High-dose Cisplatin Research Articles

Dose and Volume De-Escalation for Elective Nodal Regions in Patients With Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) Undergoing Curative-Intent Concurrent Chemoradiation (CCRT)

Several de-escalation strategies for HPV-associated OPC have focused on treatment de-intensification to the gross disease. We propose that by systematically reducing the volume and dose to the elective regions, toxicity can be decreased without compromising tumor control. Here we report our long-term results.Since 2010, we started our systemic de-escalation approach by first reducing the treatment volumes for the node-negative neck. Retropharyngeal, level IB, high level II, and levels IV-V nodal basins were not included in the subclinical target volume. For the node-positive neck, levels IB and V were not covered unless involved. Using this approach, we have observed high control rates. Starting March 2017, we subsequently reduced the dose to all elective regions to 30 Gy in 15 fractions for all patients with HPV-positive OPC undergoing curative CCRT. This is followed by a cone-down to the gross disease with a 3-5 mm margin delivering 40 Gy in 20 fractions. Patients were required to receive concurrent cisplatin or other chemotherapy.From March 2017 to July 2019, 276 consecutive HPV-positive OPC patients underwent CCRT. Median age was 61 (range: 34-87), 90% were male, and 26% had ≥ 15 pack-year of smoking history. Overall, 35% had cT3-4 and 24% had cN2-3 per AJCC 8th Edition. The majority (77%) received high-dose cisplatin and 81% of them had a cumulative dose of 300mg/m2. With a median follow-up of 23 months (range: 1-42), 7 patients (2.5%) developed locoregional recurrence - 6 had disease recurrence in the primary site and/or gross nodes that received 70 Gy and 1 patient had a gross nodal recurrence in the 30 Gy region due to mistargeting. All patients with gross nodal recurrence in the neck were successfully salvaged with surgery. There was no disease recurrence in the subclinical fields receiving 30 Gy or in the omitted radiation fields. Seventeen (6.2%) patients developed distant metastasis. The 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was 92.5%, distant metastasis-free survival 90.0%, and overall survival 94.6%. Fifty-six of the 276 patients were also enrolled on an adaptive radiotherapy protocol (NCT03096808) to study modification of the radiation treatment plan during treatment course to account for temporal variations in anatomy, with toxicities and quality-of-life (QoL) metrics evaluated at baseline and follow-up visits. Of the 56 patients on adaptive protocol, 5.8% had feeding tube placement during treatment. No patient had feeding tube dependence at 6 months after radiotherapy. At 2-year follow-up, most of the QoL metrics (pain, social contact, social eating, speech, and swallow) were comparable or superior to baseline measures except for taste and xerostomia.The systematic de-escalation strategy of volume and dose resulted in favorable locoregional control and acute toxicities profile. This regimen can be adapted for treating a wide range of HPV-associated OPC patients undergoing primary CCRT.

Renal Outcomes in High-Dose Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A New and Interesting Perspective

Renal Outcomes in High-Dose Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A New and Interesting Perspective

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin is superior to radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and radiotherapy alone : Analysis of the Austrian head and neck cancer registry of the AGMT.

BackgroundThe addition of cisplatin or cetuximab to radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has significantly improved the outcome. While the superiority of cisplatin over cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy has been shown in a definitive setting, we set out to compare postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin to radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and radiotherapy alone within the Austrian head and neck cancer registry of the Working Group on Pharmaceutical Tumor Treatment (AGMT) study group.Material and methodsIn the AGMT head and neck cancer registry, data of 557 patients with SCCHN from five Austrian cancer centers were prospectively collected between 2012 and 2017. Of these patients 120 received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, 26 patients received postoperative radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and 56 patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy only. Patient characteristics, stage of disease, details on treatment as well as survival were analyzed by a chart-based review.ResultsIn patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy the addition of cisplatin significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to cetuximab (PFS 84.2 months vs. 17.0 months, p = 0.04, OS not reached vs. 46.0 months, p = 0.02) and PFS compared to radiotherapy alone (PFS 84.2 months vs. 28.5 months, p < 0.01). Patients treated with cetuximab were significantly older and had a worse performance score than patients receiving cisplatin or radiotherapy alone.ConclusionThis study confirmed the importance of multimodal treatment concepts in patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Postoperative cetuximab might be an option in patients not eligible for high-dose cisplatin but cisplatin should remain the standard of care.

