Heart Failure Events Research Articles

Long term safety and outcomes after atrial shunting for heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: 5-year and 3-year follow-up in the REDUCE LAP-HF I and II trials

BackgroundThere is a little evidence regarding long-term safety and efficacy for atrial shunt devices in heart failure (HF). MethodsThe REDUCE LAP-HF I (n=44) and II (n=621) trials (RCT-I and -II) were multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trials of patients with HF and ejection fraction >40%. Outcome data were analyzed from RCT-I, a mechanistic trial with 5-year follow-up, and RCT-II, a pivotal trial identifying a responder group (n=313) defined by exercise PVR <1.74 WU and no cardiac rhythm management device with 3-year follow-up. ResultsAt 5 years in RCT I, there were no differences in cardiovascular (CV) mortality, HF events, embolic stroke, or new-onset atrial fibrillation between groups. After 3 years in RCT II, there was no difference in the primary outcome (hierarchical composite of CV mortality, stroke, HF events, and KCCQ) between shunt and sham in the overall trial. Compared to sham, those with responder characteristics in RCT-II had a better outcome with shunt (win ratio 1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.2], P=0.006; 44% reduction in HF events [shunt 9 vs. control 16 per 100 patient-years], P=0.005; and greater improvement in KCCQ overall summary score [+17.9±20.0 vs. +7.6±20.4], P<0.001), while non-responders had significantly more HF events. Shunt treatment at 3 years was associated with a higher rate of ischemic stroke (3.2% vs. 0%, 95% CI 2% - 6.1%, p=0.032) and lower incidence of worsening kidney dysfunction (10.7% vs. 19.3%, p=0.041). ConclusionsWith up to 5 years of follow up, adverse events were low in patients receiving atrial shunts. In the responder group, atrial shunt treatment was associated with a significantly lower HF event rate and improved KCCQ compared to sham through 3 years of follow-up.Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02600234, NCT03088033

Surveillance and Alert-based Multiparameter Monitoring to Reduce Worsening Heart Failure Events: Results From SCALE-HF 1

There is a need for better noninvasive remote monitoring solutions that prevent hospitalizations through the early prediction and management of heart failure (HF). SurveillanCe and Alert-Based Multiparameter Monitoring to ReducE Worsening Heart Failure Events (SCALE-HF 1) evaluated the performance of a novel congestion index that alerts to fluid accumulation preceding HF events. SCALE-HF 1 was a multicenter, prospective, observational study investigating HF event prediction using data from the cardiac scale. Participants with HF took measurements at home by standing barefoot on the scale for approximately 20 seconds each day. The congestion index was applied retrospectively, and an alert was generated when the index exceeded a fixed threshold established in prior studies. HF events were defined as unplanned administration of IV diuretics or admissions with a primary diagnosis of HF. Sensitivity was defined as the ratio of correctly identified HF events to the total number of HF events. We enrolled 329 participants (mean age 64 ± 14 years; 43% women; 32% Black; 56% with reduced ejection fraction) across 8 sites with 238 participant-years of follow-up and 69 usable HF events. The congestion index predicted 48 of the 69 HF events (70%) at 2.58 alerts per participant-year. In contrast, the standard weight rule (weight gain of >3 lb in 1 day or >5 lb in 7 days) predicted only 24 of the 69 HF events (35%) at 4.18 alerts per participant-year. The congestion index alerts had a significantly higher sensitivity (P < .01) at a lower alert rate than the standard weight rule. The congestion index alerts demonstrated sensitive prediction of HF events at a low alert rate, significantly exceeding the performance of weight-based monitoring. NCT04882449.

