Heteromeric Receptor Complexes Research Articles

Concluding Remarks

This meeting has well illustrated the state-of-the-art phenomenon of receptor-receptor interactions between heptaspanning membrane receptors (also named G protein-coupled receptors [GPCRs]), as both theoretical aspects and new experimental evidence have been discussed extensively.From a general standpoint the theoretical discussion has enlightened us to the phenomenon of receptor-receptor interactions as a "privileged window," which allows the exploration of some important structural and functional aspects of molecular networks (Agnati et al., this issue). Also, unexpected functions of well-known proteins can be studied, such as beta-arrestins, which are at the interface between horizontal and vertical molecular networks and have a signaling function of their own besides modulating receptor transduction and trafficking (Lefkowitz, this issue). The experimental data have shown that many in vitro approaches are now available to study the structure and function of homo- and hetero-oligomers in cell lines and primary cultures, making possible a major expansion of the field. However, the in vivo approaches to study the role of heteromeric receptor complexes in cell function have been less clear cut. It was discussed, especially by George, that one problem with receptor knockout mice is inter alia that the removal of one receptor will alter the balance of various homomeric and heteromeric receptor complexes in which the deleted receptor participated. In fact, each receptor might participate in a number of heteromeric receptor complexes. An attractive in vivo approach in the receptor-receptor interaction study will be to use knockin mice in which one receptor A (Ra) has been removed and replaced by a mutated A receptor (Ra'). Several different strategies can be considered, and here are some of them. 1. Ra' can still recognize its ligand and signal but does not interact with its usual heteromeric receptor partner B (Rb). Thus, Ra' operates as a monomer and/or homomer. 2. Ra' can still recognize its ligand and interact with Rb, but it cannot signal (e.g., it does not couple to the G protein). Thus, Ra' operates as a modulator protein of Rb. 3. Ra' can still recognize its ligand and signal, but it allosterically affects its heteromeric partner Rb in a different way. Thus, Ra' operates as an unusual modulator of Rb.

Adenosine A<SUB>2A</SUB> and Dopamine D<SUB>2</SUB> Heteromeric Receptor Complexes and Their Function

The existence of A2A-D2 heteromeric complexes is based on coimmunoprecipitation studies and on fluorescence resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analyses. It has now become possible to show that A2A and D2 receptors also coimmunoprecipitate in striatal tissue, giving evidence for the existence of A2A-D2 heteromeric receptor complexes also in rat striatal tissue. The analysis gives evidence that these heteromers are constitutive, as they are observed in the absence of A2A and D2 agonists. The A2A-D2 heteromers could either be A2A-D2 heterodimers and/or higher-order A2A -D2 hetero-oligomers. In striatal neurons there are probably A2A-D2 heteromeric complexes, together with A2A-D2 homomeric complexes in the neuronal surface membrane. Their stoichiometry in various microdomains will have a major role in determining A2A and D2 signaling in the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Through the use of D2/D1 chimeras, evidence has been obtained that the fifth transmembrane (TM) domain and/or the I3 of the D2 receptor are part of the A2A-D2 receptor interface, where electrostatic epitope-epitope interactions involving the N-terminal part of I3 of the D2 receptor (arginine-rich epitope) play a major role, interacting with the carboxyl terminus of the A2A receptor. Computerized modeling of A2A-D2 heteromers are in line with these findings. It seems likely that A2A receptor-induced reduction of D2 receptor recognition, G protein coupling, and signaling, as well as the existence of A2A-D2 co-trafficking, are the consequence of the existence of an A2A-D2 receptor heteromer. The relevance of A2A-D2 heteromeric receptor complexes for Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia is emphasized as well as for the treatment of these diseases. Finally, recent evidence for the existence of antagonistic A2A-D3 heteromeric receptor complexes in cotransfected cell lines has been summarized.