Osteosarcoma in Children: Not Only Chemotherapy.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most severe bone malignant tumor, responsible for altered osteoid deposition and with a high rate of metastasis. It is characterized by heterogeneity, chemoresistance and its interaction with bone microenvironment. The 5-year survival rate is about 67% for patients with localized OS, while it remains at 20% in case of metastases. The standard therapy for OS patients is represented by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy. The most used chemotherapy regimen for children is the combination of high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Considered that the necessary administration of high-dose chemotherapy is responsible for a lot of acute and chronic side effects, the identification of novel therapeutic strategies to ameliorate OS outcome and the patients’ life expectancy is necessary. In this review we provide an overview on new possible innovative therapeutic strategies in OS.

Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy (HITOC) after Cytoreductive Surgery for Pleural Malignancies-A Retrospective, Multicentre Study.

Simple SummaryThere continues to be little research in the literature on perioperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with intraoperative hyperthermic chemotherapy-lavage (HITOC) in patients with malignant pleural tumours. The aim of this multicentre study was to assess the results of the current practice in Germany so as to give recommendations to standardize the procedure. CRS with cisplatin-based HITOC can be performed with low major morbidity and a low rate of renal insufficiency, which was associated with the cisplatin dosage of irrigation.In the context of quality assurance, the objectives were to describe the surgical treatment and postoperative morbidity (particularly renal insufficiency). A retrospective, multicentre study of patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with cisplatin-based HITOC was performed. The study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation (GZ: RI 2905/3-1)). Patients (n = 350) with malignant pleural mesothelioma (n = 261; 75%) and thymic tumours with pleural spread (n = 58; 17%) or pleural metastases (n = 31; 9%) were analyzed. CRS was accomplished by pleurectomy/decortication (P/D: n = 77; 22%), extended P/D (eP/D: n = 263; 75%) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP: n = 10; 3%). Patients received cisplatin alone (n = 212; 61%) or cisplatin plus doxorubicin (n = 138; 39%). Low-dose cisplatin (≤125 mg/m2 BSA) was given in 67% of patients (n = 234), and high-dose cisplatin (>125 mg/m2 BSA) was given in 33% of patients (n = 116). Postoperative renal insufficiency appeared in 12% of the patients (n = 41), and 1.4% (n = 5) required temporary dialysis. Surgical revision was necessary in 51 patients (15%). In-hospital mortality was 3.7% (n = 13). Patients receiving high-dose cisplatin were 2.7 times more likely to suffer from renal insufficiency than patients receiving low-dose cisplatin (p = 0.006). The risk for postoperative renal failure is dependent on the intrathoracic cisplatin dosage but was within an acceptable range.

Role of chemotherapy in malignant bone tumors

Background Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary malignant bone tumor. In Europe and the United States, its prognosis has been greatly improved by the use of multimodal treatment, including preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy as well as surgery. In Japan, however, only a few clinical studies on osteosarcoma have been carried out. The aim of this study is To evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on nonmetastatic, operable osteosarcoma arising in the extremities.Patients and methods A total of 124 patients were enrolled in this trial, and ultimately 113 patients were eligible, the Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Osteosarcoma (NECO) study, was conducted. Preoperative chemotherapy included high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), cisplatin (CDDP), and adriamycin (ADR). If the induction therapy was assessed as not effective, high-dose ifosfamide (IFO) was added to the chemotherapy regimen.Results The 5-year overall survival (OAS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates in the NECO study were 77.9% and 65.5%, respectively. A good histological response to the induction chemotherapy resulted in favorable OAS (78.7%). The patients assessed as poor histological responders with progressive disease after the induction chemotherapy exhibited comparable outcomes (OAS 89.5%, EFS 68.2%).Conclusion We analyzed the results of the intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the effects of adding IFO on patients with osteosarcoma . The results suggest efficacy of the high-dose IFO addition to the standard three-drug chemotherapy regimen. However, a randomized clinical study is needed to establish the true impact of IFO on patients with osteosarcoma

Serum selenium predicts achievement of full-dose cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, observational study

ObjectiveConcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with three-weekly high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m2) is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but compliance with cisplatin is often poor due to various adverse events. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to determine the predictors of achievement of full-dose cisplatin. MethodsA prospective, observational study was conducted involving 60 patients who received CCRT with three-weekly high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m2) for locally advanced HNSCC. Possible predictors affecting compliance with cisplatin were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Age, sex, primary site, clinical stage, treatment intent, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking and drinking habits, body mass index, creatinine clearance, serum albumin, controlling nutrition status, trace elements (Fe, Zn, Cu, Se), acute kidney injury, white blood cell count decrease, neutrophilia, and weight loss were the variables evaluated. ResultsTwenty-seven patients achieved full-dose cisplatin (300 mg/m2), and the other 33 patients did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both mild renal dysfunction and selenium deficiency before treatment independently had negative impacts on achievement of full-dose cisplatin. ConclusionsAs well as renal function, selenium deficiency is a potential therapeutic target for CCRT with high-dose cisplatin in HNSCC patients.

Outcomes of Osteosarcoma in Children Without High-Dose Methotrexate: Could It Be Less Toxic Without Effecting Survival Rates?

Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone sarcoma in childhood. High-dose methotrexate, doxorubicine, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide combinations are used as standard treatment in chemotherapy and could cause serious toxicity. Another alternative chemotherapy protocol is consisting of epirubicin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (ECI), which we use in our center. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients with OS who were treated with ECI protocol, retrospectively. Methods: Forty-three patients with OS diagnosed at our center between December 1995 and September 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Results: The mean follow-up period was 31 months (5-145 months). Recurrence was detected in 15 of 43 patients. When the factors affecting relapse are examined, recurrence was higher in patients who were older than 10 years at the time of diagnosis, upper extremity involvement, osteoblastic, and chondroblastic subgroups, but there was no statistically significant difference. Five-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 67.4% and 58.9%, and event-free survival rates were 54% and 47.3%, respectively. While 5-year overall survival rate was 86.7% in nonrecurrent cases, this rate was 40.9% in recurrent cases and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.023). Just two patients died because of the toxicity. Conclusion: The prognosis of OS is still poor in relapse cases, so the choice of chemotherapy for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy is vital. When the risk of toxicity is also considered, the first step of ECI protocol is seen as a preferable treatment option because the survival rates are similar to the literature.

Comparative study on hemato- and nephrotoxicity profile of weekly versus every 3-weekly cisplatin dosage during induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head neck squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundCisplatin is a frontline anticancer drug routinely used as part of concurrent chemoradiation administered at 3-weekly (100 mg/m2) dose. However, its role as fractionated weekly dose has achieved favorable outcome in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (LA-SCCHN) during induction chemotherapy (IC). We therefore sought to compare the toxicity outcomes of patients with LA-SCCHN treated with platinum-based IC at a single institution study using split-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. We compared the hematological and renal toxicity profile between the weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) (group A) versus 3-weekly (100 mg/m2) (group B) dosage schedule in this setting.ResultsThe median age of the patients in groups A and B were 49.1 years and 48.27 years respectively with male:female ratio of 4:1. Most of the patients were of oropharyngeal cancers. Group A patients showed greater neutropenia (40.2%) than group B (20.6%). There was statistically significant fall in Hb% level in group A (13.9%) than in group B (11.9%). Renal profile showed greater rise in serum urea and serum creatinine (52.7%) in group B than in group A (52.29%) with statistically significant difference.ConclusionsSince toxicities induced by high-dose cisplatin are irreversible and reduce quality of life in patients, the weekly regimen may be preferred owing to less renal toxicity, lesser hospitalization and more feasible in situations with high patient load and limited resources.