Association of Multiple Nonhypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-Related Genetic Variants and Outcomes in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Approximately 10% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients have left ventricular systolic dysfunction (end-stage HCM) leading to severe heart-failure; however, risk stratification to identify patients at risk of progressing to end-stage HCM remains insufficient. In this study, the authors sought to elucidate whether the coexistence of other cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related variants is associated with progression to end-stage HCM in patients with HCM harboring pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) sarcomeric variants. The authors performed genetic analysis of 83 CVD-related genes in HCM patients from a Japanese multicenter cohort. P/LP variants in 8 major sarcomeric genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, TPM1, MYL2, MYL3, and ACTC1) definitive for HCM were defined as "sarcomeric variants." In addition, P/LP variants associated with other CVDs, such as dilated cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, were referred to as "other CVD-related variants." Among 394 HCM patients, 139 carried P/LP sarcomeric variants: 11 (7.9%) carried other CVD-related variants, 6 (4.3%) multiple sarcomeric variants, and 122 (87.8%) single sarcomeric variants. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, presence of multiple sarcomeric variants (adjusted HR [aHR]: 3.35 [95%CI: 1.25-8.95]; P = 0.016) and coexistence of other CVD-related variants (aHR: 2.80 [95%CI: 1.16-6.78]; P = 0.022) were independently associated with progression to end-stage HCM. Coexisting other CVD-related variants were also associated with heart failure events (aHR: 2.75 [95%CI: 1.27-5.94]; P = 0.010). Approximately 8% of sarcomeric HCM patients carried other CVD-related variants, which were associated with progression to end-stage HCM and heart failure events. Comprehensive surveillance of CVD-related variants within sarcomeric HCM patients contributes to risk stratification and understanding of mechanisms underlying end-stage HCM.

Avoiding Treatment in Hospital With Subcutaneous Furosemide for Worsening Heart Failure: A Pilot Study (AT HOME-HF)

BackgroundTherapies are needed to address worsening congestion, without hospitalization, in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). ObjectivesThis pilot study assessed outcomes of a novel subcutaneous (SC) furosemide formulation compared to usual care in outpatients with worsening congestion. MethodsParticipants with chronic HF and worsening congestion were randomized open-label 2:1 to SC furosemide compared to usual care (UC). Decongestion was estimated by tracking body weight. The primary endpoint was a win ratio of a 30-day hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death, HF events, and change in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide. Secondary endpoints included dyspnea severity, functional capacity, and quality of life. ResultsThirty-four participants were randomized to SC furosemide and 17 to UC. SC furosemide caused greater reduction in body weight: between-group difference in least square mean change was −2.02 kg at day 3 (95% CI: −3.9 to −0.14; P = 0.035). SC furosemide-to-UC win ratio was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.48-2.50; P = 0.806). Significant between-group least square mean differences favoring SC furosemide occurred in 7-point dyspnea score (P = 0.017) and 6-minute walk test (P = 0.032), with trend in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 Overall Summary Score of 9.15 (95% CI: 1.95-20.3; P = 0.106). The most common related adverse event with SC furosemide was mild infusion site pain (11.8%). ConclusionsSC furosemide augmented weight loss in patients with HF and worsening congestion. The composite primary endpoint was not statistically significant in this pilot investigation. However, findings of improved dyspnea scores and functional capacity, with favorable trend in KCCQ-12 score, warrant additional investigation to further document the clinical value of SC furosemide as an alternative to hospitalization (AT HOME-HF [Avoiding Treatment in the Hospital With Furoscix for the Management of Congestion in Heart Failure—A Pilot Study]; NCT04593823)

Safety and Feasibility of an Implanted Inferior Vena Cava Sensor for Accurate Volume Assessment: FUTURE-HF2 Trial.

A novel implantable sensor has been designed to accurately measure inferior vena cava (IVC) area to allow daily monitoring of IVC area and collapse to predict congestion in heart failure (HF). A prospective, multicenter, single arm, Early Feasibility Study enrolled 15 HF patients (irrespective of ejection fraction) with a HF event in the previous 12 months, an elevated NT-proBNP, and receiving ≥40 mg of furosemide equivalent. Primary endpoints included successful deployment without procedure-related (30 days) or sensor-related complications (three months) and successful data transmission to a secure database (3 months). Accuracy of sensor-derived IVC area, patient adherence, NYHA classification, and KCCQ were assessed from baseline to three months. Patient-specific signal alterations were correlated with clinical presentation to guide interventions. Fifteen patients underwent implantation (66±12 years; 47% female; 27% HFpEF, NT-ProBNP 2569 (median, IQR: (1674-5187)) ng/L; 87% NYHA Class III). All patients met the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. Sensor-derived IVC area showed excellent agreement with concurrent CT (R2=0.99, mean absolute error=11.15 mm2). Median adherence to daily readings was 98% (IQR: 86-100%) per patient-month. A significant improvement was seen in NYHA class and a non-significant improvement was observed for KCCQ. Implantation of a novel IVC sensor (FIRE1) was feasible, uncomplicated, and safe. Sensor outputs aligned with clinical presentation and improvements in clinical outcomes. Future investigation to establish the IVC sensor remote management of HF is strongly warranted.