Existence and Theoretical Aspects of Homomeric and Heteromeric Dopamine Receptor Complexes and Their Relevance for Neurological Diseases

Dopamine (DA) and other receptors physically interact in the plasma membrane of basal ganglia neurons forming receptor mosaics (RMs). Two types of RMs are discussed, homomers formed only by DA-receptor (DA-R) subtypes and heteromers formed by DA-R associated with other receptors, such as A2A, A1, mGluR5, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), gamma-aminobutryic acid (GABA)-A, and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid. By being part of horizontal molecular networks, RMs tune multiple effector systems already at membrane level, such as G protein regulated inward rectifying potassium channels and dopamine transporter activity. Also, ligand-gated ion channels such as GABA-A and NMDA receptors are modulated by DA-R, e.g., in the striatal GABA output neurons through the formation of heteromeric complexes with these receptors. Thus, intramembrane DA-R-receptor interactions play an important role in the information handling in the basal ganglia. On this basis, functional implications of DA RM in physiological and pathological conditions are discussed. The effects of temperature on RM are discussed not only because receptor-decoding mechanisms are temperature sensitive, but also in view of the suggestion that possible ordering effects (i.e., changes in the entropy of a receptor complex) induced by a ligand are as a result of alterations in the receptor oligomerization (i.e., are related to rearrangements of the RM). Hence, brain temperature may have profound effects on brain integrative functions not only because its effects on the kinetics of biochemical reactions, but also for its effects on receptor geometry, building up of RM, and alterations in protein expression, as is the case of H-channels following febrile seizures.

Trafficking of Adenosine A<SUB>2A</SUB> and Dopamine D<SUB>2</SUB> Receptors

An interaction between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors has been demonstrated previously. It is generally found that agonist treatment internalizes receptors, including A2A and D2, whereas less is known of the long-term effects involved in the agonist-mediated trafficking of A2A and D2 receptors. Furthermore, the possible influence of the antagonists on receptor trafficking is still undefined. The present studies focus on the long-term effects of A2A and D2 agonist and D2 antagonist treatments on both A2A and D2 receptor trafficking studied at three different time intervals--3, 15, and 24 h. In addition, with the fluorescence resonance energy transfer technique, formation of heteromeric A2A and D2 receptor complexes was shown in the cotransfected CHO cell line. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that a 3-h treatment with the D2 agonist induced coaggregation of A2A/D2 receptors. These A2A/D2 receptor coaggregates internalized after 15 h with a recruitment of the receptors back to the cell membrane after 24 h. In contrast to the effects of the agonist treatment, a 3-h treatment with the D2-like antagonist raclopride increased both A2A and D2 immunoreactivity, indicating that the D2 antagonist stabilizes the D2 receptor and thereby reduces the internalization of both of the A2A and D2 receptors. Taken together, an activation of either A2A and D2 receptor or blockade of D2 receptors will cause long-lasting changes in A2A and D2 receptor trafficking.

Role of Rho/ROCK and p38 MAP Kinase Pathways in Transforming Growth Factor-β-mediated Smad-dependent Growth Inhibition of Human Breast Carcinoma Cells in Vivo

Role of Rho/ROCK and p38 MAP Kinase Pathways in Transforming Growth Factor-β-mediated Smad-dependent Growth Inhibition of Human Breast Carcinoma Cells in Vivo

Phosphorylation of Smad signaling proteins by receptor serine/threonine kinases.

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family members, which include TGF-βs, activins, and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), elicit their multifunctional effects by binding to and complex formation of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors (see Fig. 1). Each family member signals via distinct combinations of type I and type II receptors, both of which are required for signaling. Upon formation of the heteromeric receptor complex, the type I receptor is phosphorylated by the type II receptor kinase. Phosphorylation occurs predominantly in a region rich in glycine and serine residues (GS domain) in the juxtamembrane domain of the type I receptor, which possibly leads to a conformational change and thereby activates the type I receptor kinase (see Fig. 1) (, , ). The activated type I receptor propagates the signal downstream through transient interaction with, and phosphorylation of, particular Smoeand mad related protein (Smad) molecules (, , ). Certain Smads are phosphorylated directly by activated type I receptors in a differential manner; they are therefore termed pathway-restricted Smads. Whereas Smad2 and Smad3 act in TGF-β and activin pathways, Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 are thought to act in BMP pathways. Phosphorylation occurs at the two most C-terminal serine residues in a conserved C-terminal Ser-Ser-X-Ser motif (see Fig. 2). Pathway-restricted Smads oligomerize with Smad4, which acts as a common mediator in TGF-β, activin, and BMP signaling. After translocation to the nucleus, the oligomers interact with DNA directly, or in complex with other DNA-binding proteins, and control transcription of target genes (see Figs. 1 and 2). Recently, inhibitory Smads, Smad6, and Smad7, have been identified that antagonize TGF-β family signaling (). Open image in new window Fig. 1. TGF-β signaling through Smad proteins. A hypothetical signal transduction pathway for TGF-β family members through their serine/threonine kinase receptors and downstream effector molecules of the Smad family, is depicted. Open image in new window Fig. 2. Functional domains in Smad proteins. Type I receptor-induced phosphorylation of pathway-restricted Smads may induce an unfolding of the N-and C-terminal domains (shown on left side), allowing heteromeric complex formation and transcriptional activation mediated by C-terminal domain and direct DNA-binding via N-terminal domain (shown on right side). The phospho-acceptor site of type I receptor kinase is indicated. The conserved regions in the N-terminal domain (MH1 domain) and C-terminal domain (MH2 domain), are indicated by black and hatched boxes, respectively.

Ryk: Another Heretical Wnt Receptor Defies the Canon

The number of proteins that serve as Wnt receptors is growing, and Ryk is one of the newest members of this group. Understanding how extracellular Wnt ligands interact with transmembrane receptors to activate intracellular signaling cascades is of broad importance to biology and to human disease because of the roles for Wnt in embryogenesis, cancer, and neural development and plasticity. The functions and properties of Ryk, a receptor tyrosine kinase-like protein, in canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling are beginning to be uncovered. Biochemical and genetic studies reveal that the extracellular regions of Ryk and Fz can form a mutual ligand-binding domain. It remains to be seen whether Ryk can form similar complexes with other Wnt-binding proteins. If divergent transmembrane proteins can combine interchangeably to form heteromeric Wnt receptor complexes, then a stunning diversity of signaling responses might be mediated through differential expression and localization of these proteins in target cells.

CAVEOLAE ARE NEGATIVE REGULATORS OF TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR-β1 SIGNALING IN URETERAL SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS

The mechanisms underlying ureteral cell regulation are largely unknown. Previous studies have identified lipid rafts/caveolae as regulators of growth stimulatory signals in ureteral smooth muscle cells (USMCs). In this study we determined whether growth inhibitory signaling by transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is also regulated by caveolae in USMC. Expression of components of the TGF-beta1 signaling axis in USMCs was determined by immunoblot and mRNA analyses. Growth regulatory activity of TGF-beta1 was assessed by H-thymidine incorporation. In select experiments caveolae were disrupted reversibly by cholesterol depletion and replenishment prior to TGF-beta1 treatment. TGF-beta1-responsive gene expression was evaluated using the TGF-beta1 responsive promoter-reporter construct 3TP-Lux. USMCs expressed TGF-beta1, types I and II TGF-beta1 receptors, and the effector Smad-2. TGF-beta1 potently inhibited DNA synthesis in USMCs (IC50 60 pM). TGF-beta1 mediated DNA synthesis inhibition was potentiated following the disruption of caveolae by cholesterol depletion. This effect was reversible with membrane cholesterol restoration. TGF-beta1 stimulated gene activity was augmented by caveolae disruption, while caveolae reformation returned promoter activity to baseline levels. TGF-beta1 is a potent growth inhibitor of USMCs and its activity can be enhanced by caveolae ablation. These findings suggest a role for TGF-beta1 in the growth regulation of normal ureteral cells and implicate caveolar membrane domains in the negative regulation of TGF-beta1 signaling. These studies may be relevant to ureteral pathologies that are characterized by smooth muscle dysplasia.