Midazolam increases cisplatin-sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via the miR-194-5p/HOOK3 axis

BackgroundsAs previously reported, midazolam anesthesia exerts tumor-suppressing effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the regulating effects of this drug on cisplatin-resistance in NSCLC have not been studied. Thus, we designed this study to investigate this issue and preliminarily delineate the potential molecular mechanisms.MethodsWe performed MTT assay and trypan blue staining assay to measure cell proliferation and viability. Cell apoptosis was examined by FCM. qRT-PCR and immunoblotting were performed to determine the expression levels of genes. The targeting sites between genes were predicted by bioinformatics analysis and were validated by dual-luciferase reporter gene system assay. Mice tumor-bearing models were established and the tumorigenesis was evaluated by measuring tumor weight and volume. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to examine the pro-proliferative Ki67 protein expressions in mice tumor tissues.ResultsThe cisplatin-resistant NSCLC (CR-NSCLC) cells were treated with high-dose cisplatin (50 μg/ml) and low-dose midazolam (10 μg/ml), and the results showed that midazolam suppressed cell proliferation and viability, and promoted cell apoptosis in cisplatin-treated CR-NSCLC cells. In addition, midazolam enhanced cisplatin-sensitivity in CR-NSCLC cell via modulating the miR-194-5p/hook microtubule-tethering protein 3 (HOOK3) axis. Specifically, midazolam upregulated miR-194-5p, but downregulated HOOK3 in the CR-NSCLC cells, and further results validated that miR-194-5p bound to the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of HOOK3 mRNA for its inhibition. Also, midazolam downregulated HOOK3 in CR-NSCLC cells by upregulating miR-194-5p. Functional experiments validated that both miR-194-5p downregulation and HOOK3 upregulation abrogated the promoting effects of midazolam on cisplatin-sensitivity in CR-NSCLC cells.ConclusionsTaken together, this study found that midazolam anesthesia reduced cisplatin-resistance in CR-NSCLC cells by regulating the miR-194-5p/HOOK3 axis, implying that midazolam could be used as adjuvant drug for NSCLC treatment in clinical practices.

Chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin compared with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using high-dose cisplatin (HDC) is standard for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); weekly cisplatin (WC) is an alternative. We aim to compare retrospectively the survival and disease control outcomes between these regimens in our institutional experience. Patients with stage III-IV HNSCC treated with definitive or postoperative CRT between 2012 and 2018 were identified. Patients were stratified by intent-to-treat CRT. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were generated and multivariable Cox models were performed. 193 patients were treated with concurrent HDC (n=69), WC at 40mg/m2 (WC40, n=88) or WC at <40mg/m2 (WC<40, n=36). Treatment intent was definitive in 74% and adjuvant in 26%. Baseline differences included age, performance status and HPV status. Cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200mg/m2 was achieved in 89% (HDC), 86% (WC40) and 25% (WC<40, P<0.0001). For HDC, WC40 and WC<40, 2-year OS rates were 87%, 77%, 60% and 2-year DFS rates were 75%, 68% and 52%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed gender, performance status, primary site, T/N stage and chemotherapy as predictive of OS. Primary site, T/N stage and chemotherapy regimen were associated with DFS. Compared with HDC, no differences in locoregional control (LRC) or distant metastasis were observed between groups. Concurrent HDC is associated with increased total cisplatin intensity, OS and DFS compared with weekly cisplatin regimens. LRC was not associated with chemotherapy regimen. HDC remains the standard of care; WC40 is a reasonable alternative that does not appear to sacrifice LRC.

Effect of cisplatin chemotherapy on the inner ear function and serum prestin concentration.

One of the main side effects of chemotherapy with cisplatin is irreversible sensorineural hearing loss. This study was conducted to assess the correlation between the serum prestin concentration as a potential cochlear biomarker and audiologic findings in patients after cisplatin chemotherapy. A total of 52 patients aged 18-75years were included in this prospective study. All the subjects were recruited from the radiotherapy and oncology center of a tertiary hospital in Rasht, Iran. Audiologic parameters evaluations and serum prestin concentrations were measured at baseline and after 1-3weeks of chemotherapy. The inner ear function was evaluated by pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and distortion product of otoacoustic emission (DPOAE). A repeated-measure analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the relationship between the PTA, DPOAE, serum prestin concentration and cumulative cisplatin dose. Fifty-two patients (36 females) participated in this study. The PTA results showed that ototoxicity was more frequent among the patients with a high cumulative dose of cisplatin (χ2 trend = 15.25; P < 0.001). DPOAE responses revealed that 38.5% of the patients had ototoxicity change after 40-80mg of cisplatin administration. After receiving 40-80mg of cisplatin, serum prestin concentration increased from 130 to 230pg/ml. There is a significant positive correlation between prestin concentration after receiving more than 80mg of cisplatin and the ototoxic changes in the DPOAE response. The present study showed correlations between prestin concentrations and ototoxicity diagnosis by DPOAE findings. An early rise in prestin concentration is particularly important and an early sign of hearing loss. Future studies are recommended to investigate the effect of varying doses of cisplatin on prestin concentration and any association between ototoxicity and clinicopathological features.