Febuxostat leads to better cardiovascular outcomes compared to allopurinol in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: A Population-based Cohort Study

ObjectiveHyperuricemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease complications in patients with chronic kidney disease. The impact of febuxostat on cardiovascular disease in advanced chronic kidney disease remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the cardiovascular benefits of xanthine oxidase inhibitors, particularly febuxostat and allopurinol, in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. MethodsA retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) (2006–2017). The TriNetX dataset served as an external validation dataset. The study involved 13,187 patients with advanced chronic kidney disease treated with febuxostat or allopurinol. After propensity score matching, a balanced cohort of 976 patients (488 in each arm) was created. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for all-cause mortality and hospitalizations, utilizing the competing risk regression model. ResultsFebuxostat was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.98) and fewer hospitalizations (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44–0.63) than allopurinol. After adjustments, febuxostat also reduced hospitalizations for heart failure (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43–0.80) and infection (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52–0.82). This cardiovascular benefit of febuxostat was consistently observed in the TriNetX dataset. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed that febuxostat was better in reducing death and heart failure events than allopurinol across most of the subgroups. ConclusionsFebuxostat may confer cardioprotective effects in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease compared with allopurinol, thereby potentially useful in reducing cardiovascular risks in this high-risk population.

Finerenone in Patients With a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction. This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event. FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7days, 7days to 3months, >3months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method. Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7days and 3months, and 937 (15.6%) >3months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95%CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7days and 3months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95%CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (Ptrend=0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF. Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With HeartFailure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).

Finerenone in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction

BackgroundSteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce morbidity and mortality among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy in those with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction has not been established. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction are needed.MethodsIn this international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive finerenone (at a maximum dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily) or matching placebo, in addition to usual therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of total worsening heart failure events (with an event defined as a first or recurrent unplanned hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) and death from cardiovascular causes. The components of the primary outcome and safety were also assessed.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 32 months, 1083 primary-outcome events occurred in 624 of 3003 patients in the finerenone group, and 1283 primary-outcome events occurred in 719 of 2998 patients in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95; P=0.007). The total number of worsening heart failure events was 842 in the finerenone group and 1024 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P=0.006). The percentage of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was 8.1% and 8.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11). Finerenone was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and a reduced risk of hypokalemia.ConclusionsIn patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone resulted in a significantly lower rate of a composite of total worsening heart failure events and death from cardiovascular causes than placebo. (Funded by Bayer; FINEARTS-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04435626.)

Rule-based natural language processing to examine variation in worsening heart failure hospitalizations by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and left ventricular ejection fraction

BackgroundPrior studies characterizing worsening heart failure events (WHFE) have been limited in using structured healthcare data from hospitalizations, and with little exploration of sociodemographic variation. The current study examined the impact of incorporating unstructured data to identify WHFE, describing age-, sex-, race and ethnicity-, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-specific rates. MethodsAdult members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) with a HF diagnosis between 2014-2018 were followed through 2019 to identify hospitalized WHFE. The main outcome was hospitalizations with a principal or secondary HF discharge diagnosis meeting rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) criteria for WHFE. In comparison, we examined hospitalizations with a principal discharge diagnosis of HF. Age-, sex-, and race and ethnicity-adjusted rates per 100 person-years (PY) were calculated among age, sex, race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic (NH) Asian/Pacific Islander [API], Hispanic, NH Black, NH White) and LVEF subgroups. ResultsAmong 44,863 adults with HF, 10,560 (23.5%) had an NLP-defined, hospitalized WHFE. Adjusted rates (per 100 PY) of WHFE using NLP were higher compared to rates based only on HF principal discharge diagnosis codes (12.7 and 9.3, respectively), and this followed similar patterns among subgroups, with the highest rates among adults ≥75 years (16.3 and 11.2), men (13.2 and 9.7), and NH Black (16.9 and 14.3) and Hispanic adults (15.3 and 11.4), and adults with reduced LVEF (16.2 and 14.0). Using NLP disproportionately increased the perceived burden of WHFE among API and adults with mid-range and preserved LVEF. ConclusionRule-based NLP improved the capture of hospitalized WHFE above principal discharge diagnosis codes alone. Applying standardized consensus definitions to EHR data may improve understanding of the burden of WHFE and promote optimal care overall and in specific sociodemographic groups.