Adenosine A2A Receptor and Dopamine D3 Receptor Interactions: Evidence of Functional A2A/D3 Heteromeric Complexes

Adenosine A(2A) and dopamine D(2) receptors have been shown previously to form heteromeric complexes and interact at the level of agonist binding, G protein coupling, and trafficking. Because dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors show a high degree of sequence homology, A(2A) and D(3) receptors may also interact in a similar manner. The present studies with confocal microscopy showed that A(2A)-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and D(3)-green fluorescent protein 2 (GFP2) receptors colocalize in the plasma membrane. Furthermore, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis demonstrated that A(2A)-YFP and D(3)-GFP2 receptors give a positive FRET efficiency and are thereby likely to exist as heteromeric A(2A)/D(3) receptor complexes. Saturation experiments with [(3)H]dopamine demonstrated that the A(2A) receptor agonist 4-[2-[[6-amino-9(N-ethyl-beta-d-ribofuranuronaminoamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid (CGS-21680) reduced the affinity of the high-affinity agonist binding state of the D(3) receptor for [(3)H]dopamine. The A(2A) and D(2A) receptors seem to interact also at the level of G protein coupling, because the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680 fully counteracted the D(3) receptor-mediated inhibition of a forskolin-mediated increase in cAMP levels. Taken together, when coexpressed in the same neuron, A(2A) and D(3) receptors seem to form A(2A)/D(3) heteromeric receptor complexes in which A(2A) receptors antagonistically modulate both the affinity and the signaling of the D(3) receptors. D(3) receptor is one of the therapeutic targets for treatment of schizophrenia, and therefore, the A(2A)/D(3) receptor interactions could provide an alternative antischizophrenic treatment.

Activation of LIMK1 by binding to the BMP receptor, BMPRII, regulates BMP-dependent dendritogenesis

The growth and morphological differentiation of dendrites are critical events in the establishment of proper neuronal connectivity and neural function. One extrinsic factor, BMP7, has been shown to specifically affect dendritic morphogenesis; however, the underlying mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. Here we show that LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1), a key downstream effector of Rho GTPases, colocalizes with the BMP receptor, BMPRII, in the tips of neurites and binds to BMPRII. This interaction is required for BMP-dependent induction of the dendritic arbor in cortical neurons. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the physical interaction of LIMK1 with BMPRII synergizes with the Rho GTPase, Cdc42, to activate LIMK1 catalytic activity. These studies thus define a Smad-independent pathway that directly links the BMP receptor to regulation of actin dynamics and provides insights into how extracellular signals modulate LIMK1 activity to permit fine spatial control over cytoskeletal remodelling during dendritogenesis.

The tyrosine 974 within the LIF-R-chain of the gp130/LIF-R heteromeric receptor complex mediates negative regulation of LIF signalling

Signalling of interleukin (IL)-6 and interleukin-11 through gp130 homodimeric receptor complexes has been analysed with respect to initiation and termination of signalling in great detail. Gp130 contains a crucial motif around tyrosine Y759, which mediates negative regulation through the feedback inhibitor SOCS3 and the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2. Signalling of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), CT-1-like factor (CLC) or oncostatin M (OSM) through gp130/LIF-R is believed to be similar due to the presence of the common signal transducer gp130 within the receptor complexes utilized, but the difference in the composition of gp130/gp130-homodimers and gp130/LIF-R-heterodimers is likely to be reflected in different signalling. Here, we analysed the contribution of the LIF-R within the gp130/LIF-R complex to negative regulation mediated by SHP2 and SOCS3. We show that SHP2 contributes to the negative regulation of signalling through gp130/LIF-R complexes. The inhibitory tyrosine motifs within the cytoplasmic parts of gp130 and the LIF-R act independently. Whereas SHP2 and SOCS3 bind directly to the inhibitory motif of gp130, only SHP2 was found to bind to the corresponding inhibitory sequence of the LIF-R. This observation was further corroborated by experiments indicating that mainly gp130 contributes to the inhibition of signalling by SOCS3.