Outcomes of Post-Operative Treatment with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in High-Risk Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OCSCC): A Multi-Institutional Collaboration.

Adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), with high-dose cisplatin remains standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with high-risk pathologic features. We evaluated outcomes associated with different cisplatin dosing and schedules, concurrent with radiation (RT), and the effect of cumulative dosing of cisplatin. An IRB-approved collaborative database of patients (pts) with primary OCSCC (Stage I–IVB AJCC 7th edition) treated with primary surgical resection between January 2005 and January 2015, with or without adjuvant therapy, was established from six academic institutions. Patients were categorized by cisplatin dose and schedule, and resultant groups compared for demographic data, pathologic features, and outcomes by statistical analysis to determine disease free survival (DFS) and freedom from metastatic disease (DM). From a total sample size of 1282 pts, 196 pts were identified with high-risk features who were treated with adjuvant CRT. Administration schedule of cisplatin was not significantly associated with DFS. On multivariate (MVA), DFS was significantly better in patients without perineural invasion (PNI) and in those receiving ≥200 mg/m2 cisplatin dose (p < 0.001 and 0.007). Median DFS, by cisplatin dose, was 10.5 (<200 mg/m2) vs. 20.8 months (≥200 mg/m2). Our analysis demonstrated cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2 was associated with improved DFS in high-risk resected OCSCC pts.

Efficacy of Salvage Chemotherapy in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma with Primary Treatment Failure According to Putative Cell of Origin

Efficacy of Salvage Chemotherapy in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma with Primary Treatment Failure According to Putative Cell of Origin

Dexamethasone-Sparing Regimens with Oral Netupitant and Palonosetron for the Prevention of Emesis Caused by High-Dose Cisplatin: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.

BackgroundTo reduce the overall exposure to dexamethasone (DEX) in patients receiving cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, we evaluated the noninferiority of DEX on day 1, with or without low‐dose DEX on days 2 and 3, combined with an oral fixed‐dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA), compared with the guideline‐consistent use of 4‐day DEX.Patients and MethodsIn this open‐label, multicenter study, chemotherapy‐naïve patients undergoing high‐dose cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2), were given NEPA and DEX (12 mg) on day 1 and randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to receive either (a) no further DEX (DEX1), (b) oral DEX (4 mg daily) on days 2–3 (DEX3), or (c) DEX (4 mg twice daily) on days 2–4 (DEX4). The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR: no emesis and no rescue medication) during the 5‐day overall phase. The noninferiority margin was set at −15% difference (DEX1 or DEX3 minus DEX4). Secondary efficacy endpoints included complete protection (CP: CR and none or mild nausea).ResultsTwo‐hundred twenty‐eight patients, 76 in each arm, were assessable. Noninferiority was met for both DEX‐sparing regimens and the reference arm, with overall phase CR rates of 76.3% in each of the DEX1 and DEX3 arms and 75.0% in the DEX4 arm (95% confidence interval, −12.3% to 15% for each comparison). During the overall phase, CP rates were similar between groups.ConclusionA simplified regimen of NEPA plus single‐dose DEX offers comparable chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting prevention throughout 5 days post‐chemotherapy with the advantage of sparing patients additional doses of DEX in the high–emetic‐risk setting of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy.Implications for PracticeDexamethasone (DEX) has traditionally played an integral role in the management of chemotherapy‐induced emesis. Although generally considered safe, even short‐term DEX use is associated with various side effects, and some evidence suggests that concurrent steroids may reduce the efficacy of immunotherapies. This study demonstrates comparable antiemetic control during the 5 days post‐chemotherapy with a simplified regimen of netupitant/palonosetron plus single‐dose DEX versus the standard 4‐day DEX reference treatment in high‐dose cisplatin. This represents a clinically relevant achievement as it not only simplifies antiemetic prophylaxis but also offers an opportunity to appropriately use in patients where caution with corticosteroid use is advised.