Effects of Semaglutide on Heart Failure Outcomes in Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease in the FLOW Trial

BackgroundPeople with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for heart failure (HF) and premature death from cardiovascular (CV) causes. The FLOW (Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease), which enrolled participants with T2D and CKD, demonstrated that semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduced the incidence of the primary composite outcome (persistent ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, kidney replacement therapy, and kidney or CV death) by 24%. ObjectivesThis prespecified analysis examined the effects of semaglutide on HF outcomes in this high-risk population. MethodsParticipants were randomized (1:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg or placebo. The prespecified main outcome was a composite of HF events (new onset or worsening of HF leading to an unscheduled hospital admission or an urgent visit, with initiation of or intensified diuretic/vasoactive therapy) or CV death. HF data were collected by the investigator. CV death was adjudicated by an independent committee. ResultsA total of 3,533 randomized participants were followed for a median of 3.4 years. HF was present at baseline in 342 participants (19.4%) in the semaglutide group and 336 (19.0%) in the placebo group. In the overall trial population, semaglutide increased time to first HF events or CV death (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.87; P = 0.0005), HF events alone (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92; P = 0.0068), and CV death alone (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56-0.89; P = 0.0036). The risk reduction for the composite HF outcome was similar in those with (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.98; P = 0.0338) and without (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.89; P = 0.0028) HF at baseline. The risk of HF outcomes (HF events or CV death) was generally higher in participants categorized as NYHA functional class III and those with the HF reduced ejection fraction subtype, regardless of treatment. ConclusionsSemaglutide substantially reduced the risk of time to first composite outcome of HF events or CV death, as well as HF events and CV death alone, in a high-risk population with T2D and CKD. These effects were consistent regardless of history of HF. (A Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease [FLOW]; NCT03819153)

Semaglutide versus placebo in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials

Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (hereafter referred to as HFpEF) is the most common type of heart failure and is associated with a high risk of hospitalisation and death, especially in patients with overweight, obesity, or type 2 diabetes. In the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations in participants with HFpEF. Whether semaglutide also reduces clinical heart failure events in this group remains to be established. We conducted a post-hoc pooled, participant-level analysis of four randomised, placebo-controlled trials (SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM) to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2·4 mg in SELECT, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM; 1·0 mg in FLOW) on heart failure events. The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF, the SELECT trial enrolled participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, and the FLOW trial enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Hence, for this analysis, we include all participants from the STEP-HFpEF trials and those with an investigator-reported history of HFpEF from SELECT and FLOW. The main outcomes for this analysis were the composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or first worsening heart failure event (defined as hospitalisation or urgent visit due to heart failure), time to first worsening heart failure event, and time to cardiovascular death. Efficacy and safety endpoints were analysed with the full analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment, according to the intention-to-treat principle). The SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597, NCT03819153, NCT04788511, and NCT04916470, respectively, and all are complete. Across the four trials, 3743 (16·8%) of 22 282 participants had a history of HFpEF (1914 assigned to semaglutide and 1829 assigned to placebo). In this group of participants with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure events (103 [5·4%] of 1914 in the semaglutide group had events vs 138 [7·5%] of 1829 in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·53-0·89]; p=0·0045). Semaglutide also reduced the risk of worsening heart failure events (54 [2·8%] vs 86 [4·7%]; HR 0·59 [0·41-0·82]; p=0·0019). No significant effect on cardiovascular death alone was seen (59 [3·1%] vs 67 [3·7%]; HR 0·82 [0·57-1·16]; p=0·25). A lower proportion of patients treated with semaglutide had serious adverse events than did those who were treated with placebo (572 [29·9%] vs 708 [38·7%]). In patients with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events, and worsening heart failure events alone, whereas its effect on cardiovascular death alone was not significant. These data support the use of semaglutide as an efficacious therapy to reduce the risk of clinical heart failure events in patients with HFpEF, for whom few treatment options are currently available. Novo Nordisk.