Conditional deletion of the TGF-β type II receptor in Col2a expressing cells results in defects in the axial skeleton without alterations in chondrocyte differentiation or embryonic development of long bones

Members of the TGF-β superfamily are secreted signaling proteins that regulate many aspects of development including growth and differentiation in skeletal tissue. There are three isoforms of TGF-β that act through the same heteromeric receptor complex. To address the question of the role of TGF-β signaling in skeletal development, we generated mice with a conditional deletion of the TGF-β type II receptor gene ( Tgfbr2) specifically in Col2a expressing cells using the Cre/lox recombinase system. Alizarin red-/Alcian blue-stained skeletons were prepared from embryos at 17.5, 15.5, and 13.5 days of gestation. Col2acre +/−; Tgfbr loxP/loxP and Col2acre −/−; Tgfbr2 +/loxP skeletons were compared. Multiple defects were observed in the base of the skull and in the vertebrae. Specifically, the size and spacing of the vertebrae were altered, and defects were detected in the closure of the neural arches. In addition, alterations in transverse processes, costal joints, and zygapophyses were detected. While the vertebral bodies were only moderately affected, the intervertebral discs (IVDs) were either missing or incomplete. Alterations in the vertebrae could be detected as early as E13.5 days. Surprisingly, alterations in length and mineralization of long bones were not detected at E17.5 days. In addition, the expression patterns of markers for chondrocyte differentiation were not altered in vertebrae or long bones suggesting that loss of responsiveness to TGF-β in chondrocytes does not affect embryonic endochondral bone formation. In contrast, mice that survived postnatally demonstrated alterations in the length of specific bones. Skeletons from Col2acre +/−; Tgfbr2 loxP/loxP mice were compared to those from mice null for the TGF-β2 ligand. The differences observed between these models allow distinctions to be made between the roles of the various isoforms of TGF-β and the signaling in specific cell types. The data provide information regarding mechanisms of skeletal development and suggest that TGF-β signaling is a critical component.

WSX-1 and Glycoprotein 130 Constitute a Signal-Transducing Receptor for IL-27

The recently discovered cytokine IL-27 belongs to the IL-6/IL-12 family of cytokines and induced proliferation of naive CD4(+) T cells and the generation of a Th1-type adaptive immune response. Although binding of IL-27 to the cytokine receptor WSX-1 was demonstrated, this interaction proved insufficient to mediate cellular effects. Hence, IL-27 was believed to form a heteromeric signaling receptor complex with WSX-1 and another, yet to be identified, cytokine receptor subunit. In this study, we describe that WSX-1 together with gp130 constitutes a functional signal-transducing receptor for IL-27. We show that neither of the two subunits itself is sufficient to mediate IL-27-induced signal transduction, but that the combination of both is required for this event. Expression analysis of WSX-1 and gp130 by quantitative PCR suggests that IL-27 might have a variety of cellular targets besides naive CD4(+) T cells: we demonstrate gene induction of a subset of inflammatory cytokines in primary human mast cells and monocytes in response to IL-27 stimulation. Thus, IL-27 not only contributes to the development of an adaptive immune response through its action on CD4(+) T cells, it also directly acts on cells of the innate immune system.

Receptor heteromerization in adenosine A2A receptor signaling: relevance for striatal function and Parkinson's disease.