Randomized trial on acute toxicities of weekly vs three-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiation in head and neck cancer.

BackgroundThe current first‐line treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LAHNC) is concurrent chemoradiation with three‐weekly cisplatin 100 mg/m2. However, prescribing cisplatin at this dose increases the treatment toxicity, which may compromise the treatment results. An alternative schedule is weekly 40 mg/m2 cisplatin.AimTo compare the acute hematologic and renal toxicities of these two regimens.MethodsThis randomized clinical trial included 77 LAHNC patients who were allocated to a high dose (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or low dose (40 mg/m2 weekly) cisplatin group concurrent with radiotherapy. Hematologic and renal indices were measured weekly during chemoradiation.ResultsThe average age of patients was 55.3 years. Overall, 71.4% of patients were treated in a definitive setting. The incidence of severe hematologic events was not significantly different. However, the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly greater in the three‐weekly group (67.85 vs. 58.57% mL/min per 1.73 m2; P‐value = .02). Cumulative cisplatin dose of ≥240 mg/m2 was significantly greater in the weekly group. Totally, treatment breaks occurred in 40.3% of patients due to treatment toxicity. Treatment interruption was primarily due to neutropenia in the three‐weekly and renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia in the weekly group.ConclusionsSevere acute hematologic toxicities were comparable for three‐weekly and weekly groups. The decrease in eGFR through treatment was more significant with weekly cisplatin. Further follow‐up, however, is needed to confirm its impact on delayed renal function.

Phase I study of functionalized hafnium oxide nanoparticles (NBTXR3) activated by radiotherapy in cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced HNSCC patients.

6051 Background: The non-surgical standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) patients is concurrent chemoradiation with high dose cisplatin or cetuximab in case of contra-indication to cisplatin. However elderly patients, and those with poor performance status, comorbidities, and/or intolerance, may not benefit from these SOC treatments and represent a high unmet need. New approaches are thus needed to improve clinical outcomes without adding toxicity. NBTXR3, a novel radioenhancer, composed of functionalized hafnium oxide nanoparticles, is injected once intratumorally and activated by radiotherapy (RT).NBTXR3 increases the RT energy deposit inside tumor cells and subsequently increases tumor cell death compared to RT alone, while sparing healthy tissues. We present here the results of the dose expansion part of the phase I study evaluating NBTXR3 plus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in this population. Methods: Patients with stage III-IVA or T3/T4 (AJCC/UICC TNM staging system 8th ed.) HNSCC of the oropharynx or oral cavity, ineligible to cisplatin or cetuximab and amenable for RT, received a single intratumoral injection of NBTXR3 and IMRT (70 Gy in 35 fractions /7 weeks). A classical 3 + 3 dose escalation design has tested four doses of NBTXR3, equivalent to 5, 10, 15, and 22% of baseline theoretical tumor volume. The RP2D established as 22% of baseline tumor volume is further tested in the dose expansion part. The primary endpoints of the dose expansion part are objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) of the primary tumor, by imaging according to RECIST 1.1. Safety is also evaluated. Results: As of August 13, 2020, 43 patients have been treated in the phase I dose expansion part. The median age was 70.7 years old (range: 50.7- 89.9), 70% of patients had cardiac disorder risk, 44% had gastrointestinal disorder risk and 44% metabolic and nutrition disorder risk. The median tumor volume was 42.8 mL (range: 1.3 - 222.3). At a median time of 7.8 months after NBTXR3 injection, the ORR of the primary lesion was 83.9% and the CRR 67.7% in the evaluable population for efficacy (N = 31). Three patients (7%) experienced at least one serious adverse event (AE) related to the injection procedure and/or NBTXR3 which represented less than 1% of all reported AEs. RT-related toxicity was as expected with IMRT. Three deaths due to AEs related to RT and other causes were reported. The recruitment is ongoing and updated efficacy and safety results will be presented. Conclusions: NBTXR3 intratumoral administration followed by IMRT may represent an option in elderly patients or patients with multiple comorbidities with LA-HNSCC who have limited therapeutic options. NBTXR3 activated by RT showed promising anti-tumor efficacy, supporting further evaluation in a phase III randomized trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01946867.