Inflammation in Obesity-Related HFpEF: The STEP-HFpEF Program

BackgroundInflammation is thought to be an important mechanism for the development and progression of obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program, once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide improved heart failure–related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, reduced the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, and reduced body weight in participants with obesity-related HFpEF. However, neither the prevalence nor the clinical characteristics of patients who have various magnitudes of inflammation in the context of obesity-related HFpEF have been well described. Furthermore, whether the beneficial effects of semaglutide on the various HF efficacy endpoints in the STEP-HFpEF Program are modified by the baseline levels of inflammation has not been fully established. Finally, the relationship between weight reduction and changes in CRP across the STEP-HFpEF Program have not been fully defined. ObjectivesThis study sought to: 1) evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF that have various levels of inflammation in the STEP-HFpEF Program; 2) determine if the effects of weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo across all key outcomes are influenced by baseline levels of inflammation assessed by CRP levels; and 3) determine the relationship between change in CRP and weight loss in the STEP-HFpEF Program. MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM). The outcomes were change in the dual primary endpoints (health status [measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire—Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS)] and body weight) from baseline to 52 weeks according to baseline CRP levels. Additional efficacy endpoints included change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), a hierarchical composite endpoint that included death, heart failure events, and differences in the change in the KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD, and levels of CRP in semaglutide- vs placebo-treated patients. Patients were stratified into 3 categories based on baseline CRP levels (<2, ≥2 to <10, and ≥10 mg/L). ResultsIn total, 1,145 patients were randomized, of which 71% of patients had evidence of inflammation (CRP ≥2 mg/L). At baseline, those with higher levels of inflammation were younger, were more likely to be female, and had higher body mass index, worse health status (KCCQ-CSS), and shorter 6MWD. Semaglutide vs placebo led to reductions in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations as well as body weight, and to improvements in 6MWD and the hierarchical composite endpoint that were consistent across baseline CRP categories (all P interaction nonsignificant). Semaglutide also reduced CRP to a greater extent than placebo regardless of baseline CRP levels (P interaction = 0.32). Change in CRP from baseline to 52 weeks was similar regardless of the magnitude of weight loss (P interaction = 0.91). ConclusionsInflammation is highly prevalent in obesity-related HFpEF. Semaglutide consistently improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, and reduced body weight across the categories of baseline CRP. Semaglutide also reduced inflammation, regardless of either baseline CRP or magnitude of weight loss during the trials. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511]; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP HFpEF DM; NCT04916470])

Atrial Fibrillation and Semaglutide Effects in Obesity-Related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: STEP-HFpEF Program