Recently evidence has been presented that adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors form functional heteromeric receptor complexes as demonstrated in human neuroblastoma cells and mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells. These A2A/D2 heteromeric receptor complexes undergo coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization on D2 or A2A receptor agonist treatments and especially after combined agonist treatment. It is hypothesized that the A2A/D2 receptor heteromer represents the molecular basis for the antagonistic A2A/D2 receptor interactions demonstrated at the biochemical and behavioral levels. Functional heteromeric complexes between A2A and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGluR5) have also recently been demonstrated in HEK-293 cells and rat striatal membrane preparations. The A2A/mGluR5 receptor heteromer may account for the synergism found after combined agonist treatments demonstrated in different in vitro and in vivo models. D2, A2A, and mGluR5 receptors are found together in the dendritic spines of the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Therefore, possible D2/A2A/mGluR5 multimeric receptor complexes and the receptor interactions within them may have a major role in controlling the dorsal and ventral striatopallidal GABA neurons involved in Parkinson's disease and in schizophrenia and drug addiction, respectively.

Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) proteins regulate cell function, and have key roles in development and carcinogenesis. The intracellular effectors of TGF-beta signalling, the Smad proteins, are activated by receptors and translocate into the nucleus, where they regulate transcription. Although this pathway is inherently simple, combinatorial interactions in the heteromeric receptor and Smad complexes, receptor-interacting and Smad-interacting proteins, and cooperation with sequence-specific transcription factors allow substantial versatility and diversification of TGF-beta family responses. Other signalling pathways further regulate Smad activation and function. In addition, TGF-beta receptors activate Smad-independent pathways that not only regulate Smad signalling, but also allow Smad-independent TGF-beta responses.

Myostatin signals through a transforming growth factor beta-like signaling pathway to block adipogenesis.

Myostatin, a transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) family member, is a potent negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth. In this study we characterized the myostatin signal transduction pathway and examined its effect on bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-induced adipogenesis. While both BMP7 and BMP2 activated transcription from the BMP-responsive I-BRE-Lux reporter and induced adipogenic differentiation, myostatin inhibited BMP7- but not BMP2-mediated responses. To dissect the molecular mechanism of this antagonism, we characterized the myostatin signal transduction pathway. We showed that myostatin binds the type II Ser/Thr kinase receptor. ActRIIB, and then partners with a type I receptor, either activin receptor-like kinase 4 (ALK4 or ActRIB) or ALK5 (TbetaRI), to induce phosphorylation of Smad2/Smad3 and activate a TGF-beta-like signaling pathway. We demonstrated that myostatin prevents BMP7 but not BMP2 binding to its receptors and that BMP7-induced heteromeric receptor complex formation is blocked by competition for the common type II receptor, ActRIIB. Thus, our results reveal a strikingly specific antagonism of BMP7-mediated processes by myostatin and suggest that myostatin is an important regulator of adipogenesis.

Distribution of Kainate Receptor Subunits at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses

Kainate receptors function as mediators of postsynaptic currents and as presynaptic modulators of synaptic transmission at mossy fiber synapses. Despite intense research into the physiological properties of mossy fiber kainate receptors, their subunit composition in the presynaptic and postsynaptic compartments is unclear. Here we describe the distribution of kainate receptor subunits in mossy fiber synapses using subunit-selective antibodies and knock-out mice. We provide morphological evidence for the presynaptic localization of KA1 and KA2 receptor subunits at mossy fiber synapses. Immunogold staining for KA1 and KA2 was commonly seen at synaptic contacts and in vesicular structures. Postsynaptic labeling in dendritic spines was also observed. Although KA1 predominantly showed presynaptic localization, KA2 was concentrated to a greater degree on postsynaptic membranes. Both subunits coimmunoprecipitated from hippocampal membrane extracts with GluR6 but not GluR7 subunits. These results demonstrate that KA1 and KA2 subunits are localized presynaptically and postsynaptically at mossy fiber synapses where they most likely coassemble with GluR6 subunits to form functional heteromeric kainate receptor complexes.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons.

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.

