital pharmacy and therapeutics committees.