BackgroundObesity is a key factor in the development and progression of both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program (comprising the STEP-HFpEF [Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes] trials), once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function and reduced body weight in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. Whether the effects of semaglutide in this patient group differ in participants with and without AF (and across various AF types) has not been fully examined. ObjectivesThe goals of this study were: 1) to evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF with and without a history of AF; and 2) to determine if the efficacy of semaglutide across all key trial outcomes are influenced by baseline history of AF (and AF types) in the STEP-HFpEF Program. MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials. Patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or matching placebo for 52 weeks. Dual primary endpoints (change in KCCQ-CSS and percent change in body weight), confirmatory secondary endpoints (change in 6-minute walk distance; hierarchical composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, HF events, thresholds of change in KCCQ-CSS, and 6-minute walk distance; and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and exploratory endpoint (change in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) were examined according to investigator-reported history of AF (yes/no). Responder analyses examined the proportions of patients who experienced a ≥5-, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS per history of AF. ResultsOf the 1,145 participants, 518 (45%) had a history of AF (40% paroxysmal, 24% persistent AF, and 35% permanent AF) and 627 (55%) did not. Participants with (vs without) AF were older, more often male, had higher NT-proBNP levels, included a higher proportion of those with NYHA functional class III symptoms, and used more antithrombotic therapies, beta-blockers, and diuretics. Semaglutide led to larger improvements in KCCQ-CSS (11.5 points [95% CI: 8.3-14.8] vs 4.3 points [95% CI: 1.3-7.2]; P interaction = 0.001) and the hierarchal composite endpoint (win ratio of 2.25 [95% CI: 1.79-2.83] vs 1.30 [95% CI: 1.06-1.59]; P interaction < 0.001) in participants with AF vs without AF, respectively. The proportions of patients receiving semaglutide vs those receiving placebo experiencing ≥5-, ≥10-, ≥15-, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS were also higher in those with (vs without) AF (all P interaction values <0.05). Semaglutide consistently reduced CRP, NT-proBNP, and body weight regardless of AF status (all P interaction values not significant). There were fewer serious adverse events and serious cardiac disorders in participants treated with semaglutide vs placebo irrespective of AF history. ConclusionsIn the STEP-HFpEF Program, AF was observed in nearly one-half of patients with obesity-related HFpEF and was associated with several features of more advanced HF. Treatment with semaglutide led to significant improvements in HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, as well as reductions in weight, CRP, and NT-proBNP in people with and without AF and across AF types. The magnitude of semaglutide-mediated improvements in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations was more pronounced in those with AF vs without AF at baseline. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511]; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM; NCT04916470])

Colchicine in acutely decompensated heart failure: the COLICA trial.

Acute heart failure (AHF) promotes inflammatory activation, which is associated with worse outcomes. Colchicine has proven effective in other cardiovascular conditions characterized by inflammatory activation, but has never been evaluated in the setting of AHF. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial included patients with AHF, requiring ≥40 mg of intravenous furosemide, regardless of their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and inpatient or outpatient setting. Patients were randomized within the first 24 hours of presentation to receive either colchicine or placebo, with loading dose of 2 mg followed by 0.5 mg every 12 hours for 8 weeks. A total of 278 patients (median age 75 years, LVEF 40%, baseline N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] 4390 pg/mL) were randomized to colchicine (n=141) or placebo (n=137). The primary endpoint, the time-averaged reduction in NT-proBNP levels at 8 weeks, did not differ between the colchicine group (-62.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -68.9% to -54.2%) and the placebo group (-62.1%, 95% CI -68.6% to -54.3%) (ratio of change 1.0). The reduction in inflammatory markers was significantly greater with colchicine: ratio of change 0.60 (p<0.001) for C-reactive protein and 0.72 (p=0.019) for interleukin-6. No differences were found in new worsening heart failure episodes (14.9% with colchicine vs. 16.8% with placebo, p=0.698); however, the need for intravenous furosemide during follow-up was lower with colchicine (p=0.043). Diarrhea was slightly more common with colchicine, but it did not result in differences in medication withdrawal (8.5% vs. 8.8%). Colchicine was safe and effective in reducing inflammation in patients with AHF, however colchicine and placebo exhibited comparable effects on reducing NT-proBNP and preventing new worsening heart failure events.

Natural History, Phenotype Spectrum and Clinical Outcomes of Desmin (DES)-Associated Cardiomyopathy.

Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) desmin (DES) variants cause heterogeneous cardiomyopathy and/or skeletal myopathy phenotypes. Limited data suggest a high incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac conduction disease (CCD), sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA), and heart failure (HF) events (HF hospitalization, LVAD/cardiac transplant, HF-related death), in patients with P/LP DES variants. However, pleiotropic presentation and small cohort sizes have limited clinical phenotype and outcome characterization. We aimed to describe the natural history, phenotype spectrum, familial penetrance and outcomes in patients with P/LP DES variants through a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis using published reports. We searched Medline (PubMed) and Embase for studies that evaluated cardiac phenotypes in patients with P/LP DES variants. Cardiomyopathy diagnosis or occurrence of MACE were considered evidence of cardiac involvement/penetrance. Lifetime event-free survival from CCD, sustained VA, HF events, and composite MACE was assessed. Out of 4,212 screened publications, 71 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 230 patients were included (52.6% male, 52.2% probands, median age: 31 years [22.0; 42.8] at first evaluation, median follow-up: 3 years [0; 11.0]). Overall, 124 (53.9%) patients were diagnosed with cardiomyopathy, predominantly dilated cardiomyopathy (14.8%), followed by restrictive cardiomyopathy (13.5%), whereas other forms were less common: arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (7.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (6.1%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (5.2%), and other forms (7.4%). Overall, 132 (57.4%) patients developed MACE, with 96 [41.7%] having CCD, 36 [15.7%] sustained VA, and 43 [18.7%] HF events. Familial penetrance of cardiac disease was 63.6% among relatives with P/LP DES variants. Male sex was associated with increased risk of sustained VA (HR 2.28, p=0.02) and HF events (HR 2.45, p=0.008). DES cardiomyopathy exhibits heterogeneous phenotypes and distinct natural history, characterized by high familial penetrance and substantial MACE burden. Male patients face higher risk of sustained VA events.

Comparison Between Heart Failure Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Progression to End-Stage in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

The incidence and prognostic predictors of heart failure (HF) without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), particularly their differences in terms of developing LVSD (progression to end-stage) or sudden cardiac death (SCD), are not fully elucidated. This study included 330 consecutive HCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. HF hospitalization without LVSD and development of LVSD were evaluated as main outcomes. During a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the incidence of HF hospitalization without LVSD was 18.8%, which was higher than the incidence of developing LVSD (10.9%) or SCD (8.8%). Among patients who developed LVSD, only 19.4% experienced HF hospitalization without LVSD before developing LVSD. Multivariable analysis showed that predictors for HF hospitalization without LVSD (higher age, atrial fibrillation, history of HF hospitalization, and higher B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations) were different from those of developing LVSD (male sex, lower LVEF, lower left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and higher tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient). Known risk factors for SCD did not predict either HF without LVSD or developing LVSD. In HCM with LVEF ≥50%, HF hospitalization without LVSD was more frequently observed than development of LVSD or SCD during mid-term follow-up. The overlap between HF without LVSD and developing LVSD was small (19.4%), and these 2 HF events had different predictors.

Effectiveness and Safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 3-Year Results from a Multicentre Cohort Study.

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill (QSYQ) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted at 40 centers in China. Patients with ACS after PCI entered either the QSYQ or Western medicine (WM) groups naturally based on whether they had received QSYQ before enrollment. QSYQ group received QSYQ (0.52 g, 3 times a day for 12 months) in addition to WM. The primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization. The secondary endpoint included rehospitalization due to ACS, heart failure, stroke, and other thrombotic events. Quality of life was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). A total of 936 patients completed follow-up of the primary endpoint from February 2012 to December 2018. Overall, 487 patients received QSYQ and WM. During a median follow-up of 566 days (inter quartile range, IQR, 517-602), the primary endpoint occurred in 46 (9.45%) and 65 (14.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.90; P=0.013]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 61 (12.53%) and 74 (16.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.09; P=0.136). In sensitivity analysis, the results still demonstrated that WM combined with QSYQ reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98; P=0.039). Moreover, QSYQ improved the disease perception domain of the SAQ (P<0.05). In patients with ACS after PCI, QSYQ combined with WM reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint. These findings provide a promising option for managing ACS after PCI and suggest the potential treatment for reducing the risk of primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization through intermittent administration of QSYQ (Registration No. ChiCTR-OOC-14005552).

Relationship of the trajectory of the triglyceride-glucose index with heart failure: the Kailuan study