Glutamate mGlu5-Adenosine A2A-Dopamine D2 Receptor Interactions in the Striatum. Implications for Drug Therapy in Neuro-psychiatric Disorders and Drug Abuse

There is growing evidence for the existence of not only homomeric, but also functional heteromeric receptor complexes, particularly involving G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). These include adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 and adenosine A2A-glutamate mGlu5 receptor complexes. The role of these receptor complexes in receptor function seems to be multiple, involving hetero-modulation of ligand recognition, signalling and trafficking. The preferential localization of A2A-D2 and A2A-mGlu5 receptor complexes is in the dendritic spines of striatopallidal GABAergic neurons. Results obtained from behavioral and in vivo microdialysis experiments have shown an important role of mGlu5-A2A-D2 receptor interactions in the modulation of the function of the striatopallidal GABAergic neurons. The striatopallidal GABAergic neurons play a key role in the pathophysiology of basal ganglia disorders, like Parkinsons disease, and it is a common pathway for the rewarding effects of opiates and psychostimulants and for the antipsychotic effects of neuroleptics. The formation of receptor complexes modifies the single receptor transducing characteristics and leads to the appearance of “emergent properties”. Thus, the study of mGlu5-A2A-D2 receptor interactions in the striatum reveals new properties of these GPCRs and gives indications for a new rational approach for drug therapy in neuro-psychiatric disorders and drug addiction.

Possible role of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions in memory and learning via formation of long-lived heteromeric complexes: focus on motor learning in the basal ganglia.

Learning in neuronal networks occurs by instructions to the neurons to change their synaptic weights (i.e., efficacies). According to the present model a molecular mechanism that can contribute to change synaptic weights may be represented by multiple interactions between membrane receptors forming aggregates (receptor mosaics) via oligomerization at both pre- and post-synaptic level. These assemblies of receptors together with inter alia single receptors, adapter proteins, G-proteins and ion channels form the membrane bound part of a complex three-dimensional (3D) molecular circuit, the cytoplasmic part of which consists especially of protein kinases, protein phosphatases and phosphoproteins. It is suggested that this molecular circuit has the capability to learn and store information. Thus, engram formation will depend on the resetting of 3D molecular circuits via the formation of new receptor mosaics capable of addressing the transduction of the chemical messages impinging on the cell membrane to certain sets of G-proteins. Short-term memory occurs by a transient stabilization of the receptor mosaics producing the appropriate change in the synaptic weight. Engram consolidation (long-term memory) may involve intracellular signals that translocate to the nucleus to cause the activation of immediate early genes and subsequent formation of postulated adapter proteins which stabilize the receptor mosaics with the formation of long-lived heteromeric receptor complexes. The receptor mosaic hypothesis of the engram formation has been formulated in agreement with the Hebbian rule and gives a novel molecular basis for it by postulating that the pre-synaptic activity change in transmitter and modulator release reorganizes the receptor mosaics at post-synaptic level and subsequently at pre-synaptic level with the formation of novel 3D molecular circuits leading to a different integration of chemical signals impinging on pre- and post-synaptic membranes hence leading to a new value of the synaptic weight. Engram retrieval is brought about by the scanning of the target networks by the highly divergent arousal systems. Hence, a continuous reverberating process occurs both at the level of the neural networks as well as at the level of the 3D molecular circuits within each neuron of the network until the appropriate tuning of the synaptic weights is obtained and, subsequently, the reappearance of the engram occurs. Learning and memory in the basal ganglia is discussed in the frame of the present hypothesis. It is proposed that formation of long-term memories (consolidated receptor mosaics) in the plasma membranes of the striosomal GABA neurons may play a major role in the motivational learning of motor skills of relevance for survival. In conclusion, long-lived heteromeric receptor complexes of high order may be crucial for learning, memory and retrieval processes, where extensive reciprocal feedback loops give rise to coherent synchronized neural activity (binding) essential for a sophisticated information handling by the central nervous system.