The equivalency study of novel current standard 3-drugs combination regimen (ondansetron, dexamethasone and olanzapine) to netupitant containing regimen for preventing high dose cisplatin induce nausea and vomiting treatment, double blind placebo control trial.

12100 Background: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is vital in cancer treatment. Here, we compared the efficacy of netupitant-containing regimen; composed of NEPA, dexamethasone, and olanzapine (NEPAs), which is recommended for preventing CINV from high-emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) to standard 3-drugs; ondansetron, dexamethasone, olanzapine for preventing CINV from high-dose cisplatin (≥75 mg/m2). Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial randomly assigned untreated patients who were received high-dose cisplatin in a 1:1 ratio to either NEPAs or standard 3-drugs combination regimen. Dose of dexamethasone in NEPAs regimen was modified after preplanned interim safety analysis to increase from 4 to 8 mg per day on days 2-4. The stratification factors were concurrent treatment with radiation and sex. The primary endpoint was the overall complete response (CR) rate defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue antiemetic drugs. The protocol allowed crossover to NEPAs for those who received standard 3-drugs and did not reach CR in the first cycle. We collected outcome in the first 2-cycle of treatment. Results: Between January 2019 and December 2020, hundred patients were randomly assigned to either NEPAs (n = 51) or in-house standard 3-drugs (n = 49). Demographic characteristics were well-balanced in both arms. Total events in both arms were 101 events for NEPAs and 78 events for standard 3-drug. Overall CR rate were 70% and 69% in NEPAs and standard 3-drugs, ( p-value 0.87) respectively. According to emesis phase, CR in acute (0- 24 hrs.) and delay phase (24-120 hrs.) were not different in both arms; 91% vs. 89% and 72% vs. 71% in NEPAs and standard 3-drugs respectively. However, mean nausea VAS score was significantly lower in NEPAs (1.63 vs. 2.02, p-value = 0.001). The ad hoc subgroup analysis shown similar efficacy between before and after protocol amendment of NEPAs regimen in term of delay emesis CR rate; 70.9% vs. 73.9% ( p-value 0.73). Conclusions: The NEPA-containing regimen did not show superiority compare to standard 3-drug in terms of complete response rate for CINV prevention among patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Furthermore, the dexamethasone dosage of 4 vs. 8 mg per day might not affect the efficacy of delay emesis of the NEPAs regimen. Clinical trial information: TCTR20190508001. [Table: see text]

Noninferiority study evaluating dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing regimens administered with NEPA, a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) caused by high-dose cisplatin.

12093 Background: Corticosteroids such as DEX continue to play a key role for the prevention of CINV. Although they are generally considered safe when used in combination with other anti-emetic agents, corticosteroids can cause a range of side effects. To reduce the overall exposure to DEX in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy, we evaluated the non-inferiority of DEX on day 1, with or without low-dose DEX on days 2 and 3, combined with oral NEPA, a fixed combination of the NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron, compared with NEPA plus the guideline-recommended use of 4-day DEX (reference arm). Non-inferiority was met for both DEX-sparing regimens and the reference arm for the primary endpoint of complete response (CR: no emesis and no rescue use) during the overall (0-120h) phase post-chemotherapy. In this analysis secondary efficacy endpoints were evaluated for the single-dose DEX-sparing group versus the 4-day DEX arm. Methods: In this analysis from an open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04201769) chemotherapy-naïve patients undergoing high-dose cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2) received either NEPA and DEX (12 mg) on day 1 only or NEPA and DEX [12 mg on day 1 plus 4 mg twice daily on days 2-4 (DEX4)]. Efficacy endpoints included complete protection (CR plus no significant nausea), no emesis, and no significant nausea (&lt;25 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale) during the acute (0-24h), delayed (&gt;24-120h) and overall phases. The non-inferiority margin was set at -15% difference (DEX1 minus DEX4). Results: One-hundred fifty-two patients, 76 in each arm, were included. Non-inferiority was met for the DEX1 arm and the DEX4 reference arm for all efficacy endpoints (Table). Conclusions: A simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX offers comparable CINV prevention throughout 5 days post-chemotherapy with the advantage of sparing patients additional doses of DEX in the high emetic risk setting of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04201769. [Table: see text]

Developing a Metabolic Therapy for Osteosarcoma

Developing a Metabolic Therapy for Osteosarcoma