BackgroundA high triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) is associated with a higher risk of incident heart failure. However, the effects of longitudinal patterns of TyG index on the risk of heart failure remain to be characterized. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to characterize the relationship between the trajectory of TyG index and the risk of heart failure.MethodsWe performed a prospective study of 56,149 participants in the Kailuan study who attended three consecutive surveys in 2006–2007, 2008–2009, and 2010–2011 and had no history of heart failure or cancer before the third wave survey (2010–2011). The TyG index was calculated as ln [fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)/2], and we used latent mixture modeling to characterize the trajectory of the TyG index over the period 2006–2010. Additionally, Cox proportional risk models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident heart failure for the various TyG index trajectory groups.ResultsFrom 2006 to 2010, four different TyG trajectories were identified: low-stable (n = 13,554; range, 7.98–8.07), moderate low-stable (n = 29,435; range, 8.60–8.65), moderate high-stable (n = 11,262; range, 9.31–9.30), and elevated-stable (n = 1,898; range, 10.04–10.25). A total of 1,312 new heart failure events occurred during a median follow-up period of 10.04 years. After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident heart failure for the elevated-stable, moderate high-stable, and moderate low-stable groups were 1.55 (1.15, 2.08), 1.32 (1.08, 1.60), and 1.17 (0.99, 1.37), respectively, compared to the low-stable group.ConclusionsHigher TyG index trajectories were associated with a higher risk of heart failure. This suggests that monitoring TyG index trajectory may help identify individuals at high risk for heart failure and highlights the importance of early control of blood glucose and lipids for the prevention of heart failure.

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices to predict acute clinical decompensation events.

Heart failure (HF) patients are at constant risk of decompensation, and urgent hospital admissions can be life-threatening events. Monitoring biological variables has been proved to be an important mechanism to anticipate decompensations. TriageHF is a validated diagnostic algorithm tool available on Medtronic® cardiac implantable electronic devices that combines physiological data to stratify a patient's risk of HF hospitalization in the following 30 days in low, medium or high risk. We aimed to evaluate the utility of TriageHF algorithm to predict the occurrence of acute clinical decompensation events (ACDE), including HF and non-HF cardiovascular events, within a 30-day period in a population of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. We reviewed the transmissions received by the Medtronic® Carelink™ Network between August 2022 and July 2023. The heart failure risk status (HFRS) and the device parameters contributing to that risk, from the previous 30 days, were collected, along with the occurrence of ACDEs within 30 days. We retrospectively assessed 207 transmissions from the 64 patients included in the study. Among the 93 medium HFRS transmissions, 16 (17.2%) resulted in ACDEs. For the 21 high HFRS transmissions, 10 (47.6%) resulted in ACDEs. Considering the ACDEs, 60.7% were preceded by an alarm-initiated transmission. Except for heart rate variability, each diagnostic parameter demonstrated effectiveness in stratifying risk for ACDEs. Optivol® and the Combined Heart Rhythm showed independent association with ACDEs (p<.001). Patients with medium and high HFRS were, respectively, 8.6 and 29.1 times more likely to experience an ACDE in the next 30 days than low risk patients. A medium-high HFRS conferred a sensitivity of 92.9% and a NPV of 97.8% for an ACDE. TriageHF is a useful method for predicting ACDEs and has the potential to trigger medical actions to prevent hospitalizations.

Precision prediction of heart failure events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and mildly reduced ejection fraction using multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

To assess whether left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), is associated with (i) progressive heart failure (HF), and (ii) sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with mildly reduced ejection fraction (DCMmrEF). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of patients with DCM and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% assessed by CMR, including feature-tracking to assess LV GLS and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Long-term adjudicated follow-up included (i) HF hospitalization, LV assist device implantation or HF death, and (ii) SCD or aborted SCD (aSCD). Of 355 patients with DCMmrEF (median age 54 years [interquartile range 43-64], 216 men [60.8%], median LVEF 49% [46-54]) followed up for a median 7.8 years (5.2-9.4), 32 patients (9%) experienced HF events and 19 (5%) died suddenly or experienced aSCD. LV GLS was associated with HF events in a multivariable model when considered as either a continuous (per % hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.21, p = 0.045) or dichotomized variable (LV GLS > -15.4%: HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.30-5.94, p = 0.008). LGE presence was not associated with HF events (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.73-3.01, p = 0.270). Conversely, LV GLS was not associated with SCD/aSCD (per % HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.22, p = 0.257), whereas LGE presence was (HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.39-9.23, p = 0.008). LVEF was neither associated with HF events nor SCD/aSCD. Multi-parametric CMR has utility for precision prognostic stratification of patients with DCMmrEF. LV GLS stratifies risk of progressive HF, while LGE stratifies SCD risk.